Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => Training Q&A => Topic started by: Detroit Muscle on October 18, 2007, 05:43:21 PM

Title: Weird split?
Post by: Detroit Muscle on October 18, 2007, 05:43:21 PM

Is there anything beneficial whatsoever to training hamstrings and biceps together?  Some dudes do it at my gym and it seems whacky.  Doesn't whichever muscle group you train first suffer while you train the second?  i.e., it goes an awfully long time without postworkout nutrition.  Discuss.

Title: Re: Weird split?
Post by: Geo on October 18, 2007, 06:19:04 PM

Quote from: Detroit Muscle on October 18, 2007, 05:43:21 PM

Is there anything beneficial whatsoever to training hamstrings and biceps together?  Some dudes do it at my gym and it seems whacky.  Doesn't whichever muscle group you train first suffer while you train the second?  i.e., it goes an awfully long time without postworkout nutrition.  Discuss.

there are no weird splits......


there's only weird people !

Title: Re: Weird split?
Post by: Bluto on October 19, 2007, 03:23:48 AM

benefit would be lower body than upper body after hams he gotta be pretty fresh in biceps since he hasnt used it for hardly anything

Title: Re: Weird split?
Post by: slaveboy1980 on November 04, 2007, 05:25:07 PM

KEEP IT SIMPLE   :o

Title: Re: Weird split?
Post by: D-bol on November 04, 2007, 09:52:11 PM

Quote from: Detroit Muscle on October 18, 2007, 05:43:21 PM

Is there anything beneficial whatsoever to training hamstrings and biceps together?  Some dudes do it at my gym and it seems wacky.  Doesn't whichever muscle group you train first suffer while you train the second?  i.e., it goes an awfully long time without post workout nutrition.  Discuss.

beneficial to which part? bi's or hams?
bro, you can train same kinetic groups - like bis and back or chest and tris - together, or opposite groups - like bi's and chest - together...i'd vary those month-on-month
i think dudes in you gym simply train different parts together to focus on least related areas... all depends on individual

i also agree w/ Detroid - there are no wierd splits - whatever works 4 u bro!

Title: Re: Weird split?
Post by: slaveboy1980 on November 05, 2007, 05:21:49 AM

Quote from: D-bol on November 04, 2007, 09:52:11 PM

beneficial to which part? bi's or hams?
bro, you can train same kinetic groups - like bis and back or chest and tris - together, or opposite groups - like bi's and chest - together...i'd vary those month-on-month
i think dudes in you gym simply train different parts together to focus on least related areas... all depends on individual

i also agree w/ Detroid   geo - there are no wierd splits - whatever works 4 u bro!

Title: Re: Weird split?
Post by: mitchyboy on November 05, 2007, 10:26:45 AM

Ha ha ha, this guy asked the same ? in another thread just a different way. Your gonna get same kind of answers bro ;D

Title: Re: Weird split?
Post by: Detroit Muscle on November 19, 2007, 06:50:13 PM

asked in Gossip & Opinion, got moved.  thanks anyway.

Title: Re: Weird split?
Post by: Alex23 on November 19, 2007, 06:51:36 PM

Epic non regional training split and messing up with the blood flow.