Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: MattT on March 19, 2008, 10:52:04 PM

Title: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: MattT on March 19, 2008, 10:52:04 PM
Hell no!, those mother fuckers broke the rules!, and Clintons bitch ass keeps trying to make it happen. She didn't care about the FL & MI when she was ahead in delegates, now that she's behind, all of a sudden she all for a re vote ::).  Just shows you that she will do anything to win. How can any sane man vote for that whore?
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 10:55:45 PM
No... Fuck them.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 19, 2008, 10:57:58 PM
Hell no!, those mother fuckers broke the rules


Which "motherfucckers" would those be, the millions of voters who were disenfranchised through no fault of their own? Those motherfucckers?  ::)


You're only against it because it would work against your preferred candidate.  If the shoe were on the other foot, you'd be screaming the loudest to "let all the votes count".
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: thisiskeith12 on March 19, 2008, 10:59:41 PM
If you support a candidate that much you are gay as cool as MusclePhone!
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on March 19, 2008, 11:00:40 PM
If you support a candidate that much you are gay. Plain and simple.

You'll have to excuse MattC, he's still bummed over his fling with a certain IFBB pro not panning out :-\
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 11:01:22 PM

Which "motherfucckers" would those be, the millions of voters who were disenfranchised through no fault of their own, those motherfucckers?  ::)


You're only against it because it would work against your preferred candidate.  If the shoe were on the other foot, you'd be screaming the loudest to "let all the votes count".


Actually, I don't think it would hurt Obama at all if they had a "re-vote"... He would get the opportunity to campaign an it can only help him to get more delegates... remember... the magic number is 2024 right? Putting him on the ballot in those states may actually make Hillary look that much worse... especially if he wins them the second go around.

It's not like he won't pick up delegates in Florida, and I bet money if you revote Michigan he'll win that state outright.

This is the same guy who won Texas... now if Obama can win Texas over Hillary (which he did) then he'll win this thing outright.

Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 19, 2008, 11:02:14 PM
You'll have to excuse MattC, he's still bummed over his fling with a certain IFBB pro not panning out :-\


Oh well, they'll always have Dubai (India)!
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: The_Iron_Disciple on March 19, 2008, 11:03:14 PM
No... Fuck them.


And fuck you, too !  :D
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on March 19, 2008, 11:04:11 PM

Oh well, they'll always have Dubai (India)!

That's f'n sick dude












 ;D
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 11:05:42 PM

And fuck you, too !  :D

Politicians always do.

:)
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 19, 2008, 11:08:42 PM


This is the same guy who won Texas... now if Obama can win Texas over Hillary (which he did) then he'll win this thing outright.




Are you stupid or something?  Hillary won the Texas primary.

http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/states/TX.html
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 11:10:21 PM

Are you stupid or something?  Hillary won the Texas primary.

http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/states/TX.html

Apparently not as stupid as you.

Obama won the caucus... his votes added together are more than hers.

He won texas.

Feel free to add them up on your own.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#TX

Obama - 61+38 = 99

Clinton - 65+29 = 94



Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on March 19, 2008, 11:13:10 PM
Looks like Obama is gonna win the nomination.  Numbers don't lie.  That said, I'm not gonna vote this election.  I would only vote if the great Josef Stalin were running ;D
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: MattT on March 19, 2008, 11:14:07 PM
Apparently not as stupid as you.

Obama won the caucus... his votes added together are more than hers.

He won texas.

Feel free to add them up on your own.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#TX

Obama - 61+38 = 99



Clinton - 65+29 = 94






lol Goatboy OWNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 11:14:40 PM
Looks like Obama is gonna win the nomination.  Numbers don't lie.  That said, I'm not gonna vote this election.  I would only vote if the great Josef Stalin were running ;D

You know... he was an interesting guy that Stalin was... had some great times in the old communist Russia.

I miss the cold war.

:(
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 19, 2008, 11:17:22 PM
Apparently not as stupid as you.

Obama won the caucus... his votes added together are more than hers.

He won texas.

Feel free to add them up on your own.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#TX

Obama - 61+38 = 99

Clinton - 65+29 = 94






That's pretty asinine, considering over 3 million people voted in the primary and Hillary won by over 100,000, while fewer than 40 thousand total participated in the "caucus".


Even considering both, far more Texas voters cast a vote for Hillary than for Obama.  Leave it to democrats to create a system where he gets more delegates when he got far fewer votes.  ::)
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 11:18:23 PM

That's pretty asinine, considering over 3 million people voted in the primary and Hillary won by over 100,000, while fewer than 40 thousand total participated in the "caucus".


Even considering both, far more Texas voters cast a vote for Hillary than for Obama.  Leave it to democrats to create a system where he gets more delegates when he got far fewer votes.  ::)

You mean like the electoral college giving the 2000 election to Bush... Even though Al Gore won the popular vote?

Hmm... Ok... yeah, it's a Democratic party thing huh?

::)

Oh... quick question... Who won Texas again?
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 19, 2008, 11:21:56 PM

Oh... quick question... Who won Texas again?


The Texas primary?   Hillary won.

The "caucus" that had fewer participants than there are Muscle PhoneTM subscribers?  I think the black guy won that.  ::)
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 11:22:51 PM

The Texas primary?   Hillary won.

The "caucus" that had fewer participants than there are Muscle PhoneTM subscribers?  I think the black guy won that.  ::)

Obama won the State of Texas... get over it man... Just admit you were wrong... it's not like it's the end of the world.

Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on March 19, 2008, 11:24:11 PM
You know... he was an interesting guy that Stalin was... had some great times in the old communist Russia.

I miss the cold war.

:(

Stalin is a fascinating guy.  His clashes with Hitler are epic.  Hard to believe that a guy (Stalin) who commanded the largest standing army at the time was actually afraid of Hitler and his (by comparison) pretty small army.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 11:25:44 PM
Stalin is a fascinating guy.  His clashes with Hitler are epic.  Hard to believe that a guy (Stalin) who commanded the largest standing army at the time was actually afraid of Hitler and his (by comparison) pretty small army.

Dude... no doubt... Russia's biggest problem, I thought, was with all of those natural resources, they just didn't know how to put them to use very well.

Hitler on the other hand had very few resources, but used what he did have to perfection. Couple that with the military GENIUS of most of his inner circle... The Germans were some scary motherfuckers.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 19, 2008, 11:26:34 PM
Obama won the State of Texas... get over it man... Just admit you were wrong...

No.  >:(
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 11:27:55 PM
No.  >:(

Haha... Ok!

Sticking to politics though... Is the Obama "shining star" starting to fade with the latest rounds of statements from the Pastor and Heads of the Black Panthers?

Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 19, 2008, 11:28:26 PM
Dude... no doubt... Russia's biggest problem, I thought, was with all of those natural resources, they just didn't know how to put them to use very well.

Hitler on the other hand had very few resources, but used what he did have to perfection. Couple that with the military GENIUS of most of his inner circle... The Germans were some scary motherfuckers.


If Hitler had just stayed the fucck out of the way of his generals and let them do their jobs, Germany would have been much more successful.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on March 19, 2008, 11:29:48 PM
Dude... no doubt... Russia's biggest problem, I thought, was with all of those natural resources, they just didn't know how to put them to use very well.

Hitler on the other hand had very few resources, but used what he did have to perfection. Couple that with the military GENIUS of most of his inner circle... The Germans were some scary motherfuckers.

Very true. Hitler was a MASTER military tactician.  He gets a lot of shit about gassing the Jews, but most people don't know that Hitler had very little to do with that...his right hand man Heinrich Himmler took care of most of that. But anyway, Stalin's advantage in WW2 was the winter in Russia...the German army, as powerful and determined as it was, couldn't get past that.  Just like Napoleon's army couldn't either.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 19, 2008, 11:30:18 PM
Haha... Ok!

Sticking to politics though... Is the Obama "shining star" starting to fade with the latest rounds of statements from the Pastor and Heads of the Black Panthers?




The more I learn about the candidates and their policies, the more I think Hillary would be the lesser of two evils.


Doesn't matter, though, I'm voting for "Crazy John"!  :D
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 11:32:16 PM
Very true. Hitler was a MASTER military tactician.  He gets a lot of shit about gassing the Jews, but most people don't know that Hitler had very little to do with that...his right hand man Heinrich Himmler took care of most of that. But anyway, Stalin's advantage in WW2 was the winter in Russia...the German army, as powerful and determined as it was, couldn't get past that.  Just like Napoleon's army couldn't either.

It's what the Russians have done for 400 years... Wait for it to get cold... hang out about 20 or 30 miles outside of Moscow and just let the Russian winter kill them for you.


If Hitler had just stayed the fucck out of the way of his generals and let them do their jobs, Germany would have been much more successful.

I agree... I think he did in the beginning, then he started to get a little too high on himself... believing the hype or whatever at times... thinking he didn't need the generals.

I do think the fact he was fighting a 2 front war against far superior numbers may have been the bigger deal as well... He shouldn't have turned on Russia until after he had all of Europe and was well on the way to the US.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 19, 2008, 11:33:04 PM
Very true. Hitler was a MASTER military tactician.  He gets a lot of shit about gassing the Jews, but most people don't know that Hitler had very little to do with that...his right hand man Heinrich Himmler took care of most of that. But anyway, Stalin's advantage in WW2 was the winter in Russia...the German army, as powerful and determined as it was, couldn't get past that.  Just like Napoleon's army couldn't either.


Hitler screwed the pooch royally by starting a two-front war.  He should have gone after the west first, took Britain, paused several years to re-arm, THEN gone after the Soviets.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 11:33:28 PM

The more I learn about the candidates and their policies, the more I think Hillary would be the lesser of two evils.


Doesn't matter, though, I'm voting for "Crazy John"!  :D

I dunno... as much as I hate Bush... I may end up doing the same... I'm quite torn right now.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 19, 2008, 11:33:52 PM

I do think the fact he was fighting a 2 front war against far superior numbers may have been the bigger deal as well... He shouldn't have turned on Russia until after he had all of Europe and was well on the way to the US.

LOL...  great minds think alike.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 11:35:31 PM
LOL...  great minds think alike.

Smartz is smartz!

;D
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on March 19, 2008, 11:36:48 PM
I do think the fact he was fighting a 2 front war against far superior numbers may have been a big deal as well... He shouldn't have turned on Russia until after he had all of Europe and was well on the way to the US.

The great TU speaks truth again.  If it hadn't been for US intervention (the A-bomb and the US-Japan front), most of Europe would be speaking German now.  Germany's army was unstoppable...it took Paris, it neutralized the British navy (the most powerful wing of the Brit. empire), it took Poland, etc.  I'm not of German heritage, but damn, you gotta admire the determination of an army that was pretty small and in just a few years owned the entire world. 
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 11:39:24 PM
The great TU speaks truth again.  If it hadn't been for US intervention (the A-bomb and the US-Japan front), most of Europe would be speaking German now.  Germany's army was unstoppable...it took Paris, it neutralized the British navy (the most powerful wing of the Brit. empire), it took Poland, etc.  I'm not of German heritage, but damn, you gotta admire the determination of an army that was pretty small and in just a few years owned the entire world. 

True enough... Had Hitler been just a tad bit more patient, Germany would easily be the largest country in Europe and quite possibly having set their sites on the US after that, the US would most likely have been completely unprepared for the ensuing attack and would have been caught with their hands down and without Russia being able to focus from the East... Well, let's just say that the world would look different.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: MattT on March 19, 2008, 11:39:36 PM

Which "motherfucckers" would those be, the millions of voters who were disenfranchised through no fault of their own? Those motherfucckers?  ::)


You're only against it because it would work against your preferred candidate.  If the shoe were on the other foot, you'd be screaming the loudest to "let all the votes count".

Yes those dumb ass motherfuckers!, they were told that their vote would note count.  So unlike the estimated 2 million other people who decided not to vote because of that simple fact.    And even if there was a re vote, and Hillary won 55% to 45%, Obama would still be way ahead! in the delegates and would still have won more fuckin states then that bitch. However, Hillary is promoting to young kids, that if you break the rules, its ok and you should be able to get away with it.  And Obama says we should stick to the rules, as thats the right thing to do.  That is the type of man we need running America, not some rule breaking whore.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 19, 2008, 11:43:28 PM
Yes those dumb ass motherfuckers!, they were told that their vote would note count.  


So they should just accept that they don't get to vote in this election?  The state election officials broke the rules, not the voters.  I know you think Dubai is in India and all, but are you really that dumb?  ::)
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 11:46:29 PM

So they should just accept that they don't get to vote in this election?  The state election officials broke the rules, not the voters.  I know you think Dubai is in India and all, but are you really that dumb?  ::)

I definitely see your point on their vote counting... personally, I think all votes SHOULD count.

This is definitely throwing out the baby with the bathwater so to speak.

I'd be good with a re-vote... give them each about 8 weeks to campaign and let the  voters go to down.


Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: MattT on March 19, 2008, 11:51:16 PM

So they should just accept that they don't get to vote in this election?  The state election officials broke the rules, not the voters.  I know you think Dubai is in India and all, but are you really that dumb?  ::)

No their vote should not count cause they were told ahead of fuckin time that their stupid ass republican Governor broke the fuckin rules, yet the dumb Floridians still went out and voted.  Thats like telling students in a class, you can take this test, but it wont count towards your final mark ::).  Then why the fuck would i want to waste time writing a stupid test if i know its not going to count?? Thats something only dumb people do and did in FL & MI.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on March 19, 2008, 11:54:08 PM
True enough... Had Hitler been just a tad bit more patient, Germany would easily be the largest country in Europe and quite possibly having set their sites on the US after that, the US would most likely have been completely unprepared for the ensuing attack and would have been caught with their hands down and without Russia being able to focus from the East... Well, let's just say that the world would look different.

Definitely.  I think the tide turned when Einstein and his cohorts came along...if they hadn't "sold out" to us and given us that nuclear technology, there would have been no Hiroshima, no Nagasaki, and no US "win" in WW2.  Without those nuclear capabilities, we were not a superpower, and we would never have intimidated Japan or Germany into submission.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 19, 2008, 11:56:30 PM
Definitely.  I think the tide turned when Einstein and his cohorts came along...if they hadn't "sold out" to us and given us that nuclear technology, there would have been no Hiroshima, no Nagasaki, and no US "win" in WW2.  Without those nuclear capabilities, we were not a superpower, and we would never have intimidated Japan or Germany into submission.

No doubt... That nuclear power has kept us on top of the world for 70 years.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on March 19, 2008, 11:58:48 PM
No doubt... That nuclear power has kept us on top of the world for 70 years.

If battles were now just about standing armies, and no technology, we'd get our asses kicked royally by China, Russia (or what's left of it now), etc.  It'll be interesting to look ahead 50 years and see where things will be then.  We've seen how much everything changed in the past 50 years...
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 19, 2008, 11:59:05 PM
No their vote should not count cause they were told ahead of fuckin time that their stupid ass republican Governor broke the fuckin rules, yet the dumb Floridians still went out and voted.  Thats like telling students in a class, you can take this test, but it wont count towards your final mark ::).  Then why the fuck would i want to waste time writing a stupid test if i know its not going to count??


 ::)


You're clueless.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 20, 2008, 12:00:49 AM
If battles were now just about standing armies, and no technology, we'd get our asses kicked royally by China, Russia (or what's left of it now), etc.  It'll be interesting to look ahead 50 years and see where things will be then.  We've seen how much everything changed in the past 50 years...

Even if technology evens out, "numbers of soldiers" will never again be the factor it once was.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: no one on March 20, 2008, 12:01:36 AM

Which "motherfucckers" would those be, the millions of voters who were disenfranchised through no fault of their own? Those motherfucckers?  ::)


You're only against it because it would work against your preferred candidate.  If the shoe were on the other foot, you'd be screaming the loudest to "let all the votes count".

no, she clearly started at the start of the campaign there would be no re-count in those states, and now she wants to repeal that decision, which is her legal right, but will make her look untrustworthy and like someone who's word has no value.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 20, 2008, 12:01:47 AM
If battles were now just about standing armies, and no technology, we'd get our asses kicked royally by China, Russia (or what's left of it now), etc.  It'll be interesting to look ahead 50 years and see where things will be then.  We've seen how much everything changed in the past 50 years...

You're right... the future of combat is going to be an interesting sight to see.

I'll say this about warfare though. Like someone said... I don't know what WWIII will be fought with... but WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones.

;)
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 20, 2008, 12:03:15 AM
no, she clearly started at the start of the campaign there would be no re-count in those states, and now she wants to repeal that decison, which is her legal right, but will make her look untrustworthy and someone who's word has no value.


I'm talking about the rights of the voters in those states, not about what hillary does or doesn't do.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on March 20, 2008, 12:04:12 AM
but WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones.

;)

You see that 80s movie "The Day After"?

You see "Red Dawn" too?
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 20, 2008, 12:07:15 AM
no, she clearly started at the start of the campaign there would be no re-count in those states, and now she wants to repeal that decison, which is her legal right, but will make her look untrustworthy and like someone who's word has no value.

You mean a politician might lie?


I'm talking about the rights of the voters in those states, not about what hillary does or doesn't do.

I do think it goes against the laws of the voters of this country to deny them their say what so ever... How is this even legal?
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 20, 2008, 12:08:19 AM
You see that 80s movie "The Day After"?

You see "Red Dawn" too?

I haven't seen "The Day After".

I have Red Dawn on DVD... Wolverines bitches!
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: no one on March 20, 2008, 12:09:12 AM

I'm talking about the rights of the voters in those states, not about what hillary does or doesn't do.

this was matt t's question...

Hell no!, those mother fuckers broke the rules!, and Clintons bitch ass keeps trying to make it happen. She didn't care about the FL & MI when she was ahead in delegates, now that she's behind, all of a sudden she all for a re vote ::).  Just shows you that she will do anything to win. How can any sane man vote for that whore?

this was your answer...


Which "motherfucckers" would those be, the millions of voters who were disenfranchised through no fault of their own? Those motherfucckers?  ::)


You're only against it because it would work against your preferred candidate.  If the shoe were on the other foot, you'd be screaming the loudest to "let all the votes count".

your answer to this question had nothing to do with voters rights, but if the votes should count.

next time say what you mean, or don't say anything at all.

you'll only bring your own intelligence into question, which is probably not a new thing for you anyway.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 20, 2008, 12:13:42 AM
You mean a politician might lie?

I do think it goes against the laws of the voters of this country to deny them their say what so ever... How is this even legal?




Since the general election is open to anybody (technically, the loser of a primary could run in the general as an independant), that is the only election voters have a "right" to.  Primaries are not mentioned in the Constitution.  I think that legally the primaries are "owned" in a way by the parties, but the government administers them, keeps them fair, etc.  That still doesn't make it right ethically to disenfranchise voters who otherwise would have had a right to participate in that primary. I don't know all the legal ins and outs of this, but I wonder what would happen if a voter in one of those states tried to sue over this?
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on March 20, 2008, 12:14:56 AM
I haven't seen "The Day After".

I have Red Dawn on DVD... Wolverines bitches!

haha RD is one of the best movies ever IMO.  You gotta see Day after....Jason Robards movie from the early 80s.  Same genre as RD except more pessimistic..."we" get the shit nuked out of us and it's apocalypse.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: G o a t b o y on March 20, 2008, 12:18:17 AM
you'll only bring your own intelligence into question, which is probably not a new thing for you anyway.


Or, maybe I'm just spinning things whichever way I need to to try to get mattT to melt down.   ;)


You really think I come to getbig to have actual philosophical debates?  Either way, you sure spent a lot of time assembling your post, complete with quotes.  Good job!  :D
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 20, 2008, 12:23:27 AM
haha RD is one of the best movies ever IMO.  You gotta see Day after....Jason Robards movie from the early 80s.  Same genre as RD except more pessimistic..."we" get the shit nuked out of us and it's apocalypse.

Sounds classic... I've just added it to my netflix... That bitch should be here day after tomorrow I'm guessing.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: no one on March 20, 2008, 12:27:24 AM

Or, maybe I'm just spinning things whichever way I need to to try to get mattT to melt down.   ;)


You really think I come to getbig to have actual philosophical debates?  Either way, you sure spent a lot of time assembling your post, complete with quotes.  Good job!  :D

or maybe you are just someone who isn't as smart as he tries to pretend to be and got your ass handed to you for being such.

by the way, it's a political debate, not philosophical.

i know this must be difficult for you, but try to follow along.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on March 20, 2008, 12:42:33 AM
Sounds classic... I've just added it to my netflix... That bitch should be here day after tomorrow I'm guessing.

Good stuff. It's def an "oldie"...great spec effects for that time, but mostly it's the message of the movie.  Excellent Cold War era flick.  The very last scene, right before the credits start, is a classic.  Robard's character, all mangled from the a-bomb stuff, hugs a guy who is trying to claim the pile of rubble that is robard's character's house.  Not to be cheesy, but it's pretty moving stuff when you remember the era in which the film was made.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: Gym dude on March 20, 2008, 12:43:50 AM
I live on the other side of the world. I personally dont give a shit about the FL & Mi re vote.
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: webcake on March 20, 2008, 12:50:27 AM
I live on the other side of the world. I personally dont give a shit about the FL & Mi re vote.

Me too, thats why i dont post on the threads ;)

Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on March 20, 2008, 12:52:34 AM
I live on the other side of the world. I personally dont give a shit about the FL & Mi re vote.

You also don't "give a shit" about things like--you know--heterosexuality. ::)
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: tu_holmes on March 20, 2008, 06:13:48 PM
You also don't "give a shit" about things like--you know--heterosexuality. ::)

;D
Title: Re: Should FL & MI have a Re-Vote?
Post by: shootfighter1 on March 20, 2008, 06:33:06 PM
Yes.  The states should be penalyzed, but not the people.
Clinton was against and now for this...I understand the argument against her but the people should have the right to vote.  It was a stupid move by the state conventions.  Any rule the democratic party sets can be adjusted.