Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: bb.comscribe on February 08, 2008, 11:51:59 AM

Title: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bb.comscribe on February 08, 2008, 11:51:59 AM
Here is the latest Nasser article; he gives some insights into his recent bodybuilding.com interviews among other things:

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/nasserstories.htm

Here is a database where you can access all Nasser content:

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/nasser_interview_main.htm


And the actual interview five will be online shortly.

Thanks

David
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: JohnnyVegas on February 08, 2008, 12:08:02 PM
Thanks, I needed some good Nasser material to read so I don't end up staying up late at night and can go into a deep slumber ......
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 08, 2008, 12:09:43 PM
Lying must be easy for the DCN  (Delusional Clown Nasser)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: m8 on February 08, 2008, 12:11:32 PM
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/images/2007/nasserstoriesa.jpg)
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/images/2007/nasserstoriesh.jpg)
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/images/2007/nasserstoriesd.jpg)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: Stavios on February 08, 2008, 12:18:53 PM
Boooooooooooring
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: _bruce_ on February 08, 2008, 12:30:12 PM
Greeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeat!  ;D
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: nycbull on February 08, 2008, 01:04:05 PM
"For sure I am not just blindly stepping on people's toes and being an elephant in a so-called porcelain store."

the saying is bull in a china shop..

I like Nasser and totaly respect his truth wizardry and was the first person here to support his bbcom interviews, but he is lacking one talent and that is nicknaming...he is just not good at it. He has tried to create nicknames ie DCM, Smilley Scumcrap, etc etc. that he hoped would stick but they are just not sticking...

Nicknaming and creating catch phrases is a unique skill, i dont have it thats for sure. Squadfather is one person who is good at it, maybe Nasser should get some advice from him.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: AVBG on February 08, 2008, 01:07:53 PM
LOL at the "chemical warfare" signs ;D
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: JohnnyVegas on February 08, 2008, 01:23:35 PM
LOL at the "chemical warfare" signs ;D

Just saw that----fucking hilarious.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: Camel Jockey on February 08, 2008, 01:45:48 PM
hahahahah brutal ownage !
 ;D

Quote
I am amazed about the low, very low, average IQ of many so-called bodybuilding fans. They are actually not fans, they are just jealous and envious creatures and desperate under achievers.

Amazingly they do not only know almost nothing about bodybuilding besides thinking they know, but again they barely know anything about it because from their sentences you realize that basic knowledge and common sense is missing. No wonder some see people like the DCM and others as one-eyed kings among the many other completely blind kings.

If Ruhl retired and had spoken his mind as he does not - except privately - then all the miserable fake fan creatures would question why he is still so big and if he would become smaller like Levrone and Tom Prince, for example. Then he would become physically sick or it would be "all drugs." And if he is soon to be 50 years of age like the excellent-looking Gary Strydom then he would be "dead soon or have lost ten years of his life and living unhealthy."

Kinda sums up Stark.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: WhiteCastle on February 08, 2008, 02:12:31 PM
hahahahah brutal ownage !
 ;D

Kinda sums up Stark.


Brutal self-ownage by Nasser.  Nasser himself has said before that he doesn't care what people say about him on here...appears to not be the case in this interview.  I can't believe anything Nasser says based on this obvious lie.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: Brutal_1 on February 08, 2008, 02:17:10 PM

(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/images/2007/nasserstoriesh.jpg)



Look at Ronnie's forearm compared to Nasser's  :o  :o  :o
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigguns23 on February 08, 2008, 02:23:19 PM
hahahahah brutal ownage !
 ;D

Kinda sums up Stark.


Calling the kettle black.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: Lamplighterx on February 08, 2008, 02:53:11 PM
what a great article

happy nasser night everyone!
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 08, 2008, 02:55:18 PM
Brutal self-ownage by Nasser.  Nasser himself has said before that he doesn't care what people say about him on here...appears to not be the case in this interview.  I can't believe anything Nasser says based on this obvious lie.

Brutal self-ownage by WhiteCastle by showing low interpretation skills.  Nowhere in the post you quoted did Nasser show that he cares what people say about him.


Look at Ronnie's forearm compared to Nasser's  :o  :o  :o

Different angle.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: JohnnyVegas on February 08, 2008, 02:58:25 PM
Brutal self-ownage by WhiteCastle by showing low interpretation skills.  Nowhere in the post you quoted did Nasser show that he cares what people say about him.

Different angle.

Brutal ownage of BobBoobs, and his meltdown is classic.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 08, 2008, 03:06:24 PM

Look at Ronnie's forearm compared to Nasser's  :o  :o  :o

Coleman dwarfs Nasser....easily
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 08, 2008, 03:37:14 PM
Coleman dwarfs Nasser....easily

They are the two most massive guys to compete, but neither "dwarfs" the other.  I've seen them both in person. 

to "dwarf" you need at least 15% more size than the other.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 08, 2008, 03:42:05 PM
They are the two most massive guys to compete, but neither "dwarfs" the other.  I've seen them both in person. 

to "dwarf" you need at least 15% more size than the other.

every Pro out there has said....

When coleman was 95% or better....no one that has ever stood on stage could stand next to him.....

that includes Nasser El Nobody
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: CigaretteMan on February 08, 2008, 03:46:27 PM
They are the two most massive guys to compete, but neither "dwarfs" the other.  I've seen them both in person. 

to "dwarf" you need at least 15% more size than the other.

  You are out of your mind if you think Nasser can hold the jockstrap of Ronnie Coleman when it comes to muscular mass. Nasser has a much, much bigger frame than Ronnie. Look at the size of Nasser's ankles, wrists and knees and you'll see that. This means that he carries far less mass at the same weight. Seriosly, dude, your fanboyism is hilarious.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: Camel Jockey on February 08, 2008, 03:47:32 PM
every Pro out there has said....

When coleman was 95% or better....no one that has ever stood on stage could stand next to him.....

that includes Nasser El Nobody

Bob has met both.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: Camel Jockey on February 08, 2008, 03:49:55 PM
 You are out of your mind if you think Nasser can hold the jockstrap of Ronnie Coleman when it comes to muscular mass. Nasser has a much, much bigger frame than Ronnie. Look at the size of Nasser's ankles, wrists and knees and you'll see that. This means that he carries far less mass at the same weight. Seriosly, dude, your fanboyism is hilarious.

I think 1996 and 1997 Nasser could hold his own against Ronnie.

And let's not forget that Nasser spanked Ronnie for most of the 90's until 1998 when Ronnie took off.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 08, 2008, 03:53:11 PM
Bob has met both.

Thanks for pointing that out - yes I've met them both so I'm in a fair position to say whether or not one would dwarf the other.  Size-wise they were pretty equal (Nasser in 2000 and 2002, Ronnie in 2005).
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 08, 2008, 04:02:01 PM
Thanks for pointing that out - yes I've met them both so I'm in a fair position to say whether or not one would dwarf the other.  Size-wise they were pretty equal (Nasser in 2000 and 2002, Ronnie in 2005).

delusional
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: CigaretteMan on February 08, 2008, 04:02:52 PM
I think 1996 and 1997 Nasser could hold his own against Ronnie.

  I am talking about Coleman circa 2003 Olympia. Nasser at his biggest competition weight was 280 lbs. Ronnie in 2003 was close to 290 lbs and with smaller bones. Conclusion: he carried far more muscle mass.

Quote
And let's not forget that Nasser spanked Ronnie for most of the 90's until 1998 when Ronnie took off.

  the same can be said for Dorian. So why do you object to this argument being used as reason for why Yates would defeat Ronnie at his best ???
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 08, 2008, 04:05:10 PM
 I am talking about Coleman circa 2003 Olympia. Nasser at his biggest competition weight was 280 lbs. Ronnie in 2003 was close to 290 lbs and with smaller bones. Conclusion: he carried far more muscle mass.

Wrong.  Nasser competed at 298 lbs at an English Euro Grand Prix Tour.  He also competed at 289 at the 99 Arnold Classic.  He competed at 285ish a number of times.

I think Ronnie competed at 296 in one Olympia, and 287 in his second highest bodyweight.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 08, 2008, 04:08:29 PM
delusional

Why, do you think Ronnie is so big here that he would "dwarf" Nasser?  ::)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=199666.0;attach=232549;image)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: WhiteCastle on February 08, 2008, 04:09:43 PM
Brutal self-ownage by WhiteCastle by showing low interpretation skills.  Nowhere in the post you quoted did Nasser show that he cares what people say about him.

Different angle.

Just do a search for "boards" in the article...he's not referring to surf boards.  The whole article is just a Nasser meltdown.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 08, 2008, 04:10:11 PM
Why, do you think Ronnie is so big here that he would "dwarf" Nasser?  ::)



Damn...Ronnie off the juice (like in that picture) still would dwarf Nasser
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 08, 2008, 04:13:14 PM
Damn...Ronnie off the juice (like in that picture) still would dwarf Nasser

"Off the juice??"  Are you trying to insult Ronnie by saying he's not huge??  That pic is in July/2005 just before he started his prep for the 2005 Mr. Olympia, in other words, he was at the end of his offseason/bulking stage for that year.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: CigaretteMan on February 08, 2008, 04:14:43 PM
Wrong.  Nasser competed at 298 lbs at an English Euro Grand Prix Tour.  He also competed at 289 at the 99 Arnold Classic.  


  Huh..I will have to see written evidence for that. But you're right that he did come to some contests at 285 lbs. In any case, Ronnie would still be carrying more muscle because he was 287 lbs for the 2003 Olympia woh smaller bones.

Quote
He competed at 285ish a number of times.

  Ya, but that still would mean he would be carrying less mass than Coleman, because the latter has smaller bones.

Quote
I think Ronnie competed at 296 in one Olympia, and 287 in his second highest bodyweight.

  Yes, and if Nasser did indeed compete at 298 lbs, it would mean that he would be carrying less mass than Coleman at the 2004 Olympia due to the bone size difference. ;)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 08, 2008, 04:17:22 PM
Here you go: http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/ronnie-coleman-july-23-2005/
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 08, 2008, 04:20:06 PM


  Huh..I will have to see written evidence for that. But you're right that he did come to some contests at 285 lbs. In any case, Ronnie would still be carrying more muscle because he was 287 lbs for the 2003 Olympia woh smaller bones.

  Ya, but that still would mean he would be carrying less mass than Coleman, because the latter has smaller bones.

  Yes, and if Nasser did indeed compete at 298 lbs, it would mean that he would be carrying less mass than Coleman at the 2004 Olympia due to the bone size difference. ;)


My point isnt to get into the nitty-gritty of who has one or two lbs more mass than the other - what I said was that Ronnie does not "dwarf" Nasser AND that they look pretty comparable in size as I've seen them both.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 08, 2008, 04:20:21 PM
"Off the juice??"  Are you trying to insult Ronnie by saying he's not huge??  That pic is in July/2005 just before he started his prep for the 2005 Mr. Olympia, in other words, he was at the end of his offseason/bulking stage for that year.

Ronnie was not in full motion in that picture...not even close
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: Camel Jockey on February 08, 2008, 04:22:05 PM
Wrong.  Nasser competed at 298 lbs at an English Euro Grand Prix Tour.  He also competed at 289 at the 99 Arnold Classic.  He competed at 285ish a number of times.

I think Ronnie competed at 296 in one Olympia, and 287 in his second highest bodyweight.


Ronnie was 287lbs in the 2003 Mr. Olympia, and 296 lbs in 2004 Mr. Olympia.

Nasser being the pioneer that he was set the stage for so many.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 08, 2008, 04:22:52 PM
Ronnie was not in full motion in that picture...not even close

Yes he was.  Why would he be in anything but "full motion" at the start of his Olympia prep?!  He takes some months off after the Olympia, and then has a hardcore offseason immediately followed by precontest.  That pic was taken at the end of his offseason for 2005.  I also put a link up with other pics taken at that session.

The promoter purposely booked that time since it was a given that Ronnie would be at his biggest.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 08, 2008, 04:48:32 PM
Yes he was.  Why would he be in anything but "full motion" at the start of his Olympia prep?!  He takes some months off after the Olympia, and then has a hardcore offseason immediately followed by precontest.  That pic was taken at the end of his offseason for 2005.  I also put a link up with other pics taken at that session.

The promoter purposely booked that time since it was a given that Ronnie would be at his biggest.

Cuz Big Bubba just isn't dipshit
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: Mcmuscle on February 08, 2008, 04:53:28 PM
I think 1996 and 1997 Nasser could hold his own against Ronnie.

And let's not forget that Nasser spanked Ronnie for most of the 90's until 1998 when Ronnie took off.


Vince Taylor is the man!
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 08, 2008, 05:03:24 PM

  Yes, and if Nasser did indeed compete at 298 lbs, it would mean that he would be carrying less mass than Coleman at the 2004 Olympia due to the bone size difference. ;)


The biggest difference in the most tiny skeletal bone structure compared to the biggst ever is less than 6 (six) LBS!!!  So the discussion of bones making a difference is just BS.
 
Is that also the reason why Ronnie has small weak calves?  And if this is the case how can you criticize Nasser for being "bigger" boned?  So when Nasser's frame is bigger than Ronnies - why is this bad - it's like saying Dennis Wolfs frame is bigger than Cutlers so Wolf should never defeat Cutler?!
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: onlyme on February 08, 2008, 05:31:21 PM
Here is Nasser going fishing with some of the gang.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: Camel Jockey on February 08, 2008, 05:54:07 PM
Thanks for picture, onlyme.  8)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigguns23 on February 08, 2008, 06:05:53 PM
Here is Nasser going fishing with some of the gang.

Awsome injection spot.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: dearth on February 08, 2008, 07:02:49 PM
Awsome injection spot.

team undies will tell you thats a mosquito bite or be sting...
nasser is way to clever to inject oil into his delts, wait a minute he did...
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 08, 2008, 07:04:12 PM
team undies will tell you thats a mosquito bite or be sting...
nasser is way to clever to inject oil into his delts, wait a minute he did...

So you can tell by an injection site whether there is "synthol" or anabolic steroids that were injected?  ::)  Are you saying no other pros have ever had a visible injection scab?
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: Lamplighterx on February 08, 2008, 07:09:11 PM
bigbobs you were looking pretty good next to the big nasty 8)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: dearth on February 08, 2008, 07:10:30 PM
So you can tell by an injection site whether there is "synthol" or anabolic steroids that were injected?  ::)  Are you saying no other pros have ever had a visible injection scab?

so you can tell when a pro has/hasn't injected synthol into his delts based on your epic gay love ?

your stunning objectivity says much about your crediblity
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 08, 2008, 07:11:20 PM
bigbobs you were looking pretty good next to the big nasty 8)

Thanks, normally I'm pretty humble but today I took it as a huge compliment that Knny187 thought that Ronnie Coleman was "off drugs" or "not in full motion" from his pic with me!  He did realize that the pics were taken July 23/05 when Ronnie was at the end of his 2005 offseason and fully grown about to start dieting down for the 2005 Olympia!
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 08, 2008, 07:13:02 PM
so you can tell when a pro has/hasn't injected synthol into his delts based on your epic gay love ?

your stunning objectivity says much about your crediblity


So we assume every pro injects synthol and if anyone objects to such an assumption it means they are in gay love with the bodybuilder?  ::)

I give benefit of the doubt unless I have reason not to.  No one here is a guru such that they can look at a rear delt and tell whether a lump is due to synthol or scar tissue, or something else.  Besides, Flex Wheeler's rear delt was much more lumpy/pointy than Nasser's was (after Nasser's scar tissue built up by the early 2000's)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: Go 4 It on February 08, 2008, 07:16:49 PM
Who's ship is that?
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: Eric2 on February 08, 2008, 07:21:08 PM
 ;D

Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: The Squadfather on February 08, 2008, 07:21:17 PM
holy shit i was at this show, this is Springfield, MO in July 2000 at the MO state championships, i still have pictures meeting Nasser and Ronnie at this show.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 08, 2008, 08:30:52 PM
holy shit i was at this show, this is Springfield, MO in July 2000 at the MO state championships, i still have pictures meeting Nasser and Ronnie at this show.

Post them!  The more Nasser (okay and even Ronnie ;) pics the better...you can crop yourself out if you dont want to give the haters photoshop material :)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: nycbull on February 08, 2008, 09:03:20 PM
bigbobs, thats a pretty dainty watch Nasser is wearing, how do you explain that?
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: webcake on February 08, 2008, 09:11:06 PM
Flex looks small next to Nasser and Big Ron 8)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: The Squadfather on February 09, 2008, 08:05:37 AM
Flex looks small next to Nasser and Big Ron 8)
we talked to Flex and he claimed to be 275 pounds there but honestly when he posed he looked maybe 245-250, he was wearing a huge 3XL Hilfiger polo shirt and baggy khaki pants so you can't really tell what he weighed, i remember being shocked at Ronnie's size and thickness though, he looked liek a gorilla, this was maybe 2 months before he filmed the Unbelievable.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: DOGGCRAPP on February 09, 2008, 09:21:58 AM
   BigBobs I know your very passionate about Nasser and thats to be admired, and he was massive beyond belief in his heyday but Ronnie at the 2004 Grand Prix was at a level noone in this sport has ever been at muscle mass wise. 303-305 pounds onstage. There isnt a bodybuilder in history who could of stood next to Ronnie sizewise front to back at that show.

(and an atlas stone for good measure)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 09:43:15 AM
Asser couldn't support Ronnie's jock strap
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: The Squadfather on February 09, 2008, 09:45:05 AM
   BigBobs I know your very passionate about Nasser and thats to be admired, and he was massive beyond belief in his heyday but Ronnie at the 2004 Grand Prix was at a level noone in this sport has ever been at muscle mass wise. 303-305 pounds onstage. There isnt a bodybuilder in history who could of stood next to Ronnie sizewise front to back at that show.

(and an atlas stone for good measure)
he wasn't 303-305 onstage. ::)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigguns23 on February 09, 2008, 09:51:27 AM
Squad he was.  He was 305 at the Dutch Grand Prix in Holland in 2004. I remember talking to him about that. He told me after the Olympia that year, (he admitted he came in a little flat) he just really filled up on food once he got over seas from the US and that in part led to him filling out and tightening up.  It's really not hard to believe. He was 296 at the 04 olympia.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: dearth on February 09, 2008, 09:52:28 AM
So we assume every pro injects synthol and if anyone objects to such an assumption it means they are in gay love with the bodybuilder?  ::)

I give benefit of the doubt unless I have reason not to.  No one here is a guru such that they can look at a rear delt and tell whether a lump is due to synthol or scar tissue, or something else.  Besides, Flex Wheeler's rear delt was much more lumpy/pointy than Nasser's was (after Nasser's scar tissue built up by the early 2000's)

actually those of us not in love with nasser, can actually beleive our own eyes when it comes to recognizing a synthol laced bodypart.

it is not that difficult to do, but the recognizing your inabilty to objectively look at anything,
the " since no one is a guru in recognizing synthol, there is none." argument was quite creative, though still in line with your delusional mentality.

"a guru" to recognize synthol.

Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: The Squadfather on February 09, 2008, 09:52:46 AM
Squad he was.  He was 305 at the Dutch Grand Prix in Holland in 2004. I remember talking to him about that. He told me after the Olympia that year, (he admitted he came in a little flat) he just really filled up on food once he got over seas from the US and that in part led to him filling out and tightening up.  It's really not hard to believe. He was 296 at the 04 olympia.
did you see him on a scale?
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigguns23 on February 09, 2008, 09:54:33 AM
No, but he told me on the way back from the airport in Dallas back in 2004 in his Mercedes so I believe him bro. Also, I did talk to Chad the following year, and asked him about it.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: Brutal_1 on February 09, 2008, 10:17:18 AM
   BigBobs I know your very passionate about Nasser and thats to be admired, and he was massive beyond belief in his heyday but Ronnie at the 2004 Grand Prix was at a level noone in this sport has ever been at muscle mass wise. 303-305 pounds onstage. There isnt a bodybuilder in history who could of stood next to Ronnie sizewise front to back at that show.

(and an atlas stone for good measure)


Damn!!!  :o

That first photo, ronnie is so damn thick and filled out, he looks 5'4 easily!  ;D
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: The Squadfather on February 09, 2008, 10:20:51 AM
No, but he told me on the way back from the airport in Dallas back in 2004 in his Mercedes so I believe him bro. Also, I did talk to Chad the following year, and asked him about it.
::)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigguns23 on February 09, 2008, 10:27:00 AM
::)

Ok, it's Glennnnnnnnnnnr222222222 2222222. Flame away then. I started a different username because I didn't want to be flamed every post I put on the board.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 09, 2008, 12:03:22 PM
   BigBobs I know your very passionate about Nasser and thats to be admired, and he was massive beyond belief in his heyday but Ronnie at the 2004 Grand Prix was at a level noone in this sport has ever been at muscle mass wise. 303-305 pounds onstage. There isnt a bodybuilder in history who could of stood next to Ronnie sizewise front to back at that show.

(and an atlas stone for good measure)

So 303-305 lbs would "dwarf" 298 lbs at about the same height?  I never knew 5-7 lbs, or 2% difference in bodyweight was able to "dwarf" another.  Like I said earlier, I'm not going to argue about who was exactly a few pounds more or less than the other, my original claim - which I still stick with - is that both Nasser and Ronnie were comparable in size at their biggest.  It was only about 8 months after that Grand Prix you're mentioning that I met Ronnie in person, and like I said he still looked comparable to Nasser in size.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: CigaretteMan on February 09, 2008, 12:21:42 PM
So 303-305 lbs would "dwarf" 298 lbs at about the same height?  I never knew 5-7 lbs, or 2% difference in bodyweight was able to "dwarf" another.  Like I said earlier, I'm not going to argue about who was exactly a few pounds more or less than the other, my original claim - which I still stick with - is that both Nasser and Ronnie were comparable in size at their biggest.  It was only about 8 months after that Grand Prix you're mentioning that I met Ronnie in person, and like I said he still looked comparable to Nasser in size.

  Jean-Pierre Fux was 285 lbs at a height of 5'11. Going by your logic, he was as muscular as Ronnie at the 2003 Olympia. Obviously, this is not true. You don't take into consideration Nasser's bigger bones and significant water retention in his back when claiming that he was as muscular as Ronnie was at the 2003 Olympia. No bodybuildercarried that much leam mass at that weight. No one.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 12:42:05 PM
Nasser is a fat ass
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: The Squadfather on February 09, 2008, 12:45:48 PM
Nasser is a fat ass
got any proof of the 405 incline that you claim?
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 12:49:01 PM
got any proof of the 405 incline that you claim?

not for you asswipe

 ;D
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: The Squadfather on February 09, 2008, 12:49:50 PM
not for you asswipe

 ;D
hahaha, just what i thought, another chickenshit pusssy who lies about his lifts. :D
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 12:52:03 PM
hahaha, just what i thought, another chickenshit pusssy who lies about his lifts. :D

Ok....I lift 100 lbs on the incline....

Makes you feel better?

Oh wait....I could be lying   ::)

dipshit

 ;D
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: The Squadfather on February 09, 2008, 12:53:24 PM
Ok....I lift 100 lbs on the incline....

Makes you feel better?

Oh wait....I could be lying   ::)

dipshit

 ;D
hahahaha, another meltdown, what are your other world class lifts Mr. Internet marine/powerlifting badass? ;D
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 12:54:50 PM
hahahaha, another meltdown, what are your other world class lifts Mr. Internet marine/powerlifting badass? ;D

I can squat (ATF) while holding two cans of baked beans

Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: JediKnight on February 09, 2008, 01:33:40 PM
(http://images112.fotki.com/v593/free/b0fc2/9/910165/3540047/DSC02369-vi.jpg?1147437199)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 01:45:15 PM
Monster forearms
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 09, 2008, 02:04:10 PM
(http://images112.fotki.com/v593/free/b0fc2/9/910165/3540047/DSC02369-vi.jpg?1147437199)

Photoshopped.  Here's his actual arm size in that pose during retirement:

Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: bigbobs on February 09, 2008, 02:05:32 PM
  Jean-Pierre Fux was 285 lbs at a height of 5'11. Going by your logic, he was as muscular as Ronnie at the 2003 Olympia. Obviously, this is not true. You don't take into consideration Nasser's bigger bones and significant water retention in his back when claiming that he was as muscular as Ronnie was at the 2003 Olympia. No bodybuildercarried that much leam mass at that weight. No one.

Yes, JP Fux was up there too, as well as Markus Ruhl.  Like i said earlier, bones make a couple of pounds difference max.  have you ever picked up a bone before and felt how relatively light they are?  Imagine how many bones you would have to put on a scale to tip it by anything more than 5 lbs?  No way that Nasser and Ronnie's difference in bones is more than 2-3 lbs!
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: benz on February 09, 2008, 02:12:49 PM
where is nasser el wheeler training these days?
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: WhiteCastle on February 09, 2008, 02:19:22 PM
Photoshopped.  Here's his actual arm size in that pose during retirement:



I don't see the comparison.  Nasser has a much more tan complexion in the first photo...the two photos are not within the same time frame.

Nasser looks like complete shit in that 2nd picture anyway....like a sac of peeled potatos dragged across a barbershop floor.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: onlyme on February 09, 2008, 02:33:09 PM
Who's ship is that?

Its a boat and it was my neighbors.  I took all the BB's out deep sea fishing.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: FLYLO on February 09, 2008, 03:19:47 PM
Lying must be easy for the DCN  (Delusional Clown Nasser)

TADA!!
DCN  ;D
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 04:00:34 PM
 ;)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: The Squadfather on February 09, 2008, 04:02:14 PM
;)
can you give us a heads up on when the proof of your 405 incline is coming?
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 04:08:21 PM
can you give us a heads up on when the proof of your 405 incline is coming?

suck my dick...then i'll give you proof

 ;)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: The Squadfather on February 09, 2008, 04:11:55 PM
suck my dick...then i'll give you proof

 ;)
hahahha, more backpeddling pusssy ass bullshit. ;D
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 04:18:23 PM
hahahha, more backpeddling pusssy ass bullshit. ;D

I could BP 85lbs & still kick your chubby ass

With you...there's no need to lift anymore

 ;)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: The Squadfather on February 09, 2008, 04:20:16 PM
I could BP 85lbs & still kick your chubby ass

With you...there's no need to lift anymore

 ;)

i'll take that as a no on the proof, Captain Skinny/Fat. :D
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 05:05:15 PM
i'll take that as a no on the proof, Captain Skinny/Fat. :D

dipshit says what?

Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: The Squadfather on February 09, 2008, 05:15:40 PM
dipshit says what?


you heard me skinny wimp bitch. :)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 05:19:15 PM
you heard me skinny wimp bitch. :)

yup...that me....skinny whimp

 ;)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: The Squadfather on February 09, 2008, 05:21:06 PM
yup...that me....skinny whimp

 ;)
post a picture and prove you're not.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 05:25:37 PM
post a picture and prove you're not.

ok     ;D
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: kiwiol on February 09, 2008, 05:29:11 PM
;)

LMFAO!
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 05:29:59 PM
LMFAO!

Well...it's me

he didn't say it had to be current

 ;D
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: kiwiol on February 09, 2008, 05:31:56 PM
Well...it's me

he didn't say it had to be current

 ;D

I was referring to your chop of Nasser being a skinny stripper. Just as funny!
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 05:32:53 PM
I was referring to your chop of Nasser being a skinny stripper. Just as funny!

thats not a chop
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: kiwiol on February 09, 2008, 05:34:29 PM
thats not a chop

No need to go that far - Bigbobs has feelings too - he's not made of stone >:(
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on February 09, 2008, 05:36:02 PM
can you give us a heads up on when the proof of your 405 incline is coming?

HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Another getbigger claims a lift that only the most advanced lifters in the world could do. ::)
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 05:38:28 PM
HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Another getbigger claims a lift that only the most advanced lifters in the world could do. ::)

if you think 405 (incline) is advanced in this world.....

you've been living in a bubble
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on February 09, 2008, 05:39:30 PM
if you think 405 (incline) is advanced in this world.....

you've been living in a bubble

Then post a pic of your massive physique and prove me wrong.
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: James Blunt on February 09, 2008, 05:45:58 PM
Then post a pic of your massive physique and prove me wrong.
What if he posted a naked photo? Would you approve?
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2008, 05:50:55 PM
Then post a pic of your massive physique and prove me wrong.

ok....sure
Title: Re: New Nasser article - 02-08-08
Post by: FLYLO on February 09, 2008, 07:41:52 PM
ok....sure

 ;D ;D ;D

These threads are filled with old Nasser pics.  Touche Nasser Team fuckwads!!