Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: donrhummy on July 29, 2008, 11:33:52 AM

Title: Nunn vs Bryant
Post by: donrhummy on July 29, 2008, 11:33:52 AM
I think Nunn should have taken the 2nd pro card.

Some comparisons:

Who has the better x-frame/v-taper? Who has the better waist/obliques? Who does not have gyno?
(http://contests.ironmanmagazine.com/~photos/807/Men/807mpp0637.jpg)
(http://contests.ironmanmagazine.com/~photos/807/Men/807mpf1111.jpg)

Who's got the better lats? Who's not holding water in their back?
(http://contests.ironmanmagazine.com/~photos/807/Men/807mpf0954.jpg)
(http://contests.ironmanmagazine.com/~photos/807/Men/807mpf1116.jpg)
Title: Re: Nunn vs Bryant
Post by: donthate1 on July 29, 2008, 12:26:06 PM
Can't say I disagree, at least based on those photos.  I give Nunn the nod as well.
Title: Re: Nunn vs Bryant
Post by: QuakerOats on July 29, 2008, 12:58:58 PM
they both look awesome, what bodybuilding should be.
Title: Re: Nunn vs Bryant
Post by: donrhummy on July 29, 2008, 05:10:14 PM
The incredible thing about Nunn is he's a super-heavyweight, so he's not 5' 7" like most BB's, he's 6' 1". That's impressive muscle on that big a frame!

(http://contests.ironmanmagazine.com/~photos/807/Men/807mpp1199.jpg)
Title: Re: Nunn vs Bryant
Post by: Jeffro on July 29, 2008, 05:16:32 PM
The incredible thing about Nunn is he's a super-heavyweight, so he's not 5' 7" like most BB's, he's 6' 1". That's impressive muscle on that big a frame!

(http://contests.ironmanmagazine.com/~photos/807/Men/807mpp1199.jpg)
Yea i agree, he's an awesome tall bodybuilder.  Incredibly large.