Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: 240 is Back on May 22, 2007, 09:18:35 PM
-
HAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A
This lady sits on Oreilly and bashes people who quesiton the 911 story as crazy or unpatriotic.
In 2002 she wrote a newspaper column in which she was VERY critical of the official story. She said a missile took down Flight 93!! She pointed out big flaws in the Flight 11 story too.
SHE WAS ONE OF THE ORIGINAL 911 TRUTHERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh geez, this is good. She is like a god to the neotaints, as she is hot and spends so much time calling 9/11 skeptics crazy. Turns out a few years ago, she was writing newspaper articles pointing out the very holes she now denies exist.
Slap!
-
hahaha London Guardian writer George Mobiot -- who writes columns bashing 9/11 truth - used to feel quite differently ;)
He called bullshit on the official story on Sept 25, 2001 = 2 weeks after the attack.
Then, he DELETED THE ARTICLE FROM HIS WEBSITE:
http://www.zmag.org/monbiotcollat.htm
Luckily internet archiving means nothing ever goes away!
hahahahahaha
Sounds like crickets in here!
-
Here you go once again. Google+too much free time+CT websites=one sad life
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons
Links at the bottom of the page.
-
HAHAHAHAHAHA
You didn't address Miss Malkin.
Instead, you posted a link which has nothing to do with malkin, Mobiot, or their hypocracy.
hahahahahah address the point: Two of your biggest 911 truth skeptics used to point out big holes in the story. You want to talk about CREDIBILITY? Ouch!
-
March 8 2002 piece, entitled 'Just Wondering'.
What really happened on United Airlines Flight 93? As the Philadelphia Daily News reported back in November, many folks in Shanksville, Pa., where the hijacked Boeing 757 crashed, believe the plane was shot down.
The eight-mile-wide debris field seems to bolster claims of an on-board explosion. So did the discovery of a one-ton chunk of the plane's engine far from the rest of the crash site - which some say points to evidence that a heat-seeking missile targeted the flight.
-Michelle Malkin
-
HAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
This lady sits on Oreilly and bashes people who quesiton the 911 story as crazy or unpatriotic.
In 2002 she wrote a newspaper column in which she was VERY critical of the official story. She said a missile took down Flight 93!! She pointed out big flaws in the Flight 11 story too.
SHE WAS ONE OF THE ORIGINAL 911 TRUTHERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh geez, this is good. She is like a god to the neotaints, as she is hot and spends so much time calling 9/11 skeptics crazy. Turns out a few years ago, she was writing newspaper articles pointing out the very holes she now denies exist.
Slap!
2002? LMAO......she obviosly woke up since then and realized it was all bullshit, shit Rob, and say I'm the one who fuels the fire between parties, it was 2002 for Christ's sake ::)!
-
HAHAHAHAHAHA
You didn't address Miss Malkin.
Instead, you posted a link which has nothing to do with malkin, Mobiot, or their hypocracy.
hahahahahah address the point: Two of your biggest 911 truth skeptics used to point out big holes in the story. You want to talk about CREDIBILITY? Ouch!
I don't follow the woman and thus have nothing to say on the matter. Quit posting anything to deal with 911. You are sad. You obsess about this so much. You are a Dem and lie about it and search day and night for useless drivel to try and get people to buy your brand of BS. It's too funny. The fact that you continuously post this cracks me up. Go back to your days of harassing pros (although I hear these days you are too scared to) and search your post about never posting 911. As far as people talking about 911, nobody cares now. There are bigger fish to fry. Posting quotes that are 5 years old really shows how little normal people care. Good try though.
Added:
(I googled recent news from her)
MICHELLE MALKIN: It is and it doesn't belong here. And I'm glad that this moment provided great TV for FOX News — it was a very instructive exchange — but Ron Paul really has no business being on stage as a legitimate representative of Republicans, because the 9/11 truth virus is something that infects only a very small proportion of people that would identify themselves as conservative or Republican. And as you say, John, this is far more prevalent, this strain of 9/11 truth virus, on the left, and in much of the mainstream of the Democratic Party as that Rasmussen poll showed.
...
You know, I try not to spend too much time in these cesspools, but it is worth taking a visit to places like, you know, these WTC7 sites and Students and Scholars for Truth, and I note that Ron Paul has basically allied himself with these people. He appears with Students for Truth on campus and he's appeared on radio shows like 9/11 conspiracy nut Alex Jones.
-
2002? LMAO......she obviosly woke up since then and realized it was all bullshit, shit Rob, and say I'm the one who fuels the fire between parties, it was 2002 for Christ's sake ::)!
The points she made in 2002 are still valid today, and have never been addressed by the 911 commission.
Joe, the official story tells us the plane nosedived into the ground at a 90 degree angle, and was solid until impact. The evidence, as Miss Malkin points out, shows that the plane exploded in midair and the debris was spread over EIGHT MILES.
malkin was one of the early pioneers in the truth movement, joe. Sad as it is, her point was valid, then, and valid now. And while you call it bullshit, YOU CANNOT TELL US WHY THE DEBRIS IS SPREAD OVER 8 miles.
malkin is a hypocrite. and the minute you realize 911 truth IS NOT about repub/dem, you'll be more open to the obvious evidence that malkin was smart enough to see ;)
-
Quit posting anything to deal with 911.
Piss off.
I don't follow the woman and thus have nothing to say on the matter.
yet you follow this with 250 more words on it?
As far as people talking about 911, nobody cares now.
Here are 10,000 people with college degrees to get you started.
http://67.15.255.19/~c911sch1/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=20&Itemid=35
College professors, engineers, members of Bush and Reagan cabinets.
And 'nobody cares now' about 3000 dead americans? You're a fcking terrorist, cap86.
-
The points she made in 2002 are still valid today, and have never been addressed by the 911 commission.
Joe, the official story tells us the plane nosedived into the ground at a 90 degree angle, and was solid until impact. The evidence, as Miss Malkin points out, shows that the plane exploded in midair and the debris was spread over EIGHT MILES.
malkin was one of the early pioneers in the truth movement, joe. Sad as it is, her point was valid, then, and valid now. And while you call it bullshit, YOU CANNOT TELL US WHY THE DEBRIS IS SPREAD OVER 8 miles.
malkin is a hypocrite. and the minute you realize 911 truth IS NOT about repub/dem, you'll be more open to the obvious evidence that malkin was smart enough to see ;)
So when someone see's a different side of things and then they're convinced they were wrong the first time, because they change they're mind that make them a hypocrite?
-
So when someone see's a different side of things and then they're convinced they were wrong the first time, because they change they're mind that make them a hypocrite?
No, because Michelle made a lot of valid points then - and TODAY, she won't even address those points, talk about them, etc.
Today, her position is "911 truth is dems that hate bush and we shouldn't look at their crazy evidence".
One more thing - please SHOW US where malkin says she has "changed her mind" or that she was WRONG about her 2002 synopsis. I'm waiting... ;)
-
No, because Michelle made a lot of valid points then - and TODAY, she won't even address those points, talk about them, etc.
Today, her position is "911 truth is dems that hate bush and we shouldn't look at their crazy evidence".
One more thing - please SHOW US where malkin says she has "changed her mind" or that she was WRONG about her 2002 synopsis. I'm waiting... ;)
I want to see the ENTIRE artical where you found, I have a serious feeling this was taken waaay out of context as usual!
-
why the self-delete, cap86? ;)
You said everyone has 'moved on' and no one cares.
what the fvck is wrong with you dude? you're a sad excuse for an american. i'll say it. you can believe the evidence of an inside job, or not believe it. but to say we shouldn't look at it because "no one cares' Spits in the face of America.
You don't respect american life. 911 truth might come out one day, it might not. (altho all trends show it is!). But at the end of the day, you're an american soldier who said "NOBODY CARES" about the victims. you disappointed me man. Tell me I'm wrong, okay. But don't tell me "NOBODY CARES" about 2976 dead civlians.
-
I want to see the ENTIRE artical where you found, I have a serious feeling this was taken waaay out of context as usual!
look it up yourself. I posted her 2002 text, word for word.
And, she never took it back ;)
WHy don't you email bill o reilly and ask him why his #1 girl said the plane must have exploded in the air?
-
why the self-delete, cap86? ;)
You said everyone has 'moved on' and no one cares.
what the fvck is wrong with you dude? you're a sad excuse for an american. i'll say it. you can believe the evidence of an inside job, or not believe it. but to say we shouldn't look at it because "no one cares' Spits in the face of America.
You don't respect american life. 911 truth might come out one day, it might not. (altho all trends show it is!). But at the end of the day, you're an american soldier who said "NOBODY CARES" about the victims. you disappointed me man. Tell me I'm wrong, okay. But don't tell me "NOBODY CARES" about 2976 dead civlians.
You're not worth the effort or time. Nobody cares=only coverage is CT these days. Nuff said.
-
You're not worth the effort or time. Nobody cares=only coverage is CT these days. Nuff said.
YOU don't care. We got that.
it's history. Some folks like history, especially when it's the catalyst for these wars. You don't have to like history, that's fine. But don't minimize the value of their lives, dude.
-
YOU don't care. We got that.
it's history. Some folks like history, especially when it's the catalyst for these wars. You don't have to like history, that's fine. But don't minimize the value of their lives, dude.
I didn't. I care about what happened, not what you think happened. Big difference. I care about their lives, families, and have visited the site. You tarnish their memory. That I will not discuss anymore. I will not sit here and defend my patriotism to someone like you pal.
-
look it up yourself. I posted her 2002 text, word for word.
And, she never took it back ;)
WHy don't you email bill o reilly and ask him why his #1 girl said the plane must have exploded in the air?
Rob, you posted it, from where? Damn dude, I'm almost ready for bed, my day starts at 5:30am, pre-season football started yesterday.
-
I didn't. I care about what happened, not what you think happened. Big difference. I care about their lives, families, and have visited the site. You tarnish their memory. That I will not discuss anymore. I will not sit here and defend my patriotism to someone like you pal.
Their famlies are the ones leading the charge for a second investigation, actually. I don't see how properly investigating a crime (when 4/10 of the 911 commissioners have said there needs to be a second investigation) will "tarnish the memory" of the victims.
I'm not trying to convince you or anyone - I could give a shit what anyone believes. You said "nobody cares', referring to the crime which killed 3000. I disagree. That's about all we can say. have a good one.
-
Rob, you posted it, from where? Damn dude, I'm almost ready for bed, my day starts at 5:30am, pre-season football started yesterday.
her own words:
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/michelle/malkin030802.asp
-
HAHAHAHAH Malkin is QUITE the little CTer!!!
She doesn't just "wake up" one day and change position - she makes some SERIOUS accusations here!!
her column:
Just wondering
http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com -- THE six-month anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks is upon us. Here are a half-dozen unsolved mysteries still on my mind:
What really happened on United Airlines Flight 93? As the Philadelphia Daily News reported back in November, many folks in Shanksville, Pa., where the hijacked Boeing 757 crashed, believe the plane was shot down. Eyewitnesses reported seeing a small, unmarked jet flying overhead immediately after impact; others are convinced they heard the piercing sound of a missile. A federal flight controller told The Telegraph of Nashua, N.H., that an F-16 had indeed been in "hot pursuit" of Flight 93 until it hit the ground. One of the 911calls from a passenger on the flight indicated that there was an explosion aboard the plane. The FBI immediately confiscated the tape.
The eight-mile-wide debris field seems to bolster claims of an on-board explosion. So did the discovery of a one-ton chunk of the plane's engine far from the rest of the crash site - which some say points to evidence that a heat-seeking missile targeted the flight. Then there's the eight-minute gap from the time all cell phone calls from the plane ceased and the time it crashed.
Although both the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder were recovered, not a single scrap about what was on the black boxes has been officially released. This despite the government's otherwise routine release of such information. (Recall that after American Airlines Flight 587 crashed in New York last November, the feds released detailed information from one of the black boxes within less than two days.)
The feds insist on keeping all the Flight 11 data secret because disclosing such information might "interfere with enforcement proceedings." Against whom? All the hijack culprits are dead.
What really happened on American Airlines Flight 11? Did one of the hijackers have a gun on board? Was it planted before the flight took off, or was it smuggled on? Either way, shouldn't someone be held accountable if such an egregious security breach did in fact take place? Investigative reporter Paul Sperry, formerly of Investor's Business Daily and now with Worldnetdaily.com, scooped the mainstream press by exposing a high-level, internal report from the Federal Aviation Administration. It detailed the alleged shooting of Flight 11 passenger Daniel Lewin by hijacker Satam Al Suqami.
According to the document, which was later obtained by the Washington Post, USA Today, and others, an onboard flight attendant reported in a phone call that "one bullet was reported to have been fired" during the flight, killing Lewin before the plane crashed into the north tower of the World Trade Center. FAA officials dismissed the leaked memo as a draft and claimed that the very specific report of gunfire - including the names of the victim, shooter, and their precise seat numbers -- was an editing error.
Just a typo, huh?
Who murdered Katherine Smith, and why? Smith was the Tennessee state license examiner who had been implicated last month in a phony ID scam involving a group of shady Middle Eastern men from New York City. Investigators say there are "connections" between the ring and the Sept. 11 terrorists; one of them had a repair pass in his possession that gave him access to the lower levels of the World Trade Center basement. It was dated Sept. 5.
A day before Smith was to appear in court over the matter, she died in a bizarre and fiery crash inside a car registered to one of her Middle Eastern co-defendants. Smith was burned beyond recognition; her arms and legs disintegrated in the flames. Yet, her car was traveling barely over 20 mph when it hit a utility pole and damage to the vehicle was minimal. This week, the Tennessee Highway Patrol concluded definitively that her "death was not the result of the crash itself. Her death was by other means." Is this the vengeful work of al Qaeda killers still on the loose?
Finally: Why does Norm Mineta still have a job? Who's responsible for the anthrax attacks? And the most nagging unresolved question of all:
So where the he-l is Osama bin Laden, anyway?
-
I'm actually a little embarassed for malkin... she is OUT THERE lol...
I would pay $ to hear her read this little rant on the air to Bill OReilly.
For you guys to say "She probably just woke up and realized it was all BS", i have to laugh.
Her opinions here outright CALL OUT the official story, FBI, and White House. She makes half a dozen serious charges, even getting into anthrax, add'l terrorists, etc. This is hilarious.
Neos, speak on it!
-
HAHAHAHAH Malkin is QUITE the little CTer!!!
She doesn't just "wake up" one day and change position -
I didn't say she just woke up one day.........it was over FIVE YEARS AGO!
-
I didn't say she just woke up one day.........it was over FIVE YEARS AGO!
5 years ago, she wrote for a newspaper - and claimed the white house, FBI, and others were LYING.
her questions are valid, and you, nor they, can answer them.
Dude, Malkin's words are big here. You can say it was 5 years ago, but she was writing for a big media outlet - she MEANT it. And until you can show me a response for her saying "I was wrong about those points" - well, I am going to believe she believes them.
Anmyone wanna bet she'll be replaced on the show inside 3 weeks? ;)
cap86, sorry to question your patriotism, i was pissed.
-
5 years ago, she wrote for a newspaper - and claimed the white house, FBI, and others were LYING.
her questions are valid, and you, nor they, can answer them.
Dude, Malkin's words are big here. You can say it was 5 years ago, but she was writing for a big media outlet - she MEANT it. And until you can show me a response for her saying "I was wrong about those points" - well, I am going to believe she believes them.
Anmyone wanna bet she'll be replaced on the show inside 3 weeks? ;)
cap86, sorry to question your patriotism, i was pissed.
And I apologize as well. Let the thread continue.
-
Is it true that this miserable bitch had plastic surgery to "Caucasianize" her eyes? Must've been hard for the surgeons to have scraped through that pound-and-a-half of pornstar make-up to get to them.
-
2002? LMAO......she obviosly woke up since then and realized it was all bullshit, shit Rob, and say I'm the one who fuels the fire between parties, it was 2002 for Christ's sake ::)!
WHOA!!!!
I-One makes a good post?
What's next? The Pope converting to Judaism?
-Hedge
-
So when someone see's a different side of things and then they're convinced they were wrong the first time, because they change they're mind that make them a hypocrite?
When a Repug flipflops, it's called changing their minds. ::)
-
what the fvck is wrong with you dude? you're a sad excuse for an american.
Mega ditto's.
-
she asked VERY provacative questions in an Isaraeli publication?
She has balls.
Now, have her questions been answered to her satisfaction? if so, I'm sure she'll tell us that tomorrow night on OReilly, right?
-
HAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
This lady sits on Oreilly and bashes people who quesiton the 911 story as crazy or unpatriotic.
In 2002 she wrote a newspaper column in which she was VERY critical of the official story. She said a missile took down Flight 93!! She pointed out big flaws in the Flight 11 story too.
SHE WAS ONE OF THE ORIGINAL 911 TRUTHERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh geez, this is good. She is like a god to the neotaints, as she is hot and spends so much time calling 9/11 skeptics crazy. Turns out a few years ago, she was writing newspaper articles pointing out the very holes she now denies exist.
Slap!
You think Malkin is hot? I guess when you look like you do your standards can't be to high. Sorry man but ever since EGJ e-mailed me your picture, there is no way I can take you serious. Did I see an arm band tattoo? LMAO.....clown
-
You think Malkin is hot?
Compared to some of the other female TV speakers, the FOX girls - including kendall and malkin - are pretty hot.
-
Compared to some of the other female TV speakers, the FOX girls - including kendall and malkin - are pretty hot.
Kendall is gorgeous, but sorry Malkin isn't anything to write home about
-
In 2002, she got on an israeli news outlet and cast light on the most horrible attack in US history.
I would like to see Ms Malkin, if she no longer believes we were lied to by the FBI, white house, etc, to tell us.
She was one of the catalysts in the early 911 movement - she was telling thousands of readers to doubt the official story before the Loose Change kids had even started their movie.
Michelle Malkin was a PIONEER in the 911 truth movement. Joe, for you to say "that was 4 and a half year ago she wrote that" just doesn't cut mustard. She helped START this fcking 911 thing. She can't just pretend it didn't happen.
-
You think Malkin is hot? I guess when you look like you do your standards can't be to high. Sorry man but ever since EGJ e-mailed me your picture, there is no way I can take you serious. Did I see an arm band tattoo? LMAO.....clown
Ouch!! That was cold.
-
Ouch!! That was cold.
I actually prefer the cold, but serious...good guy or not....an arm band? I guess we all make mistakes
-
I actually prefer the cold, but serious...good guy or not....an arm band? I guess we all make mistakes
Just wondering MM.....did the arm band have an old girlfriends name enscribed on it? :o
-
Is it true that this miserable bitch had plastic surgery to "Caucasianize" her eyes? Must've been hard for the surgeons to have scraped through that pound-and-a-half of pornstar make-up to get to them.
When someone described her as an "asian ann coulter" she replied "I'm not asian, I'm american." Hahaha brutal lack of self-confidence and wanting to fit in with the hardcore christian right.
-
When someone described her as an "asian ann coulter" she replied "I'm not asian, I'm american." Hahaha brutal lack of self-confidence and wanting to fit in with the hardcore christian right.
Exactly. I mean, not being a fan of multiculturalism is one thing (and a GOOD thing, too), but she's like one of those black guys who wants to join the Klan because he hates his own race.
-
Exactly. I mean, not being a fan of multiculturalism is one thing (and a GOOD thing, too), but she's like one of those black guys who wants to join the Klan because he hates his own race.
Honestly, I can tolerate people who are for Bush.. I like Christopher Hitchens because he can actually explain his positions and believes in a certain cause. I can't tolerate people like O'rielly and Malkin because they just seem to take certain positions by default.
-
I can't tolerate people like O'rielly and Malkin because they just seem to take certain positions by default.
You might want to add Mr I-one's hero, Rush "I carry GOP water" Limbaugh to that list.
-
You might want to add Mr I-one's hero, Rush "I carry GOP water" Limbaugh to that list.
Lest we forget Man Coulter? :)
-
Just wondering MM.....did the arm band have an old girlfriends name enscribed on it? :o
lol, I didn't notice, I had to get my ex-wife's name covered on my chest. No arm band for this hero though