Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Alternative Boards => Y Board - The Player's Club => Topic started by: benz on May 25, 2008, 08:07:20 PM

Title: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: benz on May 25, 2008, 08:07:20 PM
And why are you avoidng to answer about it bro? Did you kill someone? Wife beater? Bring us the truth!
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Matt C on May 25, 2008, 09:10:27 PM
And why are you avoidng to answer about it bro? Did you kill someone? Wife beater? Bring us the truth!

I will speak a little on this later.  I am watching Shark Attack 3: Megalodon with four of my Lebanese friends right now.  Epic racist.  ;D
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: benz on May 25, 2008, 09:12:44 PM
I will speak a little on this later.  I am watching Shark Attack 3: Megalodon with four of my Lebanese friends right now.  Epic racist.  ;D

Did you kill someone? rape? wife beater? drug dealing? pedophile?
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: titusisback on May 25, 2008, 11:09:32 PM
pedophile?

Bingo. MC himself can tell more if he feels like doing so...
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: calmus on May 25, 2008, 11:12:21 PM


Now why would someone consult a SPECIAL EDUCATION attorney? Seems pretty obvious what legal issues he was having.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Matt C on May 25, 2008, 11:27:14 PM
I would prefer to just say nothing and let the board go on with this as they will.  ;D

Discuss.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: gordiano on May 25, 2008, 11:35:36 PM
I would prefer to just say nothing and let the board go on with this as they will.  ;D

Discuss.

You can always just PM me with details......let the leeches wonder.... ;)
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Purple Aki on May 25, 2008, 11:36:10 PM
Are they trying to extradite grandpa Shitclitz Canning from Brazil again?
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: columbusdude82 on May 25, 2008, 11:36:36 PM
I will speak a little on this later.  I am watching Shark Attack 3: Megalodon with four of my Lebanese friends right now.  Epic racist.  ;D

I see your epic hatred for the Jewish people has led you to cavort with Hizbollah ::)
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: benz on May 25, 2008, 11:37:14 PM
I would prefer to just say nothing and let the board go on with this as they will.  ;D

Discuss.

i think you should answer unless we I start spamming some sites with your racist comments :(
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Matt C on May 25, 2008, 11:55:42 PM
I see your epic hatred for the Jewish people has led you to cavort with Hizbollah ::)

There is a lot more to the Lebanon/Israel conflict than the mainstream media reported.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: ironneck on May 25, 2008, 11:59:37 PM
maybe special ed is jealous beacuse matt c is more muscular?
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: benz on May 26, 2008, 12:00:48 AM
so matt, why are you avoiding this topic? You talk about selling your sister's body to the wolves @ ifbb but you cant talk about legal problems wtf you are boring  ::)
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: columbusdude82 on May 26, 2008, 12:04:56 AM
There is a lot more to the Lebanon/Israel conflict than the mainstream media reported.

STFU you racist turd, go back to cavorting with your camel-raping friends!
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Matt C on May 26, 2008, 12:10:23 AM
so matt, why are you avoiding this topic? You talk about selling your sister's body to the wolves @ ifbb but you cant talk about legal problems wtf you are boring  ::)

There is no trouble.  But I'm not going to talk about it.  You can fill in the blanks with whatever you want.

STFU you racist turd, go back to cavorting with your camel-raping friends!

Epic politically correct commentary.  ;D
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: columbusdude82 on May 26, 2008, 12:11:57 AM
Israel should keep bombing those fuckers into oblivion.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Special Ed on May 26, 2008, 12:24:44 AM
Matt believed he may have been unjustly persecuted and crucified by a Jew in his past life and wanted the opinion of a Pharisee before resurrecting himself and retaining legal counsel for a wrongful death suit.
When he found out Bethlehem was devoid of non-Jewish lawyers, he sought counsel over the internet.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: ironneck on May 26, 2008, 12:28:09 AM
you guys take the internet way too serious
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: benz on May 26, 2008, 12:30:52 AM
There is no trouble.  But I'm not going to talk about it.  You can fill in the blanks with whatever you want.

Epic politically correct commentary.  ;D

why not
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: columbusdude82 on May 26, 2008, 12:44:19 AM
(http://www.psywar.org/psywar/images/Nasrallah.jpg)

Matzi's new idol, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah



::)
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Matt C on May 26, 2008, 01:01:26 AM
Someone explain to me how the Hezbollah/Israeli conflict began.

I will not justify Lebanese extremists, but at least they kept their military strengths as exactly that - military ones.  Targeting a civilian airport is another thing entirely.  Two other Lebanese friends of mine (different family) had to actually stay in Lebanon a lot longer in the summer of 2006 as a result.  You would be amazed what facts there are to be learned from people who were actually there.  Similarly, ask a parent who lost a child to the war in Iraq what they think about the military industrial complex.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: columbusdude82 on May 26, 2008, 01:04:33 AM
Someone explain to me how the Hezbollah/Israeli conflict began.

I will not justify Lebanese extremists, but at least they kept their military strengths as exactly that - military ones.  Targeting a civilian airport is another thing entirely.  Two other Lebanese friends of mine (different family) had to actually stay in Lebanon a lot longer in the summer of 2006 as a result.  You would be amazed what facts there are to be learned from people who were actually there.  Similarly, ask a parent who lost a child to the war in Iraq what they think about the military industrial complex.

Did you just compare our men and women in uniform to freakin' terrorist towelheads??????????????????

And on Memorial Day no less????????????????????

Shame on you, and fuck off!
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: ironneck on May 26, 2008, 01:20:06 AM
Did you just compare our men and women in uniform to freakin' terrorist towelheads??????????????????

And on Memorial Day no less????????????????????

Shame on you, and fuck off!


america is not even a bit better than the towelheads


europe is da shit
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: columbusdude82 on May 26, 2008, 01:24:22 AM

america is not even a bit better than the towelheads


europe is da shit

STFU you turd-colored piece of eurotrash... Too bad Squad is gone because he kept you in your rightful place.

FUKK CANADA, FUKK THE TOWELHEADS, FUKK EUROPE.

Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Matt C on May 26, 2008, 01:29:51 AM
Did you just compare our men and women in uniform to freakin' terrorist towelheads??????????????????

No, that's just a strawman you constructed.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: FullROM on May 26, 2008, 02:09:22 AM
No, that's just a strawman you constructed.

SO HOW SHOULD THE CRISS BE RESOLVED?
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Matt C on May 26, 2008, 02:17:44 AM
SO HOW SHOULD THE CRISS BE RESOLVED?

The Israeli/Lebanon conflict?  You would have to ask the people that live there.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Beener on May 26, 2008, 03:10:27 AM
STFU you turd-colored piece of eurotrash... Too bad Squad is gone because he kept you in your rightful place.

FUKK CANADA, FUKK THE TOWELHEADS, FUKK EUROPE.




Hey hey hey many of us are over helpin you guys out in trashganistan, so watch the canadians bit. but you're right we do have too many left wing hippies here, its shameful.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Petrucci on May 26, 2008, 05:16:04 AM
jesus, epic taking posts on internet too serious...

why dont you guys go have a beer or something... :-\
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: HTexan on May 26, 2008, 03:18:28 PM
What the big deal with saying what you did? ??? Did you rape DA or something? ;D
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on May 26, 2008, 06:09:49 PM
(http://www.psywar.org/psywar/images/Nasrallah.jpg)

Matzi's new idol, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah



::)

That mother fucker isn't worthy of holding an m16
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Camel Jockey on May 26, 2008, 06:14:39 PM
Eugene Stoner was a jew.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: columbusdude82 on May 26, 2008, 06:15:14 PM
That mother fucker isn't worthy of holding an m16

That's a kalashnikoff...
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: bigdumbbell on May 26, 2008, 06:16:14 PM
lots of people have legal issues    lots :)
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: flagadajones on May 26, 2008, 06:16:50 PM
it's either a m16 or car-15 but not a ak...
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on May 26, 2008, 06:17:36 PM
Eugene Stoner was a jew.

Stoner is my hero
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on May 26, 2008, 06:18:34 PM
That's a kalashnikoff...

Ak good machine gun M16 great precision rife.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Camel Jockey on May 26, 2008, 06:18:45 PM
Stoner is my hero

It's all a conspiracy!  ;D
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: 240 is Back on May 26, 2008, 06:19:19 PM
That mother fucker isn't worthy of holding an m16

agreed.

It's likely he received that gun from the USA.

Bush sent thousands of rifles and lots of bullets over there to help the militias fight one another.  It was labeled 'peacekeeping' but assured the internal sunni/shiite fighting went on long enough to put in 41 bases and an oil pipeline ;)

Didn't you wonder how they're still getting explosives and guns, FIVE YEARS into a war where we control all the air and roads? LOL...

Problem is, the fighting factions all realized what we were doing - helping them kill each other - and they decided to use the US made weapons, on us.  bastards.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on May 26, 2008, 06:25:35 PM
agreed.

It's likely he received that gun from the USA.

Bush sent thousands of rifles and lots of bullets over there to help the militias fight one another.  It was labeled 'peacekeeping' but assured the internal sunni/shiite fighting went on long enough to put in 41 bases and an oil pipeline ;)

Didn't you wonder how they're still getting explosives and guns, FIVE YEARS into a war where we control all the air and roads? LOL...

Problem is, the fighting factions all realized what we were doing - helping them kill each other - and they decided to use the US made weapons, on us.  bastards.

Right the US talks outside both side of its mouth , one year a guys an ally and the next he's a dictator and needs to be deposed remind of the movie with Nick Cage as the arms dealer .
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: 240 is Back on May 26, 2008, 06:29:34 PM
Right the US talks outside both side of its mouth , one year a guys an ally and the next he's a dictator and needs to be deposed remind of the movie with Nick Cage as the arms dealer .

the goals of the war were simple: control oil, put in bases.

we're signing the oil contract now, and we just signed to keep 41 bases there permanent.

mission in iraq was absolutely successful, by the goals that Cheney listed in 2000 as his goals for the Bush adminstration.  He released them in summer 2000 in the PNAC document, and said it would make the USA stronger, and he's right.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on May 26, 2008, 06:31:33 PM
the goals of the war were simple: control oil, put in bases.

we're signing the oil contract now, and we just signed to keep 41 bases there permanent.

mission in iraq was absolutely successful, by the goals that Cheney listed in 2000 as his goals for the Bush adminstration.  He released them in summer 2000 in the PNAC document, and said it would make the USA stronger, and he's right.

They got their eyes on Iran now and they needed bases in the heart of the middle east and hurry up with the contracts because this $4 bucks a gallon shit is sickening .
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: columbusdude82 on May 26, 2008, 06:31:58 PM
agreed.

It's likely he received that gun from the USA.

Bush sent thousands of rifles and lots of bullets over there to help the militias fight one another.  It was labeled 'peacekeeping' but assured the internal sunni/shiite fighting went on long enough to put in 41 bases and an oil pipeline ;)

Didn't you wonder how they're still getting explosives and guns, FIVE YEARS into a war where we control all the air and roads? LOL...

Problem is, the fighting factions all realized what we were doing - helping them kill each other - and they decided to use the US made weapons, on us.  bastards.

Dude, you're a freakin retard. Bush never sent weapons to Hizbollah ::)
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: benchmstr on May 26, 2008, 06:32:36 PM
Stoner is my hero
is that a ziess conquest on that rifle?

bench
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: mikediesel on May 26, 2008, 06:34:56 PM
it's either a m16 or car-15 but not a ak...

Its an M-4
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: 240 is Back on May 26, 2008, 06:37:01 PM
Dude, you're a freakin retard. Bush never sent weapons to Hizbollah ::)

no, but we did arm al-sadr and a bunch of other warlords, and they did share the weapons with Al-Q and other terror groups.  

They got their eyes on Iran now and they needed bases in the heart of the middle east and hurry up with the contracts because this $4 bucks a gallon shit is sickening .

Yeah, we have Iran surrounded - bases in Afghanistan on one side, and Iraq on the other side.  Iran will be the beast of a war, they're triple the population of Iraq, very rich, and they know the formula for fighting us in the cities now.  It's going to be a bad, bad war.

They could just sell us the right to drill there, but they'd rather be stubborn.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: columbusdude82 on May 26, 2008, 06:39:36 PM
no, but we did arm al-sadr and a bunch of other warlords, and they did share the weapons with Al-Q and other terror groups. 


The guy in the picture is Hassan Nasrallah of Lebanese Hizbollah. You said: "It's likely he received that gun from the USA."

Maybe your derangement and utter retarded-ness prevents you from keeping your facts straight, or informing yourself at all, as that would prevent you sinking further into the abyss of your dim-witted conspiracy theories.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: 240 is Back on May 26, 2008, 06:40:33 PM
The guy in the picture is Hassan Nasrallah of Lebanese Hizbollah. You said: "It's likely he received that gun from the USA."

Maybe your derangement and utter retarded-ness prevents you from keeping your facts straight, or informing yourself at all, as that would prevent you sinking further into the abyss of your dim-witted conspiracy theories.

Am I wrong that the USA supplied weapons to gangs, warlords, al sadr, and local militias to fight one another?
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on May 26, 2008, 06:41:29 PM
is that a ziess conquest on that rifle?

bench

Nope Burris fullfilled II I'll be trading up to an Aimpoint soon ( hopefully )
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: columbusdude82 on May 26, 2008, 06:41:59 PM
Am I wrong that the USA supplied weapons to gangs, warlords, al sadr, and local militias to fight one another?

Can you fuckin' read?

The reason the country is so fucked is that they let people like you vote...

Re-read my post, turd-brains.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: slummin on May 26, 2008, 09:05:26 PM
I will speak a little on this later........

his mouth is full of Chris Mason's protein at the moment.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: benchmstr on May 27, 2008, 08:25:59 AM
Nope Burris fullfilled II I'll be trading up to an Aimpoint soon ( hopefully )
i have a few acog's but i like my millett dms1 more than anything.

bench
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Camel Jockey on May 27, 2008, 08:36:09 AM
Ak good machine gun M16 great precision rife.

Um..

You say that he isn't worthy of hold an m-16.. That's funny, because most militia fighters hold the m-16 in very low regard. They would rather carry some HK rifle or the ak-47. Most police forces around the world don't use any m-16 or any of its variants. Most don't produce their own version; they opt for the ak instead.

The m-16 isn't practical unless you clean it constantly. It's round is also weak and has poor knockdown power.

Most combat takes place with 50-150 yards so why do you even need 'great precision'? lol
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: HTexan on May 27, 2008, 11:10:02 AM
That's funny, because most militia fighters hold the m-16 in very low regard.
yep. truth.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on May 27, 2008, 11:19:40 AM
Um..

You say that he isn't worthy of hold an m-16.. That's funny, because most militia fighters hold the m-16 in very low regard. They would rather carry some HK rifle or the ak-47. Most police forces around the world don't use any m-16 or any of its variants. Most don't produce their own version; they opt for the ak instead.

The m-16 isn't practical unless you clean it constantly. It's round is also weak and has poor knockdown power.

Most combat takes place with 50-150 yards so why do you even need 'great precision'? lol

H&K great rifles creame de la creame and lots of military use M16s and so do many law enforcement agencies around the world ! AK47 is great because the round is more powerfull and its more ' reliable ' and cheap but your right about keeping M16's clean and nothing wrong with keeping a weapon clean  ;) and 1 5.56 round may be ' weak ' but in these CQ combat these guys aren't shooting 1 round a time

M16 is a precision rifle
AK47 = machine gun

and FYI they make AR15 in gas piston and 7.62mm so you have the best of both worlds.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: emn1964 on May 27, 2008, 11:23:17 AM
H&K great rifles creame de la creame and lots of military use M16s and so do many law enforcement agencies around the world ! AK47 is great because the round is more powerfull and its more ' reliable ' and cheap but your right about keeping M16's clean and nothing wrong with keeping a weapon clean  ;) and 1 5.56 round may be ' weak ' but in these CQ combat these guys aren't shooting 1 round a time

M16 is a precision rifle
AK47 = machine gun

and FYI they make AR15 in gas piston and 7.62mm so you have the best of both worlds.

for CQ combat I prefer the HK MP5
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Petrucci on May 27, 2008, 11:43:12 AM
Am I wrong that the USA supplied weapons to gangs, warlords, al sadr, and local militias to fight one another?

incredible to see an american saying this... ;D

props to you
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Fury on May 27, 2008, 11:43:33 AM
This thread gets dumped but the other shit on the G&O stays? Dynamite moderating!  ::)
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: CalvinH on May 27, 2008, 12:05:11 PM
This thread gets dumped but the other shit on the G&O stays? Dynamite moderating!  ::)



Yeah,I was wondering what this thread is doing here :-\
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Palpatine Q on May 27, 2008, 12:08:06 PM
for CQ combat I prefer the HK MP5

Are you a mercenary or something?
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: CQ on May 27, 2008, 01:41:50 PM
for CQ combat I prefer the HK MP5

I am not into combat though ???
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: drkaje on May 27, 2008, 02:35:00 PM
Someone explain to me how the Hezbollah/Israeli conflict began.

I will not justify Lebanese extremists, but at least they kept their military strengths as exactly that - military ones.  Targeting a civilian airport is another thing entirely.  Two other Lebanese friends of mine (different family) had to actually stay in Lebanon a lot longer in the summer of 2006 as a result.  You would be amazed what facts there are to be learned from people who were actually there.  Similarly, ask a parent who lost a child to the war in Iraq what they think about the military industrial complex.

Matt... if you ask 90+% of Christian Lebanese they will deny being Arabs. Some bullshit about France and the mountains but I digress.

Lebanese all hate the Jews, however. And I'm fucking warning you to not say this statement or bring it up around any older Lebanese person or they will talk your ear right the fuck off your head. "Lebanon was the Paris of the middle east before the Jews came and kicked the Palestinians out of Israel" is what they will all say. The Palestinian refugees (and ultimately Hezbolla (sp?)) ended up ruining Lebanon and the Lebanese hold the Jews responsible for it. Most Christian Lebanese, I know, believe the Jews are entitled to the land. They just wish it had been done with less violence and in a way that didn't destroy Lebanon.

Like I said though.. unless you're really prepared for a long, long, long... long speech don't bring it up. My ears still fucking hurt from asking the same question, LOL! Also, don't ever ask an older Lebanese person who lived there during the Israeli takeover what was done to the Palestinians. Let's just say 'they learned from the best' and leave it at that. :)
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on May 27, 2008, 02:42:50 PM
for CQ combat I prefer the HK MP5

You can't go wrong with an HK they are the Rolls Royce of small arms.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: benchmstr on May 27, 2008, 04:26:15 PM
You can't go wrong with an HK they are the Rolls Royce of small arms.
i have a H&K 91 and i love it,but accuracy wise its horrible.H&K is what i trust for my side arm on patrol and when i was in the sand box.

all together i own 12 H&K'S

bench
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: drkaje on May 27, 2008, 05:28:50 PM
HK's are supposed to be great. I was thinking about a Sig, however. Not sure which one is best for concealed carry.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Nordic Beast on May 27, 2008, 05:31:19 PM
HK's are supposed to be great. I was thinking about a Sig, however. Not sure which one is best for concealed carry.
I have a compact 40 HK------was going to get a sig but after checking out the HK I had to have it
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: Fury on May 27, 2008, 05:33:48 PM
He was arrested in a sting soliciting male prosties.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: benchmstr on May 27, 2008, 05:37:11 PM
HK's are supposed to be great. I was thinking about a Sig, however. Not sure which one is best for concealed carry.
Sig's are a quality weapon,they just don't suit me well for a tactical weapon though.

bench
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: drkaje on May 27, 2008, 07:18:21 PM
I went from a .45 to a 9mm. Never once felt as safe. There's something about the "flying ashtray" and all of it's 240-graininess. :)

Always felt the 9 was easy to conceal but if I knew there was gonna be unavoidable shit, I'd wish the .45 was in hand.
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: benchmstr on May 27, 2008, 07:31:54 PM
I went from a .45 to a 9mm. Never once felt as safe. There's something about the "flying ashtray" and all of it's 240-graininess. :)

Always felt the 9 was easy to conceal but if I knew there was gonna be unavoidable shit, I'd wish the .45 was in hand.
45 is the way to go,thats what i carry at work.it may not be the fastest bullet but last time i checked no human could run 900 feet per second to out run it.

bench
Title: Re: So Matt C, what were your legal problems
Post by: drkaje on May 27, 2008, 07:35:24 PM
45 is the way to go,thats what i carry at work.it may not be the fastest bullet but last time i checked no human could run 900 feet per second to out run it.

bench

A cop buddy of mine just got this Kimber .45.Thing is beautiful!!