Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Mark Kerr on October 31, 2007, 05:19:36 PM

Title: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Mark Kerr on October 31, 2007, 05:19:36 PM
Bob,

Shawn went to MD for more money.

My question is, would you?
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: gordiano on October 31, 2007, 05:32:57 PM
Bob Chicardillo would sell his soul for a bag of Doritos.....
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: The_Leafy_Bug on October 31, 2007, 05:35:25 PM
Bob Chicardillo would sell his soul for a bag of Doritos Oatmeal and chicken breast
;D
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Chico_Holiday on October 31, 2007, 05:35:52 PM
Bob Chicardillo would sell his soul for a bag of Doritos.....

Those new Blazin' Buffalo Ranch are pretty tastey.........

I heard that Bob is going for the health look these days though, maybe he'd sell it for a bag of Sun Chips.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Chick on October 31, 2007, 07:56:28 PM
Bob,

Shawn went to MD for more money.

My question is, would you?

not likely...........
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Mad Nickels on October 31, 2007, 08:00:49 PM
not likely...........

Why insult our intelligence?

If MD offered ten times what you are making today, you'd be at the MD booth making tranny jokes in about 5 seconds flat.

No need to posture, Bob.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: G o a t b o y on October 31, 2007, 08:08:36 PM
canadians are st00pid
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Matt C on October 31, 2007, 08:19:11 PM
If your needs in life are met, your needs are met.  Not everyone in life is motivated by more money if they are happy doing what they are doing.  I sure as hell am not.  I am content just to have a gym membership and go on getbig actually.  ;D  Maybe Bob is happy where he's at...
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: The_Iron_Disciple on October 31, 2007, 08:26:07 PM
not likely...........

Good Man !
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Mad Nickels on October 31, 2007, 08:33:45 PM
Why insult our intelligence?

If MD offered ten times what you are making today, you'd be at the MD booth making tranny jokes in about 5 seconds flat.

No need to posture, Bob.

You'll all notice Bob didn't deny this.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Rimbaud on October 31, 2007, 08:34:51 PM
Those new Blazin' Buffalo Ranch are pretty tastey.........

Very true. They're like crack. 
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Mad Nickels on October 31, 2007, 08:35:54 PM
Very true. They're like crack. 

What is it about you and crack?
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: gmflex on October 31, 2007, 08:55:46 PM
bump for bob's response :o
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Chick on October 31, 2007, 09:39:51 PM
You'll all notice Bob didn't deny this.

It's a pure hypothetical...my answer is what it is...not likely...as in, it would take some monumental events to unfold and a shitload of money for it to even have a remote chance...all not very likely to happen.

That being said...if those monumental events were to take place, I would more than likely just go into something else....

Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: sgt. d on October 31, 2007, 11:42:21 PM
Very true. They're like crack. 

dill pickle pwns them ;D
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: New Hank Wood on October 31, 2007, 11:51:27 PM
Romano and Polumbo commented recently on MD radio that they cant understand why Chick still posts on Getbig !  Citing the 'negative environment' issue.

...The boys also went on to say that they find the Getbig site to  be  too out of control for their liking!..

These two upstanding citizens also alleged that Bob only posted on Getbig because of the Bodybuilding.com  connection to Getbig.

Not hating, just the messenger!

Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: sgt. d on October 31, 2007, 11:52:33 PM
Romano and Polumbo commented recently on MD radio that they cant understand why Chick still posts on Getbig !  Citing the 'negative environment' issue.

...The boys also went on to say that they find the Getbig site to  be  too out of control for their liking!..

These two upstanding citizens also alleged that Bob only posted on Getbig because of the Bodybuilding.com  connection to Getbig.

Not hating, just the messenger!



trying way to hard buddy
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Spicy Shushi on November 01, 2007, 12:45:42 AM
Romano and Polumbo commented recently on MD radio that they cant understand why Chick still posts on Getbig !  Citing the 'negative environment' issue.

...The boys also went on to say that they find the Getbig site to  be  too out of control for their liking!..

These two upstanding citizens also alleged that Bob only posted on Getbig because of the Bodybuilding.com  connection to Getbig.

Not hating, just the messenger!



Hi Shawna. Go back to MD now like a good little bitch.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: rocket on November 01, 2007, 01:05:31 AM
These two upstanding citizens also alleged that Bob only posted on Getbig because of the Bodybuilding.com  connection to Getbig.

Not hating, just the messenger!


Doesn't seem awfully far from the truth..

Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: New Hank Wood on November 01, 2007, 01:18:59 AM
The two felons in Romano and Palumbo just seem dumbfounded as to why Chick still posts here.  They find the boards negativity just 'over the top'.

Chick, you are indeed resilient. You give so much to Getbig.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Mark Kerr on November 01, 2007, 06:03:51 AM
It's a pure hypothetical...my answer is what it is...not likely...as in, it would take some monumental events to unfold and a shitload of money for it to even have a remote chance...all not very likely to happen.

That being said...if those monumental events were to take place, I would more than likely just go into something else....



Bob, if they did offer you shitload of money, you would go?

Are you telling us you would share a booth with G4P Derek Anthony, "grapefruit fucker" Kai Green, and convicts?

Please Bob, tell us you wouldn't do it!
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: dknole on November 01, 2007, 07:03:55 AM
I respect Bob, he posts here, on another board or two, has a family, appears for BB.com, works for them and is a proponent for the IFBB members, let him be and concentrate on yourselves for growth...and not just in the gym my firend.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Mad Nickels on November 01, 2007, 07:34:49 AM
well, when there is a demand for "in the closet", retarded, too much time on my hands, even though I hate bodybuilding I spend all my time on a BB board, idiots..............you're a shoe-in for a looooooong contract.

I'm a psych major.

It's pretty well agreed upon... people who treat others like shit... will usually treat those at home like shit, eventually.

When a girl sees her date treat the waiter like shit - run.  That guy will treat her like shit one day.

People who talk to others like crap, in general, will treat the wife and kid like garbage the minute stress arrives.  Watch and see ;)
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Mark Kerr on November 01, 2007, 07:37:36 AM
I respect Bob, he posts here, on another board or two, has a family, appears for BB.com, works for them and is a proponent for the IFBB members, let him be and concentrate on yourselves for growth...and not just in the gym my firend.

I have a tremendous amount of respect for Bob, and he is a great spokes person for the sport. That is why I ask the question. I became a fan of Bob when I saw him on the news when the Titus shit went down. Great guy and extremely articulate. He is now a family man, wouldn't want to see him get caught up with the lowlifes of bodybuilding.

He's too good of a person to be associated with those scumbags.
 
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Stark on November 01, 2007, 07:50:59 AM
I have a tremendous amount of respect for Bob, and he is a great spokes person for the sport. That is why I ask the question. I became a fan of Bob when I saw him on the news when the Titus shit went down. Great guy and extremely articulate. He is now a family man, wouldn't want to see him get caught up with the lowlifes of bodybuilding.

He's too good of a person to be associated with those scumbags.
 

Hi Bob  ;)
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Quagmire on November 01, 2007, 07:58:40 AM
Bob Chicardillo would sell his soul for a bag of Doritos.....

As would I. Well, only if it was Nacho cheese!
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: G o a t b o y on November 01, 2007, 08:09:00 AM
I have a tremendous amount of respect for Bob, and he is a great spokes person for the sport. That is why I ask the question. I became a fan of Bob when I saw him on the news when the Titus shit went down. Great guy and extremely articulate. He is now a family man, wouldn't want to see him get caught up with the lowlifes of bodybuilding.

He's too good of a person to be associated with those scumbags.
 


Bob's only problem is he's waaaay to quick to jump to the defense of his IFBB bosses, even when their position is indefensible.  Now, if he were "IFBB Public Relations Manager" that would be fine, but as Athlete's Rep, it just makes him look like a bought and paid for "company man".
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Chick on November 01, 2007, 08:14:24 AM

Bob's only problem is he's waaaay to quick to jump to the defense of his IFBB bosses, even when their position is indefensible.  Now, if he were "IFBB Public Relations Manager" that would be fine, but as Athlete's Rep, it just makes him look like a bought and paid for "company man".

and you base that comment on... what?
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: The Squadfather on November 01, 2007, 08:15:40 AM
Bob,

Shawn went to MD for more money.

My question is, would you?
so what if he did? who the fucck are you to judge what job another man has or what another man does to feed his family if it's not illegal?
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Mark Kerr on November 01, 2007, 08:17:24 AM

Bob's only problem is he's waaaay to quick to jump to the defense of his IFBB bosses, even when their position is indefensible.  Now, if he were "IFBB Public Relations Manager" that would be fine, but as Athlete's Rep, it just makes him look like a bought and paid for "company man".

Well, when the Titus story broke, the IFBB sent Bob to represent the IFBB. When he was on the news, the guy did a great job, I was impressed. We need more people like Bob representing our sport. You have to admit, Bob has charisma. He's a funny guy.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: omgsoswole on November 01, 2007, 08:36:06 AM
Well, when the Titus story broke, the IFBB sent Bob to represent the IFBB. When he was on the news, the guy did a great job, I was impressed. We need more people like Bob representing our sport. You have to admit, Bob has charisma. He's a funny guy.

Hi Bob.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Mark Kerr on November 01, 2007, 08:36:53 AM
so what if he did? who the fucck are you to judge what job another man has or what another man does to feed his family if it's not illegal?

So, you think making money by being G4P and/or fking a grapefruit is ok? You think that's ok to do if you need to feed your family?

No you get a real job.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: The Squadfather on November 01, 2007, 08:37:51 AM
So, you think making money by being G4P and/or fking a grapefruit is ok? You think that's ok to do if you need to feed your family?

No you get a real job.
when did Bob ever do any of that shit? and besides WHO THE FUCCK ARE YOU TO JUDGE?
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Mark Kerr on November 01, 2007, 08:50:25 AM
when did Bob ever do any of that shit? and besides WHO THE FUCCK ARE YOU TO JUDGE?

What?

I'm not talking about Bob, genius.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: dearth on November 01, 2007, 09:33:57 AM
and you base that comment on... what?

any and every post of yours that has anything to do with the ifbb/ami
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Chick on November 01, 2007, 09:36:45 AM
any and every post of yours that has anything to do with the ifbb/ami

Be specific, since Goatballs has ironically disappeared......
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Mad Nickels on November 01, 2007, 10:23:20 AM
well, when there is a demand for "in the closet", retarded, too much time on my hands, even though I hate bodybuilding I spend all my time on a BB board, idiots..............you're a shoe-in for a looooooong contract.

I'm a psych major.

It's pretty well agreed upon... people who treat others like shit... will usually treat those at home like shit, eventually.

When a girl sees her date treat the waiter like shit - run.  That guy will treat her like shit one day.

People who talk to others like crap, in general, will treat the wife and kid like garbage the minute stress arrives.  Watch and see ;)
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: dknole on November 01, 2007, 04:46:20 PM
So, you think making money by being G4P and/or fking a grapefruit is ok? You think that's ok to do if you need to feed your family?

No you get a real job.

Someone fucking a grapefruit can be and is hilarious. Just watch Stern sometime!
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: webcake on November 01, 2007, 04:51:45 PM
I'm a psych major.

It's pretty well agreed upon... people who treat others like shit... will usually treat those at home like shit, eventually.

When a girl sees her date treat the waiter like shit - run.  That guy will treat her like shit one day.

People who talk to others like crap, in general, will treat the wife and kid like garbage the minute stress arrives.  Watch and see ;)

Aren't we all.
 ::) ::)
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: dearth on November 01, 2007, 05:25:58 PM
Be specific, since Goatballs has ironically disappeared......

don't worry Bob, I'll point out your sycophantic ways  in the next thread with the implication
that the IFBB isn't a perfect organization.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: New Hank Wood on November 01, 2007, 05:32:18 PM
Bob's become the 'laughing stock' over at MD. 

The 'two felons' in John R. and Dave P. find it quite bemusing that Bob continually exposes himself to negative taunts from hateful Getbiggers!

These two x-cons believe Bob will continue to post on Getbig despite all the smack he cops because he has an agenda.....

Surprise, surprise:  Bob has an agenda...hahahahahaha.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: affy on November 01, 2007, 05:36:24 PM
I don't think he can...he has a contract with bb.com..if he signed with md he wouldn't be able to use the bb.com forums..which would be retarded since he's their spokesperson

they'd probably have to offer him a contract double what bb.com is paying him
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Chick on November 01, 2007, 06:42:00 PM
don't worry Bob, I'll point out your sycophantic ways  in the next thread with the implication
that the IFBB isn't a perfect organization.

Attaboy...expose yourself for the fact that you dont have a clue as to what you're talking about...good work
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: knny187 on November 01, 2007, 06:42:59 PM
Attaboy...expose yourself for the fact that you dont have a clue as to what you're talking about...good work

.......in the library with a candlestick
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: The Squadfather on November 01, 2007, 06:43:19 PM
Attaboy...expose yourself for the fact that you dont have a clue as to what you're talking about...good work
hahahahaha, i love how these clowns sitting behind the computer know all the inner workings of the IFBB. ::)
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: dearth on November 02, 2007, 09:52:07 AM
you shouldn't be so defensive Chick.

promising to point out your sycophantic ways should be taken as a challenge, not as an insult.

of course if you know it is true, then your interpretation of it as an insult is understood.

Attaboy...expose yourself for the fact that you dont have a clue as to what you're talking about...good work
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: dearth on November 02, 2007, 09:53:06 AM
hahahahaha, i love how these clowns sitting behind the computer know all the inner workings of the IFBB. ::)

I love it even betterwhen a fat out of shape blob kisses bob chicks ass on a message board
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Chick on November 02, 2007, 10:00:12 AM
you shouldn't be so defensive Chick.

promising to point out your sycophantic ways should be taken as a challenge, not as an insult.

of course if you know it is true, then your interpretation of it as an insult is understood.


You decided to chime in on the subject and make a statement, I asked you to qualify it...unless, of course, you're merely talking out of your ass like I pointed out.......
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: bigmc on November 02, 2007, 10:31:32 AM
bob takes alot of shit on here

and sticks with it

props to bob

fu ck shawn
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: MikeThaMachine on November 02, 2007, 10:50:50 AM
Bob isn't in a fragile state of mind liek the MD "staff/things", he can come on and not get emotional over someone not agreeingg with him or taking shots at him. Bob is mature and the fags at MD are pissed because they have been exposed as tranny loving convict freaks who are all fake.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Mad Nickels on November 02, 2007, 10:53:06 AM
I bet shawn deletes all the comments over there about his failed Colorado show.


It is a shame that they belittle Bob like that on the air.  Pisses me off.  I like to mess with Bob cause he's a regular getbig members.  But when Romano and Shawn mock him, that's BS.  They're lucky that Weiders even let them attend shows!
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: MikeThaMachine on November 02, 2007, 11:00:02 AM
I bet shawn deletes all the comments over there about his failed Colorado show.


It is a shame that they belittle Bob like that on the air.  Pisses me off.  I like to mess with Bob cause he's a regular getbig members.  But when Romano and Shawn mock him, that's BS.  They're lucky that Weiders even let them attend shows!


Hey they banned them from reporting on the O two years ago, they can do it again.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Mad Nickels on November 02, 2007, 11:04:21 AM

Hey they banned them from reporting on the O two years ago, they can do it again.

they should.  I always listen to MD radio, and i like it, but some of that shit was just awfully rude.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: dearth on November 02, 2007, 12:31:52 PM
You decided to chime in on the subject and make a statement, I asked you to qualify it...unless, of course, you're merely talking out of your ass like I pointed out.......

your resentment in me calling you out of for being an ifbb puppet, which by the way isn't exactly a "secret",
is fully expected Chick.

by the way, you had Jay winning the olympia based solely on the night show, right?
 Jay is an AMI endorsed athlete, right?
you're paid by AMI, right?
the olympia is a fairly judged contest, right?
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Chick on November 02, 2007, 05:02:18 PM
your resentment in me calling you out of for being an ifbb puppet, which by the way isn't exactly a "secret",
is fully expected Chick.

by the way, you had Jay winning the olympia based solely on the night show, right?
 Jay is an AMI endorsed athlete, right?
you're paid by AMI, right?
the olympia is a fairly judged contest, right?



STILL nothing..? You're wasting my time jerkoff...........

Don't try talking shop when you have nothing to back it up, makes you look dumber than you are......

I had Victor in the prejudging and Jay at night...sounds like a tie to me, could have gone either way...obviously it went to Jay this time. Not too tough to figure out.....

Now piss off, rookie......
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: The Squadfather on November 02, 2007, 05:06:19 PM
your resentment in me calling you out of for being an ifbb puppet, which by the way isn't exactly a "secret",
is fully expected Chick.

by the way, you had Jay winning the olympia based solely on the night show, right?
 Jay is an AMI endorsed athlete, right?
you're paid by AMI, right?
the olympia is a fairly judged contest, right?

Bob is ON THE RECORD saying that he thought Victor was better in the prejudging and that he could have gone either way for the title between Victor or Jay, people here on the board heard it with their own ears on PBW, now go play in traffic. :D
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: G o a t b o y on November 02, 2007, 05:07:45 PM
.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: dearth on November 02, 2007, 05:53:24 PM


whats not too tough to figure out is that the outcome of this years olympia
was a farce, and you are way too much of a company man to even suggest otherwise.

On your post olympia interview, only Dan had some semblence of a backbone to ask Jay why he ran away from Wolf.
You on the other hand pretty much kissed Cutlers ass the whole time.

the only one that "looks dumb" here, is the puppet who's opinion is dictated by who his employer(s) are.



STILL nothing..? You're wasting my time jerkoff...........

Don't try talking shop when you have nothing to back it up, makes you look dumber than you are......

I had Victor in the prejudging and Jay at night...sounds like a tie to me, could have gone either way...obviously it went to Jay this time. Not too tough to figure out.....

Now piss off, rookie......
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: knny187 on November 02, 2007, 05:55:50 PM
bob a pupet?
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: Chick on November 02, 2007, 10:44:44 PM

whats not too tough to figure out is that the outcome of this years olympia
was a farce, and you are way too much of a company man to even suggest otherwise.

On your post olympia interview, only Dan had some semblence of a backbone to ask Jay why he ran away from Wolf.
You on the other hand pretty much kissed Cutlers ass the whole time.

the only one that "looks dumb" here, is the puppet who's opinion is dictated by who his employer(s) are.



Jay was the defending champ, Einstein...he didn't have to chase anyone, they were chasing him.
Title: Re: Question for Bob Chick
Post by: knny187 on November 03, 2007, 03:08:32 PM
Jay was the defending champ, Einstein...he didn't have to chase anyone, they were chasing him.

Rumor has it he was chasing a guy in the parking lot that stole his donut after the show