Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: MattT on September 21, 2008, 12:35:34 AM
-
Its crazy how huge Fux's gut is in this vid!
-
You can tell Nasser is already off there compared to previous years.
'All Drugs' ? 190 pounds top if he was clean? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
-
damn fux looked a lot better in BFO 2000
-
They both seem to have some "left in the tank" during the sets i.e. not to failure. JPF seems to use a very short range of motion for his triceps training.
-
Monster chest on JP at 3:45
-
GAYER THAN A RIM JOB ::)
-
Gayer than respect for women.
All that is wrong with bodybuilding.
All synthol.
-
palumbolism
-
simply awesome workout attire....
-
Nasser is all syntho, Fux is all IGF
-
The WORST segment on the video! The BEST segment is Flex Wheeler and Chris Cormier training chest and back together. 8)
-
Synthol and guts...that should be the name of their video :-*
-
wow great nasser video-thanks for posting
hes one strong mofo
that nasser hat rocks-id love to get one...
-
:-X
-
haha look at fuxs gut :o :-X
-
haha look at Nasser's gut :o :-X
;)
-
?
-
Nasser El Syntholdaddy
-
I bet that all that the fagish Nasser teams sees isn't the huge gut and Synthol but just a hot pair of shorts they can buy from Nasser site!!
On sale BFTO shorts! They have pedigree! Shameful retards.
-
huge beyond belief
-
u mean his penis? :D
-
Fux at the 1999 Mr. O.........
-
Fux at the 1999 Mr. O.........
Very aesthetic. Bodybuilding at its best right there.
-
well developed diaphragm on this specimen
-
LOL @ so many blind accusations of "synthol" towards Nasser in this 99 video. Please tell which part of the clip shows evidence of synthol on Nasser? ::)
99 Olympia was one show where he lost a bit too much size when dieting and never had any accusations of "synthol"
-
LOL @ so many blind accusations of "synthol" towards Nasser in this 99 video. Please tell which part of the clip shows evidence of synthol on Nasser? ::)
99 Olympia was one show where he lost a bit too much size when dieting and never had any accusations of "synthol"
He never ever recovered the size and conditioning he showed at the 98 O.
He didn't lose too much size while dieting, his body had stopped responding as well to what he was pumping in it.
-
LOL @ so many blind accusations of "synthol" towards Nasser in this 99 video. Please tell which part of the clip shows evidence of synthol on Nasser? ::)
99 Olympia was one show where he lost a bit too much size when dieting and never had any accusations of "synthol"
:-\
-
people knock fux... but at the 97 ( not too sure if its 96 or 7, last yr of dorians reign) , he looked spot on and should have made top 6 easily, huge with good proportions and condition
-
:-\
My question was in regards to accusations of synthol in that video pre-99 Olympia, and in response you're posting a comparison of 98 vs. 2001? ???
All I see there, other than pics from two Olympias that are irrelevent to my question and this thread, is the effect of accumulated scar tissue in rear delt. The first "comparison" pic is also scaled horribly, with the 2001 version enlarged relative to the 98 version.
-
My question was in regards to accusations of synthol in that video pre-99 Olympia, and in response you're posting a comparison of 98 vs. 2001? ???
All I see there, other than pics from two Olympias that are irrelevent to my question and this thread, is the effect of accumulated scar tissue in rear delt. The first "comparison" pic is also scaled horribly, with the 2001 version enlarged relative to the 98 version.
You're a bright guy Bob , Nasser says everyone in competitive bodybuilding uses synthol and he is the sole exception ::) , I mean get serious , I don't buy that scare tissue for a moment
-
the tricep heads are nonexistant when they do pressdowns
E
-
why were they using such light weight?
-
You're a bright guy Bob , Nasser says everyone in competitive bodybuilding uses synthol and he is the sole exception ::) , I mean get serious , I don't buy that scare tissue for a moment
He admitted to using a variation of synthol, and when he said that everyone uses synthol I imagine he grouped the variation into his statement as well.
What I asked for in relation to this thread is what part of the video all the haters are referring to when they keep saying he has so much synthol in him, and have yet to get a response to that.
As for your 98/2001 comparison (which is still irrelevent to this thread and my question) but nonetheless worth discussing, you will notice there is not much difference in the side-chest comparison because it is scaled better. The MM-comparison looks different mainly due to scaling, and scar tissue in the rear delt. The muscles other than the rear-delt do not look much different in the comparison, except for the MM pose which has some differences due to scaling.
-
I imagine he grouped the variation into his statement as well.
Maybe you should read what he wrote instead of imagining everything like Nasser putting you in a headlock or some other sick shit
-
Basically a physique like Fux's would only appeal to someone who has no eye for aesthetics whatsoever. Yes, I grew up on Arnold's physique and he was plenty massive, especially in 74...but he looked good. I wanted to look like that. He never had a gut. People who have grown up in the modern era of bodybuilding have come to accept big bloated bellies, ridiculous looking synthol muscles, pathetic calf development. I don't want to look like Fux and neither does anyone who has a discerning eye for great physiques.
-
Basically a physique like Fux's would only appeal to someone who has no eye for aesthetics whatsoever. Yes, I grew up on Arnold's physique and he was plenty massive, especially in 74...but he looked good. I wanted to look like that. He never had a gut. People who have grown up in the modern era of bodybuilding have come to accept big bloated bellies, ridiculous looking synthol muscles, pathetic calf development. I don't want to look like Fux and neither does anyone who has a discerning eye for great physiques.
agreed
the judging criteria doesn't think aesthetics are important :-\
E