Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: England_1 on December 09, 2007, 04:37:00 PM

Title: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: England_1 on December 09, 2007, 04:37:00 PM
Will anyone ever have freakier arms than Coleman did? Eventhough his physique fell apart over the years, his arms just kept getting freakier. Unreal genetics.

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/1174-3/2006-olympia-weekend-4-ronnie-coleman.JPG?g2_GALLERYSID=97104a2c94721a198eee40807c1d186e)
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: The Squadfather on December 09, 2007, 04:39:01 PM
pretty crazy, that's what bodybuilding should be.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Tigerman on December 09, 2007, 04:39:25 PM
Peace for small forearms  ;)
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Wiggs on December 09, 2007, 04:40:57 PM
gawd damn...thats nice.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Camel Jockey on December 09, 2007, 04:41:34 PM
Hi bicep peaks are unreal.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Necrosis on December 09, 2007, 04:42:22 PM
Peace for small forearms  ;)

you think his forarms are small there? lol
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Hulkster on December 09, 2007, 04:43:29 PM
Quote
Will anyone ever have freakier arms than Coleman did?

not likely, and if so, not for a long time.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Croatch on December 09, 2007, 04:43:41 PM
(http://www.pro-tectfilm.com/blog/images/sema2005_jay.jpg)
Cutler is way more vascular. ::)
It also appears that Jay has gone the synthol route, while Ronnie is just a straight up freak.  Not like it isn't working for Cutler though.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: England_1 on December 09, 2007, 04:46:49 PM
not likely, and if so, not for a long time.

I don't know.....McGrath is right there. He has better vascularity than Coleman and bigger forearms. Coleman has more upper arm size and better peaks. Apples and oranges I guess, both awesome.


(http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/413d68168b.jpg)
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Hulkster on December 09, 2007, 04:47:27 PM
all I see is a yellow frog.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Rudee on December 09, 2007, 04:47:41 PM
pretty crazy, that's what bodybuilding should be.


Minus the pregnant belly.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: The Squadfather on December 09, 2007, 04:49:34 PM

Minus the pregnant belly.
hahahaha, it makes me laugh how guys expect these guys to have 23 inch arms, 60 inch chest and 36 inch legs and have a 28 inch waist like a bantamweight competitor. ::)
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: England_1 on December 09, 2007, 04:50:09 PM
all I see is a yellow frog.

do you see it now?
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: SS on December 09, 2007, 04:51:51 PM
How big do you think his arms is in that pic? 22''?
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: The Squadfather on December 09, 2007, 04:52:15 PM
How big do you think his arms is in that pic? 22''?
yep probably right at 22".
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Hulkster on December 09, 2007, 04:56:47 PM
I see the pic now.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Cap on December 09, 2007, 06:01:31 PM
hahahaha, it makes me laugh how guys expect these guys to have 23 inch arms, 60 inch chest and 36 inch legs and have a 28 inch waist like a bantamweight competitor. ::)
Arnold had a 58 inch chest, 21-22 inch arms, 28 inch quads, and a 33 or 34 inch waist.  ;)

Coleman does look like he has a pumpkin in his stomach.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: affy on December 09, 2007, 06:13:43 PM
Arnold had a 58 inch chest, 21-22 inch arms, 28 inch quads, and a 33 or 34 inch waist.  ;)

Coleman does look like he has a pumpkin in his stomach.
arnold was a god though, and i highly doubt his arms were 21-22 inches..and there was no slin and GH back then

he had a pretty wide waist...he was a master at hiding his flaws

heres a shot that shows just how wide it was

(http://aycu14.webshots.com/image/37933/2004966268472888574_fs.jpg)
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Cap on December 09, 2007, 06:23:47 PM
arnold was a god though, and i highly doubt his arms were 21-22 inches..and there was no slin and GH back then

he had a pretty wide waist...he was a master at hiding his flaws

heres a shot that shows just how wide it was

(http://aycu14.webshots.com/image/37933/2004966268472888574_fs.jpg)
I'd give him 21.  His waist was wide but Ronnie's was wide and distended as hell.  So bodybuilding has progressed into bigger legs, guts, smaller chests and bigger delts.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Hulkster on December 09, 2007, 06:33:29 PM
no one knows for sure what ronnie's arms measure (except for ronnie himself) but one thing is for sure:

whether he was 257 or 297 his arms were freaking massive: :o
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: bigbobs on December 09, 2007, 06:36:10 PM
Great pic England_1.  When I first saw Coleman in the title and England_1 as the thread starter I was positive it would be something sarcastic towards Coleman and a comparison to Dorian  ;D  Good to know that you give respect where it's due.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Hulkster on December 09, 2007, 06:38:54 PM
England 1 (aka Pubes) has gone on record before saying Coleman was the greatest ever.

so we do know he can give credit where credit is due.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Matt C on December 09, 2007, 06:39:18 PM
Gunter claims 23".

http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/gunterronniearms.html
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: The_Leafy_Bug on December 09, 2007, 06:47:06 PM
no one knows for sure what ronnie's arms measure (except for ronnie himself) but one thing is for sure:

whether he was 257 or 297 his arms were freaking massive: :o
(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)
(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)
(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)
(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: England_1 on December 09, 2007, 06:52:46 PM
England 1 (aka Pubes) has gone on record before saying Coleman was the greatest ever.

so we do know he can give credit where credit is due.

First off, who the fuck is pubes? Secondly, I would never say Yates was inferior to anyone at his best. Never.

Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: bigguns23 on December 09, 2007, 06:57:20 PM
(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)
(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)
(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)
(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)(http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)


lol Team Gunther!
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Matt C on December 09, 2007, 06:57:33 PM
Is my friend a guido?

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=12263353
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Hulkster on December 09, 2007, 06:59:08 PM
First off, who the fuck is pubes? Secondly, I would never say Yates was inferior to anyone at his best. Never.



LOL hi Pubes.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: England_1 on December 09, 2007, 07:00:27 PM
I think Hulkster's had a bit too much to drink tonight  :-\
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Matt C on December 09, 2007, 07:04:19 PM
LOL hi Pubes.

LMAO...

Even if he isn't pubes, he would at least know who he is.  Him denying it outright leads me to believe that he is in fact pubes.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: sgt. d on December 09, 2007, 07:12:01 PM
I don't know.....McGrath is right there. He has better vascularity than Coleman and bigger forearms. Coleman has more upper arm size and better peaks. Apples and oranges I guess, both awesome.


(http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/413d68168b.jpg)

Hi MattC
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: England_1 on December 09, 2007, 07:24:30 PM
Check out this awesome video of McGrath doing incline presses!

Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: dearth on December 09, 2007, 07:24:36 PM
oh wow,
his gut fills out the whole shirt, unreal roid belly.

Will anyone ever have freakier arms than Coleman did? Eventhough his physique fell apart over the years, his arms just kept getting freakier. Unreal genetics.

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/1174-3/2006-olympia-weekend-4-ronnie-coleman.JPG?g2_GALLERYSID=97104a2c94721a198eee40807c1d186e)
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: sgt. d on December 09, 2007, 07:25:56 PM
oh wow,
his gut fills out the whole shirt, unreal roid belly.


roid belly? ???
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Rudee on December 09, 2007, 08:08:49 PM
hahahaha, it makes me laugh how guys expect these guys to have 23 inch arms, 60 inch chest and 36 inch legs and have a 28 inch waist like a bantamweight competitor. ::)

My reply was regarding your comment "that's what bodybuilding should be".  So, no, bodybuilding shouldn't be just about size alone.  Get it?  Got it?  Good!
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Necrosis on December 09, 2007, 08:16:59 PM
I don't know.....McGrath is right there. He has better vascularity than Coleman and bigger forearms. Coleman has more upper arm size and better peaks. Apples and oranges I guess, both awesome.


(http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/413d68168b.jpg)

are you stupid or something, frank is not more vascular then coleman in that shot, ronnie viens are twice the size of franks, and his arms at his peak would dwarf franks.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: England_1 on December 09, 2007, 08:26:51 PM
are you stupid or something, frank is not more vascular then coleman in that shot, ronnie viens are twice the size of franks, and his arms at his peak would dwarf franks.

 ::)

(http://www.wpse.com/Galleries/1/444/Frank%20Mcgrath_61559.jpg)

Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Spicy Shushi on December 09, 2007, 08:37:59 PM
are you stupid or something, frank is not more vascular then coleman in that shot, ronnie viens are twice the size of franks, and his arms at his peak would dwarf franks.

150% correct. To compare McGrath's arms to Colemans is evidence of heavy recreational drug use by England 1.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Meso_z on December 10, 2007, 03:55:49 AM
(http://wpse.com/Galleries/1/55/Ronnie%20Coleman_54374.jpg)
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: SF1900 on December 10, 2007, 06:55:27 AM
McGrath does have bigger forearms than Ronnie. BUT, vasuclarity and size wise, ALL Ronnie!
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: YoungBlood on December 10, 2007, 07:25:57 AM

Ronnie's arms are just from another planet. Same goes for Frank McGrath's. One is white, one black.

Why get so caught up (as evidenced by the "Truce Thread") in deciding who is better? Just like both of them, there is enough room for both of their physiques on your hard drive, you pervs! I could see if you were riding in a cab with 'em and couldn't fit the two of them in there with you-but that's not the case.

:-\
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: KillerMonk on December 10, 2007, 07:33:35 AM
Ronnie arms are without a doubt the largest most muscular arms on the planet.

There should be a place in the Guiness book of Records with natural(no synthol) size arms at a specific bodyfat and no synthol.

2003 MrO atleast bordering on 23 inches or more.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Tombo on December 10, 2007, 08:29:29 AM
http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg[/img](http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)
http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg[/img](http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)
http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg[/img](http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)
http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg[/img](http://www.guntherfans.com/pictures/full/gunther2.jpg)

THE WALLS ALWAYS WIN
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: donrhummy on December 10, 2007, 10:13:38 AM
I don't know.....McGrath is right there. He has better vascularity than Coleman and bigger forearms. Coleman has more upper arm size and better peaks. Apples and oranges I guess, both awesome.


(http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/413d68168b.jpg)

If McGrath just improved his back, he'd be right up there with Wolf. He's got so much potential.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Arkadius on December 10, 2007, 11:41:42 AM
Quote
no one knows for sure what ronnie's arms measure (except for ronnie himself)
55cm 


Quote
2003 MrO atleast bordering on 23 inches or more.
lol
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Necrosis on December 10, 2007, 07:06:49 PM
55cm 

lol

i couldnt watch more the 2 seconds of that shit, but roonie looks like the old version in that video. his arms where gigantic in the 04 press conference. absolutely massive. in cost of redemption they have to be 24
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Hulkster on December 10, 2007, 07:13:19 PM
this is one of the craziest arm shots of his whole career, possibly THE most freaky, from 2003:
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: bigguns23 on December 10, 2007, 07:28:15 PM
this is one of the craziest arm shots of his whole career, possibly THE most freaky, from 2003:

Check out his front left dealt. You can actually see his fibers. Looks like a V!
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Bobby on December 11, 2007, 05:47:16 AM
Is my friend a guido?

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=12263353

do you even have to ask?
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Necrosis on December 18, 2007, 10:16:56 AM
this is one of the craziest arm shots of his whole career, possibly THE most freaky, from 2003:

that is the best most muscular in the history of bodybuilding. he is obviously the most shredded and biggest bodybuilder ever. that shot blows my mind, his traps are fucking jonnie jackson like there.
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Hulkster on December 18, 2007, 10:57:00 AM
ronnie's bis in 2003:

could be close to 23 inches:
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: Meso_z on December 18, 2007, 12:05:26 PM
ronnie's bis in 2003:

could be close to 23 inches:

wow, finaly a great picture from another angle! amazing.... :o
Title: Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
Post by: kevcat on December 18, 2007, 12:46:00 PM
McGraths forearms are bigger than Ronnies??? Evidence???  ::)