Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: MB_722 on January 17, 2008, 01:06:44 PM

Title: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: MB_722 on January 17, 2008, 01:06:44 PM
this looks like the ideal physique.

Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Mars on January 17, 2008, 01:08:11 PM
only if hes tall. dont want to be a midget.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Danimal77 on January 17, 2008, 04:50:07 PM
Why black out the head?

Mars, you can tell he's not short by the length of his arms. BTW, how tall are you Mars?
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: NeverTrustABlonde on January 17, 2008, 04:52:33 PM
what does his ass look like?
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: TrueGrit on January 17, 2008, 04:54:36 PM
Not for me he isn't. However, he does appear to have a penis unlike modern day pros whose thongs look like girls bikini's..so props to him for having a (probably) functioning manhood, I guess.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 17, 2008, 05:13:11 PM
this looks like the ideal physique.



Ideal in 83 today no
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 17, 2008, 05:24:12 PM
Ideal beach physique

Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 17, 2008, 05:25:23 PM
Ideal beach physique



Furthest thing from it
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 17, 2008, 05:26:14 PM
Furthest thing from it

How so?  Notice how everyone got up and left the beach as they realized they should work out instead after seeing Nasser?
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: TrueGrit on January 17, 2008, 05:28:03 PM
Ideal beach physique



Surely you mean beached whale physique?
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: BlueDevil on January 17, 2008, 05:31:46 PM
How so?  Notice how everyone got up and left the beach as they realized they should work out instead after seeing Nasser?

he reeks => they left
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: TrueGrit on January 17, 2008, 05:36:18 PM
Nasser is a very lonely guy; he is always on his own. He has lost his friendships and his wife left him for a another man. I sometimes feel cruel pointing out the sad, isolated and bitter existence this poor man is left with. To cap it all he has to demean himself by selling his soiled clothes and engaging in phonesex with schmoes.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Deadpool on January 17, 2008, 05:38:07 PM
Nasser is a very lonely guy; he is always on his own. He has lost his friendships and his wife left him for a another man. I sometimes feel cruel pointing out the sad, isolated and bitter existence this poor man is left with. To cap it all he has to demean himself by selling his soiled clothes and engaging in phonesex with schmoes.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: _bruce_ on January 17, 2008, 06:19:15 PM
Ideal in 83 today no
Greatness never dies - such a body turns heads no matter if in old Rome or NewYork 2017  8)
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: England_1 on January 17, 2008, 06:21:31 PM
Ideal in 83 today no

Samir's structure was too flawed, short torso and long legs. Flex was far more ideal.

(http://www.geocities.com/gymcentertr/galeri/flex1/flex13.jpg)
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: TrueGrit on January 17, 2008, 06:24:14 PM
So who is the guy the thread starter posted?

Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: wes mantooth on January 17, 2008, 06:54:17 PM
this thread is going in the wrong direction....
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 17, 2008, 06:57:59 PM
this thread is going in the wrong direction....


 ;)
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: gmflex on January 17, 2008, 07:00:02 PM
 ;D ;D ;D
thanks for fixing this thread....
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: MB_722 on January 17, 2008, 07:24:44 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=195326.0;attach=227613;image)

who is this? any more pics?
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: technokc on January 17, 2008, 07:28:24 PM
where's "divecunt" to say he's seen shaka zulu's penis and it is 21230% bigger than a white man's and this chick is ruined and blah, blah, blah, blah :P



(http://www.carolinaknives.com/images/zulu.jpg)


Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: The_Hammer on January 17, 2008, 11:45:27 PM
Take a poll and show the average joe a picture of Brad Pitt's body, Zane's, and Nasser's and 9/10 the average joe would pick Zane's as the ideal.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: NeoSeminole on January 18, 2008, 12:15:58 AM
Bob Paris and Richard Jones are the closest to what I consider perfection.

(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Bob%20Paris/BobParis20.jpg)

(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Richard%20Jones/RichardJones2.jpg)
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: England_1 on January 18, 2008, 12:18:10 AM
Bob Paris and Richard Jones are the closest to what I consider perfection.

(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Bob%20Paris/BobParis20.jpg)

(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Richard%20Jones/RichardJones2.jpg)




Richard Jones was incredible. He was so down to earth on the BFTO 04 (I think it was 04?) tape. He was smart and realized he could never compete without sacrificing his health. Sad that's the state of BB'ing today.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: _bruce_ on January 18, 2008, 01:25:58 AM
yep - Jones looked incredible.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: mass243 on January 18, 2008, 03:36:56 AM
yep - Jones looked incredible.

Can't beat Flex when it comes to ideal body... Plus Flex had the attitude to be something called great!
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: chester_bbb on January 18, 2008, 01:00:45 PM
Ideal beach physique



Beached whale. :P
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 18, 2008, 01:42:38 PM
Take a poll and show the average joe a picture of Brad Pitt's body, Zane's, and Nasser's and 9/10 the average joe would pick Zane's as the ideal.

The average joe does not work out either and would think that anyone with more than 10 lbs of muscle above average is probably too big.

Nasser is a very lonely guy; he is always on his own. He has lost his friendships and his wife left him for a another man. I sometimes feel cruel pointing out the sad, isolated and bitter existence this poor man is left with. To cap it all he has to demean himself by selling his soiled clothes and engaging in phonesex with schmoes.

And how many of the other pictuers posted on this thread are group photos?  Obviously if the thread is on "the ideal physique" the photos will be ones where they are wearing little and probably alone - onstage, during a photosheet, etc.  In another thread one of the pumpkinheads from San Diego was questioning why he always travels with an entourage. 

yep - Jones looked incredible.

But Nasser looked better

Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: JCL on January 18, 2008, 01:45:02 PM
Ideal = Nasser and I
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: m8 on January 18, 2008, 06:53:08 PM
what does his ass look like?

gayer than respect for women.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: chaos on January 18, 2008, 06:57:20 PM
Ideal = Nasser and I
The new "gayest post ever"....unless you're a chick?
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Camel Jockey on January 18, 2008, 07:00:43 PM
Ideal in bbing terms = Nasser.

Normal and mortal people, I'd say Bob Paris or Francis Bannafato or whatever his name was.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: KillerMonk on January 18, 2008, 08:48:28 PM
Ideal in bbing terms = Nasser.

Normal and mortal people, I'd say Bob Paris or Francis Bannafato or whatever his name was.
Agreed Bob Paris if i had physique like that i could nail almost any chick. ;D
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: TrueGrit on January 18, 2008, 08:52:00 PM
Who is the guy in the picture with his head blacked out?

Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Big Worm on January 18, 2008, 08:56:09 PM
The average joe does not work out either and would think that anyone with more than 10 lbs of muscle above average is probably too big.

And how many of the other pictuers posted on this thread are group photos?  Obviously if the thread is on "the ideal physique" the photos will be ones where they are wearing little and probably alone - onstage, during a photosheet, etc.  In another thread one of the pumpkinheads from San Diego was questioning why he always travels with an entourage. 

But Nasser looked better


F@G! Nasser sucks..He's ugly and so is his physique!
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Sharma on January 18, 2008, 08:58:15 PM
For a three year period Nasser El Sonbaty undoubtedly had the greatest physique ever seen in the history of mankind.

He had no weak points and everything was perfect. He was the victim of racism and politics.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Big Worm on January 18, 2008, 09:32:44 PM
For a three year period Nasser El Sonbaty undoubtedly had the greatest physique ever seen in the history of mankind.

He had no weak points and everything was perfect. He was the victim of racism and politics.
Bullshit...
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: chaos on January 18, 2008, 09:33:49 PM
For a three year period Nasser El Sonbaty undoubtedly had the greatest physique ever seen in the history of mankind.

He had no weak points and everything was perfect. He was the victim of synthol and insulin.
Fixed, supertwink.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 18, 2008, 09:39:43 PM
For a three year period Nasser El Sonbaty undoubtedly had the greatest physique ever seen in the history of mankind.

He had no weak points and everything was perfect. He was the victim of racism and politics.

Very good post.  I agree!  Sharma, you've got PM.

F@G! Nasser sucks..He's ugly and so is his physique!

And this is your physique "big worm"

(http://www.andymeneely.com/album/college/pumpkinheads.jpg)
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Big Worm on January 18, 2008, 09:40:08 PM
Fixed, supertwink.
B.I.N.G.O. !
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Big Worm on January 18, 2008, 09:45:08 PM
Very good post.  I agree!  Sharma, you've got PM.

And this is your physique "big worm"

(http://www.andymeneely.com/album/college/pumpkinheads.jpg)
Where's the funny.. Where's the owning? You keep those pics on your computer ,as if you break them out ,only for a massive owning ?? Well....Where's the owning ? Pumpkinhead?  ::)Sheesh.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: joelocal on January 18, 2008, 09:45:10 PM
Bob Paris and Richard Jones are the closest to what I consider perfection.

(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Bob%20Paris/BobParis20.jpg)



This is perfection right here, no flaws, perfect posing, perfect look, perfect presentation and a professional demeanor on and off stage.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Sharma on January 18, 2008, 09:48:01 PM
Very good post.  I agree!  Sharma, you've got PM.

And this is your physique "big worm"

(http://www.andymeneely.com/album/college/pumpkinheads.jpg)

Ha, the pumpkin heads are out in force. Bigworm seems to think that bodybuilding is about men's faces. Is that what he wants to see? A man's face looking down at him as he offers himself? I think so. Usually they sit at the their computers bigbobs, feeling rage and envy when they see the beautiful female company you and Nasser keep. Jealous of a successful and flourishing life - the opposite of their own pathetic, failed existence.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Big Worm on January 18, 2008, 09:54:11 PM
Ha, the pumpkin heads are out in force. Bigworm seems to think that bodybuilding is about men's faces. Is that what he wants to see? A man's face looking down at him as he offers himself? I think so.
HAHAHAH!! No. I want to be like you and your Lover (knobs) .. I want to see these mens greased up asses  ::).. You need to look inside of yourself and let the inner f@g come out ..Shit we all see and know about Knobs(bob). F@g.. You homo's make me sick ..
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 18, 2008, 10:00:10 PM
This is perfection right here, no flaws, perfect posing, perfect look, perfect presentation and a professional demeanor on and off stage.

Whenever an "ideal physique" thread pops up it's basically just a thread for people to post pictures of bodybuilders who held less mass, and are usually ones who competed in the old days.  If that were really considered "ideal" then today's bodybuilders would not be seeking mass as judges would not be rewarding it.  I think anyone who is a fan of today's IFBB shows, follows them, watches them, etc. yet insists that the 80's less massive physique is "ideal" is a hypocrite.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Big Worm on January 18, 2008, 10:04:43 PM
Whenever an "ideal physique" thread pops up it's basically just a thread for people to post pictures of bodybuilders who held less mass, and are usually ones who competed in the old days.  If that were really considered "ideal" then today's bodybuilders would not be seeking mass as judges would not be rewarding it.  I think anyone who is a fan of today's IFBB shows, follows them, watches them, etc. yet insists that the 80's less massive physique is "ideal" is a hypocrite.
So..If you know this? Then why try to force feed Nasser to people ? In all honesty..You don't resemble Nasser at all (sorry to break your heart) .. But look at all of the "ideal" physiques posted ?? Your physique resembles those more than Nasser's ..
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Earl1972 on January 18, 2008, 10:08:01 PM
This is perfection right here, no flaws, perfect posing, perfect look, perfect presentation and a professional demeanor on and off stage.

you knew him, tell some stories about the chicks coming on to him

E
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: joelocal on January 18, 2008, 10:08:22 PM
Whenever an "ideal physique" thread pops up it's basically just a thread for people to post pictures of bodybuilders who held less mass, and are usually ones who competed in the old days.  If that were really considered "ideal" then today's bodybuilders would not be seeking mass as judges would not be rewarding it.  I think anyone who is a fan of today's IFBB shows, follows them, watches them, etc. yet insists that the 80's less massive physique is "ideal" is a hypocrite.

1. I'm not a fan of todays physiques, 98% of them look like shit and wouldn't no how to train without a ton of gear, GH and insulin.

2. The judges set the standard for the "size only" physiques back in the mid 90's, the judges set the standards not the freaky competitor.

3. The phyiques of the 80's were better, better conditioning, better separation, more striated, better posing and especially better symmetry.

4. Nasser looked like shit..........PERIOD!
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Big Worm on January 18, 2008, 10:10:38 PM
1. I'm not a fan of todays physiques, 98% of them look like shit and wouldn't no how to train without a ton of gear, GH and insulin.

2. The judges set the standard for the "size only" physiques back in the mid 90's, the judges set the standards not the freaky competitor.

3. The phyiques of the 80's were better, better conditioning, better separation, more striated, better posing and especially better symmetry.

4. Nasser looked like shit..........PERIOD!
Well put !! 
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: joelocal on January 18, 2008, 10:11:37 PM
you knew him, tell some stories about the chicks coming on to him

E

Chicks dug him......too bad it wasn't the other way around :-\
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Earl1972 on January 18, 2008, 10:12:17 PM
Chicks dug him......too bad it wasn't the other way around :-\

care to elaborate?

E
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: joelocal on January 18, 2008, 10:13:00 PM
care to elaborate?

E

No















 ;D
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 18, 2008, 10:14:16 PM
So..If you know this? Then why try to force feed Nasser to people ? In all honesty..You don't resemble Nasser at all (sorry to break your heart) .. But look at all of the "ideal" physiques posted ?? Your physique resembles those more than Nasser's ..

Of course my physique or any common man's physique will resemble those posted as "the ideal physique" over Nasser's since Nasser's level of physique is so unattainable that almost nobody can be compared to it or resemble it, while it is easier to resemble the other physiques posted here.  Thanks for your pro-Nasser post!

1. I'm not a fan of todays physiques, 98% of them look like shit and wouldn't no how to train without a ton of gear, GH and insulin.

2. The judges set the standard for the "size only" physiques back in the mid 90's, the judges set the standards not the freaky competitor.

3. The phyiques of the 80's were better, better conditioning, better separation, more striated, better posing and especially better symmetry.

4. Nasser looked like shit..........PERIOD!

Jaelocal if the majority of fans shared your view the judges would be forced to reward such physiques and you would not see the ones you do onstage today.  In other words, your opinion means shit.  Ever hear of supply and demand?
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Earl1972 on January 18, 2008, 10:15:35 PM
No















 ;D


hahaha this is what I expected after your excalibur/youtube question ;D

i was just fuckin around, i didn't know how to break up the vid into parts ;)

lets hear a story :)

E
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Big Worm on January 18, 2008, 10:18:00 PM
Of course my physique or any common man's physique will resemble those posted as "the ideal physique" over Nasser's since Nasser's level of physique is so unattainable that almost nobody can be compared to it or resemble it, while it is easier to resemble the other physiques posted here.  Thanks for your pro-Nasser post!

Jaelocal if the majority of fans shared your view the judges would be forced to reward such physiques and you would not see the ones you do onstage today.  In other words, your opinion means shit.  Ever hear of supply and demand?
Dude.. It wasn't a pro Nasser post...I dislike the man .. And those physiques (also yours) are not common  physiques..
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 18, 2008, 10:18:49 PM
Dude.. It wasn't a pro Nasser post...I dislike the man .. And those physiques (also yours) are not common  physiques..

I know you didnt intend it to be but it turned out to be a pro-Nasser post.  Truth comes out.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Big Worm on January 18, 2008, 10:21:58 PM
I know you didnt intend it to be but it turned out to be a pro-Nasser post.  Truth comes out.
Dude..If I like him ,I'd tell you...You don't know me and I don't know you ...
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Matt C on January 18, 2008, 10:25:53 PM
this looks like the ideal physique.

(http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/samirbannout/samirbannout10.jpg)

Yes, Samir had a great physique.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: joelocal on January 18, 2008, 10:31:36 PM

Jaelocal if the majority of fans shared your view the judges would be forced to reward such physiques and you would not see the ones you do onstage today.  In other words, your opinion means shit.  Ever hear of supply and demand?


Lets clear a few things up here...

1. I have been saying on here since day one that it's MUCH easier to get big than it is to get and maintain symmetry.

2. Nassers physique is attainable, can someone look like Nasser...of course not, but then again Nasser could never look like me, you, Ronnie, Lavrone or anyone else. Do we have the genetics to reach Nassers size, no, but then again Nasser doesn't have the genetics for great symmetry and quite frankly Nasser couldn't do shit without as much gear as this dude took. The years he placed high in the Olympia was the year they started rewarding for size and through symmetry out the window.........just like today >:(
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: FullROM on January 18, 2008, 11:58:25 PM
Yes, Samir had a great physique.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 19, 2008, 01:09:03 AM
Lets clear a few things up here...

1. I have been saying on here since day one that it's MUCH easier to get big than it is to get and maintain symmetry.

But even more difficult is to get big and be symmetrical both!  Like Nasser, Ronnie Coleman, or Yates in 93.

2. Nassers physique is attainable, can someone look like Nasser...of course not, but then again Nasser could never look like me, you, Ronnie, Lavrone or anyone else. Do we have the genetics to reach Nassers size, no, but then again Nasser doesn't have the genetics for great symmetry and quite frankly Nasser couldn't do shit without as much gear as this dude took. The years he placed high in the Olympia was the year they started rewarding for size and through symmetry out the window.........just like today >:(

You're wrong there.  Actually, yes Nasser does have the genetics to look like them (and better) since he looked like them when he was in his early twenties (see below), and from there he continued improving his physique to surpass them into eventually the best physique in the world. 

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=186045.0;attach=218305;image)
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/images/2007/drobson317i.jpg)
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: LatsMcGee on January 19, 2008, 01:37:00 AM
The Ideal:

(http://www.bodyconcept.com/articlefiles/297-DonHoworthGym.jpg)
(http://www.bodyconcept.com/articlefiles/297-DonHoworth.jpg)
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: webcake on January 19, 2008, 02:01:15 AM
You're wrong there.  Actually, yes Nasser does have the genetics to look like them (and better) since he looked like them when he was in his early twenties (see below), and from there he continued improving his physique to surpass them into eventually the best physique in the world. 

No doubt Nassers physique was great at a time, but the best in the world...come on ::)
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 19, 2008, 02:03:52 AM
No doubt Nassers physique was great at a time, but the best in the world...come on ::)


For some years, yes.  Anyway, my main point there was to jaelocal who was saying that Nasser didnt have the genetics to look like these "smaller, aesthetic guys," so I'm showing that every mass monster looked like "smaller aesthetic guy" at one point but surpassed that.  Some lose their symmetry as they grew but Nasser didnt

Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: webcake on January 19, 2008, 02:08:25 AM
For some years, yes.  Anyway, my main point there was to jaelocal who was saying that Nasser didnt have the genetics to look like these "smaller, aesthetic guys," so I'm showing that every mass monster looked like "smaller aesthetic guy" at one point but surpassed that.  Some lose their symmetry as they grew but Nasser didnt

Yeah, i hate to say it, but i agree. For a mass monster, Nasser's symmetry was pretty good.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: hazbin on January 19, 2008, 02:30:21 AM
The Ideal:

(http://www.bodyconcept.com/articlefiles/297-DonHoworthGym.jpg)
(http://www.bodyconcept.com/articlefiles/297-DonHoworth.jpg)

40 some years later, i still can't get over don howarth's shoulders. incredible!!
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Barracuda on January 19, 2008, 07:26:29 AM
 Nasser  ???

Still dont get it do you. Nobody cares about Nasser except you and your underwear buddies. How often was nasser even discussed on this forum before you started spamming every thread? Zero. Coleman/Yates/Wheeler etc are the most talked about. All the size and drug use and his placings dropped to a dismal 14th which ultimately ended in his retirement and started new career as worn clothes salesman.  How many firsts does Nasser have? 3-4? If his physique was that great he would have won more often - notably in international competitions ( racism there too?). The ones that he did win he ended up placing 3rd or worse in the later years.

Even when discussing size people bring up Ruhl or Dennis James. Again nasser is not even worth a mention. Nasser is a footnote or less in bodybuilding history. No one cared before or now, that it until his infamous interview. Did that win him any respect? Only among you queers. Thanks to you mutts Nasser is now a joke on this site. Before your spam game people were simply indifferent.

As far as him having the ideal physique - that's laughable. Only musclebear worshipping retards like you lot seem to think so. Anyway do continue to post more nasser pics and your enlightened comments.  We need some humor on this site.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: joelocal on January 19, 2008, 07:40:15 AM
You're wrong there.  Actually, yes Nasser does have the genetics to look like them (and better) since he looked like them when he was in his early twenties (see below), and from there he continued improving his physique to surpass them into eventually the best physique in the world. 

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=186045.0;attach=218305;image)
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/images/2007/drobson317i.jpg)

Yes, I agree, at one time he did have a great physique at one time, but then, like most today decided to take ten steps further and totally ruin what he had instead of putting just a little more size and perfecting and refining what he already had, his choices lead to a shortened career and injuries left and right.

Ronnies best was between 99-01 after that his symmetry went to crap, he went from having great symmetry to having some of the worst symmetry to date.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: candidizzle on January 19, 2008, 07:40:46 AM
i think dugdale is pretty close to the ideal...
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Pete Nice on January 19, 2008, 08:49:04 AM
i think dugdale is pretty close to the ideal...

he's like 5'5 though
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: The Viking on January 19, 2008, 09:39:54 AM
Bannout was great, but here are some more.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: dj181 on January 20, 2008, 12:03:22 AM
SAMASSER SMELL SOME BODY.... this dude is a fvcking toad ;D
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Big Worm on January 20, 2008, 11:25:09 AM
Nasser  ???

Still dont get it do you. Nobody cares about Nasser except you and your underwear buddies. How often was nasser even discussed on this forum before you started spamming every thread? Zero. Coleman/Yates/Wheeler etc are the most talked about. All the size and drug use and his placings dropped to a dismal 14th which ultimately ended in his retirement and started new career as worn clothes salesman.  How many firsts does Nasser have? 3-4? If his physique was that great he would have won more often - notably in international competitions ( racism there too?). The ones that he did win he ended up placing 3rd or worse in the later years.

Even when discussing size people bring up Ruhl or Dennis James. Again nasser is not even worth a mention. Nasser is a footnote or less in bodybuilding history. No one cared before or now, that it until his infamous interview. Did that win him any respect? Only among you queers. Thanks to you mutts Nasser is now a joke on this site. Before your spam game people were simply indifferent.

As far as him having the ideal physique - that's laughable. Only musclebear worshipping retards like you lot seem to think so. Anyway do continue to post more nasser pics and your enlightened comments.  We need some humor on this site.

Well put !  I agree 1,000,000% !
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 20, 2008, 05:31:42 PM
Yes, I agree, at one time he did have a great physique at one time, but then, like most today decided to take ten steps further and totally ruin what he had instead of putting just a little more size and perfecting and refining what he already had, his choices lead to a shortened career and injuries left and right.

Ronnies best was between 99-01 after that his symmetry went to crap, he went from having great symmetry to having some of the worst symmetry to date.

So you proved my point that what you guys think is the "ideal physique" is simply one that is less massive than today's top pros, and that most of the bigger pros of today had when they were younger (like 23-25) a physique that you would consider "ideal" like Samir Bannout at his biggest. 

As for your comment about their subsequent growth "ruining" their physique, I'll simply repeat what I said earlier - if the majority of fans agreed the judges would face pressure to reward such physiques and you would not see the mass monsters that you do today.  It's called supply and demand!
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 20, 2008, 05:38:17 PM
Nasser  ???

Still dont get it do you. Nobody cares about Nasser except you and your underwear buddies. How often was nasser even discussed on this forum before you started spamming every thread? Zero. Coleman/Yates/Wheeler etc are the most talked about. All the size and drug use and his placings dropped to a dismal 14th which ultimately ended in his retirement and started new career as worn clothes salesman.  How many firsts does Nasser have? 3-4? If his physique was that great he would have won more often - notably in international competitions ( racism there too?). The ones that he did win he ended up placing 3rd or worse in the later years.

Even when discussing size people bring up Ruhl or Dennis James. Again nasser is not even worth a mention. Nasser is a footnote or less in bodybuilding history. No one cared before or now, that it until his infamous interview. Did that win him any respect? Only among you queers. Thanks to you mutts Nasser is now a joke on this site. Before your spam game people were simply indifferent.

As far as him having the ideal physique - that's laughable. Only musclebear worshipping retards like you lot seem to think so. Anyway do continue to post more nasser pics and your enlightened comments.  We need some humor on this site.


Nasser has 6 pro wins (deserved many more), and a ton of top 3 placings - actually from 1995 to 2000 (for six straight years) he placed in the top 3 in 29 of the 35 shows he competed in!  That's a very consistent record to the say the least.  He also beat Levrone, Wheeler, and Ray many times, and would have beaten them more if he was a winner of the NPC USA show since they always got favoured over "foreigners."  You mentioned Ruhl and Dennis James?!  ???  They weren't even in Nasser's league.  The ONLY person to be more massive (at an average height) than Nasser at his best at the 99 Arnold Classic at a ripped 289 lbs was Ronnie Coleman in, I forget which year, but when he competed at 296 I think it was.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 20, 2008, 05:52:36 PM
Some more pics of the Ideal!

Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: MB_722 on January 20, 2008, 05:56:20 PM
Nasser Sucks.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigdumbbell on January 20, 2008, 05:59:06 PM
Nasser is a very lonely guy; he is always on his own. He has lost his friendships and his wife left him for a another man. I sometimes feel cruel pointing out the sad, isolated and bitter existence this poor man is left with. To cap it all he has to demean himself by selling his soiled clothes and engaging in phonesex with schmoes.
GETBIG CLASSIC POSTING  lol
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 20, 2008, 06:02:39 PM
Some more pics of the Ideal!



Ideal from the front lmfao ideal would include a back and less of a gut
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: SF1900 on January 20, 2008, 06:04:22 PM
Ideal from the front lmfao ideal would include a back and less of a gut

Team FAGS, I mean Team Nasser will have an excuse for that picture as well. They will be like "Oh yeah, on that day, Nasser was posing when the sun wasnt properly aligned with the universe, thus making his midsection look bloated."
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Earl1972 on January 20, 2008, 06:06:00 PM
how could anybody with a gut be considered ideal ???

E
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 20, 2008, 06:10:40 PM
Team FAGS, I mean Team Nasser will have an excuse for that picture as well. They will be like "Oh yeah, on that day, Nasser was posing when the sun wasnt properly aligned with the universe, thus making his midsection look bloated."

lol he did look great when he held it tight but again ideal I think not.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 20, 2008, 06:11:18 PM
Team FAGS, I mean Team Nasser will have an excuse for that picture as well. They will be like "Oh yeah, on that day, Nasser was posing when the sun wasnt properly aligned with the universe, thus making his midsection look bloated."

No excuse needed there at all!  He is MASSIVE and awesome in that show (see pics below).  You can find a pic of any pro where they are between poses, taking in a deep breath, and caught for a second or two not holding in their tummy.  I like how ND viewed the video on youtube and waited for the instant where Nasser's waist looked the widest, pressed pause and printscreen.  When you have to look for someone's worst shot to discredit them you know he must be good!

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=186780.0;attach=218827;image)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=186780.0;attach=218828;image)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=186780.0;attach=218829;image)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=186780.0;attach=218830;image)
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Go 4 It on January 20, 2008, 06:17:54 PM
Being crossed eyed and bald isn't "ideal"...
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: SF1900 on January 20, 2008, 06:22:52 PM
No excuse needed there at all!  He is MASSIVE and awesome in that show (see pics below).  You can find a pic of any pro where they are between poses, taking in a deep breath, and caught for a second or two not holding in their tummy.  I like how ND viewed the video on youtube and waited for the instant where Nasser's waist looked the widest, pressed pause and printscreen.  When you have to look for someone's worst shot to discredit them you know he must be good!

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=186780.0;attach=218827;image)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=186780.0;attach=218828;image)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=186780.0;attach=218829;image)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=186780.0;attach=218830;image)

Even so, his lack of back detail does not make his body ideal!
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 20, 2008, 06:29:46 PM
Even so, his lack of back detail does not make his body ideal!

NOBODY's body is PERFECT.  And Nasser's back was actually pretty good (very massive and still lots of detail) for most of his career.  He only lacked back detail when compared to like the top 6 or so.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=183230.0;attach=216025;image)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=69359.0;attach=218218;image)

Besides, overall from the rear pose above he still looks better than Ray or Dorian, since the pose includes many more bodyparts than just the back.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: MB_722 on January 20, 2008, 06:31:40 PM
NOBODY's body is PERFECT.  And Nasser's back was actually pretty good (very massive and still lots of detail) for most of his career.  He only lacked back detail when compared to like the top 6 or so.

Besides, overall from the rear pose above he still looks better than Ray or Dorian, since the pose includes many more bodyparts than just the back.

you are sickening. Nasser is not the ideal.

why even bother comparing him to ray or yates?

Samir had the ideal physique.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 20, 2008, 06:33:07 PM
you are sickening. Nasser is not the ideal.

why even bother comparing him to ray or yates?
Samir had the ideal physique.

LOL, why not compare him to Ray since he beat him many times  ???  And deserved to beat Dorian later in his career too.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: SF1900 on January 20, 2008, 06:33:22 PM
NOBODY's body is PERFECT.  And Nasser's back was actually pretty good (very massive and still lots of detail) for most of his career.  He only lacked back detail when compared to like the top 6 or so.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=183230.0;attach=216025;image)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=69359.0;attach=218218;image)

Besides, overall from the rear pose above he still looks better than Ray or Dorian, since the pose includes many more bodyparts than just the back.

Yo, tell me the truth. Do you ever have dreams or fantasies about stroking Nassers penis? Or perhaps you have dreams about being smothered in nasser "sport memorabilia."?

You can tell me the truth. I will not judge you.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 20, 2008, 06:35:46 PM
Yo, tell me the truth. Do you ever have dreams or fantasies about stroking Nassers penis? Or perhaps you have dreams about being smothered in nasser "sport memorabilia."?

You can tell me the truth. I will not judge you.

Meltdown resulting in asking me stupid questions
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Go 4 It on January 20, 2008, 06:38:33 PM
BigBobs is definitely a strange individual to say the least, maybe he never had a father figure growing up?? However he does manage to pull some pretty hot bitches so can't hate on that ;)
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: SF1900 on January 20, 2008, 06:40:18 PM
Meltdown resulting in asking me stupid questions

Yo, you told me in the chatroom that you had dreams about you and nasser getting into posing trunks and posing together! So, in essence, it is not too far fetched that you might have erotic dreams about him also.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 20, 2008, 06:45:29 PM
NOBODY's body is PERFECT.  And Nasser's back was actually pretty good (very massive and still lots of detail) for most of his career.  He only lacked back detail when compared to like the top 6 or so.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=183230.0;attach=216025;image)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=69359.0;attach=218218;image)

Besides, overall from the rear pose above he still looks better than Ray or Dorian, since the pose includes many more bodyparts than just the back.

LMFAO Dorian in 1996 is blowing Nasser out of the water in that back double biceps shot YOU NEED A back to have a back double biceps shot and he's soft compared to Yates & Ray
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 20, 2008, 06:48:37 PM
LMFAO Dorian in 1996 is blowing Nasser out of the water in that back double biceps shot YOU NEED A back to have a back double biceps shot and he's soft compared to Yates & Ray

Yes, if not being able to see ANY biceps, having little delt separation and detail, worse hamstrings, and less V-taper = Blowing away then yes Dorian is blowing him away there  ::)  The ONLY thing Dorian has on Nasser there is back detail and bigger calves.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: Voice of Doom on January 20, 2008, 06:50:21 PM
Here it is boys...the deal. ;D
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 20, 2008, 06:53:37 PM
Yes, if not being able to see ANY biceps, having little delt separation and detail, worse hamstrings, and less V-taper = Blowing away then yes Dorian is blowing him away there  ::)  The ONLY thing Dorian has on Nasser there is back detail and bigger calves.

sure , sure lol Dorian is completely OWNING Nasser from the back ( as well as the sides ) from the front in that particular contest Nasser did look better but again Nasser is great from the front hence why they ask for back and 1/4 turns so the guys like Nasser get exposed for the weaknesses they carry.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 20, 2008, 06:56:41 PM
sure , sure lol Dorian is completely OWNING Nasser from the back ( as well as the sides ) from the front in that particular contest Nasser did look better but again Nasser is great from the front hence why they ask for back and 1/4 turns so the guys like Nasser get exposed for the weaknesses they carry.

Nasser was better than Dorian from the front in 95 and every year thereafter.  From the back, like I explained earlier, in 96-97 Nasser was even beating Dorian in the rear double biceps pose.  Dorian had a slightly better read lat spread, that was it.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 20, 2008, 07:00:14 PM
Nasser was better than Dorian from the front in 95 and every year thereafter.  From the back, like I explained earlier, in 96-97 Nasser was even beating Dorian in the rear double biceps pose.  Dorian had a slightly better read lat spread, that was it.

Nasser NEVER beat Dorian from the back ever thats fantasy and he didn't beat Yates from the front in 95 , sorry slick and psot 95 Dorian still had a much better front latspread , and Nasser 96/97 had a better front double biceps and ab-thigh but again his front latspread isn't in yates' league .
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: NeverTrustABlonde on January 20, 2008, 07:05:24 PM
Being crossed eyed and bald isn't "ideal"...


took the words right out of my mouth.....
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 20, 2008, 07:06:47 PM
Nasser NEVER beat Dorian from the back ever thats fantasy and he didn't beat Yates from the front in 95 , sorry slick and psot 95 Dorian still had a much better front latspread , and Nasser 96/97 had a better front double biceps and ab-thigh but again his front latspread isn't in yates' league .

Nasser beat Dorian the rear double biceps pose in 96 and 97, and Dorian beat Nasser in the rear lat spread.  So of the two back mandatory poses, it was 1 to 1 :)

After 95 Dorian sucked from the front, there is no arguing there.  He had the second widest waist onstage (to Jp Fux only), no biceps, and lacked detail in the supper body.  Nasser on the other hand was flawless from the front, as Arnold Scharzenneger even said.  Nasser beat Dorian in the front lat spread too.  Got a comparison pic handy? - there's one from 97 flying around but I didnt save it.

Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 20, 2008, 07:08:23 PM
Check out how the Ideal here owns Levrone and Yates!

Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 20, 2008, 07:12:59 PM
Check out how the Ideal here owns Levrone and Yates!



Check out how the ideal didn't place in 96 because he failed the diuretics test and he was still soft in relation
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 20, 2008, 07:14:24 PM
Check out how the ideal didn't place in 96 because he failed the diuretics test and he was still soft in relation

Yes, you can really tell "hardness" from those pics.

So Jay Cutler didnt place in 2001 either?  ???
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 20, 2008, 07:15:47 PM
Yes, you can really tell "hardness" from those pics.

So Jay Cutler didnt place in 2001 either?  ???

great point , but it also co-insides with the contest report  ;)
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bigbobs on January 20, 2008, 07:17:02 PM
great point , but it also co-insides with the contest report  ;)

You mean coincide? ;)

And your point just further shows how biases worked against Nasser unfairly.

Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 20, 2008, 07:19:30 PM
You mean coincide? ;)

And your point just further shows how biases worked against Nasser unfairly.



yes , yes Nasser is a victim lol give me a break , Jay fought the powers that be , they place where they did the testing for diurectics wasn't a IOC lab so he fought it an won , maybe if Nasser used his ' intellect ' he would have played that game and won but he didn't and now he's all bitter & angry.
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: England_1 on January 20, 2008, 07:20:40 PM
Nasser was too much of a pussy to fight it. Now, 12 years later his balls dropped  :-\
Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: bizzy on January 20, 2008, 07:31:31 PM
Samir @ the 1983 Olympia in my opinion
is in the top 5 best bodybuilding physiques ever.
I think he is very underated by most.

Title: Re: Is this the Ideal?
Post by: LatsMcGee on January 21, 2008, 12:38:15 AM
Dorian and Ronnie - Mr. Olympia champions.
Nasser -  Mr. Nolympia. 

Enough already.