Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: GHGut on March 01, 2008, 08:53:33 PM

Title: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: GHGut on March 01, 2008, 08:53:33 PM
I'd go with Nasser in his prime (not the end of his career with the lumpy shoulders). For all his size, Nasser had a basic shape and structural integrity that Branch lacks. Interestingly enough, backs are an issue for both men (detail and conditioning that is). Now, if this were a personality contest I'd have to go with Branch.

What do you guys think???
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: monstercalves on March 01, 2008, 09:01:13 PM
nasser just wins this ......
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: EL Mariachi on March 01, 2008, 09:05:30 PM
Nasser by a mile. Branch has amazing mass but lacks everything else like simmetry and proportion.
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: Big_Tymer on March 01, 2008, 09:21:14 PM
nasser easily
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: BayGBM on March 01, 2008, 11:04:20 PM
Silly question.  It's not even close...  ::)
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: just_a_pilgrim on March 01, 2008, 11:26:27 PM
Silly question.  It's not even close...  ::)

Are you saying the 4 inches Nasser has on Branch seals the deal?
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: gordiano on March 01, 2008, 11:45:06 PM
Silly question.  It's not even close...  ::)

Are you saying that Branch's penis is not "cute" enough, Bay?
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: phyxsius on March 02, 2008, 12:12:35 AM
I'd go with Nasser in his prime (not the end of his career with the lumpy shoulders). For all his size, Nasser had a basic shape and structural integrity that Branch lacks. Interestingly enough, backs are an issue for both men (detail and conditioning that is). Now, if this were a personality contest I'd have to go with Branch.

What do you guys think???

you're either stupid or dumb to put Branch up among the legends
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: kiwiol on March 02, 2008, 12:14:19 AM
Hahaha Branch is nowhere near Nasser's league. Most of the guys from today's top 6 wouldn't place top 10 in the 90s when Nasser was placing 2nd in the Olympia and out muscling everyone.
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: Matt C on March 02, 2008, 12:18:02 AM
Are you saying the 4 inches Nasser has on Branch seals the deal?

Are you saying that Milamar would consider Branch's penis to be EXCEPTIONALLY "cute"?
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: Gym dude on March 02, 2008, 12:36:48 AM
I would also have eto go with Nasser because Nasser placed second each time he competed in the Olympia.
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: monstercalves on March 02, 2008, 12:42:30 AM
I would also have eto go with Nasser because Nasser placed second each time he competed in the Olympia.

false
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: gh15 on March 02, 2008, 03:23:37 AM
the beautiful man with the glases could sit down with one arm tied behind his back during the 90s and to be honest during 200s too and win any competition against branch ,,,that is not good comarisson ,,the frame is a lot weaker on branch ,,,the symetry is not there,,,the muscle mass is lower,,,the muscle shape is nto as good,,the muscles are nto as developed due to severe abuse of drugs during 2000s ,,seo is ok but the ability to look better needs be done with out seo what so ever

branch is buttom of first tier as yu olike to cal it,,,the beautiful man with glases should be compared with ron colman kevin,,ray,,dexter even though shorter (ray and dex) thats where his place is when it come to comparison ,,,dorian haney ,,ken,,both mikes in thir prime etc
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: MAXX on March 02, 2008, 03:29:35 AM
the beautiful man with the glases could sit down with one arm tied behind his back during the 90s and to be honest during 200s too and win any competition against branch ,,,that is not good comarisson ,,the frame is a lot weaker on branch ,,,the symetry is not there,,,the muscle mass is lower,,,the muscle shape is nto as good,,the muscles are nto as developed due to severe abuse of drugs during 2000s ,,seo is ok but the ability to look better needs be done with out seo what so ever

branch is buttom of first tier as yu olike to cal it,,,the beautiful man with glases should be compared with ron colman kevin,,ray,,dexter even though shorter (ray and dex) thats where his place is when it come to comparison ,,,dorian haney ,,ken,,both mikes in thir prime etc
hi Nasser  ;D
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: JasonH on March 02, 2008, 03:46:57 AM
Nasser.
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: Barracuda on March 02, 2008, 08:58:18 AM


The beautiful man with glasses??? :o ???.  A little too much muscle worship going on.  :D
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: BEAST 8692 on March 02, 2008, 09:04:31 AM
gh15 is not nasser, although it appears, for some reason, he wishes to propagate this myth.
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: GHGut on March 02, 2008, 07:59:03 PM
you're either stupid or dumb to put Branch up among the legends

Stupid and dumb. Thank you.
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: BayGBM on March 02, 2008, 08:00:58 PM
Hahaha Branch is nowhere near Nasser's league. Most of the guys from today's top 6 wouldn't place top 10 in the 90s when Nasser was placing 2nd in the Olympia and out muscling everyone.

They are both cool dudes, but you said it.
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: d0nny2600 on March 04, 2008, 02:47:12 AM
Nasser has this one..Branch is good but his conditioning can vary from show to show. He carries an awful lot of mass on that frame. Sometimes it doesn't look so good. Nasser (pre-synthol) had great size and lines. Branch could possibly place a lot higher if he sacrificed a little mass in favour of symmetry and proportion...


But in all seriousness...neither of them are Ronnie!!!
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: phyxsius on March 04, 2008, 03:29:20 AM
Stupid and dumb. Thank you.

then we're cool  8)
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: hamood on March 04, 2008, 03:01:26 PM
Hahaha Branch is nowhere near Nasser's league. Most of the guys from today's top 6 wouldn't place top 10 in the 90s when Nasser was placing 2nd in the Olympia and out muscling everyone.

Quoted for truth.

Good to finally see Nasser getting his due respect here.

He had great Arab genetics.
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: Camel Jockey on March 04, 2008, 03:04:50 PM
Nasser was an elite bodybuilder in his day and should have atleast won 2 Mr. Olmpias. It could be argued that he was the best bodybuilder to never win an Olympia title, along with Ray, Labrada, Levrone, Cormier and others.
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: dearth on March 04, 2008, 03:07:22 PM
nasser sells his used clothes to make a living.
theres no way branch can compare with that.
branch ought to call it a day.
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: the_swami on March 04, 2008, 04:33:00 PM
Nasser by a mile, no, 100 miles
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: Bast000 on March 04, 2008, 04:33:33 PM
brunch
Title: Re: Better bodybuilder: Nasser or Branch? Why?
Post by: Earl1972 on March 04, 2008, 05:29:41 PM
nasser was an elite bodybuilder during the most competitive era

branch is good for today but that isn't saying much

E