Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Sherief Shalaby on September 09, 2008, 05:46:37 AM
-
Which was his best shape ever 93 or 95??..
-
More..
-
'93 was an overall best package then '95: smaller waist, better bi's. Think about it: Flex got second with a unique physique that would have won him the Sandow any other year then this one. But his conditioning was better in '95. As his body gave up, Dorian relied more and more on conditioning. And did it with success.
-
you are an inquisitive young lad
-
Which was his best shape ever 93 or 95??..
95'. He was fuller. In 93', he was a little flat...
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
'93 was an overall best package then '95: smaller waist, better bi's. Think about it: Flex got second with a unique physique that would have won him the Sandow any other year then this one. But his conditioning was better in '95. As his body gave up, Dorian relied more and more on conditioning. And did it with success.
But in both contests his weight was nearly the same so if his condition was better in 1995 as you are saying, he must have carried more muscles than in 93.. What do you think??..
-
95'. He was fuller. In 93', he was a little flat...
SUCKMYMUSCLE
But I believe his quads were a little bit sharper in 93.. I am not sure may be it's the effect of the lighting..
-
But in both contests his weight was nearly the same so if his condition was better in 1995 as you are saying, he must have carried more muscles than in 93.. What do you think??..
I'm not an expert but I do think it would be right. Dorian added mass after '93 but with the injuries his physique was not as well-balanced. I do think he carried more mass overall in '95. I still prefer his '93 physique: no weak points, outstanding back, tri's, excellent legs, unreal calves,etc.... And at the same time, the undisputed master of the mass/conditioning combo.
-
Good thread Sherief
his back looked bigger in 1995 but overrall Dorian 93 was superiour...
Better arms, shape and quads...
That said the lighting in the 95 Olympia was awful
-
93 by a mile, by 95 he only had one arm!
-
Dorian looks absolutely incredible in both those years. That front lat spread in 95 is unbelievable. I prefer 95 due to the insane condition.
-
93 by a mile, by 95 he only had one arm!
+1
-
93 by a mile, by 95 he only had one arm!
You mean by 1995 he only had one arm and half... 1997 is the year where he really had one arm!!..
-
93, as he had a tighter waist. 8)
-
Good thread Sherief
his back looked bigger in 1995 but overrall Dorian 93 was superiour...
Better arms, shape and quads...
That said the lighting in the 95 Olympia was awful
Thank you.. I agree with you in general.. But I have a strange feeling that in 93 his upper body carried a little bit more water than in 95 so his skin didn't look as thin as in 95.. On the other side his legs in 93 to me looked better!!..
-
93. that arm in the bi shot is horrible in 95.