Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Sherief Shalaby on September 09, 2008, 05:46:37 AM

Title: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 09, 2008, 05:46:37 AM
Which was his best shape ever 93 or 95??..
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 09, 2008, 05:47:54 AM
More..
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: RZA on September 09, 2008, 06:00:08 AM
'93 was an overall best package then '95: smaller waist, better bi's. Think about it: Flex got second with a unique physique that would have won him the Sandow any other year then this one. But his conditioning was better in '95. As his body gave up, Dorian relied more and more on conditioning. And did it with success.
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: garebear on September 09, 2008, 06:00:31 AM
you are an inquisitive young lad
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 09, 2008, 06:06:44 AM
Which was his best shape ever 93 or 95??..

  95'. He was fuller. In 93', he was a little flat...

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 09, 2008, 06:10:44 AM
'93 was an overall best package then '95: smaller waist, better bi's. Think about it: Flex got second with a unique physique that would have won him the Sandow any other year then this one. But his conditioning was better in '95. As his body gave up, Dorian relied more and more on conditioning. And did it with success.

But in both contests his weight was nearly the same so if his condition was better in 1995 as you are saying, he must have carried more muscles than in 93.. What do you think??..
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 09, 2008, 06:13:29 AM
  95'. He was fuller. In 93', he was a little flat...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

But I believe his quads were a little bit sharper in 93.. I am not sure may be it's the effect of the lighting..
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: RZA on September 09, 2008, 06:15:31 AM
But in both contests his weight was nearly the same so if his condition was better in 1995 as you are saying, he must have carried more muscles than in 93.. What do you think??..

I'm not an expert but I do think it would be right. Dorian added mass after '93 but with the injuries his physique was not as well-balanced. I do think he carried more mass overall in '95. I still prefer his '93 physique: no weak points, outstanding back, tri's, excellent legs, unreal calves,etc.... And at the same time, the undisputed master of the mass/conditioning combo.
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on September 09, 2008, 09:15:46 AM
Good thread Sherief

his back looked bigger in 1995 but overrall Dorian 93 was superiour...

Better arms, shape and quads...
That said the lighting in the 95 Olympia was awful
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: The Wizard on September 09, 2008, 09:18:45 AM
93 by a mile, by 95 he only had one arm!
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: England_1 on September 09, 2008, 10:13:26 AM
Dorian looks absolutely incredible in both those years. That front lat spread in 95 is unbelievable. I prefer 95 due to the insane condition.
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: _bruce_ on September 09, 2008, 10:18:30 AM
93 by a mile, by 95 he only had one arm!

+1
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 09, 2008, 10:23:54 AM
93 by a mile, by 95 he only had one arm!

You mean by 1995 he only had one arm and half... 1997 is the year where he really had one arm!!..
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: Fatpanda on September 09, 2008, 10:25:48 AM
93, as he had a tighter waist. 8)
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 09, 2008, 10:27:43 AM
Good thread Sherief

his back looked bigger in 1995 but overrall Dorian 93 was superiour...

Better arms, shape and quads...
That said the lighting in the 95 Olympia was awful

Thank you.. I agree with you in general.. But I have a strange feeling that in 93 his upper body carried a little bit more water than in 95 so his skin didn't look as thin as in 95.. On the other side his legs in 93 to me looked better!!..
Title: Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
Post by: Hulkster on September 09, 2008, 01:42:04 PM
93. that arm in the bi shot is horrible in 95.