Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: MikeThaMachine on March 13, 2008, 11:47:20 AM

Title: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: MikeThaMachine on March 13, 2008, 11:47:20 AM
I just read this article from the new SI last night and wanted to share this quote which immediately changed my mind on the views of the writer Jack McCallum. The guy is obviously a biased moron...

Full Article - http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/magazine/03/11/steroids1/index.html (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/magazine/03/11/steroids1/index.html)

"Or take California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who despite having used steroids to help him become a seven-time winner of the Mr. Olympia title, bodybuilding's top prize, was named by George H.W. Bush in 1990 to head the President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. By all accounts Schwarzenegger (who says he stopped using steroids well before it became illegal to sell or possess them without a prescription, in '90) worked tirelessly and brought unprecedented attention to the council, decrying steroid use all the while. But there was the overmuscled Ah-nold model for all to see. The governor continues to say that PEDs have no place in sport, yet tacitly endorses their use with his annual Arnold Sports Festival, a carnival of muscle porn in Columbus, Ohio, that includes bodybuilding contests and an expo featuring supplements pushed by cartoonishly sculpted hulks. "Even though performance-enhancing drugs have been part of his life," said one exhibitor at last week's festival who requested anonymity, "what can Arnold do? He has to say he's against them.""

Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: 240 is Back on March 13, 2008, 11:48:37 AM
a carnival of muscle porn

cartoonishly sculpted hulks


LOL....
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: MikeThaMachine on March 13, 2008, 11:53:47 AM
a carnival of muscle porn

cartoonishly sculpted hulks


LOL....


HAHAHAHAHAHA exactly the reason I posted it ;D


But seriously what a cheap shot to sum up the entire 4 day event which host dozens of events and hundreds of athletes competing mostly in sports not involving BBing at all.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: kcballer on March 13, 2008, 12:19:20 PM
But that's how the public see it.  It's not just him, if you lined up a whole bunch of sports writers and sent them along, they'd all come up with similar views.  These guys deal with real athletes on a daily basis, to go to the ASC and see a bunch of muscle chicks in thongs, acne covered fan boys sweating in otomix shows, and the 'pros' with more drugs in them than a local pharmacy.  At least athletes who use can still lay claim to actualy ability. 
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: wes mantooth on March 13, 2008, 12:20:46 PM

HAHAHAHAHAHA exactly the reason I posted it ;D


But seriously what a cheap shot to sum up the entire 4 day event which host dozens of events and hundreds of athletes competing mostly in sports not involving BBing at all.

why do you think its a cheap shot? sure, there are dozens of events during that weekend....but the main draw was...is...and always will be the bodybuilding.

seems like a pretty accurate quote if you ask me. with the latest push against "enhancement" drugs, its seems odd that the governer of california would have his named stamped all over it. i know it was before he was in politics, but it just seems like a funny oxymoron.

obviously nothing will be done, nothing will change, but in my opinion is arnold should either continue to "act" and promote bodybuilding, or be involved in tight assed politics....not both
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: m8 on March 13, 2008, 12:24:39 PM
a carnival of muscle porn

cartoonishly sculpted hulks


LOL....

classic
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Moosejay on March 13, 2008, 06:49:56 PM
Along with the Olympia, ASC is GROUND ZERO for the greatest concentration of steroid use anywhere on the planet atr any given time.

Although not very palatable, the writer's comments were accurate.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: gordiano on March 13, 2008, 06:55:55 PM
a carnival of muscle porn

cartoonishly sculpted hulks


LOL....

Straight out of Haney Rambod's vocabulary!


LOL!
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: bebop396 on March 13, 2008, 07:02:29 PM
I just read this article from the new SI last night and wanted to share this quote which immediately changed my mind on the views of the writer Jack McCallum. The guy is obviously a biased moron...

Full Article - http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/magazine/03/11/steroids1/index.html (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/magazine/03/11/steroids1/index.html)

"Or take California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who despite having used steroids to help him become a seven-time winner of the Mr. Olympia title, bodybuilding's top prize, was named by George H.W. Bush in 1990 to head the President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. By all accounts Schwarzenegger (who says he stopped using steroids well before it became illegal to sell or possess them without a prescription, in '90) worked tirelessly and brought unprecedented attention to the council, decrying steroid use all the while. But there was the overmuscled Ah-nold model for all to see. The governor continues to say that PEDs have no place in sport, yet tacitly endorses their use with his annual Arnold Sports Festival, a carnival of muscle porn in Columbus, Ohio, that includes bodybuilding contests and an expo featuring supplements pushed by cartoonishly sculpted hulks. "Even though performance-enhancing drugs have been part of his life," said one exhibitor at last week's festival who requested anonymity, "what can Arnold do? He has to say he's against them.""



Seems pretty spot on to me, but the thing is, i could care less that its the case....Also, ive always been a fan of cartoons, so the dopehead reporter can just go back to that bowl he was smoking....
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Smokincrazy on March 13, 2008, 08:00:30 PM
But that's how the public see it.  It's not just him, if you lined up a whole bunch of sports writers and sent them along, they'd all come up with similar views.  These guys deal with real athletes on a daily basis, to go to the ASC and see a bunch of muscle chicks in thongs, acne covered fan boys sweating in otomix shows, and the 'pros' with more drugs in them than a local pharmacy.  At least athletes who use can still lay claim to actualy ability. 
What's a "REAL ATHLETE"?  Squat 465x10 and tell me you dont have to be athletic to do it.  Doesnt take any athletic ability to that,huh?
 
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: thisiskeith12 on March 13, 2008, 08:16:04 PM
It's not hard to assume that Arnold could use those other sports to hide the bodybuilding aspect of the event.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: HowieW on March 13, 2008, 08:37:24 PM
Along with the Olympia, ASC is GROUND ZERO for the greatest concentration of steroid use anywhere on the planet atr any given time.

Although not very palatable, the writer's comments were accurate.
Sadly, I agree. I also have been saying in several posts that with Arnold a big time Gov now and the sports biggest name, this drug issue is going to get more heated.
I wish drug use in sports was LEGAL, but, that is not going to happen.
That is why I am for drug testing. The sports writters and gen public know too much now and they are sick of it.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Matt C on March 13, 2008, 08:42:57 PM
But that's how the public see it.  It's not just him

Because members of the general public, by and large, are ignorant on this subject.  Good journalists wouldn't cave in and agree with such ignorance.  The Arnold Classic weekend should be described objectively as what it is, not in a way which subscribes to what the public wants to hear.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: candidizzle on March 13, 2008, 08:46:35 PM
what a fucking jealous hater


id like to take bitch slap the shit out of that little wanna-be sports writer
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: thisiskeith12 on March 13, 2008, 08:56:36 PM
what a fucking jealous hater


id like to take bitch slap the shit out of that little wanna-be sports writer

That's sports writers in general. Sometimes I think they are more vicious than investigative news reporters. Either way, the sports media is CONSUMED with steroid talk and debate and if you don't think they are going to shine a big light on the world of bodybuilding you are misled.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: The_Punisher on March 14, 2008, 05:50:25 AM
I just read this article from the new SI last night and wanted to share this quote which immediately changed my mind on the views of the writer Jack McCallum. The guy is obviously a biased moron...

Full Article - http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/magazine/03/11/steroids1/index.html (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/magazine/03/11/steroids1/index.html)

"Or take California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who despite having used steroids to help him become a seven-time winner of the Mr. Olympia title, bodybuilding's top prize, was named by George H.W. Bush in 1990 to head the President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. By all accounts Schwarzenegger (who says he stopped using steroids well before it became illegal to sell or possess them without a prescription, in '90) worked tirelessly and brought unprecedented attention to the council, decrying steroid use all the while. But there was the overmuscled Ah-nold model for all to see. The governor continues to say that PEDs have no place in sport, yet tacitly endorses their use with his annual Arnold Sports Festival, a carnival of muscle porn in Columbus, Ohio, that includes bodybuilding contests and an expo featuring supplements pushed by cartoonishly sculpted hulks. "Even though performance-enhancing drugs have been part of his life," said one exhibitor at last week's festival who requested anonymity, "what can Arnold do? He has to say he's against them.""





they mention John Romano in that article...hahahah, he spitted his gut out to them
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: wes mantooth on March 14, 2008, 06:01:17 AM
Because members of the general public, by and large, are ignorant on this subject.  Good journalists wouldn't cave in and agree with such ignorance.  The Arnold Classic weekend should be described objectively as what it is, not in a way which subscribes to what the public wants to hear.

have you ever been?

if you havent, it might change your view a little. its a side show of freaks, sluts, and delusional people....

puffed up juice monkeys roaming around in all their "golds gym" gear looking like a walking cliche for all that is wrong for the 'sport"



are there good people there? sure. are there other things other than bodybuilding? of course. but you need to realize that what we see on the internet, magazines, and in the gyms are not what people typically see on a day to day basis. the shock value of a 230lb shredded dude is gone for us...

but to the average person, muscle girls in thongs in public, juiced up, loud bodybuilders ripping their shirts off, weird supplement gimmicks, MIDGET WRESTLING!.......

a freak show.....
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: JasonH on March 14, 2008, 06:10:03 AM
have you ever been?

if you havent, it might change your view a little. its a side show of freaks, sluts, and delusional people....

puffed up juice monkeys roaming around in all their "golds gym" gear looking like a walking cliche for all that is wrong for the 'sport"



are there good people there? sure. are there other things other than bodybuilding? of course. but you need to realize that what we see on the internet, magazines, and in the gyms are not what people typically see on a day to day basis. the shock value of a 230lb shredded dude is gone for us...

but to the average person, muscle girls in thongs in public, juiced up, loud bodybuilders ripping their shirts off, weird supplement gimmicks, MIDGET WRESTLING!.......

a freak show.....

What the fuck do they expect? Sometimes I wish bodybuilding and bodybuilders in general would stop acting as if the whole thing is a sport when it's not. That's why they get into trouble in the media - because they're trying to make out that it's a sport and athletic activity. They then make it an easy target for all the anti-drug mob (the media) because no pursuit on earth compares with bodybuilding for drug use.

If it were a tattoo convention people wouldn't give a shit - that place would be full of freaks and weirdos too but at least they're not wandering around trying to pass off their culture as a "sport". People just leave them alone as a result.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: The_Punisher on March 14, 2008, 06:13:16 AM
have you ever been?

if you havent, it might change your view a little. its a side show of freaks, sluts, and delusional people....

puffed up juice monkeys roaming around in all their "golds gym" gear looking like a walking cliche for all that is wrong for the 'sport"



are there good people there? sure. are there other things other than bodybuilding? of course. but you need to realize that what we see on the internet, magazines, and in the gyms are not what people typically see on a day to day basis. the shock value of a 230lb shredded dude is gone for us...

but to the average person, muscle girls in thongs in public, juiced up, loud bodybuilders ripping their shirts off, weird supplement gimmicks, MIDGET WRESTLING!.......

a freak show.....



lol.....maybe it's just the nature of the BEAST
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: The_Punisher on March 14, 2008, 06:18:02 AM
here is a quote from this article that I think is funny "But Timbaland trumpets the bodybuilding and weightlifting regimen that turned him from a 300-pound blubber factory into a buff bodybuilder".....hahahaha, timbaland looks more like a 300lbs pile of Horse shit
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: BM OUT on March 14, 2008, 06:20:35 AM
Did you guys bother to read the article?It was as pro steroid as anything Ive read in years.Christ,they almost praised Tony Fitton in the second part of the article.This was a very fair article devoid of the usual assanine foolishness of Don Hooten or the aptly named DICK POUND.The author absolutely kills George Mitchell in it.Read the WHOLE thing.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: The_Punisher on March 14, 2008, 06:24:25 AM
Did you guys bother to read the article?It was as pro steroid as anything Ive read in years.Christ,they almost praised Tony Fitton in the second part of the article.This was a very fair article devoid of the usual assanine foolishness of Don Hooten or the aptly named DICK POUND.The author absolutely kills George Mitchell in it.Read the WHOLE thing.


these SI sport writers are full of shit. they should take their sedentary ass to a local gym and get a bang out of their sorry life instead.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: MikeThaMachine on March 14, 2008, 07:20:56 AM
Because members of the general public, by and large, are ignorant on this subject.  Good journalists wouldn't cave in and agree with such ignorance.  The Arnold Classic weekend should be described objectively as what it is, not in a way which subscribes to what the public wants to hear.


Exactly he straight up insulted everyone in the BBing industry and everyone who attends and/or competes at the Arnold sports festival. This guy is a horrible journalist and either he is ignorant and stupid or has someone elses agenda in mind.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Moosejay on March 14, 2008, 07:33:45 AM
My opinion is that his words rang true
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Swedish Viking on March 14, 2008, 07:47:36 AM
I have to agree.  But I'm sure Arnold is pretty aware of it actually and he's got to make some changes sometime soon.  I don't know what he'll do, but I'm pretty sure this is already something on his mind-he knows that more and more people are going to start seeing that as hypocritical...and their kinda right.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: HUGEPECS on March 14, 2008, 07:56:00 AM
I have to agree.  But I'm sure Arnold is pretty aware of it actually and he's got to make some changes sometime soon.  I don't know what he'll do, but I'm pretty sure this is already something on his mind-he knows that more and more people are going to start seeing that as hypocritical...and their kinda right.



Arnold doesn't need to do shit about it. it's not the first time those fat asses at SI are writing about ASC, and it won't be the last time. Arnold has more important things on his mind then to pay attention to those GIRLY MEN..... ;D
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: MikeThaMachine on March 14, 2008, 07:59:33 AM
I have to agree.  But I'm sure Arnold is pretty aware of it actually and he's got to make some changes sometime soon.  I don't know what he'll do, but I'm pretty sure this is already something on his mind-he knows that more and more people are going to start seeing that as hypocritical...and their kinda right.


WTF does it matter, by all reason Charlie Wilson should have been kicked out of office for doing coke, DUI, hit and run etc... But because of him Afghanistan was able to defeat the Soviets and basically bring an end to the Soviet Union. Just because you have a past or do things some may find immoral doesn't mean you can't be a great leader or do great things to change the world. Sometimes people need to get over it and stop looking at all that is negative and focus on whats positive.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Smokincrazy on March 14, 2008, 09:50:37 AM
Did you guys bother to read the article?It was as pro steroid as anything Ive read in years.Christ,they almost praised Tony Fitton in the second part of the article.This was a very fair article devoid of the usual assanine foolishness of Don Hooten or the aptly named DICK POUND.The author absolutely kills George Mitchell in it.Read the WHOLE thing.
Definitely right.   
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: kcballer on March 14, 2008, 10:04:38 AM
What's a "REAL ATHLETE"?  Squat 465x10 and tell me you dont have to be athletic to do it.  Doesnt take any athletic ability to that,huh?
 

i don't really consider that a massive athletic acheivment no.  Impressive yes, but not overly athletic, i've seen a guy lift some pretty big weights 500lb bench press for a few reps type of weight, and he struggled to walk hardly what i'd call athletic, besides that's in the gym, on stage i don't see the bodybuilders squatting (and i wouldn't want to) all you see is them posing.  It's about asthetics not what you lift, because the strongest aren't always the best looking.  This is why i don't consider them as athletes the same way i consider a basketball or football player. 
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Smokincrazy on March 14, 2008, 10:22:37 AM
i don't really consider that a massive athletic acheivment no.  Impressive yes, but not overly athletic, i've seen a guy lift some pretty big weights 500lb bench press for a few reps type of weight, and he struggled to walk hardly what i'd call athletic, besides that's in the gym, on stage i don't see the bodybuilders squatting (and i wouldn't want to) all you see is them posing.  It's about asthetics not what you lift, because the strongest aren't always the best looking.  This is why i don't consider them as athletes the same way i consider a basketball or football player. 
Athletes come in all shapes and forms.  To me high intensity plyometrics is athletic.  Bowling and car racing arent athletic.   A lot more people can catch/throw baseball or football than squat 500 for reps.  Bodybuilding is two parts: Training to get muscle and then presenting it
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Palpatine Q on March 14, 2008, 10:31:09 AM
Did you guys bother to read the article?It was as pro steroid as anything Ive read in years.Christ,they almost praised Tony Fitton in the second part of the article.This was a very fair article devoid of the usual assanine foolishness of Don Hooten or the aptly named DICK POUND.The author absolutely kills George Mitchell in it.Read the WHOLE thing.

Agreed. Although he did take a giant shit on the BBing culture, which is SOP for these guys.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: muscleforlife on March 14, 2008, 12:34:36 PM

WTF does it matter, by all reason Charlie Wilson should have been kicked out of office for doing coke, DUI, hit and run etc... But because of him Afghanistan was able to defeat the Soviets and basically bring an end to the Soviet Union. Just because you have a past or do things some may find immoral doesn't mean you can't be a great leader or do great things to change the world. Sometimes people need to get over it and stop looking at all that is negative and focus on whats positive.

Does this mean you think Spitzer shouldn't have resigned?
He was cleaning up wall street and large corporations.  He really did think with his small head and not his brain.
Sandra
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Swedish Viking on March 14, 2008, 01:16:20 PM

WTF does it matter, by all reason Charlie Wilson should have been kicked out of office for doing coke, DUI, hit and run etc... But because of him Afghanistan was able to defeat the Soviets and basically bring an end to the Soviet Union. Just because you have a past or do things some may find immoral doesn't mean you can't be a great leader or do great things to change the world. Sometimes people need to get over it and stop looking at all that is negative and focus on whats positive.

  I'm not talking about Arnold's past. I'm talking about his present.  He's representing himself as a leader in healthy, environmentally sound living nowadays.  This is going to be a bigger and bigger blight on his reputation.  I'm not saying he needs to do something about it, I'm saying I think he will.  And I think that's good. 
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: hipolito mejia on March 14, 2008, 04:40:45 PM
But that's how the public see it.  It's not just him, if you lined up a whole bunch of sports writers and sent them along, they'd all come up with similar views.  These guys deal with real athletes on a daily basis, to go to the ASC and see a bunch of muscle chicks in thongs, acne covered fan boys sweating in otomix shows, and the 'pros' with more drugs in them than a local pharmacy.  At least athletes who use can still lay claim to actualy ability. 

 You Beat me to it.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: hipolito mejia on March 14, 2008, 04:43:07 PM
What's a "REAL ATHLETE"?  Squat 465x10 and tell me you dont have to be athletic to do it.  Doesnt take any athletic ability to that,huh?
 

I see your point, but The anabolics take a lot of merit away.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: hipolito mejia on March 14, 2008, 04:52:23 PM
 A lot more people can catch/throw baseball or football than squat 500 for reps.  Bodybuilding is two parts: Training to get muscle and then presenting it

You can use steroids and somewhere along the line you'll squat 500 pounds......

You can use steroids and if you don't have talent you won hit (or at least see )a ball that comes at 95 MPH across the plate.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: timfogarty on March 14, 2008, 05:15:07 PM
Quote
"By all accounts Schwarzenegger (who says he stopped using steroids well before it became illegal to sell or possess them without a prescription, in '90..."

I wish some reporter would challenge him on this.  Terminator 2 was 1991, Last Action Hero was 1993, True Lies was 1994, Terminator 3 was 2003.   Anyone believe he has been PED free for his action movies?

Kindergarden Cop was 1990, Junior was 1994, Jingle All The Way was 1996, the list goes on
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: hipolito mejia on March 14, 2008, 05:19:07 PM
I wish some reporter would challenge him on this.  Terminator 2 was 1991, Last Action Hero was 1993, True Lies was 1994, Terminator 3 was 2003.   Anyone believe he has been PED free for his action movies?

Kindergarden Cop was 1990, Junior was 1994, Jingle All The Way was 1996, the list goes on


Exactly.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Mobil on March 14, 2008, 06:01:05 PM
I wish some reporter would challenge him on this.  Terminator 2 was 1991, Last Action Hero was 1993, True Lies was 1994, Terminator 3 was 2003.   Anyone believe he has been PED free for his action movies?

Kindergarden Cop was 1990, Junior was 1994, Jingle All The Way was 1996, the list goes on

it says without a prescription. im sure he had a doc write all his meds. if u got that much money
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: sync pulse on March 14, 2008, 06:16:25 PM
it says without a prescription. im sure he had a doc write all his meds. if u got that much money

It used to be that gyms, (even the downtown Houston YMCA!) had lists and advertising for sports doctors that would supervise cycles.  The most mass with the least sides.  All pharmaceutical grade and legit.  I would be so happy if it were so again.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: FrenchFrie on March 14, 2008, 07:18:16 PM
Because members of the general public, by and large, are ignorant on this subject.  Good journalists wouldn't cave in and agree with such ignorance.  The Arnold Classic weekend should be described objectively as what it is, not in a way which subscribes to what the public wants to hear.

problem is that what the writer said isnt only what the public wants to hear, but it's also an objective description of what it is  ;D
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: LatsMcGee on March 15, 2008, 12:25:33 AM
a carnival of muscle porn

cartoonishly sculpted hulks


LOL....

"Yeah so this weekend I took my kids to the muscle porn carnival.  The lines were too long but the freakshow was top notch."
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: timfogarty on March 15, 2008, 01:19:10 AM
It used to be that gyms, (even the downtown Houston YMCA!) had lists and advertising for sports doctors that would supervise cycles.  The most mass with the least sides.  All pharmaceutical grade and legit.  I would be so happy if it were so again.

Repeal the Steroid Control Act of 1990.  That made possession without a script from a US doctor a felony, and also made it illegal for doctors to prescribe steroids for cosmetic or performance enhancing purposes.
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Moosejay on March 15, 2008, 01:21:35 AM
problem is that what the writer said isnt only what the public wants to hear, but it's also an objective description of what it is  ;D

Truth
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Moosejay on March 15, 2008, 01:22:13 AM
"Yeah so this weekend I took my kids to the muscle porn carnival.  The lines were too long but the freakshow was top notch."

 :)
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Mobil on March 15, 2008, 04:36:54 AM
Repeal the Steroid Control Act of 1990.  That made possession without a script from a US doctor a felony, and also made it illegal for doctors to prescribe steroids for cosmetic or performance enhancing purposes.

theres always loopholes... why is test, decca, anavar and winstrol still being produced by american pharmacy companies?
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: FrenchFrie on March 15, 2008, 04:43:34 AM
theres always loopholes... why is test, decca, anavar and winstrol still being produced by american pharmacy companies?
for people who use it for health related problems maybe???? you know those people who are sick and have steroids prescribed to them by doctors for health reasons, and not for cosmetic enhancement....
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Moosejay on March 15, 2008, 05:34:51 AM
Whenever I lecture I always talk about the + aspects of steroids...its necessary to do but always make the audience uncomfortable, although more attentive
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: Luv2Hurt on March 15, 2008, 06:35:03 AM
I think it takes a lot of guts and loyalty for Arnold to still be endorsing the ASC in the current political climate and with the public view on steroids.  He knows damn well that by being associated with the ASC it could be looked at as bad by the fear driven anti-steroid public.  I give him props for not running and staying true to his roots. 

Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: jason armstrong on March 15, 2008, 08:22:48 AM
have you ever been?

if you havent, it might change your view a little. its a side show of freaks, sluts, and delusional people....

puffed up juice monkeys roaming around in all their "golds gym" gear looking like a walking cliche for all that is wrong for the 'sport"



are there good people there? sure. are there other things other than bodybuilding? of course. but you need to realize that what we see on the internet, magazines, and in the gyms are not what people typically see on a day to day basis. the shock value of a 230lb shredded dude is gone for us...

but to the average person, muscle girls in thongs in public, juiced up, loud bodybuilders ripping their shirts off, weird supplement gimmicks, MIDGET WRESTLING!.......

a freak show.....

mattc 's been to the ASC...he's waaay out of place though looks like an HIV patient pasty white smooth small 160 lbs....yuck....
but he's a millionaire canadian career college student that is a bb'ing expert!!!!

how dare you argue with this beast.... ;D

what a joke...he fits in like a sore fking nut .....
Title: Re: Sports Illustrated's view on steroids, Arnold and the ASC.
Post by: timfogarty on March 15, 2008, 10:20:36 AM
theres always loopholes... why is test, decca, anavar and winstrol still being produced by american pharmacy companies?

The last US manufacturer of nandrolone decanoate, Watson Pharmaceuticals, stopped production late last year.  They were still making oxandrolone, and charging $1300 a month for it.  It is still possible to get nandrolone from a few compounding pharmacies.  Stanozolol is not available in the US.