Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Livewire on November 16, 2007, 09:59:40 AM

Title: Which man has better pro potential?
Post by: Livewire on November 16, 2007, 09:59:40 AM

#1 or #2?

Title: Re: Which man has better pro potential?
Post by: kcballer on November 16, 2007, 10:00:55 AM

#1 although he's not as dry as #2

Title: Re: Which man has better pro potential?
Post by: Camel Jockey on November 16, 2007, 10:01:01 AM

Teh first.

Putman's back double bi is horrible.. Not pro worthy.

Title: Re: Which man has better pro potential?
Post by: Jerryme7 on November 16, 2007, 10:02:37 AM

#2....

He is more marketable ;)

Title: Re: Which man has better pro potential?
Post by: mar10s on November 16, 2007, 10:11:00 AM

#1, much smaller forehead, but probably does not have as hot of a wife.

Title: Re: Which man has better pro potential?
Post by: natural al on November 16, 2007, 10:14:25 AM

Putman's calves, hamstrings and overall leg development are alot better but the other guys upper body is full and looks great.  You can't really judge a show by who "might" make a better pro but by who fullfills the criteria they're looking for.  I'm not a judge but if I was I'd have a hard time judging by those 2 photo's and alot can change in a couple of days-I think those were taken yesturday and prejudging isn't until tomorrow..right?

who would make the better pro....I dunno, to many variables.