Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Meso_z on September 20, 2008, 10:58:23 AM
-
(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45597-3/1999-mr-olympia-123.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=8b221e09b176c4cf9a3d0b61b6a8d2d5)
:o SYMMETRY, MASS, CONDITION....this cat has it all.
-
is that relaxed?
-
(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45597-3/1999-mr-olympia-123.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=8b221e09b176c4cf9a3d0b61b6a8d2d5)
:o SYMMETRY, MASS, CONDITION....this cat has it all.
NO ERECTION?
-
is that relaxed?
"front relaxed".
-
Great shot. Pretty hard to ever beat that.
-
That is quite awesome
-
pretty amazing shot. haney, labrada, paris all had some pretty awsome front relaxed's too.
-
I dunno. These two look more "relaxed" to me.
-
sr
-
I dunno. These two look more "relaxed" to me.
Does that turn you on Laura? ;)
-
Pavol
-
Reeves. Most of these guy are just sloppping on a lot of muscle on a bad bone and muscle structure. With a good bone and muscle structure you will look good at 180 AND 250. Your life would be significantly changed for the better if you were to suddenly look like Reeves. With Coleman you'd be a common man with a lot of muscles.
-
Reeves. Most of these guy are just sloppping on a lot of muscle on a bad bone and muscle structure. With a good bone and muscle structure you will look good at 180 AND 250. Your life would be significantly changed for the better if you were to suddenly look like Reeves. With Coleman you'd be a common man with a lot of muscles.
brutal 14 inch arms.
-
brutal 14 inch arms.
So you're arms are now bigger than Reeves too? ;)
-
(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45597-3/1999-mr-olympia-123.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=8b221e09b176c4cf9a3d0b61b6a8d2d5)
:o SYMMETRY, MASS, CONDITION....this cat has it all.
agreed. no twigs on a barrel here.
huge lats, narrow waist, huge chest, cut quads with great sweep.
and arms are in perfect proportion to his torso:
-
agreed. no twigs on a barrel here.
huge lats, narrow waist, huge chest, cut quads with great sweep.
and arms are in perfect proportion to his torso:
lol arms in perfect proportion
-
lol arms in perfect proportion
why are you laughing?
everyone can see that they are.
-
why are you laughing?
everyone can see that they are.
stop speaking for everyone , his arms are to long for his torso thats old news although he does look good in this pose more so than his rear standing relaxed just as long as you keep posting pics from the knees up ;)
-
his arms are to long for his torso thats old news
::)
they don't look any longer than anyone elses.
look for yourself idiot: ::)
-
So you're arms are now bigger than Reeves too? ;)
yes absolutely.
-
yes absolutely.
sorry wrong again , thanks for playing we have some lovely parting gifts for you ;)
-
::)
they don't look any longer than anyone elses.
look for yourself idiot: ::)
Sure they do and look what you've done you're reduced to posting pictures of Yates which NO ONE brought up ;)
Yates owns your mind
-
::)
they don't look any longer than anyone elses.
look for yourself idiot: ::)
And as far as balance & proportion and perfect symmetry see Cormier , just perfect.
-
Sure they do and look what you've done you're reduced to posting pictures of Yates which NO ONE brought up ;)
Yates owns your mind
no, I am simply exposing how incredibly stupid you are.
you criticize Ronnie for having 'arms too long for his torso' ::) yet worship the ground that the barrel with twigs (who looks god awful in the relaxed pose) walks on. ::)
you make no sense at all.
and I enjoy pointing out how stupid you really are. :P
-
no, I am simply exposing how incredibly stupid you are.
you criticize Ronnie for having 'arms too long for his torso' ::) yet worship the ground that the barrel with twigs (who looks god awful in the relaxed pose) walks on. ::)
you make no sense at all.
and I enjoy pointing out how stupid you really are. :P
No you're reduced to dragging Yates into everything thats YOUR hang-up I was talking about Ronnie and Ronnie compared to Flex & Cormier , Dorian owns your mind you can't type ONE sentence without my name of Dorians its pathetic and sad
I'm not stupid , here you are praising my intelligence ;) you just don't like it when I expose your ignorance . notice you can't find me praising your intelligence anywhere lmfao
-
I think this pic has been posted over and over again and we all agree it is one of the best relaxed pics ever.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=235842.0;attach=275521;image)
-
::)
they don't look any longer than anyone elses.
look for yourself idiot: ::)
and the irony of YOU claiming anyone is an idiot you post a semi-relaxed pic of Yates compared to a fully flexed pic of Ronnie , which proves two things you fear a great pic of Yates and your desperation level keeps growing , Dorian and me occupy your brain
-
I think this pic has been posted over and over again and we all agree it is one of the best relaxed pics ever.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=235842.0;attach=275521;image)
No don't say that Hulkster will get mad , Ronnie is better than everyone , at every pose from every angle and he has better parts than anyone as well
-
I'd take 14 inch arms if I looked like Steve Reeves ;D
-
No don't say that Hulkster will get mad , Ronnie is better than everyone , at every pose from every angle and he has better parts than anyone as well
Hahaha. . . does Hulkster post in any thread besides ones with Dorian or Ronnie in it? Serious question.
-
Hahaha. . . does Hulkster post in any thread besides ones with Dorian or Ronnie in it? Serious question.
Honestly no , and any thread that has Ronnie he interjects Dorian and or me , the kid is obsessed with both of us :-X ???
-
I'd take 14 inch arms if I looked like Steve Reeves ;D
His arms are a lot bigger than 14' lol
-
agreed. no twigs on a barrel here.
huge lats, narrow waist, huge chest, cut quads with great sweep.
and arms are in perfect proportion to his torso:
ronnie's abs ruin most of his front shots, except the mm where he hides the worst midsection on any pro with his arms and hands.
-
His arms are a lot bigger than 14' lol
15 maybe.
-
15 maybe.
Bigger than your unverified claim ;) and they look a hell of a lot better
-
ronnie's abs ruin most of his front shots, except the mm where he hides the worst midsection on any pro with his arms and hands.
Exactly. That gap between his abs really spoils it. It gives that turtle shell look. It wasn't as bad during his early years but after his gut expanded it ruined that tight look that Flex and Cormier has in that comparison shot.
If he had abs like either Flex or Cormier in that picture plus better inner calf development he would have truly been perfect.
-
ronnie's abs ruin most of his front shots, except the mm where he hides the worst midsection on any pro with his arms and hands.
I explained that to Hulkster one time , any advantage he has in a small & narrow waist & hips is negated by his oddly shaped abdominals that protrude even at the lightest weights
-
Exactly. That gap between his abs really spoils it. It gives that turtle shell look. It wasn't as bad during his early years but after his gut expanded it ruined that tight look that Flex and Cormier has in that comparison shot.
If he had abs like either Flex or Cormier in that picture plus better inner calf development he would have truly been perfect.
along with the abdominals his serratus , intercostals & obliques all look odd as well
-
is that relaxed?
thats what i was thinking...lol..
i cant stand the modern "relaxed".
looks bloody stupid.
-
sr
I wouldnt mind lookinh like that relaxed.
-
And as far as balance & proportion and perfect symmetry see Cormier , just perfect.
funny, you keep claiming dorian has "perfect balance and proportion" LOL ::)
-
::)
they don't look any longer than anyone elses.
look for yourself idiot: ::)
Best top three in a Mr. O.....EVER. You can honestly make a case why each could have been number 1 in 1999.
-
Best top three in a Mr. O.....EVER. You can honestly make a case why each could have been number 1 in 1999.
agreed. pretty tough to beat. although Flex was oily that year.
Chris should have beaten Flex that year IMO.
Ronnie was dry as a bone and ripped to shreads:
-
15 maybe.
shut up fatty ;D
-
funny, you keep claiming dorian has "perfect balance and proportion" LOL ::)
At his best yes
One thing that I think people underrated me on - it was never really mentioned because of my sheer physical size and condition - was my balance and proportion. Not only from muscle group to muscle group, but from upper body to lower body. My skeletal structure and everything else was there and in good balance.
He's an IFBB judge and like every other professional who crushes your nonsense all you have his denial ;)
-
agreed. pretty tough to beat. although Flex was oily that year.
Chris should have beaten Flex that year IMO.
Ronnie was dry as a bone and ripped to shreads:
to bad he wasn't as hard & dry as he was in 1998 and 2001 than maybe that would be considered his all-time best showing ;)
-
to bad he wasn't as hard & dry as he was in 1998 and 2001 than maybe that would be considered his all-time best showing ;)
you just keep clinging to that McGough quote ND.
too bad its contradicted by Ronnie himself, pro contest reviewers like Johnny Fitness from Musclemag who were there in 99, and real life..
::)
-
you just keep clinging to that McGough quote ND.
too bad its contradicted by Ronnie himself, pro contest reviewers like Johnny Fitness from Musclemag who were there in 99, and real life..
::)
lmfao Johnny Fitness lol Ronnie you say?
Ronnie what was your best Olympia?
Ronnie Coleman : I would have to say my first because my conditioning was spot-on
next , Ronnie Coleman , Peter McGough , and everyone else consider 1998/2001 his best showings because his conditioning was at its best along with size , I'm still waiting for you to find me any credible sources that say 1999 was his best showing ever ;)
-
review of mr. olympia 1999, january 2000, page 90:
257 pounds, a good seven pounds heavier than last year and the clear winner, ALTHOUGH NOT AS BONE DRY OR AS ROCK HARD IN 98. In comparison to 98, his thighs are enourmous with a greater sweep and his front delts have improved; plus the pec anomaly (gyno) is no longer present.
Flex Magazine Jan 2001
RONNIE COLEMAN : ( 264lbs As big as a house , but holding water. In '98 , he was shredded and bone dry at 250 pounds. Last year ( 1999 ) he was 257 pounds but NOT as sharp as '98. This year ( 2000 ) at 264 pounds , he's not as sharp as 99 , which would seem to say that Ronnie is better at a lighter weight .
-
well duh ;)
-
review of mr. olympia 1999, january 2000, page 90:
257 pounds, a good seven pounds heavier than last year and the clear winner, ALTHOUGH NOT AS BONE DRY OR AS ROCK HARD IN 98. In comparison to 98, his thighs are enourmous with a greater sweep and his front delts have improved; plus the pec anomaly (gyno) is no longer present.
Flex Magazine Jan 2001
RONNIE COLEMAN : ( 264lbs As big as a house , but holding water. In '98 , he was shredded and bone dry at 250 pounds. Last year ( 1999 ) he was 257 pounds but NOT as sharp as '98. This year ( 2000 ) at 264 pounds , he's not as sharp as 99 , which would seem to say that Ronnie is better at a lighter weight .
both quotes by the same person.
and that person was wrong both times.
-
both quotes by the same person.
and that person was wrong both times.
Yeah like Horton was wrong , and Yates was wrong and Ronnie was wrong , and all the professionals lol
see denial ;)
-
Next
-
ND sets up a strawman argument, something he alway accuses others of doing.
fact is, ronnie looks like he is not even contracting his back in that muscletime shot, only his arms look tensed.
in reality, his back was rock hard:
try and deny this ND:
http://www.truveo.com/Ronnie-Coleman-1999-Mr-Olympia-Part-Two/id/1160132027
compare to the muscletime back shot LOL
and note how dense, ripped and hard his back is...
::)
-
Next
Damn, 98 was way better conditioned! Even the glutes are way more ripped in 98....hmm...goes right along with what Ronnie himself says. hulkster owned.
-
Damn, 98 was way better conditioned! Even the glutes are way more ripped in 98....hmm...goes right along with what Ronnie himself says. hulkster owned.
what did he say right after his 99 win genius?
oh yeah - "I was 15 pounds heavier and in a bit better condition than last year"... ::)
-
Even the glutes are way more ripped in 98
::)
98 vs 99
his entire lower body was more ripped in 99 than in 98. esp the quads and including his lower back.
-
::)
98 vs 99
his entire lower body was more ripped in 99 than in 98. esp the quads and including his lower back.
shut it you loser. Ron himself has said on BFTO99 and in several recent interviews, as well as an email I sent him, that 98 was easily his best condition. You are in denial.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=235842.0;attach=275578;image
-
shut it you loser.
you know when you have totally owned your opponents with facts and reality when this is all they can come up with LOL
::)
-
ronnie was tight as a drum in 99.
his quads in particular were vastly more cut than in 98.
and all the idiot nuthuggers can do is say 'shut it loser"
LOL
::)
-
I always liked this one...
"Relax"
(http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x263/timeamajorova/billpearl.jpg)
-
Gonna be honest, But Paul Dillet is the freakiest thing I've seen just standing there relaxed!
-
ND sets up a strawman argument, something he alway accuses others of doing.
fact is, ronnie looks like he is not even contracting his back in that muscletime shot, only his arms look tensed.
in reality, his back was rock hard:
try and deny this ND:
http://www.truveo.com/Ronnie-Coleman-1999-Mr-Olympia-Part-Two/id/1160132027
compare to the muscletime back shot LOL
and note how dense, ripped and hard his back is...
::)
the irony you crying strawman ::) this coming from the guy who on this thread posted a semi-relaxed shot of Yates to a full-flexed shot of Ronnie and Ronnie is contracting how do I know? the video ;)
-
both quotes by the same person.
and that person was wrong both times.
Ronnie what was your best Olympia?
Ronnie Coleman: I would have to say my first because my conditioning was spot-on
Not the same person ;) Ronnie on Pro Bodybuilding Weekly at the close of his Olympia career , he could have picked the 1999 Mr Olympia he didn't and he elaborated why 1998 was his best , because of his conditioning was ' spot-on ' which means his conditioning in 1999 wasn't ' spot-on ' which verifies McGough's original assessment which means you're wrong as usual ;)
next
-
Back on topic -
-
Back on topic -
I think Serge looks leaps & bounds better than Lou in that pose
-
:o
-
I think Serge looks leaps & bounds better than Lou in that pose
I agree. Serge was very aesthetic in his prime and looked great in twisting shots.
Another classic lineup: