Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: Hereford on August 22, 2008, 12:52:18 PM
-
Why is this? I'll bet 1 in 5 people that I see on a day-to-day basis contributes no tangible value to society in any way, shape or form.
I am talking about those who don't contribute anything to the big picture in terms of employment, contribution of any time or skills, socially, etc......
Usually these are the same types that actually have a negative value, they are the ones who are always loud, dirty, stupid.... nothing more than societal consumers and paracites.
Maybe it's just here where I live? What do y'all think?
-
Off the cuff I'd say you're an elitist and arrogant as well.
-
Why is this? I'll bet 1 in 5 people that I see on a day-to-day basis contributes no tangible value to society in any way, shape or form.
I am talking about those who don't contribute anything to the big picture in terms of employment, contribution of any time or skills, socially, etc......
Usually these are the same types that actually have a negative value, they are the ones who are always loud, dirty, stupid.... nothing more than societal consumers and paracites.
Maybe it's just here where I live? What do y'all think?
what kind of people are you speaking of?
-
Off the cuff I'd say you're an elitist and arrogant as well.
Off the cuff I'd say you have no Fuccking idea. Answer the question or get off my thread.
-
It matters not. The earth will be lifeless in due course and there will not be a single trace of any human ever existing. Why worry about something so futile?
-
Contributing to society is the mark of the slave.
-
"Hereford" sounds bitter.
-
Off the cuff I'd say you have no Fuccking idea. Answer the question or get off my thread.
nah i dont feel like it. just give example of the people you talk about?
-
"Hereford" sounds bitter.
He probably "contributes" to society out of necessity, survival and fear and therefore does not realize that the ones who don`t are the ones truly free and are not beholden to any entity, creed or dogma.
-
I often wonder this myself. Humans are rather stupid creatures, really. Hopefully we will come correct or die out peacefully.
-
He probably "contributes" to society out of necessity and fear and therefore does not realize that the ones who don`t are the ones truly free and are not beholden to any entity, creed or dogma.
maybe hereford feels his 7.00 an hour Burger King job helps society in some manner. :D
-
hereford, you're saying that 20% are unemployed? i dont think so.
-
Hereford is bitter. He will conceide that fact.
Quakeroats: Although your viewpoint is quite noble, if everyone felt that way, humanity would still be in prehistoric times. No progress.
-
hereford you are nothing compared to a black professional basketball player
-
It matters not. The earth will be lifeless in due course and there will not be a single trace of any human ever existing. Why worry about something so futile?
So you are a glass half empty type of guy huh, TA? ;D
What is due course? 10 years, a century, a millenium, a million or more years? Of course, humans will die out eventually, just as most dinosaurs did millions of years ago. It is inevitable and part of evolution. Question is when?
-
Loud, dirty and stupid are subjective. Unless you personally know each and every member of society you cannot make a judgement call like that.
-
Loud, dirty and stupid are subjective. Unless you personally know each and every member of society you cannot make a judgement call like that.
Agreed, but I think we could all agree on what constitutes a 'loud and dirty" person, if we were all looking at a specific example.
I don't have to know someone personally to be qualified to determine if they are offensive.
-
Aaaaah, thread was moved. >:(
-
-
Why is this? I'll bet 1 in 5 people that I see on a day-to-day basis contributes no tangible value to society in any way, shape or form.
I am talking about those who don't contribute anything to the big picture in terms of employment, contribution of any time or skills, socially, etc......
Usually these are the same types that actually have a negative value, they are the ones who are always loud, dirty, stupid.... nothing more than societal consumers and paracites.
Maybe it's just here where I live? What do y'all think?
society as a whole is going down....
when dumbfucks like P diddy are famous something is seriously wrong...
seriously if i did not know him and he approached me...i'd hand him a mop and tell him to go clean something...looks like a damn janitor
-
How come there are so many useless people in society? That is a great topic to talk about because................. ...........of examples such as the alarming amount of teenage pregnancies during the 1990s.
Also because so many levels of schools don't teach people from that era named the MTV generation what being self-sufficient actually means in society.
As far as useless people in society are concerned, I know that people who are homeless are looked at as useless but it is humbling to me whenever I see someone that is basically destitute and asking for a few dollars too feed themselves.
Probably the most useless people in society are those that have lost their homes due to forclosure or been literally kicked to the curb because of the way society has become so restructured in the 21st Century.
To flip this subject upside down since P the Diddy was mentioned, people that are basically what I describe as very urban americans are ones that believe that to be useful you are supposed to strive to be a music level type of business man or try to copy the example set by P the Diddy and try and gain the status that is equal to what is popular and trendy in society.
-
I often wonder this myself. Humans are rather stupid creatures, really. Hopefully we will come correct or die out peacefully.
it wont be peacefull
-
Contributing to society is the mark of the slave.
Idiot.
-
Here is what I believe. There used to be a major war every few decades which resulted in the low life canon fodder being conscripted into the military and wiped out. Unfortunately this hasn't happened on a world scale since 1945. The canon fodder are the human equivalent of soldier ants and are born to die for the higher more intelligent order. These soldier ants (the unemployed, gangbangers, drug addicts, fat video playing slobs, black loud folk, mexica's in wifebeaters, ginger catholics etc etc ) really should not be alive after the age of 18-25 but are thriving due to lack of the cull we used to call a world war.
-
The breeds of people that you refer to are going to be the LEAST likely to contribute in a war. All these you list are going to do is rot the establishment of society from within.
-
The breeds of people that you refer to are going to be the LEAST likely to contribute in a war. All these you list are going to do is rot the establishment of society from within.
Yes but my point is that in the past, hundreds of thousands of the low life would lying dead in fields every 30 years or so instead of occupying a place in society.
-
The low ends of society in the US are actually encouraged to breed and otherwise proliferate.
That's the end goal of the welfare state, is it not?
MILLIONS upon MILLONS of bottom-feeders are not only forced upon the decent in this country, they are systematically given advantages at the expense of the taxpayer.
Eliminate the handouts, and watch the net worth of society rise as the useless are culled out.
-
The whole gangbanger society should be killed, as well as anyone who gets a welfare check. They really are useless people as a whole.
-
Another old and highly underrated topic from many months ago.
WHY?
I ONLY brought this topic back up because the point that was addressed based on what I re-read about this two page topic discussed and explained what the meaning of being a useful individual OR a useless person who can not measure up to the standards set in society based on not being self-sufficient so living becomes more than just being alive to consume and recycle every week, every month, and every next year in the 21st Century when you contrast that pattern with being a success story that had what it takes to be a part of what I would call 20th Century longevity plus stability and "the idea ology" to do know where to fit in with what prosperity stands for.
-
Why is this? I'll bet 1 in 5 people that I see on a day-to-day basis contributes no tangible value to society in any way, shape or form.
I am talking about those who don't contribute anything to the big picture in terms of employment, contribution of any time or skills, socially, etc......
Usually these are the same types that actually have a negative value, they are the ones who are always loud, dirty, stupid.... nothing more than societal consumers and paracites.
Maybe it's just here where I live? What do y'all think?
Our corp system only cares if people buy shit and they run the show. and it's at least 4 in 5, probably more.
-
Hereford is bitter. He will conceide that fact.
Quakeroats: Although your viewpoint is quite noble, if everyone felt that way, humanity would still be in prehistoric times. No progress.
What are you and the 80% progressing towards? What are you going to do go put a McDonalds on the moon...
-
Why is this? I'll bet 1 in 5 people that I see on a day-to-day basis contributes no tangible value to society in any way, shape or form.
I am talking about those who don't contribute anything to the big picture in terms of employment, contribution of any time or skills, socially, etc......
Usually these are the same types that actually have a negative value, they are the ones who are always loud, dirty, stupid.... nothing more than societal consumers and paracites.
Maybe it's just here where I live? What do y'all think?
I think a better question could be "how many people that think they are contributing to society are actually helping in destroying the human race"
-
I think a better question could be "how many people that think they are contributing to society are actually helping in destroying the human race"
Such a thought provoking question begs to wonder what the realistic role is of a worldwide "insider" such as david icke and another one named michael shermer. Do both of these two explicit experts know anything about what the code of silence stands for?
An example of how a person besides however many people that believe they are contributing to society but are actually helping in destroying the human race is the one set by a person such as David Koresh.
-
Such a thought provoking question begs to wonder what the realistic role is of a worldwide "insider" such as david icke and another one named michael shermer. Do both of these two explicit experts know anything about what the code of silence stands for?
An example of how a person besides however many people that believe they are contributing to society but are actually helping in destroying the human race is the one set by a person such as David Koresh.
Icke is a CIA shill... :-\
-
If Icke is indeed what you say he is, then what explains the number of books he has authored(which anyone can find at B&N) about one word that is connected with a secret society as well as the words theory, mystery, secrecy, and controversy.