Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => Steroids Info & Hardcore => Topic started by: bigbobs on June 06, 2007, 08:09:48 PM

Title: Omnadren vs other long-lasting forms of test
Post by: bigbobs on June 06, 2007, 08:09:48 PM

Is Omnadren at all inferior to sustanon, cyp, or enanthate?  By inferior I mean in terms of gains...so if you take 750 mg of omnadren for example, would you expect any less gains than if you were taking 750 mg of cypionate or sustanon--all other factors (diet, training, etc.) being equal?

If there is not any difference why would anyone use anything but omnadren, since it's so much cheaper than the other forms of test?

Title: Re: Omnadren vs other long-lasting forms of test
Post by: ThaRealist on June 07, 2007, 01:08:57 PM

I am using it right now at 1,000mg a week and having great results...I am just getting kinda sick of the slight pain from the injection site after every injection...I would rather be using human grade Test. enathate right now, but I will use up what I got right now...

Title: Re: Omnadren vs other long-lasting forms of test
Post by: Overload on June 07, 2007, 01:19:14 PM

After several continuous injections it's all the same.

Just use whatever is cheapest and REAL.

You can find Test E really cheap if you know the right people.

8)

Title: Re: Omnadren vs other long-lasting forms of test
Post by: ThaRealist on June 07, 2007, 01:22:48 PM

I got the best deal on some omna recently and that is why I am using it instead of Test E.  I prefer Test E. for long cycles though, but I can deal with it no biggie...I do love the quick Test boost the mix gives me compared to Test Enath though....