Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: The Coach on October 23, 2008, 04:07:28 PM
-
It will go down as the biggest fraudulent and dirtiest victory in the history of our country.
Discuss.
-
hahahahahaha
>:(
youre nuts
-
I was hoping you'd say you would delete your account and/or kill yourself. >:(
-
I was hoping you'd say you would delete your account and/or kill yourself. >:(
same thought process here ! ;D
NT
-
It will go down as the biggest fraudulent and dirtiest victory in the history of our country.
Discuss.
Bigger then the 2000 election?
-
Bigger then the 2000 election?
Not even close...
Apparently Elections are only dirty if a Democrat wins?
???
-
hahahahahaha
>:(
youre nuts
hahahhahahahahaha
He really is an imbecile.... ;D
-
this should be his avatar
(http://ocw.usu.edu/University_Extension/sheep-and-lambing-management/sheep.jpg)
-
It will go down as the biggest fraudulent and dirtiest victory in the history of our country.
Discuss.
considering McSame calls his wife a trollop and a cuunt.
you're probably correct Rush Coach.
NT
-
It sure is sweet to observe the pain Coach is in right now. hahaha
-
It sure is sweet to observe the pain Coach is in right now. hahaha
guy is in pure agony!very desperate are his kind.grasping at straws.
-
It sure is sweet to observe the pain Coach is in right now. hahaha
No pain what so ever. I just don't have "sucker" written across my forehead.
-
It will go down as the biggest fraudulent and dirtiest victory in the history of our country.
Discuss.
Looks like someone wants to overshadow the 2000 and 2004 elections.
Drop dead.
-
No pain what so ever. I just don't have "sucker" written across my forehead.
yea everyone that doesn't agree with your particular views or ideas is a "sucker"....
-
yea everyone that doesn't agree with your particular views or ideas is a "sucker"....
Hahaha...Ironic considering the shit that's said about me on here. Damn, you libs bash me so much you'd think I was Sarah Palin.
-
yea everyone that doesn't agree with your particular views or ideas is a "sucker"....
dude you shouldnt even talk you lump all conservatives into uneducated trash ::) Hey pot meet kettle.
-
Hahaha...Ironic considering the shit that's said about me on here. Damn, you libs bash me so much you'd think I was Sarah Palin.
don't try it you are just a blind sheep of the Republican party.anyone that disagrees with you are suckers.everyone that doesn't agree with your stance in life they are liberal,communist,socialist pigs.There are some other savory characters in history with this type of thinking....real winners might I add.
-
dude you shouldnt even talk you lump all conservatives into uneducated trash ::) Hey pot meet kettle.
not all.just the ultra religious.
-
this should be his avatar
(http://ocw.usu.edu/University_Extension/sheep-and-lambing-management/sheep.jpg)
Ironic. I was thinking that picture fits both Repubs and Obama nuthuggers reasonably well.
-
Not even close...
Apparently Elections are only dirty if a Democrat wins?
???
Apparently so.
-
Ironic. I was thinking that picture fits both Repubs and Obama nuthuggers reasonably well.
I agree.
coach takes it to another level for repubes. he and many others are falling for the right wing propaganda it doesn't help his case.
between these two assholes obama is the better one :( . Lets face it they're both bought and paid for.
if people wanted to make a statement, then no one would vote. :D
-
I agree.
coach takes it to another level for repubes. he and many others are falling for the right wing propaganda it doesn't help his case.
between these two assholes obama is the better one :( . Lets face it they're both bought and paid for.
if people wanted to make a statement, then no one would vote. :D
I was thinking of putting Brad Pitt or Toucan Sam on my ballot. Brad Pitt's a cool dude who's into charity and fruit loops just taste really good, so I'm torn between the two.
-
It will go down as the biggest fraudulent and dirtiest victory in the history of our country.
Discuss.
So weird that he'd get more votes after leading in so many polls like this.
Way different from 2004, huh?
-
Coach are you gonna move from the LA area? ::)
-
Coach are you gonna move from the LA area? ::)
I'm not in the LA area.
-
I'm not in the LA area.
OC right? You are with in the danger for a nuke in the area. are you gonna move?
-
OC right? You are with in the danger for a nuke in the area. are you gonna move?
Nope, when Long Beach harbor gets hit after Obama becomes president and I live through it, I'll just come on here saying "I told you so!"
-
Nope, when Long Beach harbor gets hit after Obama becomes president and I live through it, I'll just come on here saying "I told you so!"
You'd risk your family? that's pretty stupid.
-
You'd risk your family? that's pretty stupid.
You don't sound too confident of Obama if you think I'm risking my family by not moving. Am I supposed to live my life in fear? You live in SF, are you going to move your family?
-
You don't sound too confident of Obama if you think I'm risking my family by not moving. Am I supposed to live my life in fear? You live in SF, are you going to move your family?
I don't buy into the delusion that says if a democrat is president a city will get nuked. If i was that daft, I'd be more afraid of a republican in power because the deadliest attack in US history occurred on with a republican president. And under the repubs our border is still wide open and will be under the dems.
Are you supposed to live your life in fear? I'd think that if you truly believed the BS you've spouted about a nuke if a dem gets into power you'd move. But now it's more than obvious you had ZERO integrity when it came to warning people about that.
You've pasted pictures of a nuke going off in the past as a warning to people about what's going to happen if dems get into power.
If you don't move Coach, it pretty much says you are a __________. I'll let you fill in the blank. ;D
-
I don't buy into the delusion that says if a democrat is president a city will get nuked. If i was that daft, I'd be more afraid of a republican in power because the deadliest attack in US history occurred on with a republican president. And under the repubs our border is still wide open and will be under the dems.
Are you supposed to live your life in fear? I'd think that if you truly believed the BS you've spouted about a nuke if a dem gets into power you'd move. But now it's more than obvious you had ZERO integrity when it came to warning people about that.
You've pasted pictures of a nuke going off in the past as a warning to people about what's going to happen if dems get into power.
If you don't move Coach, it pretty much says you are a __________. I'll let you fill in the blank. ;D
We haven't been hit in 7 years and God knows they have tried and have been stopped. Biden himself said that if elected Obama would be tested (on our soil). Do you actually think for one second that if they tried that with McCain, he wouldn't hesitate for a second to back over there and level the f**k out of the middle east?
-
It will go down as the biggest fraudulent and dirtiest victory in the history of our country.
Discuss.
Seriously, I was thinking the exact same thing
If mccain is declared the winner
-
We haven't been hit in 7 years and God knows they have tried and have been stopped. Biden himself said that if elected Obama would be tested (on our soil). Do you actually think for one second that if they tried that with McCain, he wouldn't hesitate for a second to back over there and level the f**k out of the middle east?
Well do you? If you do, then will you move?
On top of that, a repub president didn't stop them initially.
also, It's not the pres. It the people's outcry. What was the outcry like with 9/11? Imagine what how the world would change if a nuke went off. the ME would be a colony no matter who's pres at the time.
-
the time of conservatives is coming to an end forever, they are wetting their beds at night and stamping their feet in anger. haha
-
No pain what so ever. I just don't have "sucker" written across my forehead.
You will when the commie socialists come after your money. They're comin' for it, ...and they're gonna get it. ;D
-
We haven't been hit in 7 years and God knows they have tried and have been stopped. Biden himself said that if elected Obama would be tested (on our soil). Do you actually think for one second that if they tried that with McCain, he wouldn't hesitate for a second to back over there and level the f**k out of the middle east?
No coach he wouldnt level the f*ck out of the middle east...McCain is not some psychotic maniac whose willing to start world war three. If youd been following the news the terrorist crazy folk said they were planning something REGARDLESS of who got into the whitehouse.
A side note, I love it how you can casually say that its ok to just level the f*ck out of somewhere, you sound like a 16 year old watching his first Iron Eagle film and getting all gung ho...secondly if you dont think that the 2000 vote was the biggest fraud in history your living on a planet far away from this one.
I used to take your posts seriously but I realise now your a completely biased moron
-
You guys are embarrassing yourselves... and me for respecting some of ya'll.
-
I used to take your posts seriously but I realise now your a completely biased moron
What took you so long? :-\
-
What took you so long? :-\
I just got myself a new pair of glasses...probably had something to do with it ;D
-
It will go down as the biggest fraudulent and dirtiest victory in the history of our country.
Discuss.
how can someone spend 160 million on advertising?......why hasent obama given that money to the people...u know speadd the wealth around.....he has outspend john maccain on advertsing 7 to 1...why are all the sudden media outlets being so partisan in the democratic side....weird...i say people are being pay offf everywhere...not the way to win
-
I wouldn't say the dirtiest campaign. Whats difficult to do is separate what is coming from Obama & his camp and what is coming from left wing nuts. I choose to believe (and hope) most of the nasty attacks are from the segment of left wing nutjob supporters.
-
I think the fear many Americans have is with merit. Obama wants to turn this country into another Europe. Socialist, cowardly, unwilling to engage in any prolonged conflict with anyone and would rather be liked by the enemy instead of confronting the enemy. I'm not sure that we get nuked when he takes over. But I will tell you one thing, we will 100% be attacked again on our shores. Put it in the bank.
PS- Oz, saying 911 took place when Bush was in office is very misleading. He had barely hung up his coat in the oval office when we got hit. Most of FBI, NSA, CIA etc. was exactly in tact from the Clinton administration & the scum who attacked the WTC in 1993 began planning for the 2001 attack almost immediately after their first attack was unsucessful. The Clinton administrations idiotic decision to try those responsible for the 1993 attack in a regular civilian court was as much to blame for the 2001 attack as anything else ( Beyond Clinton not taking Bin Laden as a threat seriously, cutting military funding, etc. etc. etc. I could go on forever).
Little known fact: One of the perpatrators of the 1993 attack was caught after going back to the rental car place where he rented the van he used to move the explosives to get back his $50 deposit.
-
I think the fear many Americans have is with merit. Obama wants to turn this country into another Europe. Socialist, cowardly, unwilling to engage in any prolonged conflict with anyone and would rather be liked by the enemy instead of confronting the enemy. I'm not sure that we get nuked when he takes over. But I will tell you one thing, we will 100% be attacked again on our shores. Put it in the bank.
PS- Oz, saying 911 took place when Bush was in office is very misleading. He had barely hung up his coat in the oval office when we got hit. Most of FBI, NSA, CIA etc. was exactly in tact from the Clinton administration & the scum who attacked the WTC in 1993 began planning for the 2001 attack almost immediately after their first attack was unsucessful. The Clinton administrations idiotic decision to try those responsible for the 1993 attack in a regular civilian court was as much to blame for the 2001 attack as anything else ( Beyond Clinton not taking Bin Laden as a threat seriously, cutting military funding, etc. etc. etc. I could go on forever).
Little known fact: One of the perpatrators of the 1993 attack was caught after going back to the rental car place where he rented the van he used to move the explosives to get back his $50 deposit.
Check this out Dick-whad..The reason for our Term System with our Offices is it dosent give time for a entire Governmental Reform Program ie, Democracy to Comunist etc...So even though Bush did try his best to fuck it up, Now someone else can come in and fix it. All this "the sky is falling" bullshit is shit you hear on AM radio...Grow the fuck up you fuckin child. Jesus H christ you say some dumb shit...
-
When Obama wins, are you going to pull your head out of your ass so we can see the tears?
-
I think the fear many Americans have is with merit. Obama wants to turn this country into another Europe. Socialist, cowardly, unwilling to engage in any prolonged conflict with anyone and would rather be liked by the enemy instead of confronting the enemy. I'm not sure that we get nuked when he takes over. But I will tell you one thing, we will 100% be attacked again on our shores. Put it in the bank.
PS- Oz, saying 911 took place when Bush was in office is very misleading. He had barely hung up his coat in the oval office when we got hit. Most of FBI, NSA, CIA etc. was exactly in tact from the Clinton administration & the scum who attacked the WTC in 1993 began planning for the 2001 attack almost immediately after their first attack was unsucessful. The Clinton administrations idiotic decision to try those responsible for the 1993 attack in a regular civilian court was as much to blame for the 2001 attack as anything else ( Beyond Clinton not taking Bin Laden as a threat seriously, cutting military funding, etc. etc. etc. I could go on forever).
Little known fact: One of the perpatrators of the 1993 attack was caught after going back to the rental car place where he rented the van he used to move the explosives to get back his $50 deposit.
Really, it's misleading? September 2001, who had been president elect for 2 months AND full on president for 9 WHOLE months? You nipple whores will stop at nothing to defend your nipple.
It cracks me up how people will use hindsight to justify blame. unbelievable. BTW. I DON NOT blame Bush for 9/11. No one is to blame, we were totally caught by surprise even though there were intelligence reports about the possible attack among the thousands we receive everyday. I only stated that the worse attack in the history of the USA occur on a republican's president's watch. And that it shows flawed logic that a Democratic president will certainly encourage an attack.
-
Ok let me ask you a question. If you were a muslim terrorist organization at war with the world at large and the leader of the most powerful country on earth decided he would (a) Cut defense spending (b) Make sure all trials against captured terrorists would be held in civilian courts (c) Pull out of Iraq asap regardless of whether or not the current government has stabalized the country (d) Favors civil liberties over national security (e) Wants to sit down with the leaders of terror funding Iran, Syria and Palestine controlled Hamas (f) Is strongly favored by the appeasment happy and spineless EU which has done nothing military wise after incidents such as the madrid train bombings[ in fact the response was pulling Spanish soldiers out of Iraq and electing a socialist leader] and on and on and on, wouldn't you be emboldened to move forward with another terrorist attack? Also, consider the fact that the democratic party as a whole is known for being weak on national defense/ national security, would rather do anything except engage in military conflict and wants to be disassociated with the prior party in charge so much that they would rather admit defeat and blame it on the republicans than take affirmative steps to combat terrorism. If I were a terrorist, I would be licking my chops at the prospect of hitting America. Throw in the fact that the economy is in bad shape, and they would be stupid not to hit us when Obama is elected.
-
Ok let me ask you a question. If you were a muslim terrorist organization at war with the world at large and the leader of the most powerful country on earth decided he would (a) Cut defense spending (b) Make sure all trials against captured terrorists would be held in civilian courts (c) Pull out of Iraq asap regardless of whether or not the current government has stabalized the country (d) Favors civil liberties over national security (e) Wants to sit down with the leaders of terror funding Iran, Syria and Palestine controlled Hamas (f) Is strongly favored by the appeasment happy and spineless EU which has done nothing military wise after incidents such as the madrid train bombings[ in fact the response was pulling Spanish soldiers out of Iraq and electing a socialist leader] and on and on and on, wouldn't you be emboldened to move forward with another terrorist attack? Also, consider the fact that the democratic party as a whole is known for being weak on national defense/ national security, would rather do anything except engage in military conflict and wants to be disassociated with the prior party in charge so much that they would rather admit defeat and blame it on the republicans than take affirmative steps to combat terrorism. If I were a terrorist, I would be licking my chops at the prospect of hitting America. Throw in the fact that the economy is in bad shape, and they would be stupid not to hit us when Obama is elected.
a. non issue
b. won't happen 100%
c. not what he said
d. skewed view
e. He should sit down with them
f. So what?
wouldn't you be emboldened to move forward with another terrorist attack?
We are so open for a terrorist attack it isn;t even funny. We are just a vulnerable as we were in 2001. Our borders are wide open and our airports are NOT secure. I've shown this few times here, how with as little as a couple thousand dollars i could shut air travel down for a day or 2, create a nation wide panic and kill a couple hundred. That vulnerability has been open all this time and no attack. And it's not because they are afraid of what America will do, because America has already done what it's gonna do.
Now don't go thinking I'm suggesting there's no threat. My point is, they could have launched another attack all this time and haven't.
Also, consider the fact that the democratic party as a whole is known for being weak on national defense/ national security, would rather do anything except engage in military conflict and wants to be disassociated with the prior party in charge so much that they would rather admit defeat and blame it on the republicans than take affirmative steps to combat terrorism.
That's you bias speaking and a common perception among people who have been manipulated by the republican propaganda machine.
If I were a terrorist, I would be licking my chops at the prospect of hitting America. Throw in the fact that the economy is in bad shape, and they would be stupid not to hit us when Obama is elected.
They are licking there chops now. Hunkered down in a cave.
Also to, Obama strikes me as a cold calculating player. I wouldn't put it past him to over react if something happens to America. Don't confuse him with Carter in this sense.
-
a. non issue
b. won't happen 100%
c. not what he said
d. skewed view
e. He should sit down with them
f. So what?
- Cutting defense is a non issue? How do you think we gather half or our intelligence?-- Im not adressing b,c,d or e because its a matter of my opinion versus yours. As far as F goes this is huge. If the one country that has gone out of its way to combat terrorism and has proactive in preventing terrorism despite world opinion is now going to get in line with the other weaklings and embrace appeasment just because it wants to be popular-- Wouldn't that be a glaring red flag that would encourage another attack?
We are so open for a terrorist attack it isn;t even funny. We are just a vulnerable as we were in 2001. Our borders are wide open and our airports are NOT secure. I've shown this few times here, how with as little as a couple thousand dollars i could shut air travel down for a day or 2, create a nation wide panic and kill a couple hundred. That vulnerability has been open all this time and no attack. And it's not because they are afraid of what America will do, because America has already done what it's gonna do.
We are nowhere nearly as vulnerable as we were in 2001. How many plots have been foiled both nationally and globally since 2001? While I agree our borders are not safe, our airport security is definetly better and law enforcment on both a state, local and federal level is way more aware of whats going on. Things aren't perfect, but we are definetly safer now.
Now don't go thinking I'm suggesting there's no threat. My point is, they could have launched another attack all this time and haven't.-- I disagree
That's you bias speaking and a common perception among people who have been manipulated by the republican propaganda machine.-- I also disagree, look at the democratic presedential record on foreign policy & look at the way democratic Senators and Congressmen vote-- There is no bias in that at all. They are licking there chops now. Hunkered down in a cave.- LOL every islamic terrorist and their supporters are hunkered down in a cave? I also suppose they have no resources, no technology and no support from anyone I assume?
Also to, Obama strikes me as a cold calculating player. I wouldn't put it past him to over react if something happens to America. Don't confuse him with Carter in this sense.
LOL I hope your right, but based on what he has shown so far, that argument is difficult to make. He's a far left Carter clone.
-
When Obama wins, are you going to pull your head out of your ass so we can see the tears?
Classic!!!
-
this should be his avatar
(http://ocw.usu.edu/University_Extension/sheep-and-lambing-management/sheep.jpg)
Hey, that's a nice Dorset you have there....
-
LOL I hope your right, but based on what he has shown so far, that argument is difficult to make. He's a far left Carter clone.
If we are not as vulnerable then why are our airports so easily open for attack right now? You would throw up to know how easy it is.
Cutting defense doesn't necessarily mean cutting the things that help us fight terrorism.
F. alarmist.
I also disagree, look at the democratic presedential record on foreign policy & look at the way democratic Senators and Congressmen vote-- There is no bias in that at all.
Whose Carter's or Clinton's?
They voted for the Iraq war, and voted to end it because they ran on that ticket. They knew it wouldn't pass as BUSH would surely veto it.
LOL every islamic terrorist and their supporters are hunkered down in a cave? I also suppose they have no resources, no technology and no support from anyone I assume?
If they had what you feared they'd have attacked us again long ago. You can breach the borders of America with ease. You can commitment attacks on Airports with ease. Do you deny my assertion?
-
So your contention is that we are vulnerable for attack but the terrorists out of the goodness of their hearts decided not to take advantage of these vulnerabilities for more than seven years? That makes absolutely no sense unless (and god forbid) we are doing something right in combating terrorism or you are under the impression that the terrorists dont have the means to attack us which contradicts your earlier point.
-
So your contention is that we are vulnerable for attack but the terrorists out of the goodness of their hearts decided not to take advantage of these vulnerabilities for more than seven years? That makes absolutely no sense unless (and god forbid) we are doing something right in combating terrorism or you are under the impression that the terrorists dont have the means to attack us which contradicts your earlier point.
lol where do you get that? NO. I'll say it again NO.
Due to our efforts internationally and militarily, the fact we haven't had a attack domestically, and the fact that an attack is VERY easy to pull off here, it suggests they don't have the capability to launch one. And don't take that to mean i think we should let our guard down. We need to seal our borders.
-
Agreed.
Ozmo knows is shit.