Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: dearth on September 30, 2007, 11:21:01 AM

Title: Was cutlers "gifted" win any more a travesty than Colemans multiples gifts??
Post by: dearth on September 30, 2007, 11:21:01 AM

I am guessing that ronnie's nuthuggers (a lot of whom are black for some reason??) will find
compelling reasons as to why ronnie deserved everyone of his questionable wins yet cutlers sandow
was because of "politics".

can't wait for the "IFBB is racist" conspiracies to start.

Title: Re: Was cutlers "gifted" win any more a travesty than Colemans multiples gifts??
Post by: MONSTER_TRICEPS on September 30, 2007, 11:24:51 AM

Monster thread there, "dearth".  ::)

Title: Re: Was cutlers "gifted" win any more a travesty than Colemans multiples gifts??
Post by: SAMSON123 on September 30, 2007, 11:30:15 AM

 ::) ??? ::)*******YAWN**** ::) ??? ::)*********

Title: Re: Was cutlers "gifted" win any more a travesty than Colemans multiples gifts??
Post by: dearth on September 30, 2007, 11:45:39 AM

Quote from: SAMSON123 on September 30, 2007, 11:30:15 AM

::) ??? ::)*******YAWN**** ::) ??? ::)*********

good one there, boy.

Title: Re: Was cutlers "gifted" win any more a travesty than Colemans multiples gifts??
Post by: sgt. d on September 30, 2007, 11:56:03 AM

This dearth guy is really annoying

Title: Re: Was cutlers "gifted" win any more a travesty than Colemans multiples gifts??
Post by: bigdumbbell on September 30, 2007, 12:05:47 PM

nah, it's actually consistant corruption

Title: Re: Was cutlers "gifted" win any more a travesty than Colemans multiples gifts??
Post by: Archer77 on September 30, 2007, 12:12:17 PM

I don't think its any better.

Title: Re: Was cutlers "gifted" win any more a travesty than Colemans multiples gifts??
Post by: dearth on September 30, 2007, 12:29:44 PM

Quote from: bigdumbbell on September 30, 2007, 12:05:47 PM

nah, it's actually consistant corruption

I agree.

If haney, yates, coleman all received gifts due to being the incumbent mr O, then why not Jay?

Title: Re: Was cutlers "gifted" win any more a travesty than Colemans multiples gifts??
Post by: Al-Gebra on September 30, 2007, 12:31:55 PM

Quote from: dearth on September 30, 2007, 12:29:44 PM

I agree.

If haney, yates, coleman all received gifts due to being the incumbent mr O, then why not Jay?

haney, yates and coleman all raised the bar.  yesterday, wolf showed promise of raising the bar, and vic was closest to the std set by coleman at his best.

hope this helps.

Title: Re: Was cutlers "gifted" win any more a travesty than Colemans multiples gifts??
Post by: bizzy on September 30, 2007, 12:39:43 PM

The only Coleman Olympia that was super questionable
was 2001 and people seem to forget that Jay didn't
pass some kind of diurectic test and was much drier than Ronnie.
Jay hired a lawyer and the whole thing was dropped ( This is what I remember
to the best of my knowledge) It's been 6 years, but I personally
think had Ronnie done the same drying out process Jay used that year
2001 wouldn't have been a question in Ronnie's carreer.