Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: donrhummy on May 16, 2008, 10:38:29 PM
-
He was bigger and more ripped in 01 (even in an out of focus picture :o)!
-
I would tend to agree, although the tan may play a role.
-
All Palumboism.
-
nope he did look better back then....he had the ability to get dry... maybe his kidneys are shot now
-
nope he did look better back then....he had the ability to get dry... maybe his kidneys are shot now
Awesome Michael Lockett leg symmetry.
-
Awesome Michael Lockett leg symmetry.
coleman lacks the genes to have striations in this quads.. jay has them... show me one pic of coleman with striations in his quads.... not veins... but striations... big difference.
-
coleman lacks the genes to have striations in this quads.. jay has them... show me one pic of coleman with striations in his quads.... not veins... but striations... big difference.
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/42/images/Ronnie_Coleman_photo135.jpg)
-
There are probably better pics but light
striations on both sides of left leg.
-
Why would he claim that Coleman's quads didnt have striations? ??? ???
-
coleman lacks the genes to have striations in this quads.. jay has them... show me one pic of coleman with striations in his quads.... not veins... but striations... big difference.
::)
-
There are probably better pics but light
striations on both sides of left leg.
The bigger he got the striations went away .
-
He was bigger and more ripped in 01 (even in an out of focus picture :o)!
He was NOT bigger in 01 he was lighter and better conditioned , his showing in 2001 easily beats 2007
-
Wow, Coleman looked phenominal in 96'! I was a big Coleman fan until he added the excessive weight and ruined his abdomen.
-
Jay was 254lbs in 2001, im not sure what he was last year, but he is now 15lbs heavier or so :-\
-
Wow, Coleman looked phenominal in 96'! I was a big Coleman fan until he added the excessive weight and ruined his abdomen.
He did look really good in 1996 he was 250 pounds and in that contest was sharp as hell
-
Jay was 254lbs in 2001, im not sure what he was last year, but he is now 15lbs heavier or so :-\
I think he was 274 pounds in 07 but he looked leaps & bounds better in 01
-
All gym lighting.
-
Interesting how good Ronnie looked back then. Ripped, good obliques, nice lower pec line. About the time he used to get soundly beaten by Yates, Levrone et al. Ronnie gradually lost those finer aspects to his physique after 96-98.
-
He was NOT bigger in 01 he was lighter and better conditioned , his showing in 2001 easily beats 2007
His head size is the same (actually a tad bigger in the '07 pic) yet his shoulder, pec, bicep and leg muscles are BIGGER. If the head matches (and actually the '07 head is just slightly bigger) then it means you're actually comparing his actual body size.
-
He was bigger and more ripped in 01 (even in an out of focus picture :o)!
Palumboism
-
Palumboism
Denial.
-
All Palumboism.
jay is dowing 1000g of carbs a day... ::)
-
He was bigger and more ripped in 01 (even in an out of focus picture :o)!
Everyone is bigger in gym pics than on the contest stage.
-
Everyone is bigger in gym pics than on the contest stage.
Only to a point. That gym pic was a day after the Olympia and he looks like he's in a diff. league from his '07 self.