Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: Hugo Chavez on March 04, 2008, 05:14:32 AM

Title: SWEET
Post by: Hugo Chavez on March 04, 2008, 05:14:32 AM
4 wheel drive, 110 mpg

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/hot_lists/car_shopping/green_machines/jeep_renegade_concept_auto_shows+view-photos.html
Title: Re: SWEET
Post by: Deadpool on March 04, 2008, 09:08:58 AM
here in my car

I feel safest of all

I can lock all my doors

it's the young, we will live in CARS

ba dop ba dop
Title: Re: SWEET
Post by: onlyme on March 04, 2008, 09:54:55 AM
Didn't the Rambo Lambo (?) go around 160mph
Title: Re: SWEET
Post by: webcake on March 05, 2008, 04:32:30 AM
Didn't the Rambo Lambo (?) go around 160mph

110 MPG, not MPH
Title: Re: SWEET
Post by: onlyme on March 05, 2008, 01:42:52 PM
110 MPG, not MPH

Actually top speed was 160mph.

http://jalopnik.com/cars/retro/rambo-lambo-the-lm002-was-lamborghinis-extreme-suv-119398.php (http://jalopnik.com/cars/retro/rambo-lambo-the-lm002-was-lamborghinis-extreme-suv-119398.php)
Title: Re: SWEET
Post by: webcake on March 06, 2008, 01:46:18 AM
Actually top speed was 160mph.

http://jalopnik.com/cars/retro/rambo-lambo-the-lm002-was-lamborghinis-extreme-suv-119398.php (http://jalopnik.com/cars/retro/rambo-lambo-the-lm002-was-lamborghinis-extreme-suv-119398.php)

Yes i know.

What i meant was that the thread was focusing on the fuel consumption of this car (MPG) not the top speed.

Title: Re: SWEET
Post by: onlyme on March 06, 2008, 11:45:35 AM
Yes i know.

What i meant was that the thread was focusing on the fuel consumption of this car (MPG) not the top speed.



sorry, then the Lambo sucks.
Title: Re: SWEET
Post by: mitchyboy on March 17, 2008, 08:45:59 PM
Jesus christ your thick >:(
Title: Re: SWEET
Post by: onlyme on March 18, 2008, 12:56:58 AM
Thank you, I think
Title: Re: SWEET
Post by: Nordic Superman on March 18, 2008, 04:05:56 AM
Jesus christ your thick >:(

Jesus Christ you're thick >:(