Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Howard on May 22, 2008, 03:41:16 PM

Title: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
Post by: Howard on May 22, 2008, 03:41:16 PM
Here is my basic idea:
Since the biggest shows in bodybuilding, have NO drug testing, why even bother trying to speculate about who is/was really natural?In fact, who uses what drug or even synthol, is a moot point.
Unless the IFBB decides to do actual, legit and complete drug testing, it is a NON issue.
Why? The physiques are judged as the appear on the stage and how they got that way is not tested for and no subtances are banned, etc.
I know I have beaten this drug issue to death, but I think it is time to let it RIP.
Your thoughts?
Howard
Title: Re: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
Post by: BlueDevil on May 22, 2008, 03:43:02 PM

i think you need to get laid  :D
Title: Re: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
Post by: Howard on May 22, 2008, 03:45:48 PM
i think you need to get laid  :D
Hmmm, are you asking?Interested in middle aged chunky bodybuilders are we?
Title: Re: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
Post by: MAXX on May 22, 2008, 03:50:28 PM
If the IFBB starts drug testing they will also lose most bb fans.

And the bb'ers in IFBB would just swich to another organisation w/o drug testing.

Seems like what gh15 says is true sadly: bodybuilding = steroids/hormones
Title: Re: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
Post by: Howard on May 22, 2008, 03:53:41 PM
If the IFBB starts drug testing they will also lose most bb fans.

And the bb'ers in IFBB would just swich to another organisation w/o drug testing.

Seems like what gh15 says is true sadly: bodybuilding = steroids/hormones
Exactly, GH15 and I may disagree about the absolute need for drugs to devlop a decent physique, but you need drugged bodies to get the extreme levels we see in the modern pro.
It is what it is, and to me I no longer care...
Title: Re: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
Post by: Moosejay on May 22, 2008, 03:55:21 PM
Here is my basic idea:
Since the biggest shows in bodybuilding, have NO drug testing, why even bother trying to speculate about who is/was really natural?In fact, who uses what drug or even synthol, is a moot point.
Unless the IFBB decides to do actual, legit and complete drug testing, it is a NON issue.
Why? The physiques are judged as the appear on the stage and how they got that way is not tested for and no subtances are banned, etc.
I know I have beaten this drug issue to death, but I think it is time to let it RIP.
Your thoughts?
Howard

with drug use:

"He who screams loudest is guilty..."

Same category as:

"Methinks the man/lady doth protest too much..."
Title: Re: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
Post by: BlueDevil on May 22, 2008, 03:57:31 PM
Hmmm, are you asking?Interested in middle aged chunky bodybuilders are we?

says the guy who's  transgender doctor was on pcp and forgot to use the scaple, but my boobs look ok,right..  :D
Title: Re: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
Post by: BayGBM on May 22, 2008, 04:16:52 PM
Hmmm, are you asking?Interested in middle aged chunky bodybuilders are we?

Yep!  :P