Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 08:35:39 AM

Title: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 08:35:39 AM
hahahahaa, oh brother ::)

Have I ever lied or exaggerated about anything?  What do I have to gain from this? 6 plates on each side is alot of weight but it aint world record poundages.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: CT_Muscle on February 25, 2008, 08:37:08 AM
hahahahaa, oh brother ::)


No thats fiction, how many guys have u seen incline 6 plates legit LOL
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: bigmc on February 25, 2008, 08:38:14 AM
maybe he though you meant ounces  ???
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Mars on February 25, 2008, 08:38:25 AM
haha he must be a beast.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: busyB on February 25, 2008, 08:38:39 AM
Did he mean six plates total?

3 a side more realistic.  :-\
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 08:39:27 AM
No thats fiction, how many guys have u seen incline 6 plates legit LOL
he claims a guy from his old gym did it regularly for reps. ::) :o
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Rimbaud on February 25, 2008, 08:40:12 AM
Did he mean six plates total?

3 a side more realistic.  :-\

I agree.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: SS on February 25, 2008, 08:40:34 AM
600lb bench presses!...Big wiggs showers in dat shyt!
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 08:41:51 AM
here's the original post, it's kinda long.

Before I went into the Air Force in 98 I worked at the Gold's Gym in Vegas on Flamingo and Sandhill.  We had some characters there.  I'm currently stationed in Germany and we have a shitload of misfits here....

(Vegas)

Kenny - Kenny is a bail bondsman that was 28 when I met him in 98.  (I was 18 young and impressionable)
One day my boss told me a guy named Kenny was going to pick something up that evening.  I asked what would he looked like and she said big and black.  Anywho late that evening in comes this brotha about 5'10, 242 lbs (I asked him).  He had a messed left eye he was blind in so it was that blueish color.  He came in wearing his bailbondman uniform and looked like a typica big brotha.  When he came out from the back he was fucking huge.  He came up and introduced himself and I asked him how big his arms where and he said 23. (We measured them months later).  he was easily 10%bf.  He kept telling me not to take steriods when I wanted to at the time.  He wasn't a bodybuilder just a big ass dude that obviously juiced himself that was cool as hell.  His wife would always call the gym while he was there with his girlfriend.... ;D

Casey- Casey is your typical 80's meathead.  He looked like John Goodman and he loved steriods and let everyone know he did.  He was about 6'1 300 30% bf but had all these stories about how awesome he used to be.  He would brag about downing a handful of d-bol before hitting the gym.  He kept talking about wanting to get on another cycle because it had been years.  He worked hard in the gym but I guess he ate more because nothing changed.  He used to yell alot when he talked and worked out.  Funny guy....

Amazon - She is a chick that's about 6'2 180-200 amazon.  If you go to the Olympia in Vegas you'll see her there in the expo.  Very scary looking.  She's sweet as hell if you get to know her.  She's like a Nicole Bass.  Very scary for a 18 year old like myself at the time to see something like that.  I think her name is Gabriella or something like that.  In 1996 at the Las Vegas Classic when I first met Shawn Ray I remember him saying " look at that big ass bitch". ;D

Sumo-Mulatto-  This guy was Kenny's training partner.  He was Black and Samoan around 6'3 and 500lbs  I remember asking kenny who the hell he was and he said he was his training partner and that he was lazy but strong as hell.  I personally witnessed this huge bastard incline bench 6 plates on each side for reps.  Scary fucker.

Strippers- tons of them, come on it's Vegas ;D

Vince- There was this guy Vince.  Great looks, perfect body, male stripper.....His voice was higher than Mike Tyson's.  It throws you off when you see a guy like this. 

(Military)

Pip - this guy wears those under armor stretch shirts only problem is his literally no more than 130 lbs at about 6'0 and he got the smallest shirt possible to display his magnificent 12 inch pipes.

Chulo- He's this middle age mexican guy who has the worst case of ILS I've ever scene.  He always wear a wife beater with his pants up to his arm pits. He's about 180 at 22%bf he oozes machismo if you see him YOU better go around.  Trust me I tried and he didn't budge.

Ass- She's this Hawaii and black mixed female.  she's a pretty healthy girl and she's wears spandex with an ass that would make 99% of black women blush.  It's very distracting. I like it, most of you wouldn't.
People will stop and gawk or point etc...

All Genetics - This brotha is who's about 170-180 lbs at 6-7% bf with perfect shape, symmetry and proportion.  He haas the smallest joints I've seen on a dude at that weight which makes him look bigger. He does these odd exercises in which he's managed to put on the muscle he has.

I've more but I'm tired of typing.


Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Wiggs on February 25, 2008, 08:42:15 AM
First off it's 585.
Second when you have powerlifters benching 1000 with bench shirts and 800 raw (I know flat)
585 incline for reps does seem like that much.  I don't remember how many reps he completed but when you see an amazing feat like that when your 18 years old.  It sticks with you.

It's great but I don't think it's world class. 8)  BTW this aint me we're talking about folks I'm nothing close to that.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 08:44:22 AM
hahahahhaa, here he is claiming that he ran a 4.4 40 in "high school". ::)

I understand its hard for you to believe anyones claims when you've always been a horrible athlete yourself.  I don't know if you've heard but us black guys are fast.   ;) BTW in highschool, I ran a 4.47 but I was 180 then.  take it or leave it I know you'll leave it. :-* 
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Mars on February 25, 2008, 08:45:37 AM
hahaha "big" wings must be the best athlete in the world.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Thealmightyronald on February 25, 2008, 08:45:56 AM
First off it's 585.
Second when you have powerlifters benching 1000 with bench shirts and 800 raw (I know flat)
585 incline for reps does seem like that much.  I don't remember how many reps he completed but when you see an amazing feat like that when your 18 years old.  It sticks with you.

It's great but I don't think it's world class. 8)

I thought the world record for a raw flat benchpress was 715...?

585 for reps on and incline is world class. I've never seen anyone touch that kind've weight in the gym, let alone for reps.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: CT_Muscle on February 25, 2008, 08:46:25 AM
First off it's 585.
Second when you have powerlifters benching 1000 with bench shirts and 800 raw (I know flat)
585 incline for reps does seem like that much.  I don't remember how many reps he completed but when you see an amazing feat like that when your 18 years old.  It sticks with you.

It's great but I don't think it's world class. 8)

Can you please tell us what you would consider a world class incline  ???
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 08:47:21 AM
Can you please tell us what you would consider a world class incline  ???
hahahahhaa, apparently to impress him you'd have to have every 45 in the gym on the bar. ;D
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Thealmightyronald on February 25, 2008, 08:48:24 AM
hahahahhaa, here he is claiming that he ran a 4.4 40 in "high school". ::)


Wow, umm maybe Bigg_Wiggs should join the NFL if he really is that fast and strong... but he's not... so he won't.

Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 08:50:27 AM
Wow, umm maybe Bigg_Wiggs should join the NFL if he really is that fast and strong... but he's not... so he won't.


shit Quag we better watch out because next thing you know "big wiggs" is gonna claim to be an expert in 10 different martial arts and could kill us inside of 3 seconds. ;D
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: cht868 on February 25, 2008, 08:52:27 AM
Big Wiggs and brandon curry must be the best athletes of our time!!!
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: WhiteCastle on February 25, 2008, 08:53:27 AM
Maybe 1% of people I have seen lifting on the incline have even 3 plates per side at all of the gyms I have been to in my life.  If I saw someone doing 6 plates per side, the first thing I would say is "fake plates."
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: medz zeppelin on February 25, 2008, 08:54:14 AM
cage fighting is in his future i reckon
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 08:55:30 AM
Big Wiggs and brandon curry must be the best athletes of our time!!!
hahahaha, shit man this guy can do it all, Air Force pilot, pulls hot White women all the time, has claimed to bench 365 for 10, knows guys who incline 585 for reps, ran the 40 in 4.4, is there anything this force of nature can't do? ;D
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: KillerMonk on February 25, 2008, 08:55:44 AM
6,3 500pounds is fucking big but when you see that kid at 234 pounds do 615 pounds raw on another thread anything possible.Not saying its true but possible.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Wiggs on February 25, 2008, 08:55:55 AM
I thought the world record for a raw flat benchpress was 715...?

585 for reps on and incline is world class. I've never seen anyone touch that kind've weight in the gym, let alone for reps.

I thought someone busted out a 800 recently?
Yes I ran a 4.4 in highschool my senior year 1996-1997.  I was blazing fast and strong at 180.
What would I consider world class?  I don't know?  I don't have anything to base it on.  700 sounds world class to me.  
I was a great athlete but I was lazy as fuck as would rely on my natural ability.  Now hahaha....I'd be happy at 4.8 I enjoy sports but have no ambition to make it my job.  I don't know why you find what I'm saying so hard to believe.  There were plenty of people that crushed me in track in highschool in track meets.

Squad need I go on for your enjoyment?? ;D

I know no martial arts sorry I'm not into all that tap out shit although I like Kimbo.  I am a boxing fan.
I don't pull hot white babes because I've been married to a hot white babe for almost 9 years (June).
I'm not an Air Force pilot but I'm in the Air Force (currently in Africa check the ip address.)
And yes squad I can USED TO bench 365 for reps on flat bench often and my max was 435. I haven't did anything really since last Jun I finish my B.A. in July and have been to busy (I'll scan the diploma for you when I get it  ;D)  I start my Masters from there. Anything else?   ;D
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Thealmightyronald on February 25, 2008, 08:56:59 AM
shit Quag we better watch out because next thing you know "big wiggs" is gonna claim to be an expert in 10 different martial arts and could kill us inside of 3 seconds. ;D

Claims he could knock us all out in 5 .. 4 .. 3 .. 2 .. 1 .. ...
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 08:59:28 AM
I thought someone busted out a 800 recently?
Yes I ran a 4.4 in highschool my senior year 1996-1997.  I was blazing fast and strong at 180.
What would I consider world class?  I don't know?  I don't have anything to base it on.  700 sounds world class to me.  
I was a great athlete but I was lazy as fuck as would rely on my natural ability.  Now hahaha....I'd be happy at 4.8 I enjoy sports but have no ambition to make it my job.  I don't know why you find what I'm saying so hard to believe.  There were plenty of people that crushed me in track in highschool in track meets.
::) ahh the infamous time tested, "shit man 60,000 for reps on inclines isn't that impressive, there are 28 guys in my gym who weigh 132 who can do it, you're a bitch Sqaudfather, maybe if you got to the gym and actually trained you'd see that .0000036 second 40's and 750 for sets of 35 on the bench is the norm, I'M GONNA FIND YOU AND YOU'RE GONNA GET HURT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" ;D
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: bigbobs on February 25, 2008, 09:04:05 AM
LOL, it makes my day whenever I see another Squadfather ownage-of-someone-else's-claims thread in all caps starting with "hahahah"  :D
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Wiggs on February 25, 2008, 09:04:42 AM
Claims he could knock us all out in 5 .. 4 .. 3 .. 2 .. 1 .. ...

Sorry bro, I'm not a violent guy 8)
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: WhiteCastle on February 25, 2008, 09:05:23 AM
Sorry bro, I'm not a violent guy 8)

You probably don't have to be, you run so fast that there's no way any attacker could keep up.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 09:06:40 AM
You probably don't have to be, you run so fast that there's no way any attacker could keep up.
yep, he's an Air Force pilot to so he would probably run the 40 in 4.4 and then jump in his F-15.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: triple_pickle on February 25, 2008, 09:06:55 AM
.... but when you see an amazing feat like that when your 18 years old.  It sticks with you.

.... it becomes an urban legend.  if the guy got 4 plates per side for a triple, 10 years later it becomes 6 plates per side for "reps"
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Thealmightyronald on February 25, 2008, 09:07:49 AM
I wish I was black so I could automatically run as fast as NFL running backs. Oh wait...  ;D
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Wiggs on February 25, 2008, 09:08:18 AM
::) ahh the infamous time tested, "shit man 60,000 for reps on inclines isn't that impressive, there are 28 guys in my gym who weigh 132 who can do it, you're a bitch Sqaudfather, maybe if you got to the gym and actually trained you'd see that .0000036 second 40's and 750 for sets of 35 on the bench is the norm, I'M GONNA FIND YOU AND YOU'RE GONNA GET HURT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" ;D

 ;D  what can I say to that.lol
Dave we do this every six months and what comes of it, nothing?  You try to lure me in to meltdown, get pissed or make some off the wall claim but what I speak is the truth sorry if you can't accept it.  lol
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 09:10:52 AM
;D  what can I say to that.lol
Dave we do this every six months and what comes of it, nothing?  You try to lure me in to meltdown, get pissed or make some off the wall claim but what I speak is the truth sorry if you can't accept it.  lol
hahahhaa, ok "big wiggs" don't you have some "White women" to pull? ;D
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Wiggs on February 25, 2008, 09:13:28 AM
hahahhaa, ok "big wiggs" don't you have some "White women" to pull? ;D

No I'm happily married.  You're so easy to neutralize...I still love give me kiss.... :-*
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Man of Steel on February 25, 2008, 10:13:34 AM
AHAAHAHAHAH!!!   Ah yes, the number of human wrecking balls on Getbig is staggering.   A 400lb incline press is a warm-up, 500lb bps are child's play, 315lb squats for sets of 50 is common place, bent over rows with 400 lbs for sets of 12 is cake, 225lbs curls happen everyday of the week for sets of 10.   Everyone has 19+" arms, everyone weighs minimum 240lbs, everyone maintains no more than 9% bf year-round, everyone has an easy 2800 lb pl total, everyone eats 12 meals a day and get 10,000 clean daily calories, everyone bangs porn stars, everyone earns millions, everyone is a worldclass mma fighter, everyone speaks 3 languages, everyone is a political genious, everyone has an older brother that's always bigger and benched more than the next guy, everyone has multiple degrees and everyone owns several successful businesses.

Unfortunately only 12 people own a camera.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: MoralMan on February 25, 2008, 10:14:21 AM
WHo the hell benches 800 raw!??!
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Man of Steel on February 25, 2008, 10:16:33 AM
WHo the hell benches 800 raw!??!

Exactly MoralMan....exactly.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on February 25, 2008, 10:18:14 AM
::) ahh the infamous time tested, "shit man 60,000 for reps on inclines isn't that impressive, there are 28 guys in my gym who weigh 132 who can do it, you're a bitch Sqaudfather, maybe if you got to the gym and actually trained you'd see that .0000036 second 40's and 750 for sets of 35 on the bench is the norm, I'M GONNA FIND YOU AND YOU'RE GONNA GET HURT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" ;D

hahahahaha
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: KillerMonk on February 25, 2008, 10:18:49 AM
AHAAHAHAHAH!!!   Ah yes, the number of human wrecking balls on Getbig is staggering.   A 400lb incline press is a warm-up, 500lb bps are child's play, 315lb squats for sets of 50 is common place, bent over rows with 400 lbs for sets of 12 is cake, 225lbs curls happen everyday of the week for sets of 10.   Everyone has 19+" arms, everyone weighs minimum 240lbs, everyone maintains no more than 9% bf year-round, everyone has an easy 2800 lb pl total, everyone eats 12 meals a day and get 10,000 clean daily calories, everyone bangs porn stars, everyone earns millions, everyone is a worldclass mma fighter, everyone speaks 3 languages, everyone is a political genious, everyone has an older brother that's always bigger and benched more than the next guy, everyone has multiple degrees and everyone owns several successful businesses.

Unfortunately only 12 people own a camera.
240 19inch arms haha Im 320 4% BF 24inch arms my camera is broken. ;D
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: medz zeppelin on February 25, 2008, 10:22:09 AM
what normal people go around taking  pics of themselves or have people taking pics in bb poses or just flexin? lmao
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Man of Steel on February 25, 2008, 10:35:34 AM
240 19inch arms haha Im 320 4% BF 24inch arms my camera is broken. ;D

AHAHAHAH!!!!  Me too KillerMonk....me too.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: MisterMagoo on February 25, 2008, 11:40:28 AM
wiggs, i've never really had a problem with you, so this ain't flaming.

585 on incline for ONE is incredible, let alone reps. top top raw benchers jeremy hoornstra and nick winters are barely over the 600 mark for a single, and likely couldn't do 585 for more than 2 or 3. and i'm talking about guys who are gunning for the world record raw bench (which is indeed 715, not even CLOSE to 800).

shit, 495 on the incline is pretty close to world class, let alone 585.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: CigaretteMan on February 25, 2008, 12:00:10 PM
hahahahaa, oh brother ::)


  Methinks he's obviously joking. 600 lbs for reps, with perfect form and without a lifting shirt, is most definitely world-record.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: tonymctones on February 25, 2008, 12:02:32 PM
goodness ive only known one or two people my entire life that might be able to hit that on flat. If I saw a guy doing reps on incline with that id have to go try and move the shit just to see if it was real
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: sgt. d on February 25, 2008, 12:08:45 PM
yep, he's an Air Force pilot to so he would probably run the 40 in 4.4 and then jump in his F-15.

lol
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: SquatAss on February 25, 2008, 12:10:04 PM
Five plates per side for reps on a regular bench is world class.

Some people here must live in a different reality than me.

Or perhaps they just don't have a fucking clue..
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: CigaretteMan on February 25, 2008, 12:17:34 PM
Five plates per side for reps on a regular bench is world class.


  Exactly. Thanks for bringing that up. I am over 6'3 with a relatively big frame and I bench only 2 plates a side. The thing is that I use truly perfect form for at least 6 reps, exploding on the concentric part of the exercise and controlling it on the eccentric. When I mention this, people say that I'm weak. That is until they try to do the exercise the way I do and they realize their real strengh is barely 40% of what they think it is. Seriously, most of the guys I've seen bench 4 plates a side do only partial reps, and they require help from the first rep. This is not training your muscles; it is destroying your joints. Benching 5 plates a side with a full range of motion for more than 6 reps and without help is freakin' Schwarzenegger, something you are not!
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: SquatAss on February 25, 2008, 12:26:22 PM
  Exactly. Thanks for bringing that up. I am over 6'3 with a relatively big frame and I bench only 2 plates a side. The thing is that I use truly perfect form for at least 6 reps, exploding on the concentric part of the exercise and controlling it on the eccentric. When I mention this, people say that I'm weak. That is until they try to do the exercise the way I do and they realize their real strengh is barely 40% of what they think it is. Seriously, most of the guys I've seen bench 4 plates a side do only partial reps, and they require help from the first rep. This is not training your muscles; it is destroying your joints. Benching 5 plates a side with a full range of motion for more than 6 reps and without help is freakin' Schwarzenegger, something you are not!

No it's not 'freakin' Schwarzenegger'. I bet he didn't have a five plate max.

It's Coleman territory.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 12:27:46 PM
No it's not 'freakin' Schwarzenegger'. I bet he didn't have a five plate max.

It's Coleman territory.
exactly, from all the stories from people who trained with him Arnold's max bench was like 405-425, still very impressive.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: thelamefalsehood on February 25, 2008, 12:59:52 PM
585 on the Incline is definitely world class, no boubt about it. You rarley even see people using 225 on the Incline, hardly ever do you see 315 or above and you never see 405 or above on the Incline. I'd shit if I saw 585 on the Incline, thats a bad man right there.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 01:02:12 PM
585 on the Incline is definitely world class, no boubt about it. You rarley even see people using 225 on the Incline, hardly ever do you see 315 or above and you never see 405 or above on the Incline. I'd shit if I saw 585 on the Incline, thats a bad man right there.
as soon as "big wiggs" gets in from his F-15 training mission he'll post the picture i'm sure. ;D
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: WhiteCastle on February 25, 2008, 01:22:22 PM
as soon as "big wiggs" gets in from his F-15 training mission he'll post the picture i'm sure. ;D

It's really difficult to catch him on camera though.  He runs so fast that it is just a blur.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Camel Jockey on February 25, 2008, 01:30:59 PM
If he thinks such poundages aren't world class and could once run a 4.4, then why did he join the military?  :-\

There are very few people in the world that can bench 405 for more than one rep clean.. Slightly higher percentage when steroids come into play. I don't know where you guys see these everyday 600 lb benches and 700 squatters by the dozen. So far I've only seen one dude rep 405, and he did like 5 clean reps. Also seen him do 495 for a very hard single.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: JasonH on February 25, 2008, 01:38:09 PM
I don't think I've ever seen anyone do a six plate incline. Not in real life anyway.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: thewickedtruth on February 25, 2008, 02:37:17 PM
hahahahaa, oh brother ::)


only person I've ever seen do it was jeremy hoornstra and rob wilkerson...what kinda crowd these guys running with if 6 plates per side on an incline isn't world class?  ???
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: WhiteCastle on February 25, 2008, 03:18:13 PM
only person I've ever seen do it was jeremy hoornstra and rob wilkerson...what kinda crowd these guys running with if 6 plates per side on an incline isn't world class?  ???

I always though you could do 6 plates inclined on a swiss ball thewickedtruth.  Are you suggesting this guy is more full of it than you?
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: CigaretteMan on February 25, 2008, 03:52:12 PM
No it's not 'freakin' Schwarzenegger'. I bet he didn't have a five plate max.

It's Coleman territory.

  Lou Ferrigno said he once saw Arnold do a single on theflat bench for 520 lbs. Far fetched? Maybe. But when you look at Arnold's pectoral, deltoid and triceps development,I believe it is possible. Remember that even though Coleman is much bigger than Arnold ever was overral, when it comes to pecks Arnold could hold his own with Ronnie. In fact, I think that Arnold's side chest pose is the best of all times. :)
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 03:54:27 PM
  Lou Ferrigno said he once saw Arnold do a single on theflat bench for 520 lbs. Far fetched? Maybe. But when you look at Arnold's pectoral, deltoid and triceps development,I believe it is possible. Remember that even though Coleman is much bigger than Arnold ever was overral, when it comes to pecks Arnold could hold his own with Ronnie. In fact, I think that Arnold's side chest pose is the best of all times. :)
still calling bullshit.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: CigaretteMan on February 25, 2008, 04:05:28 PM
still calling bullshit.

  You call bullshit even after seeing this picture? You gota admit by looking at his pectoral, deltoid and triceps developemnt that is is at least possible. This is not exactly the same as a member of this board claiming a 520 lbs bench, you know. Arnold in this picture could hold his own against Coleman in the side chest mandatory at the 2003 Olympia. ;)
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 04:06:46 PM
  You call bullshit even after seeing this picture? You gota admit by looking at his pectoral, deltoid and triceps developemnt that is is at least possible. This is not exactly the same as a member of this board claiming a 520 lbs bench, you know. Arnold in this picture could hold his own against Coleman in the side chest mandatory at the 2003 Olympia. ;)
like i've always said i'll give him 425-435, no more, still very impressive.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: CigaretteMan on February 25, 2008, 04:13:40 PM
like i've always said i'll give him 425-435, no more, still very impressive.

  And yet Ronnie had for a fact a 550 lbs bench, and yet Arnold's pectorals could still hold their own against Ronnie even when Ronnie was at his largest. Explain this. ;)
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 04:16:01 PM
  And yet Ronnie had for a fact a 550 lbs bench, and yet Arnold's pectorals could still hold their own against Ronnie even when Ronnie was at his largest. Explain this. ;)
Arnold's torso was nowhere near as thick as Ronnie's, Ronnie was 315 at 5'11" offseason and Arnold was 250 at 6 feet even so obviously Ronnie had much greater torso thickness and shorter arms.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: dr.chimps on February 25, 2008, 04:18:09 PM
I thought the world record for a raw flat benchpress was 715...?

585 for reps on and incline is world class. I've never seen anyone touch that kind've weight in the gym, let alone for reps.
No shit. Rarely does it happen in these parts, but when someone has 315 on the incline, the whole gym stops and watches. That kind of weight with that much mechanical disadvantage demands respect. 585!? I'd fall over in a dead faint.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 04:19:40 PM
No shit. Rarely does it happen in these parts, but when someone has 315 on the incline, the whole gym stops and watches. That kind of weight with that much mechanical disadvantage demands respect. 585!? I'd fall over in a dead faint.
hahahha, exactly, just think about it, DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF 45 POUND PLATES on the bar than with 315, no fuccking way on earth.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: io856 on February 25, 2008, 04:22:33 PM
I have seen a guy incline 5 york 20kgs a side on a 15kg bar before... for at least 2 with a spotter.

He weighs around 160-170kg very overweight.

Also I think he had the incline fairly low.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Camel Jockey on February 25, 2008, 04:23:46 PM
  And yet Ronnie had for a fact a 550 lbs bench, and yet Arnold's pectorals could still hold their own against Ronnie even when Ronnie was at his largest. Explain this. ;)

Ronnie's pecs are much bigger than Arnold's. The only thing is that Ronnie's pecs tend to droop and have an unusual shape. Look at Ronnie's pecs relaxed and you'll see what I'm talking about. You're also not taking into account back width and size. The back has quite a lot to do with someone's bench, and Ronnie's back was the biggest ever.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 04:24:57 PM
I have seen a guy incline 5 york 20kgs a side on a 12kg bar before... for at least 2 with a spotter.

He weighs around 160-170kg very overweight.

Also I think he had the incline fairly low.
a 12kg. bar? was it one of those 5 foot straight Olympic bars? i didn't know 5 45's would fit on one of those.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: io856 on February 25, 2008, 04:27:55 PM
a 12kg. bar? was it one of those 5 foot straight Olympic bars? i didn't know 5 45's would fit on one of those.
yeah its not the proper olympic bar
+ these are the york plates that are small

Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: CigaretteMan on February 25, 2008, 04:51:36 PM
Arnold's torso was nowhere near as thick as Ronnie's, Ronnie was 315 at 5'11" offseason and Arnold was 250 at 6 feet even so obviously Ronnie had much greater torso thickness and shorter arms.

  This is not true because the difference in weight between Coleman and Arnold came mostly from Coleman's much larger quadriceps and back. In terms of pectoral development, they were roughly equal. The proof is in the pudding. Arnold in the picture I've posted could hold his own and maybe even defeat any version of Coleman in the side chest mandatory.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: The Squadfather on February 25, 2008, 04:52:40 PM
  This is not true because the difference in size between Coleman and Arnold came mostly from Coleman's muhc larger quadriceps and back mass. In terms of pectoral development, they were roughly equal. The proof is in the pudding. Arnold in the picture I've posted could hold his own and maybe even defeat any version of Coleman in the side chest mandatory.
sorry not a chance.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: James Blunt on February 25, 2008, 04:55:20 PM
(http://a164.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/53/m_52b779db5c8fd7adc292c1723bae63b3.jpg)

When you're this big 600 lbs is nothin. Just a warmup.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: CigaretteMan on February 25, 2008, 04:55:34 PM
sorry not a chance.

  Nice scientific explanation there for why Arnold couldn't do it. I have presented a reasonable hypothesis that he could possibly do it based on his ginormous pectoral development as well as considerable triceps and deltoid development. I even posted a pciture of Arnold doing the side chest mandatory where his pecs are as massive as Coleman's. ;)
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: SirTraps on February 25, 2008, 05:15:47 PM
Wiggs is a lard ass  ::)  His posts are about race 99% of the time  ::)

 315 incline is something ive done, but i am not a great bencher, i can incline and military really well.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Sarcastic Deity on February 25, 2008, 10:49:09 PM
I finish my B.A. in July and have been to busy...

 ::)
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: clownbaby on February 25, 2008, 11:26:04 PM
(http://a164.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/53/m_52b779db5c8fd7adc292c1723bae63b3.jpg)

When you're this big 600 lbs is nothin. Just a warmup.

HAHAH he "used" to bench 365 for 10 and "used" to run a 4.4 40

You are a clown
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: webcake on February 25, 2008, 11:56:05 PM
600lb incline = only a handful of some of the best benchers in the world could do that.

The record raw flat bench is 715 for a single by Scott Mendelsen (i think that record still stands). So 600 for reps on the incline not world class ???
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: Hedgehog on February 26, 2008, 12:56:44 AM
First off it's 585.
Second when you have powerlifters benching 1000 with bench shirts and 800 raw (I know flat)
585 incline for reps does seem like that much.  I don't remember how many reps he completed but when you see an amazing feat like that when your 18 years old.  It sticks with you.

It's great but I don't think it's world class. 8)  BTW this aint me we're talking about folks I'm nothing close to that.
A few questions if you don't mind, "Big Wiggs"...

1.Who is benching 800 raw?

2.If 585 for reps isn't world class by your standard, then what constitutes a world class incline benchpress in your world?

And please name one individual who has performed these world class incline benchpress reps.


Thanks.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: I ETA PI on February 26, 2008, 11:38:43 AM
You can watch Kaz open with 518lbs in the '83 nationals on youtube. 

Poor Bill....the strongest man that ever lived isn't even close to world class in the bench press....
Imagine how much it would suck to be the greatest raw bencher in history, and not even be world class.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: MarvinEderFan on February 26, 2008, 12:20:04 PM
It is without ANY doubt WHATSOEVER  WORLD CLASS.

Big Wiggs, you're a fool if you don't think it's world class.
Title: Re: HAHA, "BIG WIGGS" SAYS 600 FOR REPS ON INCLINES ISN'T WORLD CLASS!!!
Post by: thewickedtruth on February 26, 2008, 04:07:13 PM
I always though you could do 6 plates inclined on a swiss ball thewickedtruth.  Are you suggesting this guy is more full of it than you?


a few times over..  ;D