Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Hugo Chavez on November 08, 2008, 08:13:23 PM
-
How would you fellow conservatives feel about the establishment of an order of knighthood, not as some 'forum game', but in REALITY:
for the purpose of defending the nation from tyranny
and to defend the US Constitution from ruin and damage brought on by the marxists?
Yes, the idea is radical.
if you don't have a legitimate comment, don't reply.
oh, and such an Order would not be opposed to US law, as far as the constitution goes
http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=1140391
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahah ahaha... now they're worried about the constitution lol...
-
Jesus Christ was found GUILTY like AK Sen. Ted Stevens.
They both had bogus trials with FALSE accusations.
No one stood up for CHRIST, will WE do the same for STEVENS?
GOD Bless Sen. Ted Stevens and pray for his attackers
http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=1076351
BWhahahahahahaha Christ=Ted Stevens lololololol
-
Who are you quoting? Just some anonymous posters from another board?
-
Who are you quoting? Just some anonymous posters from another board?
yea, I've been having fun with some of the comments I'm reading... LOL at the guy that wants to form a knighthood to defend the constitution.
-
yea, I've been having fun with some of the comments I'm reading... LOL at the guy that wants to form a knighthood to defend the constitution.
Why bring their comments here though? There are millions of retards posting on the internet, take mattT for example. Why not argue with them over there? If we all started doing this, the whole board would be nothing but quotes from dorks from other sites with no chances for rebuttals, it kills the flow of a messageboard.
-
Imagine if some of those posters came here, they'd have a field day.
BTW, have you ever checked some of the wackjobs over at Huffington?
-
Imagine if some of those posters came here, they'd have a field day.
BTW, have you ever checked some of the wackjobs over at Huffington?
How many forums do you guys post at? I agree with both of you, there are idiots who post on the internet, like mattT for example. Just don't see the relevance here, oh well.
-
Why bring their comments here though? There are millions of retards posting on the internet, take mattT for example. Why not argue with them over there? If we all started doing this, the whole board would be nothing but quotes from dorks from other sites with no chances for rebuttals, it kills the flow of a messageboard.
Why not? Because I didn't feel like it :) the forum is flowing just fine.
-
I see no problem with doing this. It's not like that's all I do. I just got a kick out of the reactions from Hannity's listeners and wanted to share. Can't fathom there is a beef with that. The other thread I did this in went fine. plus I don't want to debate guys that say things like this, this is laughing material for me ;D
-
I see no problem with doing this. It's not like that's all I do. I just got a kick out of the reactions from Hannity's listeners and wanted to share. Can't fathom there is a beef with that. The other thread I did this in went fine.
Not saying there should be a rule against it, just saying that we can all agree there are idiots posting on the internet, take mattT for example. It just works better when you quote someone from here is all.
-
I made two posts over at Huffington long ago and got kicked off because they couldn't handle the truth.
-
Not saying there should be a rule against it, just saying that we can all agree there are idiots posting on the internet, take mattT for example. It just works better when you quote someone from here is all.
nobody here launched into these kind of panics over the Obama win, in the other thread, they were calling for civil war lol.. I was curious how Hannity supporters would handle this being that Hannity was the biggest neoconservative mouthpiece on the air. I have no problem with bringing lol material I read here for others to laugh at. again, this isn't like a constant thing. I could understand your bitch if all I did was quote other boards. Hell do they not do it all the time in Gossip? How many times have I seen outrageous stuff quoted from one board to another, happens quite a bit. You have my word it won't become habitual for me ;D
-
I made two posts over at Huffington long ago and got kicked off because they couldn't handle the truth.
yea, that's why it would be pointless to go at these guys on Hannity. They ban you really fast over there.
Maybe we could start board wars :D
-
yea, that's why it would be pointless to go at these guys on Hannity. They ban you really fast over there.
Maybe we could start board wars :D
I got banned on one post. Wasn't anything, really. No profanity. Said something like, "Bush wasted Clinton's surplus very fast after getting into office". Banned
It's still funny just to read that forum, though.
-
I got banned on one post. Wasn't anything, really. No profanity. Said something like, "Bush wasted Clinton's surplus very fast after getting into office". Banned
It's still funny just to read that forum, though.
lol, that is fast and it happens all the time over there. You have to be very nice if you lean left, but if you're a righty, you can talk about starting civil wars in America lol
-
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahahahaha... now they're worried about the constitution lol...
You just made my day LMAO....
The pat act came out and they couldn't stop defending it.
Now they give a shit.
Idiots.
-
I made two posts over at Huffington long ago and got kicked off because they couldn't handle the truth.
Which two RUSH transcripts did you repost there?
-
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahahahaha... now they're worried about the constitution lol...
When people start talking like that Waco and militia's come to mind.
Which two RUSH transcripts did you repost there?
;D!
-
Not for nothing, but if Limbaugh, Hannity and O'Reilly is the best the Irish community can come up with, we ought to deport them back to Potatoland.
What a fucking idealistic wasteland.
-
Invite the Knights Gayplar here. We need some new retards, you guys are getting boring. :)
-
Some interesting stuff there. I am presently reading all why only rich people should be allowed to vote ???
Obviously, they miss the fact that upper income and higher educated people split for Obama.
Wouldn't knocking out the trailer park crowd be messing with their base?
-
Some interesting stuff there. I am presently reading all why only rich people should be allowed to vote ???
Obviously, they miss the fact that upper income and higher educated people split for Obama.
Wouldn't knocking out the trailer park crowd be messing with their base?
yup, lucky for them there isn't a mental competency test to vote :D
-
Some interesting stuff there. I am presently reading all why only rich people should be allowed to vote ???[...]
That was the intention of the framers of the Constitution, aka "Founding Fathers". They wanted only the rich to be able to vote and the remaining population to work for a living.
It's interesting how the British point of view has ALWAYS been taken out of the equation and not excluded from any historical talk about our country's beginnings. I actually saw a BBC documentary about the war of independence and some of the things the Brits were talking about would make Americans look at the "Founding Fathers" very differently.
-
Having read that forum for a while now, I can conclude that some of those folks will end up holed in a compound with 4361872498324692 guns and we'll end up watching it conclude on CNN :-\
-
Having read that forum for a while now, I can conclude that some of those folks will end up holed in a compound with 4361872498324692 guns and we'll end up watching it conclude on CNN :-\
Did you find that thread calling for Civil War as the only viable option lol?
-
I made two posts over at Huffington long ago and got kicked off because they couldn't handle the truth.
I was kicked off of free republic after 8 posts. I guess conservatives are just more tolerant.
-
That was the intention of the framers of the Constitution, aka "Founding Fathers". They wanted only the rich to be able to vote and the remaining population to work for a living.
Not exactly. The original intent of the electoral college wsa to prevent people from only voting locally. It's a moot point with television and internet nowadays, but at the time it would have been unlikely for someone in one part of the country to know a whole lot about a candidate from another patt.
It's interesting how the British point of view has ALWAYS been taken out of the equation and not excluded from any historical talk about our country's beginnings. I actually saw a BBC documentary about the war of independence and some of the things the Brits were talking about would make Americans look at the "Founding Fathers" very differently.
TAlk on this.