Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Misc Too Board => Past IFBB & NPC Contests Boards => Pro Bodybuilding Weekly - Radio Board => Topic started by: Andrew1 on June 30, 2008, 10:22:09 AM

Title: PBW: Bill Pearl Discussion - Plus: Houston Pro Preview (Replay)
Post by: Andrew1 on June 30, 2008, 10:22:09 AM
PBW Welcomes the Legendary Bill Pearl

Plus: IFBB Houston Pro Preview - Listen Now - On Demand

"Pro Bodybuilding Weekly" welcomes one of the sports most enduring legends when Bill Pearl visits the show for a rare interview.  The former Mr. Universe and Mr. America champion discusses some of the legendary battles that elevated him to fame back in the 50's, 60's and 70's.  An orignal member of the Bodybuilding Hall of Fame, Pearl was also the IFBB's head judge during an era that included the controversial 1980 Olympia.  Since his retirement, Pearl has established himself as one of the sport's most influential authors and ambassadors. - Presented by MuscleTech, this weeks edition of PBW also includes a look ahead to the inaugural IFBB Houston Pro Show and a visit with event promoter Lee Thompson
 
PBW airs on Mondays at 8pm ET - visit the broadcast center: www.BodybuildingRadio.com (http://www.BodybuildingRadio.com)
 
 
Replay Update:   "Where Are They Now" Featuring Tom Prince (Episode # 118)  - Past Shows available now at Replay Central (courtesy of Bodybuilding.com)

Presented by MuscleTech and brought to you by Bodybuilding.com and Flex Magazine.
Additional sponsors include The Muscle Asylum Project, MuscleTime.com, Max Muscle.and Six Star Muscle Fuel.
Make your plans to attend the IFBB "Pro Bodybuilding Weekly Championships" in Florida on August 9th (www.PBWProShow.com)
PBW: The Official radio show of the 2008 Olympia Weekend (www.MrOlympia.com).
 
Title: Re: PBW: The Legendary Bill Pearl (Plus: Houston Pro Preview) Tonight
Post by: 240 is Back on June 30, 2008, 10:43:01 AM
Bill Pearl defeated Sean Connery back in the day.  Dude had Triceps like Ernie Taylor.
Title: Re: PBW: The Legendary Bill Pearl (Plus: Houston Pro Preview) Tonight
Post by: Armstrong on June 30, 2008, 11:21:35 AM
Who is competing at the Houston contest? Is there a list?
Title: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: lift 456 on July 01, 2008, 05:27:50 AM
Bill Pearl, the head judge back in 1980, said Arnold should have been no higher than 5th at the 80 O.  Pretty funny because Arnold said on PBW that BIll had him 3rd.    How the fu%# did Arnold win? 
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on July 01, 2008, 05:35:06 AM
hell no, he dwarfed his competition

Mike Mentzer is grossly overrated imo and theres no way he could of beaten Arnold that night
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: kevcat on July 01, 2008, 05:46:21 AM
Yeh iv seen loads of picures and i dont know why anyone was complaining.He was biggest guy on stage and was at a good bodyfat level, also his physique was the most pleasing so he wins IMO
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Jeffro on July 01, 2008, 05:47:01 AM
hell no, he dwarfed his competition

Mike Mentzer is grossly overrated imo and theres no way he could of beaten Arnold that night
Agreed
Arnold kills Mentzer in every bodybuilding aspect
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Pollux on July 01, 2008, 05:55:39 AM
This would make a great discussion on The Arnold Board.
Title: Re: PBW: The Legendary Bill Pearl (Plus: Houston Pro Preview) Tonight
Post by: lastrep on July 01, 2008, 05:58:54 AM
How was the show? When will the replay be available?

(Available now - thanks!)  8)
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: DK II on July 01, 2008, 05:59:03 AM
Bill Pearl, the head judge back in 1980, said Arnold should have been no higher than 5th at the 80 O.  Pretty funny because Arnold said on PBW that BIll had him 3rd.    How the fu%# did Arnold win? 

mods, move this thread to the Arnold Board please!
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: nukkaready on July 01, 2008, 06:12:39 AM
mods, move this thread to the Arnold Board please!

who the fukkkkkkkkk goes to the Arnold board? leave that shitttt here.
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Jeffro on July 01, 2008, 06:14:19 AM
who the fukkkkkkkkk goes to the Arnold board? leave that shitttt here.
There isn't one yet, smarty.  ::)
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Pollux on July 01, 2008, 06:20:41 AM
who the fukkkkkkkkk goes to the Arnold board?

Once Ron puts The Arnold Board up, I GUARANTEE that you would be one of many who'd go over there and check it out. So stop trying to put up a front.  ;)
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: nukkaready on July 01, 2008, 06:24:05 AM
Once Ron puts The Arnold Board up, I GUARANTEE that you would be one of many who'd go over there and check it out. So stop trying to put up a front.  ;)


dude there are only 2 things GUARANTEED in life and they are taxes and death. STFU
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Stu on July 01, 2008, 06:36:00 AM
Twenty Eight years on and people still deem this worthy of conversation?


Oh brother....
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Pollux on July 01, 2008, 06:44:57 AM
dude there are only 2 things GUARANTEED in life and they are taxes and death. STFU

Uh Oh! Someone's panty is in a wad. Take a deep breath, NUKK. Go ahead. Now breath out...
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: RZA on July 01, 2008, 07:14:25 AM
It high time we had that Arnold Board so all the Austrian nuthuggers would migrate there. I'll probably never go there but it will be comforting to know that Arnold's fans have a place to constantly rehash the same shit and masturbate over how great he his.
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: DK II on July 01, 2008, 07:16:04 AM
It high time we had that Arnold Board so all the Austrian nuthuggers would migrate there. I'll probably never go there but it will be comforting to know that Arnold's fans have a place to constantly rehash the same shit and masturbate over how great he his.

The Arnold board will be the greatest board of all!
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: leon on July 01, 2008, 07:58:33 AM
I know I'm bored by Arnold.
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Stark on July 01, 2008, 08:06:29 AM
Bill Pearl, the head judge back in 1980, said Arnold should have been no higher than 5th at the 80 O.  Pretty funny because Arnold said on PBW that BIll had him 3rd.    How the fu%# did Arnold win? 

Pretty funny how you give the opinion of one guy that much weigth :)
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Moosejay on July 01, 2008, 08:43:25 AM
Pretty funny how you give the opinion of one guy that much weigth :)

Well, he WAS the head judge in the #1 bb show in world

Guys who were better:

Zane
Coe
Dickerson
Mentzer
Walker
Callender
Tinnerino

Arnold around 8th-9th
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Jeffro on July 01, 2008, 08:44:26 AM
I know I'm bored by Arnold.
I know I'm bored by your posts  ::)
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Stark on July 01, 2008, 08:45:10 AM
Since this thread has not been graded yet....


I give this thread an overall basic: B- for Balls, well done informative and funny to read.
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Pollux on July 01, 2008, 09:18:22 AM
Guys who were better:

Zane
Coe
Dickerson
Mentzer
Walker
Callender
Tinnerino

Arnold around 8th-9th

Not only are you wrong, but your confidence is wrong too.
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: monstercalves on July 01, 2008, 09:21:00 AM
Yeh iv seen loads of picures and i dont know why anyone was complaining.He was biggest guy on stage and was at a good bodyfat level, also his physique was the most pleasing so he wins IMO

exactly...........

I know I'm bored by Arnold.

nonsense
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Moosejay on July 01, 2008, 09:21:26 AM
Not only are you wrong, but your confidence is wrong too.

Its just my opinion
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: monstercalves on July 01, 2008, 09:22:56 AM
Well, he WAS the head judge in the #1 bb show in world

Guys who were better:

Zane
Coe
Dickerson
Mentzer
Walker
Callender
Tinnerino

Arnold around 8th-9th

u serious moose?.....

this is outrageous ....   :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Moosejay on July 01, 2008, 09:24:24 AM
u serious moose?.....

this is outrageous ....   :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o

Yeah...just how I saw it at the time
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: lift 456 on July 01, 2008, 09:33:30 AM
i think arnold was outclassed on legs at that show
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Pollux on July 01, 2008, 09:35:07 AM
Its just my opinion

I underdstand that, but it just seems absurd.
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Moosejay on July 01, 2008, 09:35:57 AM
I underdstand that, but it just seems absurd.

Yeah, well... :-\
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: suckmymuscle on July 01, 2008, 09:38:03 AM
Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia

  No, not fifth. Maybe third losing to number two by a few points.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: monstercalves on July 01, 2008, 09:39:11 AM
Yeah...just how I saw it at the time

zane and coe are a joke..........compared to arnold...

walker was not detailed enough but big enough.... callander was good tho but not to win....

dickerson and mentzer wwere very compete but not good enough for dad......

and tinnerino was defeated about 12 years earlier...
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Moosejay on July 01, 2008, 09:41:35 AM
zane and coe are a joke..........compared to arnold...

I would have to say that that is a disrespectful statement, at best...
walker was not detailed enough but big enough.... callander was good tho but not to win....

Not win, but superior to A

dickerson and mentzer wwere very compete but not good enough for dad......

and tinnerino was defeated about 12 years earlier...
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: monstercalves on July 01, 2008, 09:43:39 AM
walker was flat and smooth even compared to arnold
Title: Ronnie Coleman Will be on stage at the Houston Pro
Post by: 240 is Back on July 01, 2008, 09:46:31 AM

 
...Presenting awards :)   According to Lee Thompson.
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Moosejay on July 01, 2008, 09:47:37 AM
walker was flat and smooth even compared to arnold

In the 1980 Olympia issue of M&F, as well as MM International, Walker was not only favorably compared to A, but, by some reviewers, in a more positive light.
Title: Re: Ronnie Coleman Will be on stage at the Houston Pro
Post by: candidizzle on July 01, 2008, 09:47:50 AM
stop spamming yourself and your 300 dollar websites !
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: OTHstrong on July 01, 2008, 09:48:30 AM
zane and coe are a joke..........compared to arnold...

walker was not detailed enough but big enough.... callander was good tho but not to win....

dickerson and mentzer wwere very compete but not good enough for dad......

and tinnerino was defeated about 12 years earlier...
This is the truth why can't people see this? Arnold won and back to the comment that bill was the best judge in the best show, well the other judges were also the best judges and in the best show and they had Arnold in first.
Title: Re: Ronnie Coleman Will be on stage at the Houston Pro
Post by: Stu on July 01, 2008, 09:48:34 AM
stop spamming yourself and your 300 dollar websites !

hahahahaha.
Title: Re: Ronnie Coleman Will be on stage at the Houston Pro
Post by: gordiano on July 01, 2008, 09:49:06 AM

...Presenting awards :)   According to Lee Thompson.

You big tease....
Title: Re: Ronnie Coleman Will be on stage at the Houston Pro
Post by: 240 is Back on July 01, 2008, 09:51:12 AM
Come on, despite what BSN says, we all know Coleman will never compete on a bodybuilding stage again.

Too many injuries, too many years.  He'll flirt wtih the idea for another 5 years though.
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Moosejay on July 01, 2008, 09:58:44 AM
This is the truth why can't people see this? Arnold won and back to the comment that bill was the best judge in the best show, well the other judges were also the best judges and in the best show and they had Arnold in first.

There is no 'truth'.

Its all subjective.

YOUR truth is not my truth, yet it is still the truth.
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: OTHstrong on July 01, 2008, 10:13:12 AM
There is no 'truth'.

Its all subjective.

YOUR truth is not my truth, yet it is still the truth.
I have respect for you since you are old school and you know a lot about bodybuilding, but this horseshit about the sport being subjective is a bunch of garbage thats what the loser says to justify his lose, to prove my point; My father is 63 years old and he has never been to a show in fact he makes fun of us all the time. I took him to a regional level 1 and 2 event and he pointed out the winner of every single category on both events including the females, before they called out the winner, i swear this is tru, he even called out the overall, so if its subjective why can he seperate the winners from the losers without knowing anything about the sport. The odd time we see a bad decision based on politics or bad gudging but everybody is in agreement that Dexter Jackson looks better then Gregg Kovacs. Subjective=BULLSHIT
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Moosejay on July 01, 2008, 10:21:03 AM
I have respect for you since you are old school and you know a lot about bodybuilding, but this horseshit about the sport being subjective is a bunch of garbage thats what the loser says to justify his lose, to prove my point; My father is 63 years old and he has never been to a show in fact he makes fun of us all the time. I took him to a regional level 1 and 2 event and he pointed out the winner of every single category on both events including the females, before they called out the winner, i swear this is tru, he even called out the overall, so if its subjective why can he seperate the winners from the losers without knowing anything about the sport. The odd time we see a bad decision based on politics or bad gudging but everybody is in agreement that Dexter Jackson looks better then Gregg Kovacs. Subjective=BULLSHIT

Your thoughts are respected.
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: wes on July 01, 2008, 10:41:25 AM
Kinda` late now......the contest was done and over 28 years ago!!  :)
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Moosejay on July 01, 2008, 10:42:34 AM
Kinda` late now......the contest was done and over 28 years ago!!  :)

Yes...kinda nuts that the debate rages ever on!
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: wes on July 01, 2008, 10:57:30 AM
It goes on and on.

The main thing people do is judge Arnold on his past conditioning,but in my opinion,he was still good enoiugh to win in `80................the judges shared this same opinion!!  LOL  :)
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: m8 on July 01, 2008, 11:03:14 AM
Arnold was the best man that day.
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: The Luke on July 01, 2008, 11:28:46 AM
Wouldn't side by side comparisons of all the top six guys doing their mandatories settle this once and for all?

Surely someone (Tim Fogarty?) can post up the pics?


Similarly, people argue about the 94 O when it's actually pretty easy to decide who should have won:
                          1st                  2nd              3rd
Front Double Bi      Levrone            Ray              Yates
Rear Double Bi       Ray                  Levrone        Yates
Front Lat Spread   Yates                Ray             Levrone
Rear Lat Spread    Yates                Ray             Levrone
Abs and Thigh       Ray                  Yates           Levrone
Side Chest           Levrone             Yates           Ray
Side Tri               Ray                   Yates           Levrone
Most Muscular      Levrone             Yates           Ray

...few people looking over the video would disagree with any of these individual pose placings... so then you simply assign three points to a first place, two points to a second place, and one point to a third place and you get a close result:
1st Shawn Ray     (17 points)
2nd Dorian Yates  (16 points)
3rd Kevin Levrone (15 points)

This result might have changed if bodybuilding had true proper scoring: meaning each and every competitor compared to each and every other competitor (in twos) for each and every mandatory pose instead of the bullshit name recognition and order-of-callouts-deciding-the-result system we have now.

But then again, it doesn't take much thinking to decide on a more equitable judging system... so it stands to reason to assume that the current system is used as a tool to fix contests by means of manipulating the callouts... this was quite apparent in 1980.


The Luke
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: suckmymuscle on July 02, 2008, 08:17:53 AM
Wouldn't side by side comparisons of all the top six guys doing their mandatories settle this once and for all?

Surely someone (Tim Fogarty?) can post up the pics?


Similarly, people argue about the 94 O when it's actually pretty easy to decide who should have won:
                          1st                  2nd              3rd
Front Double Bi      Levrone            Ray              Yates
Rear Double Bi       Ray                  Levrone        Yates
Front Lat Spread   Yates                Ray             Levrone
Rear Lat Spread    Yates                Ray             Levrone
Abs and Thigh       Ray                  Yates           Levrone
Side Chest           Levrone             Yates           Ray
Side Tri               Ray                   Yates           Levrone
Most Muscular      Levrone             Yates           Ray

...few people looking over the video would disagree with any of these individual pose placings... so then you simply assign three points to a first place, two points to a second place, and one point to a third place and you get a close result:
1st Shawn Ray     (17 points)
2nd Dorian Yates  (16 points)
3rd Kevin Levrone (15 points)

This result might have changed if bodybuilding had true proper scoring: meaning each and every competitor compared to each and every other competitor (in twos) for each and every mandatory pose instead of the bullshit name recognition and order-of-callouts-deciding-the-result system we have now.

But then again, it doesn't take much thinking to decide on a more equitable judging system... so it stands to reason to assume that the current system is used as a tool to fix contests by means of manipulating the callouts... this was quite apparent in 1980.


The Luke

  Your "evaluation" of who should have won the 1994 Olympia is wrong on so many levels that I don't even know where to begin...

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: The Luke on July 02, 2008, 10:38:17 AM
  Your "evaluation" of who should have won the 1994 Olympia is wrong on so many levels that I don't even know where to begin...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

...you use the phrase "Don't know where to begin" a lot. Whenever anyone else attempts to make a contribution you cut them off with one of these dismissive remarks.

Problem is... you never seem to know where to begin and we're all left in the position of having to take your genius on faith. I've never been impressed by your reasoning, humour or contribution SUCKMYMUSCLE... all you ever seem to post is disparaging unfunny quips.

This is GetBig... explain yourself... otherwise you're just another 800-lb-benching supermodel-screwing anonymous armchair know-it-all.


The Luke
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: suckmymuscle on July 02, 2008, 11:38:08 AM
...you use the phrase "Don't know where to begin" a lot. Whenever anyone else attempts to make a contribution you cut them off with one of these dismissive remarks.

  The stupidity of what you say is self-evident and precludes the need for further elucidation.

Quote
Problem is... you never seem to know where to begin and we're all left in the position of having to take your genius on faith.

  This quote is laughable at best, considering I have some of the longest posts in this board's history, where I explain my point in precise and deep detail.

Quote
I've never been impressed by your reasoning, humour or contribution SUCKMYMUSCLE... all you ever seem to post is disparaging unfunny quips.

  Lmao...hm...ok. I would reply by saying right back at you, but truthfully I don't even read most of your posts for lack of interest, so I can't really evaluate the value of your contributions - although judging from the little I've read of your posts, as well as what other members say about you, I think you are a complete retard.

Quote
This is GetBig... explain yourself... otherwise you're just another 800-lb-benching supermodel-screwing anonymous armchair know-it-all.

  I stopped reading your "evaluation"  of the 1994 Olympia when you gave the back double biceps to Shawn Ray over Dorian. The only thing Ray takes in this mandatory are biceps, and even that's debatable. In terms of muscular thickness, detail, completeness and even conditioning, Dorian wins the mandatory hands down. Dorian takes calves, hams, traps and back. Shawn might be a match or even slightly better in back detail, but Dorian crushes him on width and thickness. You don't need to be a genius to comprehend that a man who is 5'7 and competed at 205 lbs wouldn't be Mr.Olympia. This is bodybuilding above all, and Shawn Ray simply didn't have the sheer muscular thickness to win the Big One.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Title: Re: PBW: The Legendary Bill Pearl (Plus: Houston Pro Preview) Tonight
Post by: AVBG on July 02, 2008, 12:54:52 PM
Bill Pearl defeated Sean Connery back in the day.  Dude had Triceps like Ernie Taylor.

Bill Pearl's interview was all class.
Title: Re: PBW: Bill Pearl Discussion - Plus: Houston Pro Preview (Replay)
Post by: The Luke on July 02, 2008, 01:31:56 PM
SUCKMYMUSCLE,


I apologise... I thought you were a an attention seeking troll, my mistake... you're obviously an argument mongering Dorian fan-boy kid.

I'll ignore your "contributions" in future.


The Luke
Title: Re: PBW: Bill Pearl Discussion - Plus: Houston Pro Preview (Replay)
Post by: suckmymuscle on July 02, 2008, 03:47:10 PM
SUCKMYMUSCLE,


I apologise... I thought you were a an attention seeking troll, my mistake... you're obviously an argument mongering Dorian fan-boy kid.

I'll ignore your "contributions" in future.


The Luke

  I accept your admission of defeat. :)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: PBW: Bill Pearl Discussion - Plus: Houston Pro Preview (Replay)
Post by: AVBG on July 02, 2008, 11:42:03 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Croatian on July 03, 2008, 03:19:12 AM
Bill Pearl, the head judge back in 1980, said Arnold should have been no higher than 5th at the 80 O.  Pretty funny because Arnold said on PBW that BIll had him 3rd.    How the fu%# did Arnold win? 

I was at that joke contest 1980 it was a set up victory for Arnold one of my frends Jan Jansen told as night before in his Brodway gym what would hapend.
Jan & Frank Burwash were 2 of Australians judges at that Sydney Opera House show after pre-judging they walked away and they did not attend final at 8pm.Aussie audience was boooing very loudly, it was Mike Mentzer or Frank Zane for the title, Joe Weider run of the stage what a coward.Mike did not accept his "trophy" just walked of the stage Frank smashed his in Opera House wall.Arnold the 1st, what a superjoke.
Someone should ask Mr.Pearl what hapend with 2 Aussie judges ?.O, by the Arnold would be a year later Best man at weding of Paul & Caroline Graham promoters of Mr.Olympia '80.
Greetings from Sydney
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Croatian on July 03, 2008, 03:23:58 AM
Agreed
Arnold kills Mentzer in every bodybuilding aspect

But NOT at Sydney's Mr.Olympia, he was out of shape I was there my frend.
Title: Re: Arnold Should Have Been 5th at the 80 Olympia?
Post by: Pollux on July 03, 2008, 03:42:02 PM
But NOT at Sydney's Mr.Olympia, he was out of shape I was there my frend.

I was there too! Arnold was IN SHAPE and WON! And what?!  :P