Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: 240 is Back on April 22, 2008, 09:13:27 AM

Title: Q for RonPaul supporters: Which of the top 3 candidates would you 'settle' for?
Post by: 240 is Back on April 22, 2008, 09:13:27 AM
Now that RP isn't in the running, which of the 3 remaining candidates would you most like to see as president?
Title: Re: Q for RonPaul supporters: Which of the top 3 candidates would you 'settle'
Post by: w8tlftr on April 22, 2008, 09:37:13 AM
That's like asking how do you want your beating? With a lead pipe, baseball bat, or sledge hammer?

They're all gonna hurt.
Title: Re: Q for RonPaul supporters: Which of the top 3 candidates would you 'settle' for?
Post by: 240 is Back on April 22, 2008, 10:52:58 AM
Yes, but life is about compromises.  I'm sure we'd all love to have a ten mil trust fund, a harem of 40 supermodel nymphomaniacs, and a really cool machine that makes ice cream sundaes.

In real life, we make compromises based upon available options.

So who will you RP suporters begrudgingly support this fall?
Title: Re: Q for RonPaul supporters: Which of the top 3 candidates would you 'settle'
Post by: JBGRAY on April 22, 2008, 02:15:23 PM
If I were forced to choose from one of the three, I'd have to go with Obama.  He is very socially liberal, BUT....I'd rather have someone who is socially liberal than someone who puts forth another country's interest first before America(like the GODDAMNED Israel-first hawks that that slink around the halls of Capitol Hill like that Toad Lieberman). 

We don't fucking need the obviously senile McCain as president.  We don't need the puppet Hillary.  At least Obama offers some promise of having some integrity and principle.  I'd much rather have a man who is actually true to his principles despite them perhaps being adverse to my own than someone who pays lip service to everyone.
Title: Re: Q for RonPaul supporters: Which of the top 3 candidates would you 'settle'
Post by: w8tlftr on April 22, 2008, 03:23:57 PM
If I were forced to choose from one of the three, I'd have to go with Obama.  He is very socially liberal, BUT....I'd rather have someone who is socially liberal than someone who puts forth another country's interest first before America(like the GODDAMNED Israel-first hawks that that slink around the halls of Capitol Hill like that Toad Lieberman). 

We don't fucking need the obviously senile McCain as president.  We don't need the puppet Hillary.  At least Obama offers some promise of having some integrity and principle.  I'd much rather have a man who is actually true to his principles despite them perhaps being adverse to my own than someone who pays lip service to everyone.

I really want to like Obama but I simply don't think I can afford the man. His policies are to socialist for me.

I despise the Clintons. You could hold a gun to my head and tell me to vote for her and I'd still tell you to go fvck yourself.

McCain really pissed me off on the immigration bill he co-sponsored with Kennedy.

I really am (strongly) considering writing in Ron Paul.

Title: Re: Q for RonPaul supporters: Which of the top 3 candidates would you 'settle'
Post by: 24KT on April 22, 2008, 03:33:54 PM
I really want to like Obama but I simply don't think I can afford the man. His policies are to socialist for me.

I despise the Clintons. You could hold a gun to my head and tell me to vote for her and I'd still tell you to go fvck yourself.

McCain really pissed me off on the immigration bill he co-sponsored with Kennedy.

I really am (strongly) considering writing in Ron Paul.


For the sake of argument, let's say Obama's policies are socialist, ...and he'd tax 50% of your household income

You'd be better off with a 50% tax burden and living, ...than you would be with zero taxes and glowing in the dark

psssst: I heard nuclear radiation makes bodily appendages that are closer to the ground fall off first.
Title: Re: Q for RonPaul supporters: Which of the top 3 candidates would you 'settle' for?
Post by: Camel Jockey on April 22, 2008, 04:34:55 PM
Obama has grown on me. I like how he stands firm, but I also think that he could change his view points or policies for the better if he saw a reason fit. By that I mean he comes off as a person that can adapt faster than the typical politician.
Title: Re: Q for RonPaul supporters: Which of the top 3 candidates would you 'settle'
Post by: w8tlftr on April 22, 2008, 05:12:34 PM
For the sake of argument, let's say Obama's policies are socialist, ...and he'd tax 50% of your household income

You'd be better off with a 50% tax burden and living, ...than you would be with zero taxes and glowing in the dark

psssst: I heard nuclear radiation makes bodily appendages that are closer to the ground fall off first.

So that's the ultimatum? Vote socialist or die?

Any country that attacks the United States with nukes would face absolute annihilation. If you think America going into Afghanistan because of the Taliban was bad watch what happens if a country is housing a terrorist cell that detonates a nuke here.
Title: Re: Q for RonPaul supporters: Which of the top 3 candidates would you 'settle'
Post by: Bindare_Dundat on April 22, 2008, 06:41:27 PM
I really want to like Obama but I simply don't think I can afford the man. His policies are to socialist for me.

I despise the Clintons. You could hold a gun to my head and tell me to vote for her and I'd still tell you to go fvck yourself.

McCain really pissed me off on the immigration bill he co-sponsored with Kennedy.

I really am (strongly) considering writing in Ron Paul.



Thats pretty much the way I feel.

Dr. Paul, the most honest man up there. Some people just arent ready for the message yet it seems.  :-\