Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: GymTime on February 02, 2008, 06:53:47 PM
-
.
-
holy fucking shit.
this is x13543467862132321658678 better than that nasser video.
a fucking cartoon.
-
http://www.dailymotion.com/related/5553363/tag/ronnie/video/x282pv_paul-dillet-explosion_extreme
never seen this video until today. paul looks very similar to coleman in 1999 in this video. definitely one of hte best...
Thats not Lee Priest
-
lol, they say Nasser should have won an Olympia, what about Paul?!
-
Jurrassic Paul and Lively Lee used to be roomates
what a very insensitive thread >:(
-
without even watching it.
Im gonna guess he didn't turn around to show his back huh? =)
-
Another reminder of IFBB politics and fixed shows. Factor in less weaknesses than Yates and other top BBs (only lacking in back detail, width is fine) and even with the poor posing there's no excuse that holds water for not vying for top place in fair contests when in shape.
That vid's been on youtube and getbig for a while now but good to see. That's about the best shape he's every been in and one of the top 3-4 physiques in history along with Coleman, Oliva and Schwarzenegger, which again reminds of the crazy contest "placings".
-
This looks like it was taken at the same show? Similar lighting.
-
lol, they say Nasser should have won an Olympia, what about Paul?!
They both look great from the FRONT.
Turn them around and they look like shit.
Neither have a back.
-
Fucking owns nasser. Only nasser fanboys will say he doesn't.
-
They both look great from the FRONT.
Turn them around and they look like shit.
Neither have a back.
Bullshit stock excuse. Dillet's only weakness was back detail, everything else from the back was stellar including delts, tris, waist, thigh biceps, calves. Yates had more flaws which is never mentioned when bringing up Dillet's limited flaws.
-
Bullshit stock excuse. Dillet's only weakness was back detail, everything else from the back was stellar including delts, tris, waist, thigh biceps, calves. Yates had more flaws which is never mentioned when bringing up Dillet's limited flaws.
exactly, same "back" bullshit every time.
-
Dillet cant pose...can't present the physique.
-
holy fucking shit.
this is x13543467862132321658678 better than that nasser video.
a fucking cartoon.
fuck what aint better than a nasser video
-
It's difficult to compare the two in solo pics/videos - this is the only actual comparison that I have of the two...if anyone has any others they are welcome to post.
-
Dillet cant pose...can't present the physique.
Standard pasty nationialist white guy from the UK defensiveness.
Here's Yates from the back on the right (back shots supposedly his strong point) looking very flawed while owned against Nasser.
-
It's difficult to compare the two in solo pics/videos - this is the only actual comparison that I have of the two...if anyone has any others they are welcome to post.
Nasser definitely looks more complete but Paul looks great too.
-
Paul was well past his prime -1994- in that shot there. Plus he's not even posing yet.
Also, yet another Pumpster racial meltdown :-\
-
It's difficult to compare the two in solo pics/videos - this is the only actual comparison that I have of the two...if anyone has any others they are welcome to post.
Nasser owns the shit outta Dillet. He makes him that much his bitch in that shot like hardly anyone has ever made anybody else his bitch in the history of the world......
-
nasser and paul both own dorian, no contest.
what i dont get is how all the dorian nuthuggers think that just because he had the best back he deserved to win, when he got destroyed on all the other muscles with exception of calves.
not to mention dorians bloated, thick waistline on par with palumbo and kovacs. he should have lost major points for that, but somehow he didnt.
-
nasser and paul both own dorian, no contest.
what i dont get is how all the dorian nuthuggers think that just because he had the best back he deserved to win, when he got destroyed on all the other muscles with exception of calves.
not to mention dorians bloated, thick waistline on par with palumbo and kovacs. he should have lost major points for that, but somehow he didnt.
absolutely right.
-
Dorian trained like an animal and knew how to show up in great condition, but his physique kinda sucked. Let's move on.
-
Legit 23" arms.
-
never seen this video until today.
You're a really noob.
It's on P2P for... 10 years !
...with thousands of others
-
Dorian trained like an animal and knew how to show up in great condition, but his physique kinda sucked. Let's move on.
Pithy
-
nasser and paul both own dorian, no contest.
what i dont get is how all the dorian nuthuggers think that just because he had the best back he deserved to win, when he got destroyed on all the other muscles with exception of calves.
not to mention dorians bloated, thick waistline on par with palumbo and kovacs. he should have lost major points for that, but somehow he didnt.
It's all follow-the-leader shit, they wanna be with a winner and consider themselves winners. The IFBB proclaimed the barrel the "winner", therefore they line up behind that.
-
Another reminder of IFBB politics and fixed shows. Factor in less weaknesses than Yates and other top BBs (only lacking in back detail, width is fine) and even with the poor posing there's no excuse that holds water for not vying for top place in fair contests when in shape.
That vid's been on youtube and getbig for a while now but good to see. That's about the best shape he's every been in and one of the top 3-4 physiques in history along with Coleman, Oliva and Schwarzenegger, which again reminds of the crazy contest "placings".
Jesus, Dillets arms look about 3-4 inches bigger than dorians in that shot.
-
Conditioning anyone?