Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: 240 is Back on March 25, 2007, 12:04:44 AM
-
FIFTEEN British sailors and marines arrested by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards off the coast of Iraq may be charged with spying.
A website run by associates of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, reported last night that the Britons would be put before a court and indicted.
Referring to them as “insurgents”, the site concluded: “If it is proven that they deliberately entered Iranian territory, they will be charged with espionage. If that is proven, they can expect a very serious penalty since according to Iranian law, espionage is one of the most serious offences.”
The warning followed claims by Iranian officials that the British navy personnel had been taken to Tehran, the capital, to explain their “aggressive action” in entering Iranian waters. British officials insist the servicemen were in Iraqi waters when they were held.
-
Wait Rob, I am still looking for the conspiracy theory here. On another note maybe you should give these Iranians a map.
-
Wait Rob, I am still looking for the conspiracy theory here. On another note maybe you should give these Iranians a map.
???
It's political news.
-
???
It's political news.
Yes, it is. I hadn't seen you post anything here lately not relating to a CT. The Iranians need a map because the sailors were picked up off the coast or Iraq, not Iran. Saddam tried this b.s. before with our planes flying in what he claimed was his airspace, but wasn't.
-
Yes, it is. I hadn't seen you post anything here lately not relating to a CT. The Iranians need a map because the sailors were picked up off the coast or Iraq, not Iran. Saddam tried this b.s. before with our planes flying in what he claimed was airspace, but wasn't.
You should pay better attention. I post daily on daily political topics.
And your use of the "CT" line... You do know that by the official story, 9/11 involved 19 men. Any crime involving more than ONE man is a conspiracy, as they are conspiring, which requires at least two.
So please, if you're gonna be wrong about my posts, at least understand use the word "conspiracy" correctly. I am a skeptic of the official story.
-
You should pay better attention. I post daily on daily political topics.
And your use of the "CT" line... You do know that by the official story, 9/11 involved 19 men. Any crime involving more than ONE man is a conspiracy, as they are conspiring, which requires at least two.
So please, if you're gonna be wrong about my posts, at least understand use the word "conspiracy" correctly. I am a skeptic of the official story.
See, you still can't get off the 9/11 thing. You have really gone off th deep end. Maybe you are not getting enough fiber?
-
See, you still can't get off the 9/11 thing. You have really gone off th deep end. Maybe you are not getting enough fiber?
OKMike,
I'm not sure my bran intake has anything to do with it, but what the hey.
-
There's a simple solution.
If I was the priminister, I would now say to Iran: "You have 10 minutes to release them alive otherwise we will strike you immediately and destroy every part of your economic infrastructure."
Problem solved.
-
In 2004 8 marines were held for 3 days for entering Iranian waters, you thing the same thing can be said for the 15? Rescue mission is out of the question. Iran takes every chance they can get tot grab another country by it's balls.
-
In 2004 8 marines were held for 3 days for entering Iranian waters, you thing the same thing can be said for the 15? Rescue mission is out of the question. Iran takes every chance they can get tot grab another country by it's balls.
there was a less hard line leader in power back then. This nut, is far different.
-
There's a simple solution.
If I was the priminister, I would now say to Iran: "You have 10 minutes to release them alive otherwise we will strike you immediately and destroy every part of your economic infrastructure."
Problem solved.
Here's the CT right here. ;D
What I find interesting is why Bush is speaking about British soldiers? ...would that be up to Blair?
BTW 0 Does the fact that these guys admitted to being in Iranian waters make any difference?
...or is the invasion still on? only 2 more days... what say you 240? :)
-
Here's the CT right here. ;D
What I find interesting is why Bush is speaking about British soldiers? ...would that be up to Blair?
BTW 0 Does the fact that these guys admitted to being in Iranian waters make any difference?
...or is the invasion still on? only 2 more days... what say you 240? :)
They admitted when in iranian custody...
I find it quite a specticle that you believe everything a tyranic state has to say, but when it comes to Blair, he position just doesn't cut the mustard.
-
They admitted when in iranian custody...
I find it quite a specticle that you believe everything a tyranic state has to say, but when it comes to Blair, he position just doesn't cut the mustard.
Are you kidding me? All Bush & Blair have done is "cut the mustard" ...and it STINKS! peeee-eeew! :-X
-
Iran cannot take them into custody and admit they weren't in there territorial waters and win politically. So it only makes sense they clima they were in violation.
All this is, is a BIG political move on Iran's part with them defying the west.
Even if they were....so what? That doesn't make them spies, just bad map readers. they were doing their job, searching vessels.
-
Are you kidding me? All Bush & Blair have done is "cut the mustard" ...and it STINKS! peeee-eeew! :-X
You lack simple intelligence in logic.
-
I think this is diliberate on England's part to try and start something with that country for its natural resources. Of course the US and Blair jointly want tensions with Iran to escalate to point of war, but the only thing stopping it is the people.
-
They admitted when in iranian custody...
I find it quite a specticle that you believe everything a tyranic state has to say, but when it comes to Blair, he position just doesn't cut the mustard.
No one knows who to believe. I hope those soliders are released and tensions don't jump to the point of war.
-
No one knows who to believe.
Let's hope the Iranians treat their detainees better than we treat ours.
-
Gimme a break..have u read anything about how Arabs treat prisoners. These guys won't be beaten because they will be given back at some point soon. If we were at war they would be tortured mercilessly and then shot. I fail to see how u find your own country the bad guy time and time again. please move soon.....
-
I was drinking with a few brits I ran into this saturday and about this they said...
"You know what caused all this, right?"
"What?"
"They let the woman drive."
-
In all seriousness, what happened to the proud British Navy?
-
There's a simple solution.
If I was the priminister, I would now say to Iran: "You have 10 minutes to release them alive otherwise we will strike you immediately and destroy every part of your economic infrastructure."
Problem solved.
Well, whether striking them would be justified or not...
Destroying their economic infrastructure creates a power vacuum. China and Russia jsut signed a buddy deal with Iran, so they would quickly clean up the oil and we'd be in worse shape than ever.
(personally, at this point, I see US oil domination is the goal and I don't care anymore. If they want it to happen, it's gonna happen. Our votes don't affect it, so I am not going to stress it).
-
Let's hope the Iranians treat their detainees better than we treat ours.
I have to think Camp Gitmo and torture admissions can't HELP their odds.
-
Well, whether striking them would be justified or not...
Destroying their economic infrastructure creates a power vacuum. China and Russia jsut signed a buddy deal with Iran, so they would quickly clean up the oil and we'd be in worse shape than ever.
(personally, at this point, I see US oil domination is the goal and I don't care anymore. If they want it to happen, it's gonna happen. Our votes don't affect it, so I am not going to stress it).
Thanks for clearing that up, that means first I would do simultaneous nuclear strikes on the economic hearts of both Russia and China, then continue onto Iran after that :-*
-
There's a simple solution.
If I was the priminister, I would now say to Iran: "You have 10 minutes to release them alive otherwise we will strike you immediately and destroy every part of your economic infrastructure."
Problem solved.
Are you serious?
Were you not aware that Britain is already involved in another war?
-
Thanks for clearing that up, that means first I would do simultaneous nuclear strikes on the economic hearts of both Russia and China, then continue onto Iran after that :-*
You do know that striking their economic hearts might be fun and all... but they will fire their nukes into America, don't you?
Are you just super horny to blow up billions you've never met? Or is your intent to destory America? thanks
-
Are you serious?
Were you not aware that Britain is already involved in another war?
Well I was jesting, but the capacity is there. This wouldn't be a ground invasion. Just a strike, similar to that of the first week of the iraqi invasion.
-
ya know what's funny?
It's essentially Blair saying they were in Iraqi waters, and Ahmedijhad saying they were in Iranian waters.
Who has lied more in the last 5 years - Tony Blair or Ahmedijhad?
-
ya know what's funny?
It's essentially Blair saying they were in Iraqi waters, and Ahmedijhad saying they were in Iranian waters.
Who has lied more in the last 5 years - Tony Blair or Ahmedijhad?
Speaks volumes of your mindset. You're giving the benefit of doubt to a tyrant.
Empires have fallen because of idiots like you.
-
Speaks volumes of your mindset. You're giving the benefit of doubt to a tyrant.
Empires have fallen because of idiots like you.
who said anything about empires falling. I am asking you to list the lies admijahad, the nutty evil iranian guy, has told us in the last 5 years. thanks in advance.
-
who said anything about empires falling. I am asking you to list the lies admijahad, the nutty evil iranian guy, has told us in the last 5 years. thanks in advance.
I haven't researched the guy but, for one he believes he is holy, and that during a U.N. conference a white light surrounded him in a holy manner as he spoke, and that the worlds leader were transfixed with him.
He also makes comments about Israel being a scar on the islamic map and should be removed.
He's mentally derranged. You do show delusions similar to his in regards to you CT "theories" and other disgusting nonsense, such as supporting him.
-
I haven't researched the guy but, for one he believes he is holy, and that during a U.N. conference a white light surrounded him in a holy manner as he spoke, and that the worlds leader were transfixed with him.
He also makes comments about Israel being a scar on the islamic map and should be removed.
He's mentally derranged. You do show delusions similar to his in regards to you CT "theories" and other disgusting nonsense, such as supporting him.
I'm not supporting anyone. I just think Blair is a dishonest man, and was curious who had been caught in more lies.
And what he said about anyone other than the US - I could care less. Their problem. We have a hundred allies in this world, all with their own beefs. Israel has a badass military they can use, and nukes which could happily take out Iran. I'm fine if THEY want to do it.
Plus...a lot of elected officials here have talked a whole lot about the need to wipe Iran off the map too. It's rhetoric to appeal to your base, period. It's politics. Until you make a move, you're nothing but a lot of talk.
-
Here's the CT right here. ;D
What I find interesting is why Bush is speaking about British soldiers? ...would that be up to Blair?
BTW 0 Does the fact that these guys admitted to being in Iranian waters make any difference?
...or is the invasion still on? only 2 more days... what say you 240? :)
Where did you see that they admitted to being in Iranian waters? Not what I have seen..
-
Let's hope the Iranians treat their detainees better than we treat ours.
LMAO!!!! You are to much Ribo
-
I just want to see some evidence without the emotional crybaby bullshit that nordic brings along.
Who has told more lies to the world - Blair or Adhmedjihad?
Don't get all rude and pissy. If you admit you haven't researched it, then you're not qualified to answer, Nordic.
They're giving differning stories on where the men were caught, and I'm curious who has a bistory of lying and who doesn't. I don't see how looking at the facts is unpatriotic, especially when netiher country is the USA.
-
I just want to see some evidence without the emotional crybaby bullshit that nordic brings along.
Who has told more lies to the world - Blair or Adhmedjihad?
Don't get all rude and pissy. If you admit you haven't researched it, then you're not qualified to answer, Nordic.
They're giving differning stories on where the men were caught, and I'm curious who has a bistory of lying and who doesn't. I don't see how looking at the facts is unpatriotic, especially when netiher country is the USA.
You just aren't intelligent enough to understand what you're saying. Research Adhmedjihad.
Your stance is really starting to disgust me now, giving preference to a known lunatic THAT YOU HAVE FAILED TO RESEARCH.
-
You just aren't intelligent enough to understand what you're saying. Research Adhmedjihad.
Your stance is really starting to disgust me now, giving preference to a known lunatic THAT YOU HAVE FAILED TO RESEARCH.
You're the one who admitted you hadn't researched the guy.
I haven't researched the guy but
I'm not debating the fact he's a screwed up lunatic. You are the one making it about that. I'm just asking a question - Who has lied more in the last 5 years?
You turn it into "you love the enemy" and "you disgust me". I am simply asking who has told the world more lies - the British PM or the prez of Iran. Neither is my leader. I just want to know the answer.
Do you know the answer?
-
You're the one who admitted you hadn't researched the guy.
I'm not debating the fact he's a screwed up lunatic. You are the one making it about that. I'm just asking a question - Who has lied more in the last 5 years?
You turn it into "you love the enemy" and "you disgust me". I am simply asking who has told the world more lies - the British PM or the prez of Iran. Neither is my leader. I just want to know the answer.
Do you know the answer?
See, there's you lack of intelligence showing again. Me and you researching is mutually exclusive. Me not having researched him doesn't mean I can't tell YOU to research him. You're trying to be pretentious but can't pull it off due to your lack of intelligence.
Adhmedjihad has lied more in the last 5 years I am confident. What Blair says gets more publicity than Adhmedjihad, and people in the western world can openly criticize Blair, in Adhmedjihad's country it's not the same - freedom of speech has very refined boundaries in Iran.
But of course, you hadn't contemplated this, because you speak before you think.
-
Adhmedjihad has lied more in the last 5 years I am confident.
Upon what do you base this confidence?
I know sources are important around here. Can I click on 'your confidence' and see the evidence that Ahmiedijahd has lied more? Or is it a broken link?
Come on, man. You jumped into this convo throwing blows, so now back your shit up. You're confident he's lied more in the last 5 years. Show us a list of those lies, or the reasons you have to believe they exist.
-
Upon what do you base this confidence?
I know sources are important around here. Can I click on 'your confidence' and see the evidence that Ahmiedijahd has lied more? Or is it a broken link?
Come on, man. You jumped into this convo throwing blows, so now back your shit up. You're confident he's lied more in the last 5 years. Show us a list of those lies, or the reasons you have to believe they exist.
There's a few lies just on the topic of this thread:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6502947.stm
The first tactic was to offer Iran an easy way out. The Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett gave the co-ordinates of the British sailors to the Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki and suggested that there might have been a "mistake".
Iran at first offered a different co-ordinate and then, when it was pointed out that even this was in Iraqi waters, another reading was given, this time on the Iranian side.
-
So your source of evidence showing he lied - it's coming from a nation whose people are being held captive by Iran?
Do you believe they are neutral and impartial in this discussion?
The only evidence you can dig up to prove he is a liar - comes from the nation they're arguably holding spies from? Cough *bias?* And it comes from this week?
You can do better than that.
Haha, you're pathetic :)
England are playing shortly, and it far outweighs me schooling your miserable excuse for an existance on Getbig! So I shall reply at a later date.
-
Haha, you're pathetic :)
England are playing shortly, and it far outweighs me schooling your miserable excuse for an existance on Getbig! So I shall reply at a later date.
Hey man, no need to call names.
You said Ahmedijahad lied more.
I asked for proof.
You had none.
Now go watch some tele.
-
Yes, it is. I hadn't seen you post anything here lately not relating to a CT. The Iranians need a map because the sailors were picked up off the coast or Iraq, not Iran. Saddam tried this b.s. before with our planes flying in what he claimed was his airspace, but wasn't.
That's fucking bullshit mikey. 240 posts plenty of political threads not remotely conspiracy related. cut the man some slack.
-
That's fucking bullshit mikey. 240 posts plenty of political threads not remotely conspiracy related. cut the man some slack.
I start 10+ threads a day here. majority are just the news of the day. mikey needs his meds.
-
Gimme a break..have u read anything about how Arabs treat prisoners. These guys won't be beaten because they will be given back at some point soon. If we were at war they would be tortured mercilessly and then shot. I fail to see how u find your own country the bad guy time and time again. please move soon.....
Persians are NOT Arabs. Infact, historically, Iranians have had more in common and more affinity with Jews than they do Arabs.
Crack a book sometime idiotboy :-*
ps - I really don't think you're an idiotboy, ...but I have a lot of pentup frustration from when I censored myself cause you were overseas. Now that you're stateside, ...I'm taking off my kid gloves.
-
Has anyone seen that James Bond movie... the one where they ensure that ships venture into foreign territory by screwing up their GPS... they think they're in one location... when in actuality... they're in another? hmmm...
-
There's a few lies just on the topic of this thread:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6502947.stm
The first tactic was to offer Iran an easy way out. The Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett gave the co-ordinates of the British sailors to the Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki and suggested that there might have been a "mistake".
Iran at first offered a different co-ordinate and then, when it was pointed out that even this was in Iraqi waters, another reading was given, this time on the Iranian side.
So your source of evidence showing he lied - it's coming from a nation whose people are being held captive by Iran?
Do you believe they are neutral and impartial in this discussion?
The only evidence you can dig up to prove he is a liar - comes from the nation they're arguably holding spies from? Cough *bias?* And it comes from this week?
You can do better than that.
Still waiting for your evidence, Nordic. Show us that the loony admiedijahad has lied more than blair in the last 5 years.
-
Still waiting for your evidence, Nordic. Show us that the loony admiedijahad has lied more than blair in the last 5 years.
It will come. I'm working, you should try it some time.
-
It will come. I'm working, you should try it some time.
An insult? Come on dude, I agree he's a crazy evil fcker and I could care less if Israel or anyone else cooks his goose. I just don't think America should be starting a 3rd war with the other 2 going so badly.
So then, you can't prove your claim that he lied more than blair? Neither is my leader- I just wanted to see which world leader has more credibility with facts in the last 5 years, as this issue of "who was on which side of whose waters" depends on credibility.
-
An insult? Come on dude, I agree he's a crazy evil fcker and I could care less if Israel or anyone else cooks his goose. I just don't think America should be starting a 3rd war with the other 2 going so badly.
So then, you can't prove your claim that he lied more than blair? Neither is my leader- I just wanted to see which world leader has more credibility with facts in the last 5 years, as this issue of "who was on which side of whose waters" depends on credibility.
Who said I can't prove it? I'm working, it gets priority over you.
Once again assuming too much... typical CTer
-
Who said I can't prove it? I'm working, it gets priority over you.
Once again assuming too much... typical CTer
So you possess enough knowledge and evidence to tell me he's lied more - yesterday - and 24 hours later you still haven't shown it.
Then, you call names and use insults. I just had a simple question.
-
So you possess enough knowledge and evidence to tell me he's lied more - yesterday - and 24 hours later you still haven't shown it.
Then, you call names and use insults. I just had a simple question.
I think you need to re-read this thread you delinquent. I said I haven't researched the guy. Neither have YOU, so you can't validate your argument that he HAS lied less than Blair.
I put myself out and said he has lied more because the man is a lunatic. I can take an educated guess with the general knowledge I have of them man to produce the assumption that he has lied more.
A definitive answer would require me to research him, which I don't have the time to do ATM as I am working. How many ways do you want this to be said until your sub 100 IQ cranium realises?
Now get a fucking job you bum, you're a role model for a kid.
-
I think you need to re-read this thread you delinquent. I said I haven't researched the guy. Neither have YOU, so you can't validate your argument that he HAS lied less than Blair.
I put myself out and said he has lied more because the man is a lunatic. I can take an educated guess with the general knowledge I have of them man to produce the assumption that he has lied more.
A definitive answer would require me to research him, which I don't have the time to do ATM as I am working. How many ways do you want this to be said until your sub 100 IQ cranium realises?
Now get a fucking job you bum, you're a role model for a kid.
meltdown.
FYI, I never made the argument that one lied more than the other. I asked a question. Why did you chime in, if you didn't know the answer?
-
meltdown.
FYI, I never made the argument that one lied more than the other. I asked a question. Why did you chime in, if you didn't know the answer?
Wow, this is a politics forum, I would have thought people here, especially someone like you who likes to emit a false aurora of intelligence wouldn't resort to "meltdown" posts.
You didn't just ask a question, you gave support for why you think he has lied less and I gave my reason for why I think he has lied more in my prior post.
And all this arises because you thought you had "won" the discussion when I told you I'm too busy to do research.
-
You didn't just ask a question, you gave support for why you think he has lied less
I did?
-
I did?
Transparently yes, it's the same old shitty tactics ALL OVER AGAIN...
AND AGAIN...
AND AGAIN...
Rinse and repeat for each topic you have an interest in...
-
Transparently yes, it's the same old shitty tactics ALL OVER AGAIN...
AND AGAIN...
AND AGAIN...
Rinse and repeat for each topic you have an interest in...
Oh, 'transparently'? Can you quote that?
-
Oh, 'transparently'? Can you quote that?
I could do but it would take a while. Just re-read this thread.
-
I could do but it would take a while. Just re-read this thread.
HAHAHAHAHA - oh, re-read it?
Please quote where you claimed I "gave support for why you think he has lied less"
You're looking terrible in this thread dude. You took a position you knew nothing abuot, then attacked the neutral questioner with a claim you couldn't back up.
-
You're looking terrible in this thread dude. You took a position you knew nothing abuot, then attacked the neutral questioner with a claim you couldn't back up.
Ad hominem
Unable to refute my position and points.
-
Ad hominem
Unable to refute my position and points.
I asked a simple question: Who has told more lies?
I have taken no position. I have asked you to clarify yours.
You have made your point but given zero evidence.
No offense, but I'd rather debate/refute points with someone who does their homework.
Thanks for playing though, and I still await your promise to deliver the evidence you claimed was forthcoming 24 hours ago.
-
I asked a simple question: Who has told more lies?
I have taken no position. I have asked you to clarify yours.
You have made your point but given zero evidence.
No offense, but I'd rather debate/refute points with someone who does their homework.
Thanks for playing though, and I still await your promise to deliver the evidence you claimed was forthcoming 24 hours ago.
More ad hominem attacks... Unable to refute my posts, just iterating over the standard 240 debating template.
Nice patronising tone too ::)
Seriously, some people have WORK to do.
-
More ad hominem attacks... Unable to refute my posts, just iterating over the standard 240 debating template.
Nice patronising tone too ::)
Seriously, some people have WORK to do.
Too busy to research it 'cause you have to work... but not too busy to continue posting endlessly.
BS. You made a statement and can't back up your BS. 240 pwned you.
-
Too busy to research it 'cause you have to work... but not too busy to continue posting endlessly.
BS. You made a statement and can't back up your BS. 240 pwned you.
I'll get round to it at the weekend, quick posts don't take much of my time.
Aren't you another fool with no education? I bet your degree is in something like hair and beauty ::)
-
I'll get round to it at the weekend, quick posts don't take much of my time.
Aren't you another fool with no education? I bet your degree is in something like hair and beauty ::)
You've embarassed yourself big time here.
-
You've embarassed yourself big time here.
Of course I have Mr. Ad hominem ::)
You still haven't replied to this:
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=137866.msg1959096#msg1959096
-
Of course I have Mr. Ad hominem ::)
You still haven't replied to this:
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=137866.msg1959096#msg1959096
You're trying to get readers to leave this topic for another. It just gets worse and worse for you.
-
You're trying to get readers to leave this topic for another. It just gets worse and worse for you.
Woah, nice back tracking. Can you or can you NOT refute my scenario?
I've told you, at weekend I can do some research.
-
Woah, nice back tracking. Can you or can you NOT refute my scenario?
I've told you, at weekend I can do some research.
I asked you - which nation's leader has lied more.
You told me to go to a 911 thread and argue with you about that topic.
Dude, it's getting sad in here for you.
You said that Ahmedijahad lied more, and I asked for evidence, which you have not yet provided. I have no position in this argument, other than to call people on stating their opinion without evidence.
Your opinion has been noted, as has your inability to provide any evidence of this in 48 hours despite your posting here numerous times. Thanks for your time.
-
I asked you - which nation's leader has lied more.
You told me to go to a 911 thread and argue with you about that topic.
Dude, it's getting sad in here for you.
You said that Ahmedijahad lied more, and I asked for evidence, which you have not yet provided. I have no position in this argument, other than to call people on stating their opinion without evidence.
Your opinion has been noted, as has your inability to provide any evidence of this in 48 hours despite your posting here numerous times. Thanks for your time.
More, ad hominem attacks. Seriously brother HOW STUPID are you? Can you not even following my simplistic statements?
The other topic is mutually exclusive and I expected you in all your wisdom of 911 to be able to refute my scenario, however you have not, now onto Ahmadinejad:
Lying about his ideologies (condradictions):
http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,1964075,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=12
Lies about having fully developed nuclear technology:
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1216
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342489,00.html
Contrast to above:
http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=6410
Some analysis:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/008753.php
Suspect hostage taker (which he denies, therefore if he is an hostage taker he is lying):
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18663
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/9/17/103307.shtml
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/006882.php
http://www.danielpipes.org/article/4115
After having promised reforms he fills his cabinet with islamic hardliners and more:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4150214.stm
http://www.khaleejtimes.ae/DisplayArticleNew.asp?xfile=data/middleeast/2006/September/middleeast_September105.xml§ion=middleeast&col=
-
Lots of liberal sources there ;)
I'd like them from FOX news please.
-
Lots of liberal sources there ;)
I'd like them from FOX news please.
Damn it feels good when the shoe is on the other foot. ;D
-
Damn it feels good when the shoe is on the other foot. ;D
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Afoxnews.com+Ahmadinejad
Just search for topics relating to the ones I've already posted.
-
Here's a good one:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161284,00.html