Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: CRIS on February 18, 2008, 12:57:12 PM

Title: Ironman: Disgusted, Did King tear his quads?
Post by: CRIS on February 18, 2008, 12:57:12 PM
Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....

Hey, man...be honest and tell us the thruth about Kamali:

Did he or did not torn his quads up??

From the Ironman pics, his patellar tendons are showing a few inches up form his medialis muscle insertion. Plus, at the beginning of his pro career, his quads were way, way better, with full vastus medialis and no patellar tendons showing off. His legs are completely distorted from the front, plus, if you look very close from one of the pics posted, you can see a very thin line on the base of his knees resembling a scar tissue mark. His legs are not only the shittest, but they are not looking normal, as well.

Please, Jimmy, keep on being that honest guy you have always been here, which led to your good reputation at getbig.com and drop the real facts about Kamali's legs. Maybe, after that, the guy can cease with all the BS he have to put on on here regarding the legs.
Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: The Squadfather on February 18, 2008, 01:07:12 PM
it's always so helpful when you guys post pictures to illustrate your point. :D
Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: MAXX on February 18, 2008, 01:38:05 PM
to be henest it looks like he torn just about every muscle in his body :D

biceps, triceps, quads, part of left lat.

pec tear soon to come :D
Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: Stark on February 18, 2008, 02:24:43 PM
it's always so helpful when you guys post pictures to illustrate your point. :D

;D
Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: hardkor on February 18, 2008, 04:46:24 PM
Wonder why/how his legs are much smaller/flatter than years ago.  yeah, he's got a wide waist, but not much wider than Gustavo's.  It's just Gustavo has huge/thick legs, so it doesn't stand out...as much. 

Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: GigantorX on February 18, 2008, 05:07:16 PM
it's always so helpful when you guys post pictures to illustrate your point. :D

You've been harping on these twats all day about this.

It's easy guys...post a fucking picture so we know what the fuck you are talking about.

Hope this helps!
Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: Van_Bilderass on February 18, 2008, 06:47:46 PM
Hey, man...be honest and tell us the thruth about Kamali:

Did he or did not torn his quads up??

From the Ironman pics, his patellar tendons are showing a few inches up form his medialis muscle insertion. Plus, at the beginning of his pro career, his quads were way, way better, with full vastus medialis and no patellar tendons showing off. His legs are completely distorted from the front, plus, if you look very close from one of the pics posted, you can see a very thin line on the base of his knees resembling a scar tissue mark. His legs are not only the shittest, but they are not looking normal, as well.

Please, Jimmy, keep on being that honest guy you have always been here, which led to your good reputation at getbig.com and drop the real facts about Kamali's legs. Maybe, after that, the guy can cease with all the BS he have to put on on here regarding the legs.
You're never going to get an honest answer about injuries from a current competitor. Ronnie had the same thing going on with his vastus medialis at the O, but he was completely "injury free".
Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: Disgusted on February 18, 2008, 06:49:35 PM
You're never going to get an honest answer about injuries from a current competitor. Ronnie had the same thing going on with his vastus medialis at the O, but he was completely "injury free".

He will from me, if I may see a pic.
Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: Van_Bilderass on February 18, 2008, 06:55:46 PM
He will from me, if I may see a pic.
Here's one. I think they looked the same the last few contests.
Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: nder98 on February 18, 2008, 06:59:11 PM
Hey, man...be honest and tell us the thruth about Kamali:

Did he or did not torn his quads up??

From the Ironman pics, his patellar tendons are showing a few inches up form his medialis muscle insertion. Plus, at the beginning of his pro career, his quads were way, way better, with full vastus medialis and no patellar tendons showing off. His legs are completely distorted from the front, plus, if you look very close from one of the pics posted, you can see a very thin line on the base of his knees resembling a scar tissue mark. His legs are not only the shittest, but they are not looking normal, as well.

Please, Jimmy, keep on being that honest guy you have always been here, which led to your good reputation at getbig.com and drop the real facts about Kamali's legs. Maybe, after that, the guy can cease with all the BS he have to put on on here regarding the legs.

No, hes never torn his quads nor his biceps.....
Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: Van_Bilderass on February 18, 2008, 07:01:13 PM
No, hes never torn his quads nor his biceps.....
What do you mean by torn? You can suffer small tears and not even notice it when it happens. To me it looks like there are a bunch of small tears.
Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: mass 04 on February 18, 2008, 07:34:29 PM
No, hes never torn his quads nor his biceps.....
Glad to hear it King.
Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: Disgusted on February 18, 2008, 07:49:57 PM
The answer is no. It does appear that way in the other pic but keep in mind his leg is "in action" there so the muscle is not flexed thru out.
Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: Van_Bilderass on February 18, 2008, 08:01:44 PM
The answer is no. It does appear that way in the other pic but keep in mind his leg is "in action" there so the muscle is not flexed thru out.
What about the bicep(s)? nder98 says no tears.
Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: Smokincrazy on February 18, 2008, 10:20:04 PM
His biceps are not torn.  they just dont have good insertions
Title: Re: Jimmy DISGUSTED Magnum, c'moooonnnn.....
Post by: Ron on February 18, 2008, 10:33:06 PM
In speaking with a few people regarding King, some said his receptors are shot, and he must take a rest for a while... what do you think?
Title: Re: Ironman: Disgusted, Did King tear his quads?
Post by: rocket on February 18, 2008, 10:37:43 PM
In speaking with a few people regarding King, some said his receptors are shot, and he must take a rest for a while... what do you think?


None of that stuff matters.  Its not receptors that have given him super short biceps and its not receptors that are making his waist expand.  Take those two away from him and he's not such a bad pro.
Title: Re: Ironman: Disgusted, Did King tear his quads?
Post by: Van_Bilderass on February 18, 2008, 11:41:46 PM
His biceps are not torn.  they just dont have good insertions
Their shape is definitely not what they were a few years ago. Partial tears and/or damage from pinning.