Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Boost on November 04, 2008, 12:54:53 PM
-
Has the change in photo style warped our sense of conditioning?
On the left : Origional Flex online pic
On the right : 90's style pic that gives the illusion of better conditioning
(http://i400.photobucket.com/albums/pp83/wolf757_photo/_MG_1720.jpg?t=1225832054)
-
Has the change in photo style warped our sense of conditioning?
On the left : Origional Flex online pic
On the right : 90's style pic that gives the illusion of better conditioning
(http://i400.photobucket.com/albums/pp83/wolf757_photo/_MG_1720.jpg?t=1225832054)
i always said that
-
It certainly helps.
-
Here is another interesting comparison,
Hell, even Jay looks grainy in this pic!
The Flex Online pics really are garbage
(http://i400.photobucket.com/albums/pp83/wolf757_photo/o.jpg?t=1225832597)
-
That's a good point. I also think if you put some of the guys from 70's on a stage with the 00's lighting, they'd all look horribly out of shape as far as bodybuilders are concerned.
-
Here is another interesting comparison,
Hell, even Jay looks grainy in this pic!
These Flex Online pics really are garbage
(http://i400.photobucket.com/albums/pp83/wolf757_photo/o.jpg?t=1225832597)
All lighting, angles and picture quality.
Flexonline pictures are awful, Muscletime's are much better.
-
shapen filter
-
(http://i29.tinypic.com/28rcv9f.jpg)
-
Very interesting.
This is why graininess is not a (completely) valid reason to judge condition by, whereas separation shows in almost any light. In the shot above, Wheeler and Ray would have those lat and spinal erector striations and separation even under today's lighting conditions, as evident in the Silvio S.S. comparison.