Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: ribonucleic on March 14, 2007, 12:48:31 PM

Title: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: ribonucleic on March 14, 2007, 12:48:31 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bodybuilding#It_is_a_great_shame
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: The_Punisher on March 14, 2007, 12:51:10 PM
hahahahaha.........
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Fury on March 14, 2007, 12:57:45 PM
hahahaha, Ribonucleic goes from stalking Alexxx to stalking TA, who's slightly more pathetic. What a way for a 40 year old spend to his time.  ::)
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: ribonucleic on March 14, 2007, 12:59:36 PM
hahahaha, Ribonucleic goes from stalking Alexxx to stalking TA, who's slightly more pathetic. What a way for a 40 year old spend to his time.  ::)

To be precise: I'm "stalking" - if that's how you'd like to put it - Wikidudeman.

You're not suggesting he and Adonis are the same person, are you?  ;D
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Wikidudeman on March 14, 2007, 05:31:36 PM
I find it incredibly disingenuous that the same people who mocked my efforts to get images to use for Wikipedia and decided to make a joke out of the thread I posted asking for such pictures, are the exact same people who throw a baby fit when I have to resort to using the only good picture that was provided to me. If you whiners didn't care to help me get pictures for Wikipedia articles then why should I care what you think about the pictures that I do use?
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: ribonucleic on March 14, 2007, 05:37:59 PM
when I have to resort to using the only good picture that was provided to me

Because "this article needed more illustrations" - as you say on the article's Talk page?

Bullshit.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on March 14, 2007, 05:40:08 PM
There, problem solved.  Natural Bodybuilding pictures and I've competed.  Have a great day
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: ribonucleic on March 14, 2007, 05:44:06 PM
There, problem solved.  Natural Bodybuilding pictures and I've competed.  Have a great day

Nice try, Vince.

But even if you didn't have a ludicrous physique, I'm afraid that Adonis - through the agency of "Wikidudeman" - has attached himself to the defenseless Wikipedia in a facehugger-like deathgrip.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Wikidudeman on March 14, 2007, 05:46:32 PM
Because "this article needed more illustrations" - as you say on the article's Talk page?

Bullshit.

Wikipedia encourages the use of illustrations to make articles more lively and fun to read. Articles that are long and 'texty' tend to be overlooked and articles that have lively illustrations tend to get more traffic. Articles need pictures to illustrate the topic of discussion and make it easier to understand.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: ribonucleic on March 14, 2007, 05:49:46 PM
Wikipedia encourages the use of illustrations to make articles more lively

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5e/Nbodybuilder.jpg/180px-Nbodybuilder.jpg)

"Lively" is not the first adjective that would come to mind.  ::)
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: davidpaul on March 14, 2007, 05:50:32 PM
Wikipedia encourages the use of illustrations to make articles more lively and fun to read. Articles that are long and 'texty' tend to be overlooked and articles that have lively illustrations tend to get more traffic. Articles need pictures to illustrate the topic of discussion and make it easier to understand.

Hi Jezzabelle,

how much do you charge for a fake prada t shirt?
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Ozzy on March 14, 2007, 05:50:52 PM
Wikidudeman, if you want a natural, go here.

http://www.guybourgon.com/home.html
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Stark on March 14, 2007, 05:51:20 PM
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5e/Nbodybuilder.jpg/180px-Nbodybuilder.jpg)

"Lively" is not the first adjective that would come to mind.  ::)

lol
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Wikidudeman on March 14, 2007, 05:53:43 PM
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5e/Nbodybuilder.jpg/180px-Nbodybuilder.jpg)

"Lively" is not the first adjective that would come to mind.  ::)

Why? Because you don't like the person the picture is of? or Because you have quibbles with his "physique"?  The fact is, it's better than no picture.

Hey, I've got a great idea! Post YOUR picture and if your physique looks better than his I'll replace his with yours!

Sound fair?
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: ribonucleic on March 14, 2007, 05:53:53 PM
Wikidudeman, if you want a natural, go here.

http://www.guybourgon.com/home.html

You're wasting your time.

A dozen title-winning natural bodybuilders could provide professionally-photographed, copyright-free pictures and "Wikidudeman" would still vomit up some tortured rationale for using Stormtrooperboy's instead.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Wikidudeman on March 14, 2007, 05:55:07 PM
Wikidudeman, if you want a natural, go here.

http://www.guybourgon.com/home.html


I'm not looking for a "natural" anymore. I removed "natural" from the image caption of the "True Adonis" picture anyway. Right now I want copyright free images for the Pro-Bodybuilder articles.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: danielson on March 14, 2007, 05:56:14 PM

I'm not looking for a "natural" anymore. I removed "natural" from the image caption of the "True Adonis" picture anyway. Right now I want copyright free images for the Pro-Bodybuilder articles.

Are you a muscle worshipping homo?
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Ozzy on March 14, 2007, 05:56:26 PM
You're wasting your time.

A dozen title-winning natural bodybuilders could provide professionally-photographed, copyright-free pictures and "Wikidudeman" would still vomit up some tortured rationale for using Stormtrooperboy's instead.


Oh believe me, I'm sure "Wikidudeman" is a gimmick. I'm just hoping.

I'm not looking for a "natural" anymore. I removed "natural" from the image caption of the "True Adonis" picture anyway. Right now I want copyright free images for the Pro-Bodybuilder articles.


Oh fuck off then.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Wikidudeman on March 14, 2007, 06:09:54 PM
You're wasting your time.

A dozen title-winning natural bodybuilders could provide professionally-photographed, copyright-free pictures and "Wikidudeman" would still vomit up some tortured rationale for using Stormtrooperboy's instead.

1. How do you know that? You haven't posted a single "title-winning natural bodybuilder"s copyright free images that I can use. So don't make baseless claims about what I "will" or "wont" do.

2. The term "natural" is fairly dubious and simply winning a 'natural competition' doesn't mean someone is steroid-free.

3. You didn't address what I said....

I have a good idea, Post YOUR picture and if your physique looks better than his I'll replace his with yours!

Sound fair?
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: ribonucleic on March 14, 2007, 06:12:30 PM
Why? Because you don't like the person the picture is of? or Because you have quibbles with his "physique"?  The fact is, it's better than no picture.

Hey, I've got a great idea! Post YOUR picture and if your physique looks better than his I'll replace his with yours!

Sound fair?

Why so touchy, "Wikidudeman"? Someone would think it was your physique being criticized.  ::)

For what it's worth, I never had a significant problem with Adonis in the context of Getbig. We have no dignity to be impaired by his antics.  :)

But Wikipedia - ideally, at least - is a place for grownups. One to which I've contributed a fair amount of editing. So it pisses me off to see him plastering his delusional self - with "your" help, of course - on to the article.

So no, I guess I don't like him. And after you pathetically tried to bully me with an admin after I made a single edit you disagreed with, I don't like you much either.

But don't worry. Your - sorry, I mean "his" - precious picture isn't going to be removed by me.

Feel better now?

Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Ozzy on March 14, 2007, 06:15:37 PM
1. Get in touch with Guy Bourgon and I'm sure he'd be more than happy to let you use a pic.

2. By your skewed logic, no one can prove to be natural, even though they get tested regularly.

3. You started this whole mess by posting a picture of True Adonis, quite possibly the most horrible looking physique on GetBig. You didn't even fucking look for a picture yourself, and you get mad at the rest of us for "not helping". If you go so far as to Wiki bodybuilders, you can at least google a name or two and get pictures from a public website. This whole "copyright" crap is a poor excuse.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: ribonucleic on March 14, 2007, 06:19:20 PM
This whole "copyright" crap is a poor excuse.

Yes, but due to Wikipedia's tough standards regarding copyrighted images, one that will probably suffice for his disturbing cause of keeping Adonis' picture in the article by any means necessary.  ::)
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Ozzy on March 14, 2007, 06:21:03 PM
Oh I know. Isn't it strange how, when provided with a true natural bodybuilder, he totally reverses himself so he can keep the TA picture up?

If this isn't Adonis or Jezebelle, I'll eat my shoe.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Wikidudeman on March 14, 2007, 06:21:27 PM
Why so touchy, "Wikidudeman"? Someone would think it was your physique being criticized.  ::)

For what it's worth, I never had a significant problem with Adonis in the context of Getbig. We have no dignity to be impaired by his antics.  :)

But Wikipedia - ideally, at least - is a place for grownups. One to which I've contributed a fair amount of editing. So it pisses me off to see him plastering his delusional self - with "your" help, of course - on to the article.

So no, I guess I don't like him. And after you pathetically tried to bully me with an admin after I made a single edit you disagreed with, I don't like you much either.

But don't worry. Your - sorry, I mean "his" - precious picture isn't going to be removed by me.

Feel better now?

1. I'm not "The True Adonis". I think I established that in another thread (that seems to of vanished).  But to hammer the point home even further,  I have over 2,000 edits on en.wikipedia alone. You only have 746.

Here are the last 500 edits I have made.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Wikidudeman (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Wikidudeman)

2.If you don't want the picture gone, why continue to whine about it? Why make this thread to begin with?
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Wikidudeman on March 14, 2007, 06:30:19 PM
1. Get in touch with Guy Bourgon and I'm sure he'd be more than happy to let you use a pic.

You do it for me.

2. By your skewed logic, no one can prove to be natural, even though they get tested regularly.

Basically. The Olympics drug tests are many times more stringent than any tests  of a 'natural bodybuilding competition' and many people still seem to get by. So to trust the tests of some bodybuilding competition who's methods are generally private when that of the Olympics' is far from perfect is very credulous.


3. You started this whole mess by posting a picture of True Adonis, quite possibly the most horrible looking physique on GetBig.

I didn't post it.

You didn't even fucking look for a picture yourself, and you get mad at the rest of us for "not helping". If you go so far as to Wiki bodybuilders, you can at least google a name or two and get pictures from a public website. This whole "copyright" crap is a poor excuse.

1. I did look. No one responded to my requests and posting a thread here was clearly a waste of time.

2.The "Copyright" excuse is not an excuse at all. It's wikipedia policy. Simply using pictures from websites won't work. They will get deleted within a few minutes unless I can prove the images are copyright free.

Please read wikipedia copyright guidelines here...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights)

Here it details the image policy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights#Image_guidelines (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights#Image_guidelines)

I have a lot of experience with wikipedia copyright policy. I have uploaded image that were found in search engines and public websites before and they all got deleted within a few minutes due to the fact they are copyrighted.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: ribonucleic on March 14, 2007, 06:30:28 PM
1. I'm not "The True Adonis". I think I established that in another thread (that seems to of vanished).  But to hammer the point home even further,  I have over 2,000 edits on en.wikipedia alone. You only have 746.

Here are the last 500 edits I have made.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Wikidudeman (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Wikidudeman)

2.If you don't want the picture gone, why continue to whine about it? Why make this thread to begin with?

Your point in the 2,000 to 746 comparison eludes me. Especially since your abandonment of the attempt to defend the picture with that "you can't prove someone's not natural" nonsense is a tacit admission that you either knowingly violated the no-original-research rule or were too dim to understand it. Nor would any number of edits by "Wikidudeman" have any bearing on whether or not he was Adonis who, if you haven't heard  ::) , has so many gimmick accounts here he probably can't keep them all straight.

And I certainly don't have to justify my thread-creation choices to you. [Indeed, with your paltry post count here, one might wonder what investment you have in our thread quality at all.  ::)] But if you're curious, I thought it newsworthy that your conniving on behalf of one of Getbig's most well-known and controversial figures had drawn public criticism out in the relatively real world.

Hope this helps.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Ozzy on March 14, 2007, 06:32:43 PM
You do it for me.


Go fist yourself.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: FinnPilot on March 14, 2007, 06:33:39 PM
Quote from wikipedia:
"This article needed more illustrations and that person was the only person to provide a picture for me to use in the article." -Wikidudeman

TA, ONE QUESTION:

When I asked you, if you were the one who put that picture of you on wikipedia, you answered "Nope".
Please explain.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: ribonucleic on March 14, 2007, 06:34:18 PM

Go fist yourself.

I admire concision.  ;D
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Ozzy on March 14, 2007, 06:37:04 PM
The dude is so anal about copyright policies and won't send a simple email? He has over 2000 edits on Wikipedia and thinks it's some huge accomplishment.


Hahaha, epic misplaced convictions.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Wikidudeman on March 14, 2007, 06:44:12 PM
The dude is so anal about copyright policies and won't send a simple email? He has over 2000 edits on Wikipedia and thinks it's some huge accomplishment.


Hahaha, epic misplaced convictions.


Edits on Wikipedia are a lot more time consuming and detailed than simply posting on some message board "lol" or "owned" or "meltdown".
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: ribonucleic on March 14, 2007, 06:49:13 PM

Edits on Wikipedia are a lot more time consuming and detailed than simply posting on some message board "lol" or "owned" or "meltdown".

How about threatening people with admins for a single edit you don't like?

How long does that take?  :)
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Ozzy on March 14, 2007, 06:49:44 PM
Hahahaha what a nerd.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Wikidudeman on March 14, 2007, 06:57:57 PM
How about threatening people with admins for a single edit you don't like?

How long does that take?  :)


I already apologized for that. I thought you had removed the picture several times in the past. Drop it.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: canadaphiliac on March 14, 2007, 07:02:23 PM
How about threatening people with admins for a single edit you don't like?

How long does that take?  :)
lol, owned.

meltdown.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: MisterMagoo on March 14, 2007, 07:10:17 PM
"First of all, The only reason I included the picture of that thinner blond bodybuilder is because I have no good alternatives to use in this article."

because obviously a search for "natural bodybuilder" won't come up with a few hundred far better pictures.  ::)

(http://www.theweightclub.com/xtremephysiquesathletes/pictures/whitacre5.jpg)

(http://www.manb2p.com/kazutsunoda.jpg)

(http://www.fitnessatlantic.com/images/beyondbuilt2.jpg)

yes, i can understand why you used adonis. those pictures certainly wouldn't do.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: canadaphiliac on March 14, 2007, 07:16:42 PM
"First of all, The only reason I included the picture of that thinner blond bodybuilder is because I have no good alternatives to use in this article."

because obviously a search for "natural bodybuilder" won't come up with a few hundred far better pictures.  ::)

(http://www.theweightclub.com/xtremephysiquesathletes/pictures/whitacre5.jpg)

(http://www.manb2p.com/kazutsunoda.jpg)

(http://www.fitnessatlantic.com/images/beyondbuilt2.jpg)

yes, i can understand why you used adonis. those pictures certainly wouldn't do.
Don't you see! You can't prove these guys are natural because people competeing at natural competitions can fool drug tests easily.  Adonis on the other said that he was natural, why not just believe him? Thank God Wikidoucheman made the right choice.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: MisterMagoo on March 14, 2007, 07:25:13 PM
Don't you see! You can't prove these guys are natural because people competeing at natural competitions can fool drug tests easily.  Adonis on the other said that he was natural, why not just believe him? Thank God Wikidoucheman made the right choice.

my god i didn't even THINK of that. well put sir, well put.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: slaveboy1980 on March 14, 2007, 07:28:05 PM
I find it incredibly disingenuous that the same people who mocked my efforts to get images to use for Wikipedia and decided to make a joke out of the thread I posted asking for such pictures, are the exact same people who throw a baby fit when I have to resort to using the only good picture that was provided to me. If you whiners didn't care to help me get pictures for Wikipedia articles then why should I care what you think about the pictures that I do use?

go fuck yourself
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: canadaphiliac on March 14, 2007, 07:30:06 PM
my god i didn't even THINK of that. well put sir, well put.
Don't you just feel stupid now and see the errors of your ways for thinking those guys who've obviously cheated to pass drug tests would be natural as opposed to the saint, man among men, and upholder of perfect honesty that is TA? For shame, how do you sleep at night?
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: MisterMagoo on March 14, 2007, 07:36:36 PM
Don't you just feel stupid now and see the errors of your ways for thinking those guys who've obviously cheated to pass drug tests would be natural as opposed to the saint, man among men, and upholder of perfect honesty that is TA? For shame, how do you sleep at night?

stop that. i already feel bad enough for my thoughtless comments, i certainly don't need you exacerbating the situation.  :(
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: chaos on March 14, 2007, 07:37:38 PM
hahahah looks like I missed a full day of Wikibashing ;D

anything left of the turd?  :-\
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: canadaphiliac on March 14, 2007, 07:40:06 PM
stop that. i already feel bad enough for my thoughtless comments, i certainly don't need you exacerbating the situation.  :(
No, I don't think you understand. You fell for the LIES, ALL LIES of everyone else in the world. Don't you know, you should have just believed Fearless Leader..I mean... The True Adonis from the beginning? I don't think I'll ever be able to respect you again...

hahahah looks like I missed a full day of Wikibashing ;D

anything left of the turd?  :-\
Just enough ashes to put in an urn and send back to his family, or whatever shithole he crawled out of.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: chaos on March 14, 2007, 07:44:57 PM
the guys got tenacity...however lost his cause is :'(
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: canadaphiliac on March 14, 2007, 07:47:31 PM
the guys got tenacity...however lost his cause is :'(
Yeah, got a meltdown out of me though. Not my fault though the little artard feels he's the Champion of Human Rights and would have stared down those mean ole Nazis and gone to the camps.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Wikidudeman on March 14, 2007, 07:57:52 PM
go fuck yourself

Grow up.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: wolfgang187 on March 14, 2007, 07:59:52 PM
Grow up.


Understand and learn about the real athletes in bodybuilding and stop defending this 172lbs punk.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: chaos on March 14, 2007, 08:01:53 PM
HAHAHHHAHAHAHHAHHA I don't know why HAHAHAHA

just the thought of you still posting here makes me laugh ;D

you should be embarrassed  :-[
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: benjamin pearson on March 14, 2007, 08:03:58 PM
Grow up.

suck a cock homo
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Wikidudeman on March 14, 2007, 08:06:36 PM
HAHAHHHAHAHAHHAHHA I don't know why HAHAHAHA

just the thought of you still posting here makes me laugh ;D

you should be embarrassed  :-[

Yes, I do seem to be wasting my time. If someone does decide to help then just E-mail me. My E-mail address is in my profile. I'm not going to reply to these childish and abusive threads anymore. I wish I could say it's been fun.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: Alex23 on March 14, 2007, 08:08:11 PM
Yes, I do seem to be wasting my time. If someone does decide to help then just E-mail me. My E-mail address is in my profile. I'm not going to reply to these childish and abusive threads anymore. I wish I could say it's been fun.


Hi Adam. Nice gimmick.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: danielson on March 14, 2007, 08:08:18 PM
Yes, I do seem to be wasting my time. If someone does decide to help then just E-mail me. My E-mail address is in my profile. I'm not going to reply to these childish and abusive threads anymore. I wish I could say it's been fun.


Good riddance fag got.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: wolfgang187 on March 14, 2007, 08:08:39 PM
suck a cock homo



Real mature and now go to bed.
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: benjamin pearson on March 14, 2007, 08:08:48 PM
Yes, I do seem to be wasting my time. If someone does decide to help then just E-mail me. My E-mail address is in my profile. I'm not going to reply to these childish and abusive threads anymore. I wish I could say it's been fun.


you can use this post as your definition for meltdown queer bate
Title: Re: Wikidudeman's unholy "alliance" with True Adonis slammed on Wikipedia!!
Post by: FinnPilot on March 16, 2007, 07:43:54 AM
TA

Since you haven't answered this yet, i'm asking again:

Quote from wikipedia:
"This article needed more illustrations and that person was the only person to provide a picture for me to use in the article." -Wikidudeman


When I asked you, if you were the one who put that picture of you on wikipedia, you answered "Nope".
Please explain.