Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: affeman on November 17, 2007, 04:32:29 AM

Title: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: affeman on November 17, 2007, 04:32:29 AM
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMM ;D
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: akers1021 on November 17, 2007, 04:46:28 AM
Dude you can post the boooooommmmm pics all day.  What matters to the judges is that he IMPROVED his physique since the USA's.  Look at his hams and glutes then go look at look at some of the pics back from the USA's.  If anybody on here gives him the most critiques it would be myself and I think that he will win this class based on his condition.  If Dixon wins you will here the same controversy you did when Pete beat Auguste... 

In the End here is what you will:
1- Pete
2-Dixon
3- Auguste

If the judges like Dixons mass then he will take it, I just don't see anybody beating Peter in the condition he came with.... ;)
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: Mars on November 17, 2007, 04:50:52 AM
He doesnt believe in training back with free weights.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: local hero on November 17, 2007, 05:41:32 AM
could probly take nasser in that back shot
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: Zach Trowbridge on November 17, 2007, 09:41:54 AM
Looks better than it did this summer, that's a start.  Won't be jeopardizing my ability to see the sun anytime soon, though.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: Brutal_1 on November 17, 2007, 09:44:34 AM
Dude you can post the boooooommmmm pics all day.  What matters to the judges is that he IMPROVED his physique since the USA's.  Look at his hams and glutes then go look at look at some of the pics back from the USA's.  If anybody on here gives him the most critiques it would be myself and I think that he will win this class based on his condition.  If Dixon wins you will here the same controversy you did when Pete beat Auguste... 

In the End here is what you will:
1- Pete
2-Dixon
3- Auguste

If the judges like Dixons mass then he will take it, I just don't see anybody beating Peter in the condition he came with.... ;)


Maybe so....but how could you overlook such a HUUUUUGE glaring weakness has his soft/flat/narrow back  :-[
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: Pete Nice on November 17, 2007, 10:01:59 AM
definitley not a pro back.....but it's improved nonetheless
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: Jerryme7 on November 17, 2007, 10:25:34 AM
Personally I like Peter Putnam. I think he made great improovements. Good luck Peter!

He is great to the sport and great to everyone regardless if you are a fan or not.

We need more down to Earth people like him who represent this sport well...
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: Necrosis on November 17, 2007, 11:33:15 AM
Personally I like Peter Putnam. I think he made great improovements. Good luck Peter!

He is great to the sport and great to everyone regardless if you are a fan or not.

We need more down to Earth people like him who represent this sport well...

it aint a personality contest though, he isnt that great of a bodybuilder, he will be second tier at best.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: dearth on November 17, 2007, 01:27:47 PM
improvement doesn't mean shit, who has the best physique is what the judges are looking for.

hope this helps

Dude you can post the boooooommmmm pics all day.  What matters to the judges is that he IMPROVED his physique since the USA's.  Look at his hams and glutes then go look at look at some of the pics back from the USA's.  If anybody on here gives him the most critiques it would be myself and I think that he will win this class based on his condition.  If Dixon wins you will here the same controversy you did when Pete beat Auguste... 

In the End here is what you will:
1- Pete
2-Dixon
3- Auguste

If the judges like Dixons mass then he will take it, I just don't see anybody beating Peter in the condition he came with.... ;)
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: akers1021 on November 17, 2007, 01:30:31 PM
improvement doesn't mean shit, who has the best physique is what the judges are looking for.

hope this helps


Where have you been they guy with the most endorsements wins man!

hahaha
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: HERACLES on November 17, 2007, 02:08:42 PM
Dude you can post the boooooommmmm pics all day.  What matters to the judges is that he IMPROVED his physique since the USA's.  Look at his hams and glutes then go look at look at some of the pics back from the USA's.  If anybody on here gives him the most critiques it would be myself and I think that he will win this class based on his condition.  If Dixon wins you will here the same controversy you did when Pete beat Auguste... 

In the End here is what you will:
1- Pete
2-Dixon
3- Auguste

If the judges like Dixons mass then he will take it, I just don't see anybody beating Peter in the condition he came with.... ;)

How the fuck do you see putnam beat Dixon after the pre judge pics? I know hes your boy, but come on man...Dixon has entirely another level of muscularity goin
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: akers1021 on November 17, 2007, 02:12:24 PM
How the fuck do you see putnam beat Dixon after the pre judge pics? I know hes your boy, but come on man...Dixon has entirely another level of muscularity goin

He is not "my boy"  we have had our differences in the past, however I am cool with Peter now.  I am giving my prediction based on the way the judges awarded conditioning in the past, look how Dixon got screwed last year with Mcquay.  Same thing, Pete has him out condiontioned period...
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: Quagmire on November 17, 2007, 02:13:37 PM
What a pathetic lat spread... maybe he should think about using freeweights since this isn't doing the trick.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: Mad Nickels on November 17, 2007, 02:27:19 PM
He doesnt believe in training back with free weights.

he's weaker than a chicerillo company line.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: the Pure Majestic on November 17, 2007, 02:48:55 PM
Ironically, he compared very well on stage in the rear lat. 
His hams and calves are enough of a distraction to create the appearance of a better pose. 
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: bigdumbbell on November 17, 2007, 03:02:26 PM
bodybuilding needs a new ken and barbie.  we haven't had one since craig and killy.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: gymguy on November 17, 2007, 04:28:58 PM
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM ;D

Too bad there is NO truth in this statement.  Don't hate him because he's successful, be happy for him.  He should be an inspiration to you.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 06:36:00 PM
Ok guys, help me out here. I'm sure Putnam is a nice guy and everything, but can someone please tell me what all the hype is with this guy? Ok, he has decent legs, judging by his he can't pose or maybe it's just the photographer catching him is a transition or something, he had decent conditioning but not ripped, sorry, I just don't see it and really not just him, it's alot of these overhyped guys. Tell me, what am I missing with Putnam?
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: G o a t b o y on November 17, 2007, 06:38:32 PM
Ok guys, help me out here. I'm sure Putnam is a nice guy and everything, but can someone please tell me what all the hype is with this guy? Ok, he has decent legs, judging by his he can't pose or maybe it's just the photographer catching him is a transition or something, he had decent conditioning but not ripped, sorry, I just don't see it and really not just him, it's alot of these overhyped guys. Tell me, what am I missing with Putnam?


Nothing.  You're right...  he's way overhyped.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 06:39:31 PM

Nothing.  You're right...  he's way overhyped.

What did he weight in at?
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: Alex23 on November 17, 2007, 06:43:15 PM
Epic boogie board shaped back.

(http://www.crazyaboutgadgets.com/uploads/442.jpg)



This is what bodybuilding should look like:

(http://www.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/QW5Q4259_QSKJGGNADR.jpg)
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: G o a t b o y on November 17, 2007, 06:43:55 PM
What did he weight in at?

I would tell you, but I don't share info with people who are leaving.  You've given your 2-week notice, so you're pretty much a short-timer who's riding the clock for the next 2 wks.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: 240 is Back on November 17, 2007, 06:46:21 PM
I would tell you, but I don't share info with people who are leaving.  You've given your 2-week notice, so you're pretty much a short-timer who's riding the clock for the next 2 wks.

Mr I cannot leave.  He loves the place too much.  Plus, if he leaves, he'll have no place to complain about the Hilary Clinton presidency.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 06:46:43 PM
I would tell you, but I don't share info with people who are leaving.  You've given your 2-week notice, so you're pretty much a short-timer who's riding the clock for the next 2 wks.

I'm still on the clock and I signed no confidentiality agreement, so technically I have a right to know since I'm a senior partner on this board >:(
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: G o a t b o y on November 17, 2007, 06:48:06 PM
I'm still on the clock and I signed no confidentiality agreement, so technically I have a right to know since I'm a senior partner on this board >:(

That info was sent out in an email last Thursday.  You must have been taken off the distribution list already.  :-[
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 06:48:27 PM
Mr I cannot leave.  He loves the place too much.  Plus, if he leaves, he'll have no place to complain about the Hilary Clinton presidency.

Ha, catch me on Adriana Huffingtons boards, I get kicked off about every couple of months because they can't handle the truth.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 06:50:25 PM
That info was sent out in an email last Thursday.  You must have been taken off the distribution list already.  :-[

Thats insubordination >:(
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 06:51:29 PM
I'm eating Ben and Jerry's Strawberry Cheesecake right now ;D
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: G o a t b o y on November 17, 2007, 06:52:10 PM
Thats insubordination >:(


Go complain to HR then.  ::)
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: 240 is Back on November 17, 2007, 06:52:34 PM
Ha, catch me on Adriana Huffingtons boards, I get kicked off about every couple of months because they can't handle the truth.

25% of America agrees with you!
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: Mad Nickels on November 17, 2007, 06:53:29 PM
I'm eating Ben and Jerry's Strawberry Cheesecake right now ;D

so you take ephedra for months, then gorge yourself on cheesecake ice cream?

bodybuilding is such a healthy sport  ;D
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: the Pure Majestic on November 17, 2007, 06:57:47 PM
Ha, catch me on Adriana Huffingtons boards, I get kicked off about every couple of months because they can't handle the truth.

You're a true pioneer of American spirit.  When you die.  Surely, more than 2 people will remember who you were.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 07:05:51 PM
so you take ephedra for months, then gorge yourself on cheesecake ice cream?

bodybuilding is such a healthy sport  ;D

Who the hell said I was gorging myself? I've been eating what I want all day.....two weeks before my show ;D
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 07:07:16 PM
25% of America agrees with you!

Still see you're an in the closet liberal........time to come out of the closet Rob :D
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: the Pure Majestic on November 17, 2007, 07:07:52 PM
Who the hell said I was gorging myself? I've been eating what I want all day.....two weeks before my show ;D

You must be on top of the world.  Clearly you are better than most men.  That back fat and love handle mass from your previous photos must have disappeared for this sudden burst of confidence.
Enjoy your food.  In a few short days you're going to look back at the last month with sorrowful eyes.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 07:09:49 PM
You must be on top of the world.  Clearly you are better than most men.  That back fat and love handle mass from your previous photos must have disappeared for this sudden burst of confidence.
Enjoy your food.  In a few short days you're going to look back at the last month with sorrowful eyes.

Wanna bet? "Love handels" LOL.....K!
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: 240 is Back on November 17, 2007, 07:10:44 PM
Still see you're an in the closet liberal........time to come out of the closet Rob :D

LOL... I'm all for the war.  I just know it's about military bases and oil control.  You're still believing the WMD lie.   Honesty is a wonderful thing ;)
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: Camel Jockey on November 17, 2007, 07:13:17 PM
 ::)
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 07:13:31 PM
 You're still believing the WMD lie.  


Hahaha, so did Hillary and the rest of the looney left!
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: the Pure Majestic on November 17, 2007, 07:13:54 PM
Wanna bet? "Love handels" LOL.....K!

It is true.  
You've convinced yourself that if you only focus on the uninformed few whom commented on your "christmas tree" you'll be able to fool even yourself into thinking you're in shape.
I hope you have your post contest "what went wrong" thread already typed out, because it better be good, Coach.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 07:15:19 PM
::)

(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/club_gitmo.jpg)
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: Camel Jockey on November 17, 2007, 07:17:13 PM
is that glen beck in scubaa gear?
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 07:17:27 PM
It is true.  
You've convinced yourself that if you only focus on the uninformed few whom commented on your "christmas tree" you'll be able to fool even yourself into thinking you're in shape.
I hope you have your post contest "what went wrong" thread already typed out, because it better be good, Coach.

Gotta love the gimmicks........hey dude, what you say if I won the whole thing, lets face it, the haters (you) would still be talking shit. 2 weeks and counting.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: bigdumbbell on November 17, 2007, 07:18:50 PM
The Coach, is you're leaving the boards part of the prenuptial agreement?  regarding huffington board, well i am permanently shit canned from the lucianne goldberg boards for tell the truth  :)
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The_Leafy_Bug on November 17, 2007, 07:19:38 PM
Gotta love the gimmicks........hey dude, what you say if I won the whole thing, lets face it, the haters (you) would still be talking shit. 2 weeks and counting.
You won't. Hope this helps
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 07:20:15 PM
is that glen beck in scubaa gear?


(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/gbeck5.gif)
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: the Pure Majestic on November 17, 2007, 07:21:18 PM
Gotta love the gimmicks........hey dude, what you say if I won the whole thing, lets face it, the haters (you) would still be talking shit. 2 weeks and counting.

It doesn't matter.  In 2 years, no one will remember. 
that's what is funny.  The fact that you care so much, and none of us will even remember. 

But, you're undergoing a "vision quest" right? 
keep working!  You're almost there!
I bet you're going to make some major changes in the last week!!
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: Camel Jockey on November 17, 2007, 07:21:49 PM

(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/gbeck5.gif)

hahahah from the south park episode..
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 07:22:00 PM
You won't. Hope this helps

You're too small to speak......go to the kiddy board, what are you, like 5'11 150? seriously?
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: 240 is Back on November 17, 2007, 07:22:23 PM
Hahaha, so did Hillary and the rest of the looney left!

Nice dodge.  Classic technique.

It's 2007.  I admit I support a war for oil and bases.  You can't do that - you still shout it was about WMD.  My point has nothing to do with hilary or any loony left- you just try to shift it there because it takes the focus off of you.

But... thanks to your strong religious beliefs (which prevent you from supporting a war for oil position), you have to stick to the WMD lie.  I mean, the whole world - and you as well - know it was an excuse to manage their oil, which we now do.  But you can't admit it due to that conflict.  Oh, the conflict.
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 07:27:02 PM
It doesn't matter.  In 2 years, no one will remember. 
that's what is funny.  The fact that you care so much, and none of us will even remember. 

But, you're undergoing a "vision quest" right? 
keep working!  You're almost there!
I bet you're going to make some major changes in the last week!!

I realize that and it really doesn't matter, again, I'm doing this for me a last hoorah so to speak, then I'm walking away from bodybuilding and the industry, but that doesn't mean I'm not training and dieting my butt off for this, I'm, more than 95% ready two weeks out, the back shot was three weeks out during a cheatday, I've dropped 6-7lbs since.......I'm ready!
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 07:28:29 PM
Nice dodge.  Classic technique.

It's 2007.  I admit I support a war for oil and bases.  You can't do that - you still shout it was about WMD.  My point has nothing to do with hilary or any loony left- you just try to shift it there because it takes the focus off of you.

But... thanks to your strong religious beliefs (which prevent you from supporting a war for oil position), you have to stick to the WMD lie.  I mean, the whole world - and you as well - know it was an excuse to manage their oil, which we now do.  But you can't admit it due to that conflict.  Oh, the conflict.

Email me after the show, we'll talk about it, lke I said, after the show I'm done here....but your still my web guy ;D
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: the Pure Majestic on November 17, 2007, 07:43:06 PM
I realize that and it really doesn't matter, again, I'm doing this for me a last hoorah so to speak, then I'm walking away from bodybuilding and the industry, but that doesn't mean I'm not training and dieting my butt off for this, I'm, more than 95% ready two weeks out, the back shot was three weeks out during a cheatday, I've dropped 6-7lbs since.......I'm ready!

Believe me, we're all pulling for you. 
It's the final weeks before a bodybuilding show!  Your wife and family just don't understand all the stress you're under. 

don't second guess yourself at the end. 
Forget what I said about your love handles.  If you pretend they're not there, you'll be fine. 
Remember that most of the people judging have nothing else in their life.  If they had any level of intelligence, surely they would have better things to do than spend 14 hours on a saturday judging a bunch of losers for $50. 

KNOWLEDGE IS POWER! 
Finish things out bro!
Title: Re: Putnam: Weakest back ever on a stage!!!
Post by: The Coach on November 17, 2007, 08:40:44 PM
Believe me, we're all pulling for you. 
It's the final weeks before a bodybuilding show!  Your wife and family just don't understand all the stress you're under. 

don't second guess yourself at the end. 
Forget what I said about your love handles.  If you pretend they're not there, you'll be fine. 
Remember that most of the people judging have nothing else in their life.  If they had any level of intelligence, surely they would have better things to do than spend 14 hours on a saturday judging a bunch of losers for $50. 

KNOWLEDGE IS POWER! 
Finish things out bro!

My wife knows exactly what I'm going through and understands.......


http://www.steelgoddesses.co.uk/hayden_catwalk.htm