Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: wisconsinBB on November 16, 2007, 07:18:39 AM
-
From the pics at MD, peter looks good, but Charles Dixon appears to easily have what it takes to beat Putnum.
-
Peter's back has come up a lot and he made good improvements but Dixon looks good too.
-
From the pics at MD, peter looks good, but Charles Dixon appears to easily have what it takes to beat Putnum.
I agree 100 % ! As I said earlier in another Thread, Charles looks SPOT ON !!
-
From the pics at MD, peter looks good, but Charles Dixon appears to easily have what it takes to beat Putnum.
Not if FLEX has anything to say about it ::)
And based on this year's Olympia and Peter's last win at the USA....I really wouldn't be too surprised if they give it to him :-[
But DEEZAM, Dixon looks awesome! :o
-
guy on right looks better from 2 shots
-
Don't forget the political factor...
8)
-
In the back comparison shot.....
Notice from the mid-back down to the waist...this is where using machines for back DIDN'T pay off :o
-
Both gayer than owning an electric jar opener. ::)
-
Putnam looks a lot better than i thought he would, legs look like a mini version of Cutler's.
-
both looks damn good.
i would have to see them side by side to decide who is better.
-
Putnam looks a lot better than i thought he would, legs look like a mini version of Cutler's.
Dixon is a mini version of Toney Freeman, he's got an amazing flow to that physique, thats what it takes in the pro's.
-
Dixon is a mini version of Toney Freeman, he's got an amazing flow to that physique, thats what it takes in the pro's.
yeah, he should beat Putnam but like i said Peter looks improved for sure.
-
(http://i8.tinypic.com/80wtcvr.jpg)
(http://i11.tinypic.com/82lg6ea.jpg)
-
(http://i8.tinypic.com/80wtcvr.jpg)
(http://i11.tinypic.com/82lg6ea.jpg)
Peter looks great there, huge arms
-
thats lee priest.
-
thats lee priest.
ok mars ;D
-
From the pics at MD, peter looks good, but Charles Dixon appears to easily have what it takes to beat Putnum.
Doubtful, Dixon is not cut enough. Peter is more ripped and proportional.
-
Doubtful, Dixon is not cut enough. Peter is more ripped and proportional.
Keep smoking that crack!
-
From the pics at MD, peter looks good, but Charles Dixon appears to easily have what it takes to beat Putnum.
Samething was thought at the USA's as well.........he'll win wether he deserves it or not.
-
(http://i8.tinypic.com/80wtcvr.jpg) That's incredible :o
-
Dixon will make a good pro. Can't say the same for Putnam. That being said, if they gave the Olympia to Cutler...
-
Dixon will make a good pro. Can't say the same for Putnam. That being said, if they gave the Olympia to Cutler...
bump for truth and have The Coach on GETBIG NATION to read us one of his fairy tales lol
-
Doubtful, Dixon is not cut enough. Peter is more ripped and proportional.
you have no idea what you are talking about.
stop posting.
-
Someone post a picture of Putman's back double bi..
-
Those pics aren’t even side by side comparisons! If you look closely there is a piece of tape on the floor between their legs, and you can tell by the tape on the floor and the table that Peter is further away from the photographer! In actuality Peter is out massing Charles, Pete barley made weight weighing 198 ¼ and he is much tighter than USA’s! Dixon weighed in at 192, Peter is clearly beating Dixon conditioning in the Glutes and Hams.
Why cant you guys wait to see pre-judging pics before you have to say who isn’t going to be getting their pro card! Peter added height and size will make it a hard battle for Charles. Charles looks great but if any of you remember that at the 2006 USA Dixon placed 9th to Peter 2nd.
Peter is not a weider athlete, and you need to quit harping about politics!!!!!
Why don’t you guys hold off judging a show till you see pics from the stage!
-
Can't believe that just 5 years ago I was training alongside him at the now defunct Gold's Gym in Greenville. He was smart to listen to all advice but most importantly to make his own decisions as to what he needed to do for himself.
Charles never any guru or nutritional expert telling him how to train and what to do. He's his own man and if you ever get the opportunity to train with him, you'll see that he is a freak in the gym. I could barely hang with him back in the day even before he even considered bodybuilding.
The only advice that I ever gave him was to make sure he got paid for his hard work and not let "others" mooch off or piss on his success especially a certain former JR USA winner and now pretty much washed up bodybuilder who didn't have his best interest in heart and went around telling everyone that he stole money and never paid people back behind his back.
Everyone now says Charles would make a great pro but I already knew that long time ago when he won his first show, the Emerald Cup and completely destroyed the entire line-up. I saw the look on the folks he was onstage with at the event and they were just groaning and shaking their hands at him as they already knew that they would not be going home on top.
Charles has pretty much won the Nationals twice but was cheated out of it. But he never complained or bitched or moaned like a lot of folks. He just smiled and that is it.
I just hope the third time is a charm
-
Those pics aren’t even side by side comparisons! If you look closely there is a piece of tape on the floor between their legs, and you can tell by the tape on the floor and the table that Peter is further away from the photographer! In actuality Peter is out massing Charles, Pete barley made weight weighing 198 ¼ and he is much tighter than USA’s! Dixon weighed in at 192, Peter is clearly beating Dixon conditioning in the Glutes and Hams.
Why cant you guys wait to see pre-judging pics before you have to say who isn’t going to be getting their pro card! Peter added height and size will make it a hard battle for Charles. Charles looks great but if any of you remember that at the 2006 USA Dixon placed 9th to Peter 2nd.
Peter is not a weider athlete, and you need to quit harping about politics!!!!!
Why don’t you guys hold off judging a show till you see pics from the stage!
Good Luck Peter! :)
-
Doubtful, Dixon is not cut enough. Peter is more ripped and proportional.
Yeah, Putnam's delts and pecs are so much more striated. lol. I actually thought Peter deserved to win the USAs, but this isn't even close.
-
Dixon will make a good pro. Can't say the same for Putnam. That being said, if they gave the Olympia to Cutler...
Not unless Dixon can put on more size. Remember he is in his mid 30’s. Putnam have a frame to carry more size and remain aesthetic. That being said….
-
Peter is not a weider athlete, and you need to quit harping about politics!!!!!
Why don’t you guys hold off judging a show till you see pics from the stage!
Jessica-
You're much prettier when you don't talk.
Thanks.
-
Ok.. il do a little outlook/prediction for all the wannabe judges who are in reality, far too inexperienced to have a proper assessment on the comparison...
1. Pete is alot harder, especially from the back. This is bodybuilding fellas, yes conditioning is a major factor! Funny thing is, Pete is probably going to get HARDER as prejudging approaches! These pix are last night!
2. Someone brought up flow. Well flow is the ENTIRE package. Not just chest delts and arms. Putnam flows much better when you consider calf/ham/quad balance in unison with the upper body. Quads more seperated and detailed, balanced with hams and calves...which are balanced with upper body.
its TOTAL PACKAGE... not a few freaky parts
-
Those pics aren’t even side by side comparisons! If you look closely there is a piece of tape on the floor between their legs, and you can tell by the tape on the floor and the table that Peter is further away from the photographer! In actuality Peter is out massing Charles, Pete barley made weight weighing 198 ¼ and he is much tighter than USA’s! Dixon weighed in at 192, Peter is clearly beating Dixon conditioning in the Glutes and Hams.
Why cant you guys wait to see pre-judging pics before you have to say who isn’t going to be getting their pro card! Peter added height and size will make it a hard battle for Charles. Charles looks great but if any of you remember that at the 2006 USA Dixon placed 9th to Peter 2nd.
Peter is not a weider athlete, and you need to quit harping about politics!!!!!
Why don’t you guys hold off judging a show till you see pics from the stage!
because this is GETBIG.com, the premier online location in the fitness industry and we are hot
-
I think we should all keep a good eye on Putnam this weekend.
-
Can't believe that just 5 years ago I was training alongside him at the now defunct Gold's Gym in Greenville.
I'm quite certain your physique inspired him to greatness. ;D
-
More pics of Jessica please
-
Charles has pretty much won the Nationals twice but was cheated out of it. But he never complained or bitched or moaned like a lot of folks. He just smiled and that is it.
I just hope the third time is a charm
That’s not true! Last year Charles Flipped out Throwing weight and Screaming because he lost! Many are aware out this outburst!
-
That’s not true! Last year Charles Flipped out Throwing weight and Screaming because he lost! Many are aware out this outburst!
Jessica,
share more details, please
-
1. Pete is alot harder, especially from the back. This is bodybuilding fellas, yes conditioning is a major factor! Funny thing is, Pete is probably going to get HARDER as prejudging approaches! These pix are last night!
You have to be kidding. Putnam's arms and delts look soft. His pecs look saggy. Dixon, on the other hand, looks like he was chiseled out of granite. As far as flow, Peter has no x-frame. There's hardly any difference in width between his shoulders and waist. Dixon has wide shoulders and a waist that disappears to nothing.
-
That’s not true! Last year Charles Flipped out Throwing weight and Screaming because he lost! Many are aware out this outburst!
::)
What in the world are you talking about??? There was no outburst except from many writers on every publications. Stan should have never won that event and even he knows that but there was no throwing around weights
BTW, you previous post stated that Putnam added height and size. While I can say he may have added size but how did he add height??? Was he placed on a stretching machine or something???
-
oh yeah, make it hurt baby girl
-
Putnam has some parts that are unmatched by Dixon but overall Dixon looks better IMO and if his condition holds Dixon should win.
-
Putnam owns Dixon in the leg seperation dept. I am truly surprised at the condition he is in as of last night. Kudos to him, but like I said before, his onstage presentation will most likely be a ways more watered down. :(
-
putnam is better put together. Dixon has better natural lines and shape. I think Putnam will win the card, withouta doubt. It's a shame... both guys could be okay pros.
-
Ok.. il do a little outlook/prediction for all the wannabe judges who are in reality, far too inexperienced to have a proper assessment on the comparison...
1. Pete is alot harder, especially from the back. This is bodybuilding fellas, yes conditioning is a major factor! Funny thing is, Pete is probably going to get HARDER as prejudging approaches! These pix are last night!
2. Someone brought up flow. Well flow is the ENTIRE package. Not just chest delts and arms. Putnam flows much better when you consider calf/ham/quad balance in unison with the upper body. Quads more seperated and detailed, balanced with hams and calves...which are balanced with upper body.
its TOTAL PACKAGE... not a few freaky parts
Well...well, Dixon has two real eyes and Putnam only has one, that's a lack of symmetry...
Actually, from the pics Dixon is harder, and has better back detail, better leg detail, better abs, and his chest is striated. That's what I see, , maybe is I cover up one eye, I see what people are talking about Putnam for. Damn, I wish there more guys like Dennis Newman, Mike Francois, Flex Wheeler, back in the NPC ranks.
-
Well...well, Dixon has two real eyes and Putnam only has one, that's a lack of symmetry...
Actually, from the pics Dixon is harder, and has better back detail, better leg detail, better abs, and his chest is striated. That's what I see, , maybe is I cover up one eye, I see what people are talking about Putnam for. Damn, I wish there more guys like Dennis Newman, Mike Francois, Flex Wheeler, back in the NPC ranks.
that's some cold shit, but extremely funny at the same time!
LOL
well done sir
-
Good thing they dont judge in a lobby before ...why dont you "experts" wait till they drop water and pump up.
-
Putman has a baby's chest
-
Good thing they dont judge in a lobby before ...why dont you "experts" wait till they drop water and pump up.
Sure thing chief! DIXON WILL BEAT PUTNUM
-
Well...well, Dixon has two real eyes and Putnam only has one, that's a lack of symmetry...
Funny!
Sandra
Actually, from the pics Dixon is harder, and has better back detail, better leg detail, better abs, and his chest is striated. That's what I see, , maybe is I cover up one eye, I see what people are talking about Putnam for. Damn, I wish there more guys like Dennis Newman, Mike Francois, Flex Wheeler, back in the NPC ranks.
-
Ok.. il do a little outlook/prediction for all the wannabe judges who are in reality, far too inexperienced to have a proper assessment on the comparison...
1. Pete is alot harder, especially from the back. This is bodybuilding fellas, yes conditioning is a major factor! Funny thing is, Pete is probably going to get HARDER as prejudging approaches! These pix are last night!
2. Someone brought up flow. Well flow is the ENTIRE package. Not just chest delts and arms. Putnam flows much better when you consider calf/ham/quad balance in unison with the upper body. Quads more seperated and detailed, balanced with hams and calves...which are balanced with upper body.
its TOTAL PACKAGE... not a few freaky parts
Seriously, what are you talking about? As much as Peter is going to get harder during pre-judging because these pictures were taken last night - SO IS CHARLES! (Or anyone else for that matter - they are still dropping water, etc.) Do you think just Peter is going to improve from weigh-in's?? Also, most guys during pre-judging look better after they've been flexing - again, no surprise there . . .but again, doesn't just relate to just Peter.
As for Charles having a few freaky body parts as you were implying, he most certainly doesn't - - his physique is actually very balanced. Charles has a package and not one with just a few good bodyparts.
-
Sorry, Peter. You're gonna miss it...again!
-
Sorry, Peter. You're gonna miss it...again!
woops! sorry!...can you repeat that?, Peter wasn't looking at you with the right eye...thought you were a talking payphone!
-
Yeah, Putnam's delts and pecs are so much more striated. lol. I actually thought Peter deserved to win the USAs, but this isn't even close.
Uhm...Look at his abs, legs, arms, and you will see Peter is more ripped. But, I will not continue to argue with you. May the "best" (not the most liked) man win. Good luck to em all.
-
Putnam looks much better than the USA's. He's harder, and his back appears improved.
Dixon looks better than last year also.
Both of them did their job. They made improvements, and look to come in at their best ever. You can't fault either of them. It should be a good class.
-
Putnam looks much better than the USA's. He's harder, and his back appears improved.
Dixon looks better than last year also.
Both of them did their job. They made improvements, and look to come in at their best ever. You can't fault either of them. It should be a good class.
Justin, you ever gonna invite Peter for a nice back workout with you and Steve?? ;)
-
Those pics aren’t even side by side comparisons! If you look closely there is a piece of tape on the floor between their legs, and you can tell by the tape on the floor and the table that Peter is further away from the photographer! In actuality Peter is out massing Charles, Pete barley made weight weighing 198 ¼ and he is much tighter than USA’s! Dixon weighed in at 192, Peter is clearly beating Dixon conditioning in the Glutes and Hams.
Why cant you guys wait to see pre-judging pics before you have to say who isn’t going to be getting their pro card! Peter added height and size will make it a hard battle for Charles. Charles looks great but if any of you remember that at the 2006 USA Dixon placed 9th to Peter 2nd.
Peter is not a weider athlete, and you need to quit harping about politics!!!!!
Why don’t you guys hold off judging a show till you see pics from the stage!
Heath,
I am so sick fo your dumb ass coming to defend a GROWN man on this board. Go and leave Pete a message on your myspace page. You come on here and blow up everytime someone picks his Physique apart even if it is not personal.
With that said these guys are making there honest judgement you don't need to stay on Pete's sack 24/7...
They both LOOK AWESOME!!
Pete has done his homework and come in tight like he needed too. Dixon has a btter chest, back and shoulders. Pete has better arms, legs. The judges could go either way..
For everyone else I present the H-BOMB and his amazing SLICED physique!!
bahahahahahhahahahahahah ahah!!!!
-
Justin, you ever gonna invite Peter for a nice back workout with you and Steve?? ;)
Steve is in Texas now, so I don't get to train with him much at all anymore.
I'd love to get a lift in with Peter. Jessica and I worked together for Optimum Nutrition, so I got to speak with Peter at quite a few shows while I was at the ON booth, and he was at the MetRx booth.
They're both good people. I think Peter expects a lot of what he gets on the boards. He knows that you can only expect things like that when you're in the limelight.
Whether or not he likes the negative talk doesn't matter. If it had any reason for what appears to be great improvements in his back and conditioning in only a few short months, it wasn't necessarily a bad thing. He's kind of laughed at himself on a few threads, so I'm sure he understands it is part of the game.
I've said that if people talk negatively about your physique, it is up to you to look at what they're saying and self-evaluate. If there are changes that need to be made, it is up to you to make them. Peter looks better than I've ever seen him look, so he did his job.
-
Putnam looks much better than the USA's. He's harder, and his back appears improved.
Dixon looks better than last year also.
Both of them did their job. They made improvements, and look to come in at their best ever. You can't fault either of them. It should be a good class.
Great post!
-
Heath,
I am so sick fo your dumb ass coming to defend a GROWN man on this board. Go and leave Pete a message on your myspace page. You come on here and blow up everytime someone picks his Physique apart even if it is not personal.
With that said these guys are making there honest judgement you don't need to stay on Pete's sack 24/7...
They both LOOK AWESOME!!
Pete has done his homework and come in tight like he needed too. Dixon has a btter chest, back and shoulders. Pete has better arms, legs. The judges could go either way..
For everyone else I present the H-BOMB and his amazing SLICED physique!!
bahahahahahhahahahahahah ahah!!!!
hahaha
hobbies are eating and sleeping.. lol what a guy.
-
H-Bomb needs a new hobbie hahahahha
-
H-Bomb needs a new hobbie hahahahha
Agreed ;D
-
hahaha
hobbies are eating and sleeping.. lol what a guy.
Tell me about it....... ::)
This clown has 25 post and EVERY damn one has to do with Pete...pretty sad.
I am from Pete's hometown, I am routing for him but damn he is gonna have to fill out A LOT to beat Dixon! Dixon does not have that problem of not being able to pose like Al Auguste he can show what he has to the judges.
-
That's a tough call. I think Peter may be in better shape but, for some reason, Dixon looks to be much more striated. I'm still trying to figure out how being lean doesn't always translate to being striated? Genetics? What causes this occurance?
As for Heath, the guy is just an enthusiastic kid and Peter seems to be his idol. You mess with Peter, you mess with him. It seems as if Peter has taken on some kind of "God like" status to Heath, but, to each their own.
I think Peter wins his class and it will be deserved if he does. There's still tonight to tighten up/drop water but I think he's got Dixon by a hair.
-
look at the two, who would you want to look like? Dixon has it all: size, symmetry, proportion, condition, he has no major flaws. This one is so bloody obvious, it ain't even funny!
-
look at the two, who would you want to look like? Dixon has it all: size, symmetry, proportion, condition, he has no major flaws. This one is so bloody obvious, it ain't even funny!
Some lack sommon sense and haven't seen Putman's back double bi..
-
I wish Peter the best of luck! Both him and Jessica are friends of ours and are great people! if he wins or not there are very few that can say they have got as far as he has in bodybuilding! But those are the ones who do the most talking!
-
::)
BTW, you previous post stated that Putnam added height and size. While I can say he may have added size but how did he add height??? Was he placed on a stretching machine or something???
Hmmmm you almost got me, I am sure last time i checked Dixon was shorter than Pete unless Dixon got taller. I guess i have to dumb things down for you guys!
-
Jessica,
share more details, please
I only wish I was half as Pretty as Jessica!
Please try again sir!
-
Heath,
I am so sick fo your dumb ass coming to defend a GROWN man on this board. Go and leave Pete a message on your myspace page. You come on here and blow up everytime someone picks his Physique apart even if it is not personal.
With that said these guys are making there honest judgement you don't need to stay on Pete's sack 24/7...
They both LOOK AWESOME!!
Pete has done his homework and come in tight like he needed too. Dixon has a btter chest, back and shoulders. Pete has better arms, legs. The judges could go either way..
For everyone else I present the H-BOMB and his amazing SLICED physique!!
bahahahahahhahahahahahah ahah!!!!
Congrats man you got me finally after all for the longest time you thought i was Pete!
To reveal my identity myspace.com/Hbomb29 There it is guys the guy behind all the Posts! You can hate on me all you want and tell me i have a crappy physique which is fine.
-
From the pics at MD, peter looks good, but Charles Dixon appears to easily have what it takes to beat Putnum.
The Dixon guy looks way better... not even close. But you know Putnam will be given the win anyway, since he seems to have been blessed by the powers-that-be for whatever reason. >:(
-
Congrats man you got me finally after all for the longest time you thought i was Pete!
To reveal my identity myspace.com/Hbomb29 There it is guys the guy behind all the Posts! You can hate on me all you want and tell me i have a crappy physique which is fine.
Heath I have NEVER thought you were Pete, I figured you out after your FIRST post and seeing you on pete's freinds list....not that difficult. It's ok to defend your freind, as I have said above I think pete is gonna take this. His condition is there if he wins this you won't here a peep out of me it would be DESERVED!!
As far as poking fun welcome to Getbig ;D
Your still young and have a long time to grow just do it smart!
-
Putman looked great in the comparison pix..dixon faded
-
Putman looked great in the comparison pix..dixon faded
I'm gonna have to eat crow, here, and change my prediction. Peter looked best onstage.
-
Look at how much Dixon lost in the legs from weigh in...over did the diuretic i bet.
-
Congrats man you got me finally after all for the longest time you thought i was Pete!
To reveal my identity myspace.com/Hbomb29 There it is guys the guy behind all the Posts! You can hate on me all you want and tell me i have a crappy physique which is fine.
You still haven't explained how Peter added 'height' since the USA's. This is absolutely remarkable on a grown man who you would think maxed out in height at around 18-19 years old.
Does this have something to do with praising the lord Jesus? Can Jesus somehow not only give bodybuilding gifts but also add height to someone who may be lacking in order to advance through a highly religious bodybuilding career?
Is it some new super supplement that only pro's and top amaters are privy to? I mean adding height! We could all be 7 foot walking adonis's with girls like Jessica!
Please tell don't hold back. If you would like please add a few other details like what Peter and Jessica have on their walls at home and what his soiled boxers smell like.
-
Dixon destroys Putnam, in everyway. Not impressed with Putnam at all.
-
Just checked the pictures between Dixon and Putnam. Its going to be a pretty close one. Its really going to be depending on what the judges are looking for.
-
Just checked the pictures between Dixon and Putnam. Its going to be a pretty close one. Its really going to be depending on what the judges are looking for.
If they're going for the "cross-eyed" look, Dixon could be in trouble!
-
What time do the results come in?
Putnam will probably win it. It would be the story of the show if he lost.
-
My good friend Dixon has finally paid his dues and is now an IFBB pro!!!
-
My good friend Dixon has finally paid his dues and is now an IFBB pro!!!
Do you guys train together? Is he the one responsible for your wealth of BB knowledge?
-
Putnam has some parts that are unmatched by Dixon but overall Dixon looks better IMO and if his condition holds Dixon should win.
what is it with you and black guys??
-
:'( :'(
-
TOLD YA SO. I do have to admit that I was wrong about Cherry though. Judging by the weigh in pics, I didn't think he was going to take it, but he got better for pre-judging and Brandon Curry didn't look as good as he did at the USA's. Congrats to all the new Pros!