Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Danimal77 on December 12, 2008, 05:04:40 PM

Title: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
Post by: Danimal77 on December 12, 2008, 05:04:40 PM
Just watched his 1997 posing routine and I wonder if he was overlooked that year? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=YHiiLBTaRCw&feature=related
Title: Re: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
Post by: Danimal77 on December 12, 2008, 05:07:34 PM
Now just for fun, here he was at the 1994 Mr. Olympia: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=G4xxXSY7fGc&feature=related  :-X
Title: Re: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
Post by: Wiggs on December 12, 2008, 06:02:55 PM
Now just for fun, here he was at the 1994 Mr. Olympia: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=G4xxXSY7fGc&feature=related  :-X

I almost threw up in my mouth on that black stripper dancing.
Title: Re: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 06:06:32 PM


He was 255 pounds in 1997
Title: Re: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
Post by: tbombz on December 12, 2008, 06:11:10 PM
1:38-1:45

most beautiful lats
Title: Re: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
Post by: JimmyJam1974 on December 12, 2008, 07:03:55 PM
Photo Shopped
Title: Re: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
Post by: Danimal77 on December 12, 2008, 10:22:51 PM


He was 255 pounds in 1997

That didn't answer my question though. Was he really that far from the mark? Meaning: Was he overlooked in 1997 and if so, why? I personally see him being a little soft (water retention) and he had the beginning stages of gyno. He clearly raised the dosage in around 1996 when he started competing at over 250 pounds.
Title: Re: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
Post by: England_1 on December 12, 2008, 10:24:57 PM
Coleman, delusional as always. "I'm a lot sharper with more detail" lmfao....he was better in 96.