Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: whateva on May 29, 2007, 08:10:01 PM

Title: Who has the more pleasant physique?
Post by: whateva on May 29, 2007, 08:10:01 PM
Forget about condition, Who do you guys think has the more pleasant physique?
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: chaos on May 29, 2007, 08:12:20 PM
Dennis Wolf, the bottomn guy seems to have flat biceps.

Got any different pics to compare? front double bi?
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: benchmstr on May 29, 2007, 08:15:39 PM
Dennis Wolf, the bottomn guy seems to have flat biceps.

Got any different pics to compare? front double bi?
agreed, the mans arms are not on par with the rest of him.

bench
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: whateva on May 29, 2007, 08:17:48 PM
Dennis Wolf, the bottomn guy seems to have flat biceps.

Got any different pics to compare? front double bi?
found it
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: affy on May 29, 2007, 08:19:03 PM
holy shit who's the second guy

he looks like a bigger wolf with calves!

his arms are a bit funky though, they look like they might have some oil in them.  the rest of him is phenomenal.
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: benchmstr on May 29, 2007, 08:20:23 PM
found it
wolf  is not flexed all the way in that pic,i think the other guy is very impressive but he has some training to do to catch wolf

bench
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: carvedoutofwood on May 29, 2007, 08:22:06 PM
to be fair that isnt wolfs best front double... not that wolf has great bics IMO... but arms are just too important to have everything else but them, especially when your talking about pleasantries.... wolf has better everything, but that doesnt make his phy. more "pleasant".... having better arms does...
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: chaos on May 29, 2007, 08:36:02 PM
found it
no split between the bis and tris :-\ maybe oil? sumething funky going on, Wolf wins.
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: War-Horse on May 29, 2007, 08:41:38 PM
The guy in the first pic is daniel seccari.   lokk how small a pro looks when dried up for a show and normal lights.... :-[
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: gh15 on May 29, 2007, 08:47:27 PM
if you need to ask its pretty bad,,

you are comparing wolf with the other dude for what exactly ? wolf is couple leages above,,mr o material,,better physiqe than vic and also more pleseant physiqe and symetry and proportions are his strongest parts

if bodybuilding looked like wolf on stage then many many people would like it

Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: beatmaster on May 29, 2007, 08:48:48 PM

the second guy's head look too small for his body  :-\

is it me or wood's bis look a little suspect?
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: donrhummy on May 29, 2007, 08:58:19 PM
Both guys look very impressive. I'd say from the knees up Wolf wins on natural shape by just a little but the other guy's got calves too which makes a big diff. Where does he compete?
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: War-Horse on May 29, 2007, 09:00:24 PM
Both guys look very impressive. I'd say from the knees up Wolf wins on natural shape by just a little but the other guy's got calves too which makes a big diff. Where does he compete?



I think hes from italy, not sure tho.
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: War-Horse on May 29, 2007, 09:21:04 PM
thanks for releaving beast name !!


huh. ???
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: Rampage on May 30, 2007, 06:11:07 AM
wateva...

..you may have single handidly boosted this guys career more than he could have by posting a comparison of him and WOLF ....something that NO judges would have done onstage

Hes holding his own against wolf , but i see a lil bit of him being a texaco spokesman
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: phyxsius on May 30, 2007, 06:18:27 AM
daniel seccari is wolfe's gimmick
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: donrhummy on May 30, 2007, 08:36:50 AM
Wolf looked better at last year's Mr. O. His stomach's starting to protrude and his waist is slightly wider this year (and his biceps are slightly down too).

LAST YEAR
(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/~photos/730/Men/RH9K2811.jpg)

THIS YEAR
(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/~photos/755/Men/755rb0592.jpg)

LAST YEAR
(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/~photos/730/Men/RH9K2809.jpg)

THIS YEAR
(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/~photos/755/Men/755rb0608.jpg)

LAST YEAR
(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/~photos/730/Men/RH9K2817.jpg)

THIS YEAR
(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/~photos/755/Men/755rb0600.jpg)
Title: Re: Who has the more pleasant physique?
Post by: OneManGang on May 30, 2007, 10:17:39 AM
paluboism is a bitch
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: pumpster on May 30, 2007, 10:36:32 AM
the second guy's head look too small for his body  :-\



Definitely, he looks like a martian.
Title: Re: Who has the more pleasant physique?
Post by: War-Horse on May 30, 2007, 10:49:34 AM
Cant you guys see, its just catching them in the middle of a breathe??

At some point the oxygen has to enter the body.

And the fact that the lighting is set to cast a shadow on the muscles...means it will do the same on the stomach region.


just sayin :-\
Title: Re: who looks better?
Post by: Parker on May 30, 2007, 11:10:18 AM
if you need to ask its pretty bad,,

you are comparing wolf with the other dude for what exactly ? wolf is couple leages above,,mr o material,,better physiqe than vic and also more pleseant physiqe and symetry and proportions are his strongest parts

if bodybuilding looked like wolf on stage then many many people would like it



GH15, Wolfe could never match the conditioning and shape Vic had when he won the NOC. His taper that he displayed during his ab thigh shot is among the best, if not the best...

Wolfe has the tools, but will he build one of the greastest physiques, or will he be in the (very full) category of "wasted potential"?

And Wolf needs to get the wrinkles out of lower back :-X