Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 10:11:47 AM

Title: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 10:11:47 AM
when we attacked iraq..why didn't saddam use his WMDs against us?
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Dos Equis on June 12, 2007, 10:21:52 AM
I defer to John Kerry on this:

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 10:25:11 AM
look man i dont vote..i'm a radical lib..which means i side with EVRYONE on some issues and dislike EVERYONE on some..

if we attacked on a coulda woulda shoulda..well..then we r not better than the taliban..  ;)



i stopped drinking.....prep yerself and grow an IQ or your gonna get stomped.. :)
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Dos Equis on June 12, 2007, 10:31:05 AM
More from John Kerry:

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Dos Equis on June 12, 2007, 10:31:35 AM
look man i dont vote..i'm a radical lib..which means i side with EVRYONE on some issues and dislike EVERYONE on some..

if we attacked on a coulda woulda shoulda..well..then we r not better than the taliban..  ;)



i stopped drinking.....prep yerself and grow an IQ or your gonna get stomped.. :)

Bring it.   :)
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 10:32:18 AM
More from John Kerry:

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002


lol damn man..give me YOUR opinion...

i wont read that..yeesh for a beachbum you sure r anal..  ;D
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 10:33:09 AM
Bring it.   :)

i did..read first question on this thred..gimme your responce..


why didn't saddam use his WMDs against us?
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Dos Equis on June 12, 2007, 11:07:13 AM
i did..read first question on this thred..gimme your responce..


why didn't saddam use his WMDs against us?

Because he was too busy hiding in a hole in the ground?

I don't know why he didn't use WMDs.  Most of us (regardless of political party) believed he had them.  I suspect they were moved to someplace like Syria.  We may never know. 
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 11:13:22 AM
Because he was too busy hiding in a hole in the ground?




riiight..i have nukes..i'm gonna go hide in a hole and let my country go to hell..cause i fear bad publicity..riiiiiight  ::)

occums razor..

pwned! 8)
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Dos Equis on June 12, 2007, 11:21:28 AM

riiight..i have nukes..i'm gonna go hide in a hole and let my country go to hell..cause i fear bad publicity..riiiiiight  ::)

occums razor..

pwned! 8)

Owned?  Is this how I was supposed to get "stomped"?   :)  O.K.  You got me . . . .

Your question was why Saddam didn't use WMDs when we invaded.  As our search showed after we invaded, they weren't there.  Everyone knows this.  What's your point? 
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 11:30:25 AM
As our search showed after we invaded, they weren't there. 

if they weren't there why did we invade?
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: headhuntersix on June 12, 2007, 11:31:57 AM
Adolf Hitler had gas, plenty of it, he didn't use it..who knows...I think what he, saddam did have, was moved.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Dos Equis on June 12, 2007, 11:33:53 AM
if they weren't there why did we invade?

Because Republicans and Democrats believed he had them. 
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: OzmO on June 12, 2007, 11:35:05 AM
He didn't use them because he didn't have them.   Why is this such a debate?
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: headhuntersix on June 12, 2007, 11:35:27 AM
I know i wasn't worried in the least about his armor when we moved out..we were all worried we'd get slimed.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Dos Equis on June 12, 2007, 11:38:54 AM
He didn't use them because he didn't have them.   Why is this such a debate?

It isn't. 
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Dos Equis on June 12, 2007, 11:39:53 AM
I know i wasn't worried in the least about his armor when we moved out..we were all worried we'd get slimed.

You guys were probably in MOPP-4 the whole time.   :)
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Decker on June 12, 2007, 11:40:53 AM
Because Republicans and Democrats believed he had them. 
That's a good observation, but not really relevant b/c the people that knew best--Hans Blix and the Weapons Inspectors--had not found and were not finding WMDs right up until Bush ordered the illegal invasion.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Straw Man on June 12, 2007, 11:45:59 AM
That's a good observation, but not really relevant b/c the people that knew best--Hans Blix and the Weapons Inspectors--had not found and were not finding WMDs right up until Bush ordered the illegal invasion.

exactly - I remember telling my colleague's on the eve of the invasion that they would find no WMD's

How did I know - because that's what the inspectors had been saying all along

and also (of course) because I knew Bush was a pathological liar.

Wasn't too hard to figure out.

I wish it were that easy to figure out what the ten year bond is going to do tomorrow (next week/month)

Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 11:56:09 AM
Adolf Hitler had gas, plenty of it, he didn't use it..who knows...I think what he, saddam did have, was moved.

soo saddam chose to have his ass pwned instead of defending himself :-\
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 11:57:59 AM
o yeah next time the terrorists attack america...lets move our nukes out of the country...cause THAT MAKES SENCE  ::)

repbs = blind bible thumpers = taliban ;)

same difference ..different skin colour
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: headhuntersix on June 12, 2007, 12:03:18 PM
soo saddam chose to have his ass pwned instead of defending himself :-\

Hans Bwix..do u know how busy I am Hans Bwix
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 12:05:00 PM
all i gotta say to the above is..meh..

saddam moved his nukes soo he could have his country blowm to bits..his sons killed and himself hanged..makes total sence to me..next time the taliban attack us..lets ground all our planes and not counter attack...

..o wait...lol..we already did that :)
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: headhuntersix on June 12, 2007, 12:06:08 PM
Funny u should mention this..I have the official Rand report entitled ' Why the Iraqi Resistance to the Coalition invasion was so weak" sitting on my desk..hot off the presses. I'll leaf through and see what they say.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 12:07:05 PM
Why the Iraqi Resistance to the Coalition invasion was so

occums razor..  ;)
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Decker on June 12, 2007, 12:08:38 PM
Hans Bwix..do u know how busy I am Hans Bwix
I just saw that movie a week ago.  My brother brought it to my house.  I love depraved shit like that--very funny.  Isn't it made by the creators of South Park?  That's funny b/c I hate South Park.

My favorite scene was at the end where Alec Baldwin was losing the audience and he screams, "Global Warming..." to keep 'em terrified and interested.  I think that's how it went.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: headhuntersix on June 12, 2007, 12:12:35 PM
This is fascinating...Saddam was paying his Generals in Rolex watches so they would stand and fight...alot of Generals did no think there would be a war. I think that from glancing at this thing..which quotes Iraqi generals....that had the order come down to use what ever they had..nobody would have either believd it or followed it.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 12:14:19 PM
This is fascinating...Saddam was paying his Generals in Rolex watches so they would stand and fight...alot of Generals did no think there would be a war. I think that from glancing at this thing..which quotes Iraqi generals....that had the order come down to use what ever they had..nobody would have either believd it or followed it.

oo man o man saddam ws supposidely a retard...

such a retard that we r doing a MUCH better job of keeping that particular area at preace.. ::)
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: headhuntersix on June 12, 2007, 12:19:12 PM
If u can shoot whoever u want whenever u want its easy to keep the peace...
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 12:36:20 PM
If u can shoot whoever u want whenever u want its easy to keep the peace...
]

you'd fit right in in pakistan  :)

ya sure ya not brown? :-\
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: headhuntersix on June 12, 2007, 01:30:46 PM
No but I'm driving a Jingle truck with NE Pats or RED SOX crap all over it if ur sending me over... ;D
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 12, 2007, 04:06:48 PM
o yeah next time the terrorists attack america...lets move our nukes out of the country...cause THAT MAKES SENCE  ::)

repbs = blind bible thumpers = taliban ;)

same difference ..different skin colour

One is driven by lust for power and greed. Don't think people like Cheney are dumb.

The other are scum that will go the way of the dinosaurs.

They're not the same and I'd rather be on the side of the intelligent, regardless of the blatant imperialism.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 06:05:42 PM


They're not the same and I'd rather be on the side of the intelligent, regardless of the blatant imperialism.


define intelligence..


 ;)


is it darwinistic to be power hungry..guess we'll learn ..
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 12, 2007, 06:17:08 PM

define intelligence..


 ;)


is it darwinistic to be power hungry..guess we'll learn ..

It is..

Darwinism is happening all around. From Africa to the Middle East.

The Middle East does have the capacity to fix itself, but it isn't happening. Hard to see a culture that was once leaps and bounds ahead fade into shit. Once the leverage of oil is gone and we stop fucking with them, then maybe they'll recover.

I'm not gonna go too much into that stuff. As I think most bengalis aren't any better.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: kh300 on June 12, 2007, 06:28:31 PM
on 911 3,000 people were killed from terrorists with box cutters. but i guess 911 wasnt considered mass destruction ::)

when your dealing with terrorists anything can be used as a weapon of mass destruction. so dont get wmd and chemical weapons confused. 
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 07:04:00 PM
It is..

Darwinism is happening all around. From Africa to the Middle East.

The Middle East does have the capacity to fix itself, but it isn't happening. Hard to see a culture that was once leaps and bounds ahead fade into shit. Once the leverage of oil is gone and we stop fucking with them, then maybe they'll recover.

I'm not gonna go too much into that stuff. As I think most bengalis aren't any better.


you r not thinking big..

as a species we have a need to have others of our kind survive..

THATS darwanism..think species..not individual..

we r heading the other way..but then again i believe in UFOs ..a 10th planet that comes around every 32000 yrs(orion cluster)....a multiverse..string theory and ws solving field equations at 14..

what do i know  i'm just another nut  :-\
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 07:05:04 PM


when your dealing with terrorists anything can be used as a weapon of mass destruction. so dont get wmd and chemical weapons confused. 

ok fine..soo why didn't saddam use chemical weapons against us?

do fucking tell?

and whle you r at it..tell me why we were allys with him in the past..
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 12, 2007, 07:08:36 PM

we r heading the other way..but then again i believe in UFOs ..a 10th planet that comes around every 32000 yrs(orion cluster)....a multiverse..string theory and ws solving field equations at 14..

what do i know  i'm just another nut  :-\

Of course.. We need people on the bottom to trample on.

But what do I know?
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 07:12:30 PM


But what do I know?

fishing?


 ;D
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: kh300 on June 12, 2007, 07:15:37 PM
ok fine..soo why didn't saddam use chemical weapons against us?

do fucking tell?

and whle you r at it..tell me why we were allys with him in the past..

i dont give a shit if he had chemical weapons or not.. he was a terrorist, and terrorists can use any method they want to kill.. a box cutter can be considered a wmd.

why were we allys with him in the past? stupid question.. ive had friends in the past that have fucked me over and i now consider them my enemies.. times change, and so do people.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 07:23:33 PM
i dont give a shit if he had chemical weapons or not.. he was a terrorist, and terrorists can use any method they want to kill.. a box cutter can be considered a wmd.


ladies n gents..i present..bible thumper mentality! 

hmmm who did he terrorise again ??


box cutter a wmd eh..you r a christian aren't you??  ;D watch nascar?  ;D  handle snakes and hope jesus will protect ya?  ;D
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 12, 2007, 07:32:55 PM
fishing?


 ;D

Like pakis are any better.  ;D
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: kh300 on June 12, 2007, 07:36:03 PM
ladies n gents..i present..bible thumper mentality! 

hmmm who did he terrorise again ??


box cutter a wmd eh..you r a christian aren't you??  ;D watch nascar?  ;D  handle snakes and hope jesus will protect ya?  ;D

ask the thousands of people he put into mass graves. who did bin laden kill before 911? but i guess he wasnt a threat either.


your last statment -i have no fucking clue what your point your trying to make.  i grew up in the bronx, so i dont watch nascar and ive seen about 2 snakes in my lifetime
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 12, 2007, 07:40:16 PM

your last statment -i have no fucking clue what your point your trying to make.  i grew up in the bronx, so i dont watch nascar and ive seen about 2 snakes in my lifetime

The guy seldom makes any sense.

He doesn't get the threat posed by islam and terrorists. He is far left, when in reality it's somewhere in between, but good look trying to reason that to him.

Personally, and to the opinions of many here, he isn't worth a reply most of the time.

Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 07:52:44 PM
ask the thousands of people he put into mass graves. who did bin laden kill before 911? but i guess he wasnt a threat either.




bin laden is still alive.. :)
he ws responsible ws 911  :)

WE DIDN'T GO AFTER HIM


HOW MANY HAS BUSH PUT INTO GRAVES BY NOW? hmmmm want me to count?
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 07:53:53 PM
The guy seldom makes any sense.

He doesn't get the threat posed by islam and terrorists. He is far left, when in reality it's somewhere in between, but good look trying to reason that to him.

Personally, and to the opinions of many here, he isn't worth a reply most of the time.



the fishing comment hit home eh..  ;D

relax noobie..i ws kidding..

and when ya grow yerself an IQ..you'll comprehend me..i just dont spoon feed and connect the dots 4 ya
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 07:54:59 PM


He doesn't get the threat posed by islam and terrorists.


o wait..what religion r you parents..?

watch this guy side step my question  ;D
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 12, 2007, 08:18:20 PM
o wait..what religion r you parents..?

watch this guy side step my question  ;D

What does that have to do with anything?

My pops is not religious and neither is my mother.

Guess you are the type of scum that attacks a person's parents. Just like you wished for an innocent woman to be raped.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 08:24:33 PM
What does that have to do with anything?

My pops is not religious and neither is my mother.

Guess you are the type of scum that attacks a person's parents. Just like you wished for an innocent woman to be raped.

r you mum and dad muslim?

answer
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Camel Jockey on June 12, 2007, 08:33:18 PM
r you mum and dad muslim?

answer

In the west you can choose who you are.. Try and understand that, bro.

You make Haider look like a genius, not saying much there but still.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 12, 2007, 08:37:55 PM
In the west you can choose who you are.. Try and understand that, bro.

You make Haider look like a genius, not saying much there but still.

10th time i'm gonna ask..r you dad and mum muslim?

look at this guy avoiding the question!
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Old_Rooster on June 13, 2007, 08:33:34 AM
look man i dont vote..i'm a radical lib..which means i side with EVRYONE on some issues and dislike EVERYONE on some..

if we attacked on a coulda woulda shoulda..well..then we r not better than the taliban..  ;)



i stopped drinking.....prep yerself and grow an IQ or your gonna get stomped.. :)

idiots like you saying we are no better than the taliban.  well they should imprison you for treason.  at least castrate you so you can never reproduce.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on June 13, 2007, 09:01:16 AM
idiots like you saying we are no better than the taliban.  well they should imprison you for treason.  at least castrate you so you can never reproduce.


aww it'll never happen mayne..

hey wanna come work at one of my gasstations..i'll pay you 2ice the amount you make right now  ;D
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Old_Rooster on June 13, 2007, 10:24:33 AM

aww it'll never happen mayne..

hey wanna come work at one of my gasstations..i'll pay you 2ice the amount you make right now  ;D

why do towelheads own all the quick marts now?
Title: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on July 10, 2007, 10:53:53 PM
and i WANT a definitive answer..no beating the bush k...

ok lets begin  ..AND REMEMBER I WANT A NO MORE THAN 3 LINES DEFINITIVE ANSWER......and if you cant do that dont answer..dont make me ask ron for mod powers...caaaaaaause...t hats doable for me..al i gotta do is ask  ;)



sii the question of the dhey is...


why didn't Saddam use his WMDs when getting the shit blown outta his country when he needed WMDS the most???


do tell...i'm all ears..


..no seriously..i got big ears  :-[
Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: The Coach on July 10, 2007, 11:19:10 PM
and i WANT a definitive answer..no beating the bush k...

ok lets begin  ..AND REMEMBER I WANT A NO MORE THAN 3 LINES DEFINITIVE ANSWER......and if you cant do that dont answer..dont make me ask ron for mod powers...caaaaaaause...t hats doable for me..al i gotta do is ask  ;)



sii the question of the dhey is...


why didn't Saddam use his WMDs when getting the shit blown outta his country when he needed WMDS the most???


do tell...i'm all ears..


..no seriously..i got big ears  :-[


I'll give it to you in one line!

Because he moved them out of the country during the TWO YEAR span and SEVENTEEN resolutions the UN gave him..........HOPE THIS HELPS!
Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on July 11, 2007, 04:53:24 AM
I'll give it to you in one line!

Because he moved them out of the country during the TWO YEAR span and SEVENTEEN resolutions the UN gave him..........HOPE THIS HELPS!

soo he'd rather move em out  THAN DIE AND SEE HIS COUNTRY DESTROYED....


HOOK  LINE AND SINKER BABYEEE

....next time russia attacks lets move out our WMDs to avoid bad publicity k..  ;)


i've made my point....lets attack N. Korea also and hope they will move their WMDs out also  :D


..occums razor and you r a facking idiot..
Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: Decker on July 11, 2007, 06:42:37 AM
I'll give it to you in one line!

Because he moved them out of the country during the TWO YEAR span and SEVENTEEN resolutions the UN gave him..........HOPE THIS HELPS!
It wasn't a two year span, it was almost four years. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2167933.stm Apparently the UN resolutions did work b/c Iraq had no WMDs. 

As for your fantasy-laden speculation that Hussein spirited the weapons away to another country....whatever fits your storyline hmmm?  Why not just state that aliens from space took the WMDs--you have roughly the same amount of proof for both arguments.

Once you War-party people get your hooks into a fabricated script, well, you just don't let go. 

Bush used manipulated intelligence as 'evidence' and you still believe the fairy tales to this day.  When does critical thinking enter into the fray?

1.  Bush's own Iraqi source for info said the WMDs were destroyed.  Too bad Bush just cherry-picked the parts of the defector's testimony that fit his script that Iraq had WMDs and left out the "Iraq had no WMDs" stuff.  http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2825

2.  Biological WMDs have a short shelf life.  Nuclear WMDs cannot be moved without leaving a trace:  "...the extreme unlikelihood that ongoing work related to research and development of a nuclear weapons programme would not leave a trace, even in minute amounts, of certain half-life isotopes that would surely be susceptible to detection by the latest highly-touted, ultra-sensitive instruments employed by the IAEA inspectors..." http://www.redress.btinternet.co.uk/ikhadduri.htm

David Kay (Bush's handpicked guy) didn’t attribute the absences of stockpiles (of weapons) to their destruction or transportation to another country, Kay found that they were never produced and hadn’t been produced since 1991.

3.  The weapons inspectors from '98 concluded that Iraq destroyed nearly all of its weapons by the time the inspectors left the country.  http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,351165,00.html

Every source is screaming "NO WMDS" but Bush's cherry-picked intelligence was used as evidence to lie this country into an unnecessary and illegal war.




Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: 24KT on July 11, 2007, 08:00:43 AM
Q Beach to come in to say "It was perfectly legal"  ...or simplt to just ::)
Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: Dos Equis on July 11, 2007, 08:54:41 AM
Q Beach to come in to say "It was perfectly legal"  ...or simplt to just ::)

How are the snake oil sales going?

This is a repeat topic (soon to be merged).   :)  http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=154457.0
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on July 11, 2007, 10:13:16 AM
If u can shoot whoever u want whenever u want its easy to keep the peace...

YES...

you seriously need to visit a 3rd world country..i'm going to paki in december for a wedding..come with me...i'll pay your way thru..you'll get to live in a mansion with servants at your bidding..we'll fly to the hymilian range and trak ..by a PRIVATE pilot..you'll have you own private cook..

sounds nice?

i'm aint kidding..but i'll show you the slums..when we r eating at pizza hut..little kiddies will pull at your clothes...and yeah some with afgha green blue eyes..and beg for food ..plead for you to feed them...


its easy to sway the starving.....i'm very well aware of the other end of the argument..i'm not an idiot..

go to the religion board and read the discovery board article i posted..
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on July 11, 2007, 10:17:26 AM



 i grew up in the bronx, so i dont watch nascar and ive seen about 2 snakes in my lifetime

idiot..  :-\
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: headhuntersix on July 11, 2007, 10:20:05 AM
I don't know who your inviting to pakistan..I've been. Great Hotel 1st Class...but I've been to the slums as well. I have seen the areas where the earthquake hit. I've also been inside the border areas where Bin Laden might be. And I think more folks wshould visit the 3rd world. It would give them a greater appreciation for America and the West. Life is cheap in the 3rd world.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on July 11, 2007, 10:40:49 AM
I don't know who your inviting to pakistan..I've been. Great Hotel 1st Class...but I've been to the slums as well. I have seen the areas where the earthquake hit. I've also been inside the border areas where Bin Laden might be.

i'm inviting you fucker...sustanon is 1 dolla an amp  ;D  did ya hgo to karachi?..ya prolly only went to islamabad..




Quote
And I think more folks wshould visit the 3rd world. It would give them a greater appreciation for America and the West. Life is cheap in the 3rd world.


YES!  people ask me since i'm from paki how it breeds extremists..

well ya gotta go see starving amputee kids begging in 120 degree 100% humidity heat to realize how desperate ya need to be before ya will believe anything..when you see 3 yr old wandering around in piles of trash sucking on rotting banana peels..yeah...thats life for them...

we fucking live in paradise..
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: headhuntersix on July 11, 2007, 10:46:10 AM
I know about the sust...once the DEA launched "Gear grinder" all the stuff on the East Coast was coming from Pakistan. I was very tempted to get our Paki contractors to hook me up but some of my guys had "issues". It was Islamabad. One of my good friends is high up in the DEA working counter narcotics around the world..primarily in Afghanistan and in Haiti. His old partner launched Gear Grinder.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on July 11, 2007, 10:54:49 AM
I know about the sust...once the DEA launched "Gear grinder" all the stuff on the East Coast was coming from Pakistan. I was very tempted to get our Paki contractors to hook me up but some of my guys had "issues". It was Islamabad. One of my good friends is high up in the DEA working counter narcotics around the world..primarily in Afghanistan and in Haiti. His old partner launched Gear Grinder.

my sus is from karachi...when i visit i'll bring some/a LOT back..with a script..a distant uncles uncle is head of anti terrorism task force in karachi...1 call and Mr memon walks on thru customs  ;D  and unless they bother me at dules about it..i'm fine..

anyhow..islamabad is not karachi..hell 20% of the population is white amereekan...thats not slums...you have not been to slums..ya wanna..well come to karachi with me...if you r white...civer your head..wear tradational garb and you'll pass for afghani....but in any case we'll have bodyguards around us at all times..

you'll prolly come back with a stomach virus..but it'.ll be good times..


i plan on camping at the base of K2..my couzin in law is an arirline captain and he'll fly all of us there (his wife and kids also) in a foker

BTW..same couzin in law told me a few yrs ago that its IMPOSSIBLE to bank at the speeds the 911 planes banked to hit the towers....the wings would be damaged if it were a commercial craft.....he said out of 10 tries..he's maybe get it rightr 3 or 4 times..

he said to hit something that small at those speeds..you HAVE TO PLOT YOUR COURSE BEFORE YA TAKE OFF...
Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: The Coach on July 11, 2007, 10:59:09 AM
It wasn't a two year span, it was almost four years. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2167933.stm Apparently the UN resolutions did work b/c Iraq had no WMDs. 






If it was four years, even more time to get the WMD's out, are you saying he NEVER had the WMD's? Spin this anyway you want and get your sources from any liberal media outlet you want, the bottomline was is that people from both sides of the fence vote for this thing.

Toxie, shut up "hook line and sinker" my ass..LOL!!

Damn you liberal terrorist sympathizers, you just don't freaking get it >:(
Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: Decker on July 11, 2007, 11:14:08 AM
If it was four years, even more time to get the WMD's out, are you saying he NEVER had the WMD's? Spin this anyway you want and get your sources from any liberal media outlet you want, the bottomline was is that people from both sides of the fence vote for this thing.

Toxie, shut up "hook line and sinker" my ass..LOL!!
The theories on what happened to the WMDs are many depending on whom is asked.  David Kay gives one answer...Scott Ritter another...the iraqis, another.  But the transportation of the weapons out of the country argument is discredited. 

Since those weapons are floating around in Syria, why doesn't Pres. Bush invade Syria too?  Or were they sent to Lebanon?  Perhaps we should invade that country as well to get to the bottom of this!

What makes you think think that Hussein transported WMDs out of Iraq? 

The Duelfer Report concluded that it was very likely that Hussein didn't transport any WMDs.

The inspectors could not make a conclusory evaluation b/c they couldn't finish their jobs since
Bush ordered the illegal invasion which forced them from the country.
Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on July 11, 2007, 11:24:50 AM


Damn you liberal terrorist sympathizers, you just don't freaking get it >:(

i'm not a liberal sympthy person mane..i'm a guy that dosen't believe in god and is science first..

lemme give ya my creds..

1)my high skool diploma is from cambridge...well i got a c on my english exam so i took the oxford test and got me an a..and not the GCSE crap either..the real o-levels..makes most 200 level college classes easy..


2) i ws in college UMCP at 15..never got my degree...parents wanted me to be a doctor..i wanted to do math and physics...

3) www.asmed.com  i teach the feds and folks over at langely how to keep bad guys out of our comp networks..3 yrs ago i knew NOTHING about putters..

soo you r not dealing with any ole IQ here ya fuck..


occumz razor..

of course i see the social mores that bind you...and i feel sorry for you..

having lived in pakistan and seen afghani clerks brain wash muslims...i see EXACTLY the same here..

u r no different in your hatered. :-\

meh..i see it as a buncha c unts fighting about whose got the best imaginairy friend/fiend   (god..allah..pfft  ::)  )



Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: The Coach on July 11, 2007, 11:35:27 AM
i'm not a liberal sympthy person mane..i'm a guy that dosen't believe in god and is science first..

lemme give ya my creds..

1)my high skool diploma is from cambridge...well i got a c on my english exam so i took the oxford test and got me an a..and not the GCSE crap either..the real o-levels..makes most 200 level college classes easy..


2) i ws in college UMCP at 15..never got my degree...parents wanted me to be a doctor..i wanted to do math and physics...

3) www.asmed.com  i teach the feds and folks over at langely how to keep bad guys out of our comp networks..3 yrs ago i knew NOTHING about putters..

soo you r not dealing with any ole IQ here ya fuck..


occumz razor..

of course i see the social mores that bind you...and i feel sorry for you..

having lived in pakistan and seen afghani clerks brain wash muslims...i see EXACTLY the same here..

u r no different in your hatered. :-\

meh..i see it as a buncha c unts fighting about whose got the best imaginairy friend/fiend   (god..allah..pfft  ::)  )





Toxie, then you should know as well as I, that all the edumacation in the world sometimes doesn't translate to good ol commonsense!
Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on July 11, 2007, 11:38:36 AM
Toxie, then you should know as well as I, that all the edumacation in the world sometimes doesn't translate to good ol commonsense!

but in general IT DOES...


education in pakistan is NOT free..highskool is NOT FREE...

soo what if you are not rich enuff to afford it man..

there r people wandering the strrts of karachi that prolly believe that earth is the center of the universe and will KILL you if you tell then that it aint so...

why...well cause god/allah in arabic musta made it so..   :-\
Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: Decker on July 11, 2007, 11:45:14 AM
Toxie, then you should know as well as I, that all the edumacation in the world sometimes doesn't translate to good ol commonsense!
Ignorance is not bliss.  It's ignorance. 

Common sense connotes common experience.  What if educated people have common experiences that you don't have?

Education does not divorce one from whatever the heck 'common sense' is defined as.

Education is a good thing...not a bad thing.
Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on July 11, 2007, 11:46:46 AM
Ignorance is not bliss.  It's ignorance. 

Common sense connotes common experience.  What if educated people have common experiences that you don't have?

Education does not divorce one from whatever the heck 'common sense' is defined as.

Education is a good thing...not a bad thing.

i'm from karachi...

i'm educated..

notice the difference?
Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: trab on July 11, 2007, 02:28:16 PM
and i WANT a definitive answer..no beating the bush k...

ok lets begin  ..AND REMEMBER I WANT A NO MORE THAN 3 LINES DEFINITIVE ANSWER......and if you cant do that dont answer..dont make me ask ron for mod powers...caaaaaaause...t hats doable for me..al i gotta do is ask  ;)



sii the question of the dhey is...


why didn't Saddam use his WMDs when getting the shit blown outta his country when he needed WMDS the most???


do tell...i'm all ears..


..no seriously..i got big ears  :-[


This is gonna hurt a little. They all went to Iran and Syria, like his jets.
Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: The Coach on July 11, 2007, 03:37:03 PM
This is gonna hurt a little. They all went to Iran and Syria, like his jets.

I tried that already, they just came up with another excuse!
Title: Re: i want the bush shit eaters to answer this one...i know yall like chocolate..
Post by: trab on July 11, 2007, 04:05:41 PM
I tried that already, they just came up with another excuse!

Word is Iran allready has more than 1 nuke.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Herc on July 15, 2007, 10:56:48 PM
Saddam probably didnt have any but he acted like he did.  I think he just wanted to look more powerfull than he was like North Korea firing those bad missles that were supposed to be long range.  Sadam fooled almost everyone, republicans and democrats.  That being said I dont think it made the war justified for us to go in.  Why is it our job. There really should have been a strong resistance in Iraq by Iraqies like how we revolted against England.  Once they showed a reall will to get rid of him then we could help like France helped us.  If France saw we were overtaxed and started a war that we never had the will to fight we would be England today.There never was a strong resistance of great signifigance in Iraq and without that the people dont have the will to fight to maintain freedom or whatever there ideals are. If we had to strart a war I think Iran or North Korea would make more sence all though much more dangerous and that too would create more mess than solve any problems.
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: Eyeball Chambers on July 15, 2007, 11:30:18 PM
(http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/fire/images/plan_fossilfuel_large.jpg)(http://engr.smu.edu/clam/files_corporate_members/content/Halliburton.jpg)
Title: Re: Question for repbs..
Post by: ToxicAvenger on July 16, 2007, 07:25:38 PM
Saddam probably didnt have any but he acted like he did.  I think he just wanted to look more powerfull than he was like North Korea firing those bad missles that were supposed to be long range.  Sadam fooled almost everyone, republicans and democrats.  That being said I dont think it made the war justified for us to go in.  Why is it our job. There really should have been a strong resistance in Iraq by Iraqies like how we revolted against England.  Once they showed a reall will to get rid of him then we could help like France helped us.  If France saw we were overtaxed and started a war that we never had the will to fight we would be England today.There never was a strong resistance of great signifigance in Iraq and without that the people dont have the will to fight to maintain freedom or whatever there ideals are. If we had to strart a war I think Iran or North Korea would make more sence all though much more dangerous and that too would create more mess than solve any problems.

we imposed our way of lives on another country..

come to thik of it..thats EAXCTLY what the taliban want..

ironic no?