Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Stark on November 07, 2007, 06:01:39 PM

Title: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Stark on November 07, 2007, 06:01:39 PM
I just uploaded some more Jailbaits and I came accross these beauties... :o :o

(http://www.gymstories.com/wp-content/gallery/jailbaits-2/jailbaits_gallery_2-11.jpg)

(http://www.gymstories.com/wp-content/gallery/jailbaits-2/jailbaits_gallery_2.jpg)

(http://www.gymstories.com/wp-content/gallery/jailbaits-2/jailbaits_gallery_2-17.jpg)
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Purge_WTF on November 07, 2007, 06:06:42 PM
  "Hi, I'm Chris Hansen from Dateline NBC."
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 07, 2007, 06:07:22 PM
I just uploaded some more Jailbaits and I came accross these beauties... :o :o

(http://www.gymstories.com/wp-content/gallery/jailbaits-2/jailbaits_gallery_2-11.jpg)


This one is hot with natural breasts too thats a plus I'm all-implanted out
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Bluto on November 07, 2007, 06:07:40 PM
im still not ever gonna visit your site
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: tu_holmes on November 07, 2007, 06:08:10 PM
2 of them have piercings... don't you have to be 18 to have piercings?

If they are jailbait, please remove them at once >:(
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Stark on November 07, 2007, 06:10:51 PM
  "Hi, I'm Chris Hansen from Dateline NBC."

haha that made me spill my coffee...

Bluto calm down I can live without you visiting my page.

2 of them have piercings... don't you have to be 18 to have piercings?

If they are jailbait, please remove them at once >:(

Gayest thing I have heard so far ::)
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Purge_WTF on November 07, 2007, 06:11:42 PM
  Hey Stark--judging from your rep-points over at BB.com, they're not too happy with your choice in pics.


  http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=5463193 (http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=5463193)   :D ;D
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Stark on November 07, 2007, 06:13:14 PM
  Hey Stark--judging from your rep-points over at BB.com, they're not too happy with your choice in pics.


  http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=5463193 (http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=5463193)   :D ;D

hahah they have all fucked better over there :D utterly pathetic
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Jizzacked on November 07, 2007, 06:13:42 PM
  "Hi, I'm Chris Hansen from Dateline NBC."

LMFAO! 

ill take #1 outta the bunch, assuming she shows some fuckin ID first :D
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: tu_holmes on November 07, 2007, 06:14:33 PM
haha that made me spill my coffee...

Bluto calm down I can live without you visiting my page.

Gayest thing I have heard so far ::)

Hey, don't get me wrong, if it's legal... I'd hit it... Just making sure everyone is on the same page.
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: saucetradomous on November 07, 2007, 06:14:39 PM
1st pic is the kind of quality I like to see..
feel free to add this one stark
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Bluto on November 07, 2007, 06:15:20 PM
and then the thread was destroyed
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Sexual Mustard on November 07, 2007, 06:22:33 PM
I suppose I'd have the second girl defecate all over me if it came to that...
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Bast000 on November 07, 2007, 06:24:28 PM
that 2nd girl was my 'friend' on myspace awhile ago.  she had a bunch of pics up.
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Bindare_Dundat on November 07, 2007, 07:01:47 PM
that 2nd girl was my 'friend' on myspace awhile ago.  she had a bunch of pics up.

Wanna medal?
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: beatmaster on November 07, 2007, 07:04:46 PM

shwing  :D
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: The Coach on November 07, 2007, 08:09:07 PM
  "Hi, I'm Chris Hansen from Dateline NBC."

ROTFLMAO...hahahahahahah ahahaha.....thanks Purge, I needed that....hahahahahahahaha haha!!
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: delta9mda on November 07, 2007, 09:08:57 PM
I just uploaded some more Jailbaits and I came accross these beauties... :o :o

(http://www.gymstories.com/wp-content/gallery/jailbaits-2/jailbaits_gallery_2-11.jpg)

(http://www.gymstories.com/wp-content/gallery/jailbaits-2/jailbaits_gallery_2.jpg)

(http://www.gymstories.com/wp-content/gallery/jailbaits-2/jailbaits_gallery_2-17.jpg)
id hit em
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Andre Nickatina on November 07, 2007, 09:46:19 PM
id knock em outta the park, guaranteed.
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: suckmymuscle on November 08, 2007, 03:45:04 PM
I just uploaded some more Jailbaits and I came accross these beauties... :o :o

(http://www.gymstories.com/wp-content/gallery/jailbaits-2/jailbaits_gallery_2-11.jpg)

  This one looks simply incredible, both the face and the body. Her complexion is also perfect. Now seriously, what's so wrong with banging underage girls? Society says it's wrong but Nature says it's ok. The last time I checked, most 15 or 16 yearolds can get pregnant, and that't the tell-tale sign that Nature says it's ok to have sex with her.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 08, 2007, 03:49:48 PM
  This one looks simply incredible, both the face and the body. Her complexion is also perfect. Now seriously, what's so wrong with banging underage girls? Society says it's wrong but Nature says it's ok. The last time I checked, most 15 or 16 yearolds can get pregnant, and that't the tell-tale sign that Nature says it's ok to have sex with her.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

I'm Chris Hanson with Dateline NBC lol
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on November 08, 2007, 03:53:24 PM
  "Hi, I'm Chris Hansen from Dateline NBC."
im just waiting for one of those pedos to wise up and shank this smug bastard when he comes walking out
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: The Squadfather on November 08, 2007, 04:10:54 PM
im just waiting for one of those pedos to wise up and shank this smug bastard when he comes walking out
hahahaha, "mind having a seat over there? what's on the agenda for tonight?"......."oh, i was going to take her out to eat and then to see a movie"......."well what are the condoms and bottle of Jack Daniels for?"
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: suckmymuscle on November 08, 2007, 04:42:36 PM
I'm Chris Hanson with Dateline NBC lol

  Are you denying that Nature deems it ok to have sex with a girl who had her period?

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: ManBearPig... on November 08, 2007, 04:45:55 PM
  Are you denying that Nature deems it ok to have sex with a girl who had her period?

SUCKMYMUSCLE

thank god we have institutions for freaks like you.

is it ok to have sex with an 11 year old?  you know, that's the average age these days a girl in the U.S. has her period.

you sick fuck.
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: suckmymuscle on November 08, 2007, 04:46:56 PM
  Any guy who says he wouldn't fuck the shit out of this girl if she offered herself to him is gayer than Richard Simmons sweating to the oldies in a pink thong. :P

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Pollux on November 08, 2007, 04:50:02 PM
2 of them have piercings... don't you have to be 18 to have piercings?

If they are jailbait, please remove them at once >:(

Don't be a fuckin' putz!

Like you wouldn't nail them if you had the chan...nevermind, you couldn't!  :D
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: suckmymuscle on November 08, 2007, 04:51:20 PM
thank god we have institutions for freaks like you.

is it ok to have sex with an 11 year old?  you know, that's the average age these days a girl in the U.S. has her period.

you sick fuck.

  Yes, if the girl had her period than it is ok to have sex with her according to Nature. That's the age that she would be having sex during the Paleolithic Era - when Humans followed their natural instincts and not arbitrary and anachronistic societal stadards. And I'm not a sick fuck; I'm a realist.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: suckmymuscle on November 08, 2007, 04:56:20 PM
Don't be a fuckin' putz!

Like you wouldn't nail them if you had the chan...nevermind, you couldn't!  :D

  Lol...these guys are so full of shit. They are calling me a pervert while I'm sure that if the chick in the pic I posted walked into their bedrooms naked they would bang her eyeballs out irrespective of whether she's underage or not - unless they're gay. Why? Because to a straight man it would be simply iresistible. Why? Because no matter how wrong Society says it it, the fact is that Nature says it's ok and the hard-on any heterosexual man gets while looking at her is prima fasce evidence of that.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 08, 2007, 05:04:37 PM
  Are you denying that Nature deems it ok to have sex with a girl who had her period?

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Some girls get their period at 10 or younger is it okay to bang them? of course not , while it may be ' natural ' it not moral .
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: saucetradomous on November 08, 2007, 05:08:35 PM
Some girls get their period at 10 or younger is it okay to bang them? of course not , while it may be ' natural ' it not moral .

This is a bodybuilding board... since when have morals had any part in anyones decision around here?
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: suckmymuscle on November 08, 2007, 05:11:38 PM
Some girls get their period at 10 or younger is it okay to bang them? of course not , while it may be ' natural ' it not moral .
`

  Define morality. According to Kant, in his "Critique Of Pure Reason", morality is an illusion derived from the paradoxical nature os altrusim and selfishness in Society. According to Nietzsche, morality is an illusion created by the weak to subdue the strong into doing their bidding. There has never been any universally accepted standard of morality. In some societies, girls of the age you mentioned not only have sex, but are sold by their families into marriage by men old enough to be their grandfathers. Are they immoral? Maybe to you, but morality is a Human rather than exact science, so what is wrong for you insnot wrong for everyone else. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

P.S: And BTW, very few girls get their periods at or before age 10. The average age of menarch in the West is around age 12.
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: England_1 on November 08, 2007, 05:13:44 PM
You are only taking into account physical maturity while ignoring mental maturity.

Suckmymuscle might be GetBig's first self-admitting pedophile!

P.S. that girl in the picture above is likely about 21 years old  ;)
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 08, 2007, 05:15:17 PM
`

  Define morality. According to Kant, in his "Critique Of Pure Reason", morality is an illusion derived from the paradoxical nature os altrusim and selfishness in Society. According to Nietzsche, morality is an illusion created by the weak to subdue the strong into doing their bidding. There has never been any universally accepted standard of morality. In some societies, girls of the age you mentioned not only have sex, but are sold by their families into marriage by men old enough to be their grandfathers. Are they immoral? Maybe to you, but morality is a Human rather than exact science, so what is wrong for you insnot wrong for everyone else. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Morality is dictated by the general consensus and it constantly changing , the " prophet " Mohammed ' married ' a 9 year old girl was that right back then? maybe is it right now? NO way there has to be a line and society usually dictates it .
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Jeriko on November 08, 2007, 05:16:05 PM
I'm giving you guys the benefit of the doubt - I'm sure you guys are joking  :-X    Realist or not, Hot or not If you actually would bang (samples given) 10 or 11 yo's then you are sick fks in need of help.  
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 08, 2007, 05:18:03 PM
You are only taking into account physical maturity while ignoring mental maturity.

Suckmymuscle might be GetBig's first self-admitting pedophile!

P.S. that girl in the picture above is likely about 21 years old  ;)

He's no pedoiphile but I understand the point he's trying to make biologically these girls are ready to reproduce mentally & psychologically is another story
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on November 08, 2007, 05:19:55 PM
completely agree with SUCK.
the current american society and its social norms is one of the only places in history that gets all bent out of shape about this crap. its just stupid..'oh her body is completely matured and ready to reproduce but her age is 17 years 364 days so you are a 'sicko' for even considering it but the next day when she turns 18 something magical happens and it become ok...hahaha oh brother give me a break.
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: suckmymuscle on November 08, 2007, 05:22:05 PM
Morality is dictated by the general consensus and it constantly changing , the " prophet " Mohammed ' married ' a 9 year old girl was that right back then? maybe is it right now? NO way there has to be a line and society usually dictates it .

  Well, you've just proved my point that morality is relative. And there are countries today where girls at the age of 12 or 13 are sold into marriage by their parents. The majority? In the middle ages, the majority considered it moral to burn people in the stake for heresy and other crimes against the faifth. Nowadays, there are countries where the majority consider it moral to stone to death an adultress of adulterer. So the majority's opinion has never been a barometer for morality if you ask me. All things considered, since the age when girls are "ready" to have sex(age 18) is completely arbitrary, you can't blame me for considering the age of menarch as at least as valid an indication of the age when girls are ready for sexual intercourse.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: tu_holmes on November 08, 2007, 05:22:50 PM
Don't be a fuckin' putz!

Like you wouldn't nail them if you had the chan...nevermind, you couldn't!  :D

Hey, If some chick is 11 and you want to bang them... Go ahead... Prison is just a phone call away.

It's not my thing.

If that makes me a homo... then so be it.

Like I said... She's at least 18... the piercings prove it.

Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on November 08, 2007, 05:23:10 PM
I'm giving you guys the benefit of the doubt - I'm sure you guys are joking  :-X    Realist or not, Hot or not If you actually would bang (samples given) 10 or 11 yo's then you are sick fks in need of help.  
i dont think anyone is talking about 10 or 11 year olds...
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Pollux on November 08, 2007, 05:25:57 PM
Hey, If some chick is 11 and you want to bang them... Go ahead... Prison is just a phone call away.

It's not my thing.

If that makes me a homo... then so be it.

Like I said... She's at least 18... the piercings prove it.



Yeah, because the girls in those particular pics look 11 years old.  ::)

You're more of an idiot than I thought.  :-[

Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 08, 2007, 05:26:05 PM
  Well, you've just proved my point that morality is relative. And there are countries today where girls at the age of 12 or 13 are sold into marriage by their parents. The majority? In the middle ages, the majority considered it moral to burn people in the stake for heresy and other crimes against the faifth. Nowadays, there are countries where the majority consider it moral to stone to death an adultress of adulterer. So the majority's opinion has never been a barometer for morality if you ask me. All things considered, since the age when girls are "ready" to have sex(age 18) is completely arbitrary, you can't blame me for considering the age of menarch as at least as valid an indication of the age when girls are ready for sexual intercourse.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Yes I agree morality is relative but again there has to be a limit just because physically ready to reproduce doesn't mean she is mentally
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: tu_holmes on November 08, 2007, 05:26:40 PM
Yeah, because the girls in those particular pics look 11 years old.  ::)

You're more of an idiot than I thought.  :-[



Just hang around longer... I'm sure I'll get dumber for you.

What did my previous post say... "at least 18".

::)
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Pollux on November 08, 2007, 05:28:23 PM
Just hang around longer... I'm sure I'll get dumber for you.

What did my previous post say... "at least 18".

::)

So then why the hell are you bringing up 11 year olds?

We're talking about those girls in the pics.

Now say something and roll your eyes.  :)
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on November 08, 2007, 05:28:40 PM
 Well, you've just proved my point that morality is relative. And there are countries today where girls at the age of 12 or 13 are sold into marriage by their parents. The majority? In the middle ages, the majority considered it moral to burn people in the stake for heresy and other crimes against the faifth. Nowadays, there are countries where the majority consider it moral to stone to death an adultress of adulterer. So the majority's opinion has never been a barometer for morality if you ask me. All things considered, since the age when girls are "ready" to have sex(age 18) is completely arbitrary, you can't blame me for considering the age of menarch as at least as valid an indication of the age when girls are ready for sexual intercourse.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
brutally excellent post
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: suckmymuscle on November 08, 2007, 05:28:54 PM
  And what crap theory is this that a 12 or 13 year old girl is not psychologically ready to have sex? During tens of thousands of years, this was the age girls started having sex and getting pregnant, and the evidence that they were mature enough to handle it is that the Human Species survived to this day. Geez...if 13 year-old girls made such incompetent mothers, don't you think Humanity would have extinguished? I think so.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: tu_holmes on November 08, 2007, 05:30:44 PM
So then why the hell are you bringing up 11 year olds?

We're talking about those girls in the pics.

Now say something and roll your eyes.  :)

Power Rod mentioned 11 year olds... Others mentioned 10 year olds... My posts were simply following the thread.

Say something to make me roll my eyes and I will... no problem.
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Pollux on November 08, 2007, 05:33:02 PM
Say something to make me roll my eyes and I will... no problem.

HAHAHAHA...you're such a joke!  :D

I'm through with you.  :-*
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 08, 2007, 05:35:06 PM
  And what crap theory is this that a 12 or 13 year old girl is not psychologically ready to have sex? During tens of thousands of years, this was the age girls started having sex and getting pregnant, and the evidence that they were mature enough to handle it is that the Human Species survived to this day. Geez...if 13 year-old girls made such incompetent mothers, don't you think Humanity would have extinguished? I think so.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

In today's society girls are not psychologically ready to have sex in another time it was the ' norm ' then again its not all societies because in Brazil & Thailand the age of the prosititues are around that age but then again it doesn't mean they're not effected by it .
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: tu_holmes on November 08, 2007, 05:35:26 PM
HAHAHAHA...you're such a joke!  :D

I'm through with you.  :-*

I am a fun guy... you got me there.
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: kolja on November 08, 2007, 05:38:47 PM
You are only taking into account physical maturity while ignoring mental maturity.

In those cases in which it's EVER achieved...  ::)
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on November 08, 2007, 05:39:46 PM
 And what crap theory is this that a 12 or 13 year old girl is not psychologically ready to have sex? During tens of thousands of years, this was the age girls started having sex and getting pregnant, and the evidence that they were mature enough to handle it is that the Human Species survived to this day. Geez...if 13 year-old girls made such incompetent mothers, don't you think Humanity would have extinguished? I think so.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
i get what your saying but..a girl that age may be physically capable of reproducing but 99% of them will still exhibit prepubescent traits...a body that does not appear to be matured and therefore will not attract (normal) males, therefore indicating that in most cases they are probably not yet in an ideal reproductive state.

back then people did it out of necessity cause the lifespans were so much shorter. not because it was as optimal a time for reproducing as girls several years older.

nowadays that would fall into pedophile range because a 12 yr old will physically exhibit child-like characteristics rather than matured womanly characteristics.
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: suckmymuscle on November 08, 2007, 06:17:34 PM
In today's society girls are not psychologically ready to have sex in another time it was the ' norm ' then again its not all societies because in Brazil & Thailand the age of the prosititues are around that age but then again it doesn't mean they're not effected by it .

  no, the only thing that changed is the completely arbitrary age when Society deems it ok for girls to have sex and marriage. There is no evidence that girls are less mature today; if anything, they are more mature today. You brought up psychological maturity, and I pointed out to you that if 13 year-old girls lacked maturity to be mothers then the Human Spceies would have disappeared because during thousands of years girlas became mothers around that age. Ever saw Rome&Juliete? Well, Juliete was a13 in the play, and she was about to get married. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: suckmymuscle on November 08, 2007, 06:24:48 PM
i get what your saying but..a girl that age may be physically capable of reproducing but 99% of them will still exhibit prepubescent traits...a body that does not appear to be matured and therefore will not attract (normal) males, therefore indicating that in most cases they are probably not yet in an ideal reproductive state.

back then people did it out of necessity cause the lifespans were so much shorter. not because it was as optimal a time for reproducing as girls several years older.

nowadays that would fall into pedophile range because a 12 yr old will physically exhibit child-like characteristics rather than matured womanly characteristics.

  What you're saying is immaterial because pre-pubescent traits are not what indicates whether a girl is ready for pregnancy or not; menarch is. Menstuation only comes when secondary sexual characteristics become evident, and that's what makes men sexually attracted to women.

  And you're wrong about age of first pregnancy in the Ancient times being younger due to lifespans being shorter. The ideal age, physiologically, for a girl to get pregnant for the first time truly is 13-16, and not the abnormal 25+ years old that women nowadays get pregnant for the first time. The evidence? Fertility decreases by 5% per year after age 21 in women, to the point where a 31 year old has a 50% lower cance of getting preganant than a 21 year-old. By the age of 40, most womena re sterile and the ones who get preganant give birth to children with an unusually high rate of autism, schizofrenia, Down's Syndrome and epilepsy. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: the choad on November 08, 2007, 07:00:21 PM
  What you're saying is immaterial because pre-pubescent traits are not what indicates whether a girl is ready for pregnancy or not; menarch is. Menstuation only comes when secondary sexual characteristics become evident, and that's what makes men sexually attracted to women.

  And you're wrong about age of first pregnancy in the Ancient times being younger due to lifespans being shorter. The ideal age, physiologically, for a girl to get pregnant for the first time truly is 13-16, and not the abnormal 25+ years old that women nowadays get pregnant for the first time. The evidence? Fertility decreases by 5% per year after age 21 in women, to the point where a 31 year old has a 50% lower cance of getting preganant than a 21 year-old. By the age of 40, most womena re sterile and the ones who get preganant give birth to children with an unusually high rate of autism, schizofrenia, Down's Syndrome and epilepsy. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Mr suckmymuslce Owns all on this thread...

Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: saucetradomous on November 08, 2007, 07:15:19 PM
  What you're saying is immaterial because pre-pubescent traits are not what indicates whether a girl is ready for pregnancy or not; menarch is. Menstuation only comes when secondary sexual characteristics become evident, and that's what makes men sexually attracted to women.

  And you're wrong about age of first pregnancy in the Ancient times being younger due to lifespans being shorter. The ideal age, physiologically, for a girl to get pregnant for the first time truly is 13-16, and not the abnormal 25+ years old that women nowadays get pregnant for the first time. The evidence? Fertility decreases by 5% per year after age 21 in women, to the point where a 31 year old has a 50% lower cance of getting preganant than a 21 year-old. By the age of 40, most womena re sterile and the ones who get preganant give birth to children with an unusually high rate of autism, schizofrenia, Down's Syndrome and epilepsy. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

I find you informative and Witty and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on November 08, 2007, 08:19:01 PM
  What you're saying is immaterial because pre-pubescent traits are not what indicates whether a girl is ready for pregnancy or not; menarch is. Menstuation only comes when secondary sexual characteristics become evident, and that's what makes men sexually attracted to women.

  And you're wrong about age of first pregnancy in the Ancient times being younger due to lifespans being shorter. The ideal age, physiologically, for a girl to get pregnant for the first time truly is 13-16, and not the abnormal 25+ years old that women nowadays get pregnant for the first time. The evidence? Fertility decreases by 5% per year after age 21 in women, to the point where a 31 year old has a 50% lower cance of getting preganant than a 21 year-old. By the age of 40, most womena re sterile and the ones who get preganant give birth to children with an unusually high rate of autism, schizofrenia, Down's Syndrome and epilepsy. ;)


thats pretty much what i said. i never said anything about 25-40 year old women. i said the optimal period is probably a few years after the initial 'menarch' which you put at 12-13, therefore around 15-17 which is almost the same as what your saying.
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Special Ed on November 08, 2007, 08:24:11 PM
Kim Kardashian's new Playboy Spread
(http://coedmagazine.com/wp-content/fgallery/kim-kardashian-nsfw-pics/102859364809956375full.jpg)(http://coedmagazine.com/wp-content/fgallery/kim-kardashian-nsfw-pics/kim3.jpg)
(http://coedmagazine.com/wp-content/fgallery/kim-kardashian-nsfw-pics/kim7.jpg)(http://coedmagazine.com/wp-content/fgallery/kim-kardashian-nsfw-pics/102859364809956376full.jpg)
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Army of One on November 08, 2007, 08:43:48 PM
Kim Kardashian's new Playboy Spread
(http://coedmagazine.com/wp-content/fgallery/kim-kardashian-nsfw-pics/102859364809956375full.jpg)(http://coedmagazine.com/wp-content/fgallery/kim-kardashian-nsfw-pics/kim3.jpg)
(http://coedmagazine.com/wp-content/fgallery/kim-kardashian-nsfw-pics/kim7.jpg)(http://coedmagazine.com/wp-content/fgallery/kim-kardashian-nsfw-pics/102859364809956376full.jpg)

plz remove,this is sick, this woman was clearly 13 at a point in her life, ur a pedo, dont u have some granny tits I can jerk to blah blah blah
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Parker on November 08, 2007, 09:19:47 PM
  What you're saying is immaterial because pre-pubescent traits are not what indicates whether a girl is ready for pregnancy or not; menarch is. Menstuation only comes when secondary sexual characteristics become evident, and that's what makes men sexually attracted to women.

  And you're wrong about age of first pregnancy in the Ancient times being younger due to lifespans being shorter. The ideal age, physiologically, for a girl to get pregnant for the first time truly is 13-16, and not the abnormal 25+ years old that women nowadays get pregnant for the first time. The evidence? Fertility decreases by 5% per year after age 21 in women, to the point where a 31 year old has a 50% lower cance of getting preganant than a 21 year-old. By the age of 40, most womena re sterile and the ones who get preganant give birth to children with an unusually high rate of autism, schizofrenia, Down's Syndrome and epilepsy. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

What do the outside effects of hormones in food, extremely high protein diet, and mdeical advancements have to contribute? For instance, back in thdays of King James, women had 15 inch ( and some 13 ich) waists. Not now. Why because women and men were smaller. This was especially noted when EUropeans came to America, where the Native Americans were noticeably taller  (around the 6 foot mark), due to their high protein diets. Just go into a colonial house and see where the door frame is.

It is not uncommon for girls today to get their menses at 9 and 8 years old, even having "speed bumps" at that age. As a matter of fact, is it s a growing trend that girls are having this happen. This has probably been brought on by all the hormones in our food (ever heard of the song "Similac Child"). So to say that it is natural for a girl to have sex because of her menses is inconclusive, because most of of Western society relys on un-natural means  to cultivate and grow food, and having un-natural diets as well as medicinal supplements within our diet that others before other did not have. 

As far  as those diseases being common in women who are apparent within their 40's, their is no finite evidence that suggests that, because, one, how do we know that those people were not genetically pre-disposed for those ailments in the first place. And two, how do we know that certain medications that were given to the mother or child (for instance the uproar over the increase of autism suppposedly due to vaccinations given to infants). Too many questions to rule out...

In order to say what is natural, we must first eat naturally and try to medicate ourselves naturally and then let nature take it's course.
Title: Re: Too hot to be true...
Post by: Bast000 on November 11, 2007, 09:42:12 AM
playboy = all airbrushed.