Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Hulkster on August 30, 2008, 06:34:57 AM
-
this shot is crazy
one of the best hands on hips mm shots ever I would say.
fucking rock hard!
:o
-
this shot is crazy
one of the best hands on hips mm shots ever I would say.
fucking rock hard!
:o
Not yet pregnant...
-
great calves
-
Wow, a Hulkster thread about Ronnie 99?? Surprise surprise.... ::)
-
its his quads that really blow me away, fkin shredded and huge
-
its his quads that really blow me away, fkin shredded and huge
exactly.
he was a lot better in 99 than in 98
-
I am surprised at the lack of detail in the right deltoid.
-
Not his best year.
-
exactly.
he was a lot better in 99 than in 98
yeah that's why 1999 is considered his all-time best ::) and not 2001 despite being 10 pounds heavier and equal conditioning lmao you're to simple and posting one single pictures means NOTHING in terms of overall hardness from every angle
review of mr. olympia 1999, january 2000, page 90:
257 pounds, a good seven pounds heavier than last year and the clear winner, ALTHOUGH NOT AS BONE DRY OR AS ROCK HARD IN 98. In comparison to 98, his thighs are enourmous with a greater sweep and his front delts have improved; plus the pec anomaly (gyno) is no longer present.
Quote Peter McGough Flex Magazine Jan 2001
RONNIE COLEMAN : ( 264lbs As big as a house , but holding water. In '98 , he was shredded and bone dry at 250 pounds. Last year ( 1999 ) he was 257 pounds but NOT as sharp as '98. This year ( 2000 ) at 264 pounds , he's not as sharp as 99 , which would seem to say that Ronnie is better at a lighter weight .
Ronnie what was your best Olympia?
Ronnie: I would have to say my first because my conditioning was spot-on
Hulkster = owned as usual
-
Not yet pregnant...
unfortunately he was :-\
-
unfortunately he was :-\
Haha, they love posting BAD Dorian pics and when we post BAD Ronnie ones (which are quite easy to find), they get mad ;D
-
Haha, they love posting BAD Dorian pics and when we post BAD Ronnie ones (which are quite easy to find), they get mad ;D
a common theme with them is hypocrite
Ronnie looked great in 99 deserving champ but 98 and 01 he was better conditioned which is exactly why both are considered his best showings and not 99
-
At the 1999 mr olympia, Dorian Yates said that Ronnie looked like a cartoon character
-
At the 1999 mr olympia, Dorian Yates said that Ronnie looked like a cartoon character
yeah when he did the rear latspread
-
yeah that's why 1999 is considered his all-time best ::) and not 2001 despite being 10 pounds heavier and equal conditioning lmao you're to simple and posting one single pictures means NOTHING in terms of overall hardness from every angle
review of mr. olympia 1999, january 2000, page 90:
257 pounds, a good seven pounds heavier than last year and the clear winner, ALTHOUGH NOT AS BONE DRY OR AS ROCK HARD IN 98. In comparison to 98, his thighs are enourmous with a greater sweep and his front delts have improved; plus the pec anomaly (gyno) is no longer present.
Quote Peter McGough Flex Magazine Jan 2001
RONNIE COLEMAN : ( 264lbs As big as a house , but holding water. In '98 , he was shredded and bone dry at 250 pounds. Last year ( 1999 ) he was 257 pounds but NOT as sharp as '98. This year ( 2000 ) at 264 pounds , he's not as sharp as 99 , which would seem to say that Ronnie is better at a lighter weight .
Ronnie what was your best Olympia?
Ronnie: I would have to say my first because my conditioning was spot-on
Hulkster = owned as usual
sorry you moron, but there are lots of quotes from eyewitness claiming the exact opposite of what Peter McGough said in that article.
people like musclemag, Ronnie himself, oh, and all the visuals..
what makes his quote correct and everyone elses wrong?
LOL
you are so simple and dumb.
ronnie was equally hard everywhere in 99, but noticably harder in the quads:
what is remarkable, is that he was equally as hard (harder in some areas) and yet a full 10 pounds BIGGER: :o
and yet ND will go on and on like a retarded broken record, posting the same single disproven and hilariously wrong quote: ::)
-
sorry you moron, but there are lots of quotes from eyewitness claiming the exact opposite of what Peter McGough said in that article.
people like musclemag, Ronnie himself, oh, and all the visuals..
what makes his quote correct and everyone elses wrong?
LOL
you are so simple and dumb.
ronnie was equally hard everywhere in 99, but noticably harder in the quads:
I'm still waiting for these quotes from credible sources that state Ronnie's best was 1999 , where are they? ;)
yeah I thought so ;)
You're a liar to musclemag ::) where is that quote? I don't see it? yeah I thought so ;) Ronnie himself see above , yeah I thought so ;)
you post one pic and claim he's harder see ignorant
-
LOL I love how ALL the pics and ALL the videos show he was harder in 99
but ND dismisses them all LOL
::)
-
LOL I love how ALL the pics and ALL the videos show he was harder in 99
but ND dismisses them all LOL
::)
lmfao videos? show he's harder? you mean these videos?
yeak I thought so ;) next
-
lol look at that desperate idiot HypcriticDiety.
he thinks posting those shots proves Peter's misinformation LOL
::)
-
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=215855.msg2998258#msg2998258
take note HD.
LOL
whats it like arguing for a postion based on a simple quote that is shown to be wrong by everyone and everything? LOL
::)
-
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=215855.msg2998258#msg2998258
take note HD.
LOL
whats it like arguing for a postion based on a simple quote that is shown to be wrong by everyone and everything? LOL
::)
Still waiting for the quotes that say 1999 is his best showing from a credible source not some fan from his blog ;)
McGough was there were you? Ronnie was there were you? Perine was there were you? yeah I thought so ;)
-
Suckmyasshole has claimed that Flex 99 had better conditioning than Ronnie 99..
::)
LOL:
what is it with these moronic nuthuggers claiming Ronnie was so soft in 99?
LOL
??? ::)
-
McGough was there were you? Ronnie was there were you? Perine was there were you? yeah I thought so
Ronnie was there and said he was better than the year before the very next day:
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
Those hard sessions allowed me to pack on some extra muscle mass. I was almost 15 pounds heavier than last year, with a little bit better conditioning than last year.
you cant dismiss it HD.
-
You two would make a great couple.
-
the more pics muscletime posts, the more and more insane HD gets LOL
I love it.
-
Suckmyasshole has claimed that Flex 99 had better conditioning than Ronnie 99..
::)
LOL:
what is it with these moronic nuthuggers claiming Ronnie was so soft in 99?
LOL
??? ::)
Hulkster you really don't have the faintest idea on what great conditioning is and isn't Ronnie was harder in the hams & glutes in 98 thats why he won , 1999 same problem areas with Flex as usual
you're forced to keep on saying Ronnie was harder & drier in 99 than 98 because your THINK its his best showing and NO ONE , no one with any crediblity agrees with you. 99 isn't viewed as his best showing for that very reason , it doesn't mean he didn't deserve to win , it doesn't mean he didn't look better it just means his density & dryness aren't the same as the year earlier . but you're now bound to this stupid statement and you can't admit the obvious out of fear of being proven wrong again and looking stupid , but don't fret you're wrong and you look like an idiot ;)
I'm still waiting for ANY credible source that points to the 1999 Mr Olympia as Ronnie's best showing .......
-
Ronnie was there and said he was better than the year before the very next day:
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
you cant dismiss it HD.
Ronnie was NOT 15 pounds heavier than 98 thats just nonsense
-
lol look at that desperate idiot HypcriticDiety.
he thinks posting those shots proves Peter's misinformation LOL
::)
I love your meltdowns its so easy to get you revved up lol
-
Ronnie was NOT 15 pounds heavier than 98 thats just nonsense
LOL HD claims to know more than Ronnie Coleman LOL
::)
-
notice HD demonstrates his lack of command of the english language.
ronnie said ALMOST 15 pounds heavier
but HD cant read or understand so... ::)
-
notice HD demonstrates his lack of command of the english language.
ronnie said ALMOST 15 pounds heavier
but HD cant read or understand so... ::)
almost means 14+ pounds Ronnie was 264+ pounds in 1999? ;)
-
almost means 14+ pounds Ronnie was 264+ pounds in 1999? ;)
LOL 14 pounds - see what I mean..
the quote is 15 pounds not 14..
you need hooked on phonics ND lol
::)
-
LOL HD claims to know more than Ronnie Coleman LOL
::)
and you claim to know more than Ronnie , McGough , Perine , Team Flex , Lee Priest , Dorian Yates , Bev Francis , Shawn Ray
kid I will own you at every turn because you're ignorant about competitive bodybuilding
-
LOL 14 pounds - see what I mean..
the quote is 15 pounds not 14..
you need hooked on phonics ND lol
::)
dummy he was ALMOST 15 pounds heavier which is a LIE and almost means NOT quite 15 so that means 14+ pounds heavier than 1998 and seeing he was 250 pounds in 1998 that would make him 264+ pounds in 1999 which again is you guessed it a LIE
see fail as usual ;)
-
Hulkster I'm still waiting for the credible quotes saying 99 is his best showing , where are they? ;)
if what you say is true that he was 257 pounds with equal if not better conditioning than 1998 and 2001 surely this would be his best showing , more muscle at equal conditioning is always better
where are they? they should be rolling in left & right lol
-
he looks great there
-
he looks great there
He does look great a deserving winner
-
He does look great a deserving winner
do you hate ronnie or simply think dorian is better?
-
do you hate ronnie or simply think dorian is better?
I don't hate Ronnie . I just think Yates would beat him and either way it would be close.
-
I thnk yates is a better bb as well...... though ronnie at his prime was amazing
-
great calves
Yeah...if he had calves he could've done half as well as Matarazzo did
-
ha ha ha, I bet ND feels like an idiot now. ;D
Ronnie Coleman - 1999 Mr. Olympia Victory Seminar
"Those hard sessions allowed me to pack on some extra muscle mass. I was almost 15 pounds heavier than last year, with a little bit better conditioning than last year."
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
Ronnie said he had better conditioning in 99 than 98. So it must be true. ;)
-
Isn't there a thread for this? :D
-
I love how you have your head up colemans ass.
LOL I love how ALL the pics and ALL the videos show he was harder in 99
but ND dismisses them all LOL
::)
-
ha ha ha, I bet ND feels like an idiot now. ;D
Ronnie Coleman - 1999 Mr. Olympia Victory Seminar
"Those hard sessions allowed me to pack on some extra muscle mass. I was almost 15 pounds heavier than last year, with a little bit better conditioning than last year."
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
Ronnie said he had better conditioning in 99 than 98. So it must be true. ;)
No because its obvious he's not almost 15 pounds heavier that's just not true and what did he say on Pro Bodybuilding Weekly at the close of his Olympia career? when he had time to reflect on all his placings?
" Ronnie what was your best Olympia?
Ronnie : I would have to say my first because my conditioning was spot-on "
So he may have left that after the 99 Olympia it doesn't make it true , and the fact that he was harder and drier in 98 coincides with what the professionals claims , so who is looking stupid now? ;)
and if that were the case again where are all these quotes confiming that 1999 Mr Olympia was his best showing? lol surely 257 pounds with equal or better conditioning than 250 pounds and 247 pounds means he's better , more muscle and equal conditioning equals better
NO MENTIONS of 99 Olympia being his best , by credible sources that is and NOT someone's internet blog lol
yeah I though so ;)
-
No because its obvious he's not almost 15 pounds heavier that's just not true and what did he say on Pro Bodybuilding Weekly at the close of his Olympia career? when he had time to reflect on all his placings?
oh, so now you know more than Ronnie Coleman? Go home, kiddo. You lost at your own game. ;)
-
oh, so now you know more than Ronnie Coleman? Go home, kiddo. You lost at your own game. ;)
Great retort ::) , especially coming from YOU of all people , among your weakest posts you have nothing but felt stupid not posting you you pulled this rabbit out of your hat lol
You on many occasions have poted you know more than Ronnie himself , Yates , IFBB judges , McGough , Bev Francis , etc , etc , etc
see hypocrite and then see failure , you know your way ;)
I'll be waiting for all these quotes saying the 1999 Mr Olympia is his best showing
-
Quote Peter McGough Flex Magazine Jan 2001
RONNIE COLEMAN : ( 264lbs As big as a house , but holding water. In '98 , he was shredded and bone dry at 250 pounds. Last year ( 1999 ) he was 257 pounds but NOT as sharp as '98. This year ( 2000 ) at 264 pounds , he's not as sharp as 99 , which would seem to say that Ronnie is better at a lighter weight .
stating the obvious ;)
Peter McGough Flex Magazine August 2005
Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage (there was a contender for best-ever that I saw offstage: those crazy photos of sock-footed Dorian Yates taken seven weeks before the 1993 Mr. Olympia) was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 244 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable and would make any criticisms as redundant as a chocolate squat rack.
NO 1999 Mr Olympia here ;)
Flex Magazine August 2003
Jim Schmatltz on Ronnie chances of winning six Olympias in a row
if he repeats his 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic form, he'll experience the joy of six.
NOT if he repeats his 1999 Mr Olympia form ;)
Shawn Perine Ironage Dec 11, 2004
As much as I love Haney and my IA champs, I think Ronnie circa '98 or at the 2001 Arnold is pretty much untouchable. Except by Dorian Yates 6 weeks out from the '93 O as photographed by our own KMH. Both men, on those specific occasions carried so much dry muscle mass in good proportion and with good lines that it's almost unfair to compare them to others.
what no circa 1999 Olympia? for a very good reason ;)
While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian.
no mention of 1999 Olympia I wonder why? ;)
review of mr. olympia 1999, january 2000, page 90:
257 pounds, a good seven pounds heavier than last year and the clear winner, ALTHOUGH NOT AS BONE DRY OR AS ROCK HARD IN 98. In comparison to 98, his thighs are enourmous with a greater sweep and his front delts have improved; plus the pec anomaly (gyno) is no longer present.
Hey I've seen this before ;)
1999 is NOT considered his best showing for a reason and I'll let you dummies speculate why ...next
-
the question HD avoids:
why do you pick and choose which quotes to believe when there are contrary ones posted for all of the ones you keep repeating?
answer hypocrit: ::)
-
the question HD avoids:
why do you pick and choose which quotes to believe when there are contrary ones posted for all of the ones you keep repeating?
answer hypocrit: ::)
Ironic YOU of all people saying this lol and see above for more of your beat down YOU wont reply to because YOU can't ;) and where are all these quotes ? and not the ones from YouTube LMMFAO
-
98 vs 99
lol hey HD cue excuse #4750946798475
you can clearly see how wrong Peter was about ronnie being so much 'softer' in 99 LOL
::)
if Ronnie was so much softer, where are are the pics showing this? LOL
::)
-
Great retort , especially coming from YOU of all people , among your weakest posts you have nothing but felt stupid not posting you you pulled this rabbit out of your hat lol
idiot, I was parodying your own argument that Ronnie's word is infallible. The fact that you didn't grasp this and took me seriously is even more proof that your logic is flawed. You quoted Ronnie to argue why Dorian has a better back, the best side chest pose, and would still win the Mr. Olympia if he kept competing. Here we have a quote from Ronnie himself saying he had better conditioning in 99 than 98 and what do you do? In true hypocrite ND fashion, you ignore it. ::)
-
98 vs 99
lol hey HD cue excuse #4750946798475
note the quads LOL
not the quads are bigger and???? ;)
typical Hulkster move when clearly owned and no way out and no logical retort post a pic and say ' see ' lol I laugh at your ignorance
-
Here we have a quote from Ronnie himself saying he had better conditioning in 99 than 98 and what do you do? In true hypocrite ND fashion, you ignore it
thats why ND is forever known as HypocriticDiety!
-
idiot, I was parodying your own argument that Ronnie's word is infallible. The fact you didn't grasp this is even more proof that your logic is flawed. You quoted Ronnie to argue why Dorian has a better back, the best side chest pose, and would still win the Mr. Olympia if he kept competing. Here we have a quote from Ronnie himself saying he had better conditioning in 99 than 98 and what do you do? In true hypocrite ND fashion, you ignore it. ::)
please show me one single post where I ever claimed his word is infalliblie and I'll be waiting ;) and this just keeps gettin worse for YOU dummy and why? because I never ignored the quote see another typical Neo cop-out lie
I most certainly addressed ;) I said perhaps he did feel that way right after the contest HOWEVER dummy he revised his statement in 2007 and as you like to cling to with the polls seeing this is the latest its right ;) now don't you look fucking stupid? ;) and the best part it coincides with what the professional writers say about the two contests
so as usual you have NOTHING you're not in my league and never will be for a very good reason .
-
the question HD avoids:
why do you pick and choose which quotes to believe when there are contrary ones posted for all of the ones you keep repeating?
answer hypocrite
tell me about it. HD picks quotes from Team Flex when they give their subjective opinion on Ronnie's best conditioning but ignores when they give their subjective opinion on best physique of all-time. ::)
-
tell me about it. HD picks quotes from Team Flex when they give their subjective opinion on Ronnie's best conditioning but ignores when they give their subjective opinion on best physique ever. ::)
LMFAO this coming from the dummy who says if you believe ONE quote you're bound to believe them ALL its all or nothing as YOU claimed NOT me ;) then go one to say McGough is right about Ronnie 2001 being unbeatable but WRONG about Yates being harder & drier
like Hulkster I've been exposing your hypocrisy for a very LONG TIME NOW ;)
-
thats why ND is forever known as HypocriticDiety!
Typical Hulkster following MY lead lol I've exposed you dummies as blatant hypocrites for eons and now if you can't beat em , join em LMFAO I own you dummies at will
-
Not too pregnant...
-
please show me one single post where I ever claimed his word is infalliblie and I'll be waiting and this just keeps gettin worse for YOU dummy and why? because I never ignored the quote see another typical Neo cop-out lie
I don't have to quote a post from you. Anyone who has been following our discussion knows you always pull the "Ronnie knows best" card whenever someone takes issue with something he said. ;)
-
and this just keeps gettin worse for YOU
actually, the more pics muscletime post, the worse it gets for you.
you have already been exposed for photoshopping dorian pics, now you are faced with all the 99 shots looking harder than the 98 shots and its driving you nuts.
-
I don't have to quote a post from you. Anyone who has been following our discussion knows you always pull the "Ronnie knows best" card whenever someone takes issue with something he said. ;)
Thanks for admitting you're making up shit as usual ;)
Ronnie doesn't know best however his opinion crushes yours ;)
-
I don't have to quote a post from you. Anyone who has been following our discussion knows you always pull the "Ronnie knows best" card whenever someone takes issue with something he said. ;)
good point.
now, when ronnie's words work against him, he ingores it.
what a pathetic hypocrite. ::)
-
actually, the more pics muscletime post, the worse it gets for you.
you have already been exposed for photoshopping dorian pics, now you are faced with all the 99 shots looking harder than the 98 shots and its driving you nuts.
Making up shit again pics and busted as a HYPOCRITE yet again becase even if that was the case YOU got busted by Horton for posting photoshopped PCITURES ( plural ) and the quotes contradict you , the visual evidence contradicts you , Ronnie contradicts you and the best part is NONE of the photoshopped screencaps which you claimed were overwhelming visual evidence some close to the muscletime pics
just like your failed thread about me photoshopping pics the 99 pics blew up in your face ;)
-
good point.
now, when ronnie's words work against him, he ingores it.
what a pathetic hypocrite. ::)
No , no Ronnie 2007 said specifically he was better conditioning in 1998 , how does that work against me? ;)
-
LMFAO this coming from the dummy who says if you believe ONE quote you're bound to believe them ALL its all or nothing as YOU claimed NOT me then go one to say McGough is right about Ronnie 2001 being unbeatable but WRONG about Yates being harder & drier
yawn, we've already been through this before. I was trying to establish some guidelines to eliminate bias in this debate and keep it fair. It's intellectually dishonest to pick which quotes to accept and ignore from the same person. You're basically admitting he or she is not a credible source if you don't believe all their quotes. Since you didn't adhere to this, I felt no reason to either. I've been playing your game this whole time to demonstrate the absurdity of your logic. ;)
-
98 vs 99
lol hey HD cue excuse #4750946798475
you can clearly see how wrong Peter was about ronnie being so much 'softer' in 99 LOL
::)
if Ronnie was so much softer, where are are the pics showing this? LOL
::)
it might be the lighting but 98 Ronnie looks more crisp
-
yawn, we've already been through this before. I was trying to establish some guidelines to eliminate bias in this debate and keep it fair. It's intellectually dishonest to pick which quotes to accept and ignore from the same person. You're basically admitting he or she is not a credible source if you don't believe all their quotes. Since you didn't agree to this, I felt no reason to either. I've been playing your game this whole time to demonstrate the absurdity of your logic. ;)
yawn NOTHING you're an idiot for harping on me for something your quilty of and then have the balls to claim I'm a hypocrite when all you're doing is projecting
and NO I can most certainly pick & choose what quotes I want especially if the subject it subjective thats the difference
-
it might be the lighting but 98 Ronnie looks more crisp
lol its not the lighting , he is more crisp lol
-
good point.
now, when ronnie's words work against him, he ingores it.
what a pathetic hypocrite.
thanks, although according to ND, we're "making up shit." ::)
-
thanks, although according to ND, we're "making up shit." ::)
NO you are about me saying Ronnie's word is ' infalliable ' which is a blatant lie
and again all you're doing is projecting your own hypocrisy on me ;) so while it make you feel good thinking you accomplished something all you did is expose yourself with my help of course lol
-
yawn NOTHING you're an idiot for harping on me for something your quilty of and then have the balls to claim I'm a hypocrite when all you're doing is projecting
hey dumbass, that's the whole point of parody. ;)
-
so who do you think trained harder
ronnie or dorian ?
-
hey dumbass, that's the whole point of parody. Look it up. ;)
lamest excuse ever lol I laugh at your desperation Neo thats all one can do with you and your ' opinions ' based on ignorance , how does it feel to be crushed at every turn ? please explain that to someone who's never experiences that
-
so who do you think trained harder
ronnie or dorian ?
I could careless its moot to the point of who would beat who
-
Ronnie wasn't that pregnant back then, wonder what happened? :-\
-
lamest excuse ever lol I laugh at your desperation Neo thats all one can do with you and your ' opinions ' based on ignorance , how does it feel to be crushed at every turn ? please explain that to someone who's never experiences that
f*ck me, does your stupidity know no bounds? To imitate someone or something for purposes of satire is the definition of parody. So how is that a lame excuse when it's exactly what I was doing? I'm sure in your head you think your posts are brilliant and deserving of a medal, but damn are the things you say dumb. :-\
-
f*ck me, does your stupidity know no bounds? To imitate someone or something for purposes of satire is the definition of parody. So how is that a lame excuse when it's exactly what I was doing? I'm sure in your head you think your posts are brilliant and deserving of a medal, but damn are the things you say dumb. :-\
No the difference being dummy is you actually believe Ronnie was harder & drier than Dorian ;) and will post that quote about 2001 from McGough and the best back comment all the while balking at the idea Ronnie was never harder or drier that makes you a hypocrite because according to YOU if you believe one single quote you're bound by ALL which you don't adhere to thus making you a hypocrite and an ignorant one at that , so spare me the I was just parodying you excuse
and none of it matters because? 1999 is NOT his best showing , 2003 is NOT his best showing and I'm so far in your head all you've been reduced to his name calling and denial ;)
-
No the difference being dummy is you actually believe Ronnie was harder & drier than Dorian and will post that quote about 2001 from McGough and the best back comment all the while balking at the idea Ronnie was never harder or drier that makes you a hypocrite because according to YOU if you believe one single quote you're bound by ALL which you don't adhere to thus making you a hypocrite and an ignorant one at that , so spare me the I was just parodying you excuse
we're going in circles b/c your stupid ass cannot grasp that I was intentionally copying your use of quotes to demonstrate the weakness in your logic.
-
we're going in circles b/c your stupid ass cannot grasp that I was intentionally copying your use of quotes to demonstrate the weakness in your logic.
No we're going in circles because YOU need a way out of your retard logic . bottom line you're ignorant and a hypocrite regardless of what you claim
and lol at ' weakness ' of logic this coming from the complete moron who says all the eyewitnesses are wrong and your right despite never once being at any of the said contests , despite never once attending a pro show , despite once not even knowing how contests are judged , I laugh at your ignorance & stupidity
run along kid you bore me as usual I'll entertain your nonsense only until it ceases to amuse me and guess what? your master doesn't want to play with his dogs anymore ;)
-
lol its not the lighting , he is more crisp lol
not according to Ronnie Coleman himself!
HD cannot escape the words of Ronnie's victory seminar in 99-the day after the win.
as much as he tries..
-
if Ronnie was so much 'softer' in 99 as ND loves to claim based on a single disproven quote..
it would be obvious in all pics and videos, just as it always is when someone shows up noticably softer than a previous presentation.
so, ND, please show us the goods LOL
::)
countdown to the excuses!!! ::)
-
not according to Ronnie Coleman himself!
HD cannot escape the words of Ronnie's victory seminar in 99-the day after the win.
as much as he tries..
I don't need to escape anything did you miss the part where he said in 2007 his best Olympia was his first specifically because of his conditioning? you act like this hasn't been posted
and after the contest I'm sure he felt that way , he hadn't yet seen the pics or video but having time to reflect on his career at its closing he could have picked 1999 and guess what? he didn't ;) and his opinion that he was better conditioned in 1998 coincides with what the well established writers had to say so you're right back to square one ....no where
-
No we're going in circles because YOU need a way out of your retard logic . bottom line you're ignorant and a hypocrite regardless of what you claim
are you on drugs? You sound like a child rambling in defeat. How do I need a way out of my logic? How am I ignorant? How am I a hypocrite? I told you already I wanted to establish some guidelines to make this discussion more productive but you wouldn't agree to them. I even adhered to the rules I set forth at first but grew tired with your hypocrisy. So I decided to copy you to show why its dumb to pick which quotes to accept and ignore. Once you use or dismiss a quote from someone, you set a precedent that you believe or don't believe that person to be of good judgment. For example, how can you accept a quote from Ronnie saying Dorian would beat him and then ignore when Ronnie said he deserved to win the 06 Mr. Olympia? Either Ronnie is capable of judging bodybuilding contests or he is not. You cannot say he is both.
This is just one example of the many flaws in your logic. Sadly, I don't expect you to fully understand this b/c it requires using your brain. Instead, you'll probably respond with some insult followed by something that doesn't make any sense b/c of your poor reading comprehension followed by a quote from Peter McGough and then top it off with a wink at the end of your post. :-\
-
if Ronnie was so much 'softer' in 99 as ND loves to claim based on a single disproven quote..
it would be obvious in all pics and videos, just as it always is when someone shows up noticably softer than a previous presentation.
so, ND, please show us the goods LOL
::)
countdown to the excuses!!! ::)
its NOT based on a single quote that's a lie I posted several and all choose 1998/2001 as his best and NOT 1999 and you see what you want in pics & video I see Ronnie 98 with crisper muscularity and completely dense & hard , you see 99 as the same which one of us is right? ;) the professionals agree with me as does Ronnie
-
Ronnie 98 murders 99
-
Joe Weider
"Many experts, including reigning Mr.Olympia, Jay Cutler, believe that at his best Ronnie has the greatest physique of all-time. When looking at pictures of Ronnie from the 1998 Mr.Olympia, I find it hard to argue with that."
lmfao where is the 1999 Mr Olympia I ask you?
-
Team Flex – http://www.flexonline.com/training/49
“We've said before that the 245 pounds or so physique with which [Ronnie Coleman] won the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic is the best ever — unbeatable."
did they say 1999 Mr Olympia? nope lol next
you dummies can't counter this try as you may
-
comparisons ND hopes and prays will go away.
but they won't.
ND is on suicide watch now:
and muscletime has many more pics to come no doubt:
98 vs 99 and we havent even compared them to dorian yet! hahahahahaha
ronnie was noticably sharper in 99, just like HE said
bwahahahaha
ps HD, do you sit on this thread waiting for me to post? lol
I can come on here any time of day, post and you post three seconds later.
you follow me like a little puppy dog.
you are pathetic!
-
Jim Stoppani - Flex, July 2005
"Has anyone ever displayed a more muscular, more shredded, higher-quality physique than a 247-pound Ronnie Coleman at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic?"
Why yes they have Ronnie at the 1999 Mr Olympia LMFAO
-
comparisons ND hopes and prays will go away.
but they won't.
ND is on suicide watch now:
and muscletime has many more pics to come no doubt:
98 vs 99 and we havent even compared them to dorian yet! hahahahahaha
ronnie was noticably sharper in 99, just like HE said
bwahahahaha
ps HD, do you sit on this thread waiting for me to post? lol
I can come on here any time of day, post and you post three seconds later.
you follow me like a little puppy dog.
you are pathetic!
See follow MY leader , see this thread backfire like all your others , see fail you know the way ;)
-
Sean Toh – http://creditplushealth.org/sport%20celebrities/Ronnie%20Coleman.htm
“At the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic, Ronnie won the show and his performance at the time was hailed by many to be his best ever showing. He was 245 pounds at the contest, in extremely tight form, and dense as stone.”
and the hits just keep on coming LMFAO
-
Peter McGough - Flex, August 2005
"Ronnie sporting that [01 ASC] look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable."
Where is 1999? ;)
-
why are you switching to what presentation is ronnie's best?
actually wait, we all know.
its because you cant win that argument so you deflect it to something totally unrealated..
which presentation is ronnie's best ever has NOTHING TO DO with which was harder - 98 or 99.
just so you know.
some feel that ronnie 2003 was his best ever because of the extra 40 pounds of size.
but that, like everything else you have posted in the last 20 minutes, has nothing to do with whether ronnie was harder in 99 or 98
moron. ::)
-
Joe Weider
"Many experts, including reigning Mr.Olympia, Jay Cutler, believe that at his best Ronnie has the greatest physique of all-time. When looking at pictures of Ronnie from the 1998 Mr.Olympia, I find it hard to argue with that."
lmfao where is the 1999 Mr Olympia I ask you?
Team Flex – http://www.flexonline.com/training/49
“We've said before that the 245 pounds or so physique with which [Ronnie Coleman] won the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic is the best ever — unbeatable."
Jim Stoppani - Flex, July 2005
"Has anyone ever displayed a more muscular, more shredded, higher-quality physique than a 247-pound Ronnie Coleman at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic?"
Why yes they have Ronnie at the 1999 Mr Olympia LMFAO
Peter McGough - Flex, August 2005
"Ronnie sporting that [01 ASC] look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable."
Where is 1999? ;)
Seems that a lot of people agree Ronnie was the best ever.
-
Seems that a lot of people agree Ronnie was the best ever.
That's old news , however NONE of them agree 1999 was his best
-
why are you switching to what presentation is ronnie's best?
actually wait, we all know.
its because you cant win that argument so you deflect it to something totally unrealated..
which presentation is ronnie's best ever has NOTHING TO DO with which was harder - 98 or 99.
just so you know.
some feel that ronnie 2003 was his best ever because of the extra 40 pounds of size.
but that, like everything else you have posted in the last 20 minutes, has nothing to do with whether ronnie was harder in 99 or 98
moron. ::)
it has everything to do with it because you can't find me ONE credible source stating 99 is his best for a VERY GOOD REASON ;) because his conditioning wasn't as good in 98 or 01 thats why ;)
-
it has everything to do with it because you can't find me ONE credible source stating 99 is his best for a VERY GOOD REASON ;) because his conditioning wasn't as good in 98 or 01 thats why ;)
the only reason people remember 98 was it was the begining of a new era.
first time a new Mr. O was gauranteed to be crowned in 6 years.
has nothing to do with his actual physique - few think that 98 was his best ever shape after the performances of 99, 2001 AC and 2003,
its pretty clear it was not. even Ronnie said he was better in 99 than in 98.
much to your dismay.
-
the only reason people remember 98 was it was the begining of a new era.
first time a new Mr. O was gauranteed to be crowned in 6 years.
has nothing to do with his actual physique - few think that 98 was his best ever shape after the performances of 99, 2001 AC and 2003,
its pretty clear it was not. even Ronnie said he was better in 99 than in 98.
much to your dismay.
More nonsense NO ONE harks back to 1992 its almost forgotten because of 1993 when Yates was really bigger and just as hard and dry ;)
next excuse waiting to get crushed?
and much to your dismay Ronnie has stated he was better in 1998
-
the only reason people remember 98 was it was the begining of a new era.
first time a new Mr. O was gauranteed to be crowned in 6 years.
has nothing to do with his actual physique - few think that 98 was his best ever shape after the performances of 99, 2001 AC and 2003,
its pretty clear it was not. even Ronnie said he was better in 99 than in 98.
much to your dismay.
easily proven wrong see above quotes and NOT one of them mention 1999 , and I'm still waiting for the explanation why and you still haven't gave one because................. ........................ ....lmfao you can't
-
easily proven wrong see above quotes and NOT one of them mention 1999 , and I'm still waiting for the explanation why and you still haven't gave one because................. ........................ ....lmfao you can't
HD, do you not recall the article your best friend Peter wrote on Mr. O physiques that advanced the sport?
tell me HD, where was 98 on that list LOL
::)
only 99 was mentioned and for good reason.
even McGough feels 99 was better than 98.
him and Ronnie agree..and they know way more than you.
-
HD, do you not recall the article your best friend Peter wrote on Mr. O physiques that advanced the sport?
tell me HD, where was 98 on that list LOL
::)
only 99 was mentioned and for good reason.
even McGough feels 99 was better than 98.
him and Ronnie agree..and they know way more than you.
do you recall it states clearly that is NOT his best showing either 2001 is LMMFAO
Hulkster = owned and backfired
what a fucking idiot
-
do you recall it states clearly that is NOT his best showing either 2001 is LMMFAO
Hulkster = owned and backfired
what a fucking idiot
once again, I ask you, what the fuck does that have to do with the discussion on hand?
::)
which is harder, 98 or 99.
ronnie and Peter obviously feel 99 was better.
and for good reason.
10 pounds bigger, just as sharp.
HD owned.
-
once again, I ask you, what the fuck does that have to do with the discussion on hand?
::)
which is harder, 98 or 99.
ronnie and Peter obvious feel 99 was better.
and for good reason.
10 puonds bigger, just as sharp.
HD owned.
Because he choose 2001 because he was HARDER & DRIER than 1999 thats why as usual you just owned yourself you fucking idiot and the best is you dismissed McGough as FLAT OUT WRONG and now he's right LMFAO see hypocrite
and again answer my question where is the avalanche of quotes saying 1999 is better than 1998 & 2001 answer the question we're all waiting ;)
-
and again answer my question where is the avalanche of quotes saying 1999 is better than 1998 & 2001 answer the question we're all waiting
when shown pics from that contest, there are TONS of quotes from bb fans all over the place.
you just ignore them - see musclemecca threads, MD threads etc etc etc.
your tactic of switching to a different argument when you realize you are losing another one is pathetic.
::)
when faced with the realization that you could not argue that ronnie 98 was harder than 99, you swtich to a totally unrelated position and argue for that LOL
::)
you truly are an idiot .
-
.....
-
when shown pics from that contest, there are TONS of quotes from bb fans all over the place.
you just ignore them - see musclemecca threads, MD threads etc etc etc.
your tactic of switching to a different argument when you realize you are losing another one is pathetic.
::)
when faced with the realization that you could not argue that ronnie 98 was harder than 99, you swtich to a totally unrelated position and argue for that LOL
::)
you truly are an idiot .
LMFAO now you're reduced to what the fans say lol the slew of professionals mean nothing but all the ignorant fan-boys like yourself who never attended either contest are right
when you type idiot you're projecting your own idiocy
-
LMFAO now you're reduced to what the fans say lol the slew of professionals mean nothing but all the ignorant fan-boys like yourself who never attended either contest are right
when you type idiot you're projecting your own idiocy
how ironic since you claim Ronnie Coleman's words mean nothing too..
::)
-
how ironic since you claim Ronnie Coleman's words mean nothing too..
::)
I never claimed that I said they do ;) the one he said in 2007 where when posed with what was his best Olympia contest he recollected 1998 because of his conditioning specifically , if he were to say 1999 that you might be working with something but we know he didn't and when Ronnie said he could never beat Yates on all those occasions those words meant a LOT to yet you jackasses dismissed them all lol talk about hypocrite now you need Ronnie to be right , its so easy to lead you dummies where I want you
-
how ironic since you claim Ronnie Coleman's words mean nothing too..
::)
every quote i posted about ronnie, you deny his own words and tell us what he really means.
pathetic.
-
Pregnancy in first trimester.
-
So, true. Noone will ever be better than Ronnie was, at his peak.
-
So, true. Noone will ever be better than Ronnie was, at his peak.
especially that garbage can dorian yates lol
much to HD and his bitches dismay..
-
especially that garbage can dorian yates lol
much to HD and his bitches dismay..
You're taking this way , way to seriously when you're reduced this :-\ dude my advice take some time away from this Dorian and I are on your mind to much , comments like these expose your desperation & frustration and complete lack of abilities to covey your point without such absurdity .
-
you just sit on this thread waiting for me to post dont you?
::)
three seconds later.. ::)
-
you just sit on this thread waiting for me to post dont you?
::)
three seconds later.. ::)
lmfao this coming from the kid who follows ME around on every single thread I post in LMFAO its so bad other members bitch at you