Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: bigbobs on August 15, 2008, 11:23:21 PM

Title: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: bigbobs on August 15, 2008, 11:23:21 PM
Whenever pointing out Dorian's weaknesses from the front, his nuthuggers say he was better from the back and "sides", yet he's losing in both of these side comparisons to Nasser.  Discuss.

Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: JasonH on August 15, 2008, 11:50:14 PM
I fail to see how Nasser's beating him in the side triceps there. In the second pic it's hard to compare because Dorian's twisted round a bit much. Either way, Dorian owns Nasser and always will.
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: Earl1972 on August 16, 2008, 12:26:24 AM
levrOWNING :o :o :o

E
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on August 16, 2008, 12:28:42 AM
levrOWNING :o :o :o

E

Why do you have to be such a f'n fagg%t in EVERY post ???

Not flaming at all, just curious as to why you survive on lust for the penile tissue the way most of us survive on oxygen ???
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: LatsMcGee on August 16, 2008, 12:30:19 AM
It's apparent that Nasser still dominates certain Getbiggers from the rear.
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: Earl1972 on August 16, 2008, 12:53:16 AM
Why do you have to be such a f'n fagg%t in EVERY post ???

Not flaming at all, just curious as to why you survive on lust for the penile tissue the way most of us survive on oxygen ???

do you cry when your boyfriend danielson cries, "big guy"?

E
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on August 16, 2008, 12:55:35 AM
do you cry when your boyfriend danielson cries, "big guy"?

E

 ???
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: Alex23 on August 16, 2008, 01:08:08 AM
It's apparent that Nasser still dominates certain Getbiggers from the rear.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

wittiness is rare nowadays on here.
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: suckmymuscle on August 16, 2008, 01:32:10 AM
Why do you have to be such a f'n fagg%t in EVERY post ???

Not flaming at all, just curious as to why you survive on lust for the penile tissue the way most of us survive on oxygen ???

  I ask myself those same questions. When will Earl1972 come out of the closet? Several people have pointed out that his signature is the gayest ever. When I told him that I thought his old signature was gay, he put it up again just to prove to me that he doesen't care what I think, which proved that he does in fact care what I think. Methinks he is a 45 year-old bald and fat homosexual, which is why he won't post his picture despite the many challenges I've made him. I understand that receiving my approval is very important for his emotional well-being and that posting his picture would result in me feeling contempt for him, which is unbearable to him, but his refusal to show himself only makes him appear even more pathetic in my eyes, so he should give it a second thought.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: bigbobs on August 16, 2008, 01:47:52 AM
I fail to see how Nasser's beating him in the side triceps there. In the second pic it's hard to compare because Dorian's twisted round a bit much. Either way, Dorian owns Nasser and always will.

Nasser's waist is narrower, abs are much more defined and chest is thicker in the side triceps pose
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: GoneAway on August 16, 2008, 02:01:34 AM
In the side triceps, Nasser may just have the edge with wider-looking biceps and a thicker chest. but the inner head of Dorian's triceps are blowing Nasser's away.

Nasser wins the side chest.
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: Sharma on August 16, 2008, 02:43:19 AM
Yates did for a very brief period have a decent physique. However, he stole at least 3 Olympias when it had turned totally disgusting and repugnant. He never dominated from the side, front (obviously) or the back for that matter. Nasser even matched him on back as the picture that bigbobs posted proves.

Great pictures Bobs. Yet again you PROVE your case but the Yates lovers will just say pathetic and desperate things like:

'he won ffrom the back' (when even that is debatable)
'he looked grainy but you don't see that in the pictures ' HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHA
Pathetic
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: Sharma on August 16, 2008, 02:53:19 AM
Nasser owning this vile piece of shit and Olympia thief from the side

Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: Stu on August 16, 2008, 03:43:35 AM
I'm surprised how 10+ years after the event people still even remember this shit let alone make threads about it and discuss it so passionately, you "guys" need to get a life.
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: Hulkster on August 16, 2008, 03:49:42 AM
well, that was the travesty that was the dorian yates reign.

remember, this guy "dominated" with perfect scores too... ::)

yeah, meanwhile there are 5 billion shots of dorian getting dominated from just about everyone in one shot or another..

yet, with other dominant bodybuilders, (eg. peak flex, peak ronnie, etc) this almost never happens.

try and and explain THAT one LOL

 LOL ::)
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: The_Hammer on August 16, 2008, 04:12:07 AM
(http://i33.tinypic.com/2d8ozmh.jpg)
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 16, 2008, 05:15:04 AM
Whenever pointing out Dorian's weaknesses from the front, his nuthuggers say he was better from the back and "sides", yet he's losing in both of these side comparisons to Nasser.  Discuss.



Dorian in your head  ;)
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: jtsunami on August 16, 2008, 05:30:37 AM
Nasser owning this vile piece of shit and Olympia thief from the side



+REP 1

btw Bobs, my reply got deleted in this thread, wtf, are the mods trying to silence Nasser again...

jt
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: jtsunami on August 16, 2008, 05:32:37 AM
this is Dorian "disgusting" Yates

So many words come to my head when I think of this creature : repugnant, yes, disgusting, of course, burglar, you can say that again!

(http://miniature-curiosities.com/shop/images/categories/oldbeatupchair_380.jpg)


Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 16, 2008, 05:42:48 AM
this is Dorian "disgusting" Yates

So many words come to my head when I think of this creature : repugnant, yes, disgusting, of course, burglar, you can say that again!

(http://miniature-curiosities.com/shop/images/categories/oldbeatupchair_380.jpg)




yeah because this is so much more aesthetic lmfao
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: NaturalWonder83 on August 16, 2008, 06:43:33 AM
geez dorian looks horrible in these pics :-\
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: suckmymuscle on August 16, 2008, 07:08:42 AM
Did Dorian really dominate from the sides?

  Yes, Dorian dominated from the sides. Here is a quote from McGough reviewing the 1997 Olympia where he attests to this fact:

  "Many in attendance believed that Nasser had won. There is an explanation for this. During most of the symmetry round and when executing the free posing, the competitors faced the judges. They were only visible from other angles when executing the mandatories. So the competitors were only visible from the sides and from the back during four poses of one of three rounds. However, as soon as they turned to the sides, Dorian's superior thickness and development overshadowed Nasser, and when they turned to the back it was lights out for Nasser."

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: m8 on August 16, 2008, 07:16:37 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=229086.0;attach=268087;image)

If you think Dorian isn't dominating this shot, you don't know anything about bodybuilding. Simple as that.
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: The_Hammer on August 16, 2008, 07:27:01 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=229086.0;attach=268087;image)

If you think Dorian isn't dominating this shot, you don't know anything about bodybuilding. Simple as that.

Agreed.

It's stupid to dispute Yates' superior thickness.  He is still the thickest bodybuilder from front to back on an Olympia stage ever.

Dorian is dominating that shot from conditioning to muscularity.  Hell, he's the only one hitting the pose properly!
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: Sharma on August 16, 2008, 07:34:36 AM
McGough is a personal friend of Yates'. He (Yates) is responsible for McGough's rise to editor of Flex. McGough is indebted to the reformed racist criminal and they are close friends. His word means nothing , he swings from the convicted burglar's balls for a living and even wrote his biography as Yates can barely read and write.
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: QuakerOats on August 16, 2008, 08:29:30 AM
Nasser is absolutely destroying both Yates and levrone in those shots. :o
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on August 16, 2008, 08:31:56 AM
Those pictures are from the side, get ones from the front...
Its far easier to see whos better

That said in every one of your photos Dorian is beating Nasser
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on August 16, 2008, 08:33:03 AM
Nasser owning this vile piece of shit and Olympia thief from the side



in 1997 Dorian was still in superiour condition than Nasser
Nasser is watery while Dorian has crisp conditioning, nothing new there
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: QuakerOats on August 16, 2008, 08:33:49 AM
Those pictures are from the side, get ones from the front...
Its far easier to see whos better

That said in every one of your photos Dorian is beating Nasser
::)
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: Royalty on August 16, 2008, 11:34:57 AM
McGough is a personal friend of Yates'. He (Yates) is responsible for McGough's rise to editor of Flex. McGough is indebted to the reformed racist criminal and they are close friends. His word means nothing , he swings from the convicted burglar's balls for a living and even wrote his biography as Yates can barely read and write.

you obviously never have been to a Yates seminar. Dude is intelligent


physique wise....from the side....Yates did not have the best chest so he did get beat on side shots by Haney and Nasser.
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: dearth on August 16, 2008, 11:38:48 AM
i suppose we should then take the word of a wife beating, underwearing selling bitter old man?

McGough is a personal friend of Yates'. He (Yates) is responsible for McGough's rise to editor of Flex. McGough is indebted to the reformed racist criminal and they are close friends. His word means nothing , he swings from the convicted burglar's balls for a living and even wrote his biography as Yates can barely read and write.
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: Antony77 on August 16, 2008, 11:45:40 AM
i suppose we should then take the word of a wife beating, underwearing selling bitter old man?


Are you being sarcastic? I can't tell.  ???


Anyway Dorian had a great side Tri, but his side chest was easily bettered by guys like Levrone.  8)
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: bigbobs on August 16, 2008, 12:47:46 PM
  Yes, Dorian dominated from the sides. Here is a quote from McGough reviewing the 1997 Olympia where he attests to this fact:

  "Many in attendance believed that Nasser had won. There is an explanation for this. During most of the symmetry round and when executing the free posing, the competitors faced the judges. They were only visible from other angles when executing the mandatories. So the competitors were only visible from the sides and from the back during four poses of one of three rounds. However, as soon as they turned to the sides, Dorian's superior thickness and development overshadowed Nasser, and when they turned to the back it was lights out for Nasser."

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Ahhh so the question is solved simply by inquirnig what "McGough" said....all this time I thought it would be better supported by visual evidence than taking one man's word...silly me  ;)

Those pictures are from the side, get ones from the front...
Its far easier to see whos better

That said in every one of your photos Dorian is beating Nasser

So by turning the camera 10 degrees only Dorian mysteriously gets at a disadvantage and looks worse?  ::)
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: m8 on August 16, 2008, 12:49:21 PM
Nasser is just another bodybuilder that never accomplished anything. End of thread.
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: Royalty on August 16, 2008, 01:42:27 PM
Nasser is just another bodybuilder that never accomplished anything. End of thread.


He did win the NOC, ASC, and 2nd place at Mr O
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: Sharma on August 16, 2008, 01:44:49 PM
m8 is simply a troll who posts off topic rugby players and asks for pictures of nude males,

Nasser achieve more in one day than this roach will in his whole miserable existence.
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: YoungBlood on August 16, 2008, 02:09:21 PM


I CANNOT WAIT for tax season again.....::)
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: bigbobs on August 16, 2008, 02:18:55 PM

I CANNOT WAIT for tax season again.....::)

 ;D
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: The_Hammer on August 16, 2008, 02:23:34 PM
Nasser is just another bodybuilder that never accomplished anything. End of thread.

End of Thread

End of Nasser!

Nasser is nothing!
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: Earl1972 on August 16, 2008, 02:25:57 PM
  I ask myself those same questions. When will Earl1972 come out of the closet? Several people have pointed out that his signature is the gayest ever. When I told him that I thought his old signature was gay, he put it up again just to prove to me that he doesen't care what I think, which proved that he does in fact care what I think. Methinks he is a 45 year-old bald and fat homosexual, which is why he won't post his picture despite the many challenges I've made him. I understand that receiving my approval is very important for his emotional well-being and that posting his picture would result in me feeling contempt for him, which is unbearable to him, but his refusal to show himself only makes him appear even more pathetic in my eyes, so he should give it a second thought.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

i told you i would post a pic when you post a pic, i'm still waiting

lol at the rest of the nonsense in this post, your idiotic ramblings and delusions never get old ;D

E
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: the_swami on August 17, 2008, 08:49:00 PM
unfortunately in IFBB olympia history , "politics" saw many undeserving winners

1980 arnold won  when mentnzer should have won
1981 franco when platz was the winner
1991 yates when levrone was the winner

1997 yates when clearly Nasser was the winner

2007 jay when victor was the winner
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: m8 on August 18, 2008, 12:43:41 AM
1991 yates when levrone was the winner

Stopped reading there.

 ::) ::)
Title: Re: Did Dorian really dominate from the side?
Post by: TPSRPBBW-fan1 on August 18, 2008, 09:31:56 PM
Nasser is absolutely destroying both Yates and levrone in those shots. :o
look at it, i'm not an IFBB pro or judge, but even i have to say Nasser makes Dorian look small, shoulders, chest, even a little bit bigger in the abs and arms, it's ridiculous that Yates won.  Yes, Yates was a great champion, but Nasser should've won then.