Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => Steroids Info & Hardcore => Topic started by: theworm on December 14, 2008, 04:20:28 PM

Title: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: theworm on December 14, 2008, 04:20:28 PM
test only cycles. 500 a week x14 weeks with finasteride and nolva!   no need to add anything else for solid gains in the long run.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: 4thAD on December 14, 2008, 05:06:39 PM
How many times you gonna post this topic Worm?
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: benz on December 14, 2008, 05:40:49 PM
How many times you gonna post this topic Worm?

not sure if this guy is stupid or not, but he seems to ask the same every 2 weeks, allways about test, gyno, must be stupid i guess. Stick it for him :(
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: elite_lifter on December 14, 2008, 07:38:54 PM
not sure if this guy is stupid or not, but he seems to ask the same every 2 weeks, allways about test, gyno, must be stupid i guess. Stick it for him :(
;D, true, starting to think the guy is a narc.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: WillGrant on December 14, 2008, 08:31:15 PM
not sure if this guy is stupid or not, but he seems to ask the same every 2 weeks, allways about test, gyno, must be stupid i guess. Stick it for him :(
He posts these same questions on other boards also..guy is strange or just stupid  ???
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: jon cole on December 15, 2008, 12:26:39 AM
3 month is not enough, i recommend a 12 years cycle and two weeks off.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: WillGrant on December 15, 2008, 12:27:51 AM
3 month is not enough, i recommend a 12 years cycle and two weeks off.
;D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: io856 on December 15, 2008, 12:30:20 AM
the guy is so paranoid and fiddles around with "HRT" I wonder what goes on in that head...

Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Luv2Hurt on December 15, 2008, 06:56:32 AM
the guy is so paranoid and fiddles around with "HRT" I wonder what goes on in that head...



Yeah worm seems to be a bit paranoid that is for sure.  Just take the juice already, my God its supposed to be fun.  If your damn hair is gonna fall out it is gonna fall out, if your gonna get zits your gonna get zits.  Dude takes more or considers taking more shit to combat imagined side effects than actual gear.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: theworm on December 16, 2008, 03:19:33 PM
paranoya.

but seriously, why mess with all that other shit?  deca, winny, etc?  if you do not plan on competing, then test is all you need, and its safer.  just my 2 cents.

i do not think we know what progestins do in the male body (i.e from deca, etc..)
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Rimbaud on December 16, 2008, 03:36:32 PM
Come on worm...we know you're a little paranoid...but then again that's why we love you.  ;)
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 16, 2008, 03:54:17 PM
I did a test propionate only cycle for 6 week this summer

went from 190 to 243 in 4 weeks  ;D
major bloat but then, it was post contest

amazing strenght increase tho
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Emmortal on December 16, 2008, 04:00:30 PM
I did a test propionate only cycle for 6 week this summer

went from 190 to 243 in 4 weeks  ;D
major bloat but then, it was post contest

amazing strenght increase tho

How many boxes of donuts were you going through a day?
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: jtsunami on December 16, 2008, 04:02:22 PM
How many boxes of donuts were you going through a day?

sounds more like a question for Alex23 lol

Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: 4thAD on December 16, 2008, 04:06:27 PM
I did a test propionate only cycle for 6 week this summer

went from 190 to 243 in 4 weeks  ;D
major bloat but then, it was post contest

amazing strenght increase tho

WTF 53#'s in 4 weeks?
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Emmortal on December 16, 2008, 04:10:13 PM
WTF 53#'s in 4 weeks?

Not uncommon post contest.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: DIVISION on December 16, 2008, 04:30:55 PM
test only cycles. 500 a week x14 weeks with finasteride and nolva!   no need to add anything else for solid gains in the long run.

It's a simple cycle and very low sides......



DIV
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 16, 2008, 06:27:27 PM
How many boxes of donuts were you going through a day?

I didn't ate that much junk that's the funny part.
but I ate a SHITLOAD of carbs.

they have those huge home-made familial size lazagna at my super market, I ate 3 of those a day plus a lot of bread in the morning + lot of lean ground beef

I looked my best ever at 243 since I was fuckin swollen and I didn't really have the time to put on that much fat yet.

now, Add another 6 weeks to that and I was 230 and didn't see my abs very well anymore (12.5% bf)
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: DIVISION on December 16, 2008, 06:31:25 PM
I didn't ate that much junk that's the funny part.
but I ate a SHITLOAD of carbs.

they have those huge home-made familial size lazagna at my super market, I ate 3 of those a day plus a lot of bread in the morning + lot of lean ground beef

I looked my best ever at 243 since I was fuckin swollen and I didn't really have the time to put on that much fat yet.

now, Add another 6 weeks to that and I was 230 and didn't see my abs very well anymore (12.5% bf)

It might be time for you to go on a bulker.   :-\


DIV
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: tbombz on December 16, 2008, 06:31:51 PM
paranoya.

but seriously, why mess with all that other shit?  deca, winny, etc?  if you do not plan on competing, then test is all you need, and its safer.  just my 2 cents.

i do not think we know what progestins do in the male body (i.e from deca, etc..)
we dont know what extra test does either, really
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 16, 2008, 06:40:13 PM
It might be time for you to go on a bulker.   :-\


DIV

you think I am skinny ?  :'(
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: theworm on December 16, 2008, 08:48:13 PM
we dont know what extra test does either, really

yeah, but at least test is a naturally occurring hormone in the male body.  and 500 per week is not an enourmous amount of suprapysiological test.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: tbombz on December 17, 2008, 12:04:42 AM
yeah, but at least test is a naturally occurring hormone in the male body.  and 500 per week is not an enourmous amount of suprapysiological test.
well its easily 5-7 times the normal amount, plus by increasing test your also increasing gh which means your increasing igf-1. igf-1 we already know will probably shorten lifespan.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Luv2Hurt on December 17, 2008, 06:54:18 AM
well its easily 5-7 times the normal amount, plus by increasing test your also increasing gh which means your increasing igf-1. igf-1 we already know will probably shorten lifespan.

Awhh hell now you really got his head spinning   ;D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Emmortal on December 17, 2008, 10:47:08 AM
well its easily 5-7 times the normal amount, plus by increasing test your also increasing gh which means your increasing igf-1. igf-1 we already know will probably shorten lifespan.

Drinking soy milk increases IGF-1 levels by 40 some odd percent as well.  All those vegans thinking they're going to live a long life, oh boy do they have a big surprise coming!
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: tbombz on December 17, 2008, 11:37:30 AM
Drinking soy milk increases IGF-1 levels by 40 some odd percent as well.  All those vegans thinking they're going to live a long life, oh boy do they have a big surprise coming!
oh snap im gonna go get some soy milk !  ;D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: theworm on December 17, 2008, 02:15:36 PM
Awhh hell now you really got his head spinning   ;D

I will be fine.  i limit myself to 2 cycles per year... only 2, 12 week cycles.  so hopefully there are minimal health side effects.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: tstmaniac on December 17, 2008, 02:46:09 PM
2 cycles per year aint badd...i like doing one big one for like 16 to 20 weeks..i cant wait until may when i can load up the damnn syringe again.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: tbombz on December 17, 2008, 02:49:11 PM
if i wanted to live as long as possible and be as healthy as possible, i would never come within a  million miles of steroids, even testosterone.  maybe at the age of 70 or over, would i then use a tiny little bit, but only a maximum of 100mg per week.

Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Luv2Hurt on December 17, 2008, 03:11:06 PM
if i wanted to live as long as possible and be as healthy as possible, i would never come within a  million miles of steroids, even testosterone.  maybe at the age of 70 or over, would i then use a tiny little bit, but only a maximum of 100mg per week.



This is true a healthy male is better off not touching them for overall health.  Juice causes all kinds of things to happen some good, some not so good and if your shit is fine then really no reason to take them, unless you want to get pretty big maybe. 
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: elite_lifter on December 17, 2008, 03:14:17 PM
I will be fine.  i limit myself to 2 cycles per year... only 2, 12 week cycles.  so hopefully there are minimal health side effects.
Are you joking, .5636737783 cycles a yr. and you will die of cancer, FACT!!!!!
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: tstmaniac on December 17, 2008, 03:17:44 PM
This is true a healthy male is better off not touching them for overall health.  Juice causes all kinds of things to happen some good, some not so good and if your shit is fine then really no reason to take them, unless you want to get pretty big maybe. 

i get blood work done all the time and im still healthy from cycling juice..
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: theworm on December 17, 2008, 05:20:50 PM
true, test may not be healthy in the long run, but i think 2 small cycles a year will add mass, decease a little body fat.  Not only will that make you look good, but also other positive things can come from it, such as a reduced risk a diabetes (one of the main killers in the world). 

if test does any harmful things, it most likely interefers with cardio health by lowering HDL.  But one can increase aerobic excersise and possibly take nolva with the test.  (novla increases HLD, arimidex lowers HDL). 

so in all, i really do not see any major side effects from 2 small cycles, and maybe even more health benefits than anything else.  plus, who the hell wants to be 150 pounds?  that may be worth 5-6 years off the lifespan.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: tbombz on December 17, 2008, 10:41:34 PM
plus, who the hell wants to be 150 pounds?  that may be worth 5-6 years off the lifespan.
that general idea, is my general sentiment.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: dustin on December 18, 2008, 12:51:22 AM
Drinking soy milk increases IGF-1 levels by 40 some odd percent as well.  All those vegans thinking they're going to live a long life, oh boy do they have a big surprise coming!

Life extensionists will be turning in their graves when they become aware of this factoid!!!!!!!!! :o ;D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on December 18, 2008, 12:58:31 AM
I did a test propionate only cycle for 6 week this summer

went from 190 to 243 in 4 weeks  ;D
major bloat but then, it was post contest

amazing strenght increase tho

Bullshit. 
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: 4thAD on December 18, 2008, 08:33:00 AM
Are you joking, .5636737783 cycles a yr. and you will die of cancer, FACT!!!!!

Your joking right?
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Luv2Hurt on December 18, 2008, 08:42:04 AM
Your joking right?

LOL I think maybe this has turned into "mess with worm's head" thread. 
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 18, 2008, 10:47:32 AM
Bullshit. 

it was with a water rebound from a contest, if you think that's bullshit you clearly don't know shit about bodybuilding. it's very common
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: dustin on December 18, 2008, 02:33:30 PM
it was with a water rebound from a contest, if you think that's bullshit you clearly don't know shit about bodybuilding. it's very common

Even for naturals it's nothing outlandish. I don't know why MMM is being a dick and calling you out on it.

One point I'd like to raise though is that I personally don't think that's very safe at all. I don't mean to be the proverbial pot calling the kettle black or anything, but steroids are enough of a cardiovascular risk as it is. I don't let myself blow up more than 10lbs over the course of a couple of months. If I were being liberal - 10lbs in a month if I were coming off a hard diet or contest diet.

I tend to play things on the safe side. Blood work always comes back fine in my case and not everyone runs into heart issues, but it's nothing that anyone should take lightly. I've heard pros even saying it's pretty dangerous to let yourself explode after a contest. Taking advantage of contest dieting and rebounding is one thing but holding that much water in a short period of time is a shocking and foreign phenomenon I wouldn't ever put my body through. I don't mean to sound elitist though. A couple of friends have gained 30lbs in a month (retaining abs and little distension around the midsection) after a contest. It's pretty fucking cool to be honest, but freaky lol :o
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: theworm on December 18, 2008, 06:04:34 PM
that general idea, is my general sentiment.

yeah, but i don;t think test (2 small cycles per year) will decrease life span that much, maybe a year.

what will decrease life span is mainly eating more.

mice starved their whole life end up living twice as long. 

I would rather loose 5 years and be 240 pounds!
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Emmortal on December 18, 2008, 06:07:13 PM
yeah, but i don;t think test (2 small cycles per year) will decrease life span that much, maybe a year.

what will decrease life span is mainly eating more.

mice starved their whole life end up living twice as long. 

I would rather loose 5 years and be 240 pounds!

A few cycles a year won't shorten your lifespan any more than a bitchy girlfriend would.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: tbombz on December 18, 2008, 06:14:07 PM
Even for naturals it's nothing outlandish. I don't know why MMM is being a dick and calling you out on it.

One point I'd like to raise though is that I personally don't think that's very safe at all. I don't mean to be the proverbial pot calling the kettle black or anything, but steroids are enough of a cardiovascular risk as it is. I don't let myself blow up more than 10lbs over the course of a couple of months. If I were being liberal - 10lbs in a month if I were coming off a hard diet or contest diet.

I tend to play things on the safe side. Blood work always comes back fine in my case and not everyone runs into heart issues, but it's nothing that anyone should take lightly. I've heard pros even saying it's pretty dangerous to let yourself explode after a contest. Taking advantage of contest dieting and rebounding is one thing but holding that much water in a short period of time is a shocking and foreign phenomenon I wouldn't ever put my body through. I don't mean to sound elitist though. A couple of friends have gained 30lbs in a month (retaining abs and little distension around the midsection) after a contest. It's pretty fucking cool to be honest, but freaky lol :o
i got this theory that the reason you explode after a diet is caus the low bloog sgar associated with lipolysis is also correlated with gh release(sort of a metabolic hormone with opposite effects of insulin)..which is directly correlated to igf-1 production... igf1 creates new muscle cells (hyperplasia not hypertophy)....so even though while your dieting your not gaining a net lb of muscle ..you still are going to finish your diet with a large net gain in muscles cells.......and now when you start to overeat a bit and keep your body in a fed state then growth willbe all the more rapid
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: 4thAD on December 18, 2008, 06:16:56 PM
A few cycles a year won't shorten your lifespan any more than a bitchy girlfriend would.

Thats the damned truth. I think the girlfriend will shorten it more. ;D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 18, 2008, 06:18:41 PM
Even for naturals it's nothing outlandish. I don't know why MMM is being a dick and calling you out on it.

One point I'd like to raise though is that I personally don't think that's very safe at all. I don't mean to be the proverbial pot calling the kettle black or anything, but steroids are enough of a cardiovascular risk as it is. I don't let myself blow up more than 10lbs over the course of a couple of months. If I were being liberal - 10lbs in a month if I were coming off a hard diet or contest diet.

I tend to play things on the safe side. Blood work always comes back fine in my case and not everyone runs into heart issues, but it's nothing that anyone should take lightly. I've heard pros even saying it's pretty dangerous to let yourself explode after a contest. Taking advantage of contest dieting and rebounding is one thing but holding that much water in a short period of time is a shocking and foreign phenomenon I wouldn't ever put my body through. I don't mean to sound elitist though. A couple of friends have gained 30lbs in a month (retaining abs and little distension around the midsection) after a contest. It's pretty fucking cool to be honest, but freaky lol :o

I completely agree man ! It was the last time I went overboard with the rebound, I went a little overboard  ;D
I looked huge but I was having trouble walking cause the back pump was so horrible  :-X
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on December 18, 2008, 07:45:53 PM
it was with a water rebound from a contest, if you think that's bullshit you clearly don't know shit about bodybuilding. it's very common

If you think you gained 40lbs of water in 4 weeks without ending up in a hospital you know nothing about human physiology.  You might have gained a lot of water which is normal post contest but it wasn't 40lbs genius. 
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: elite_lifter on December 18, 2008, 08:24:39 PM
LOL I think maybe this has turned into "mess with worm's head" thread. 
;D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: dustin on December 19, 2008, 12:52:27 PM
If you think you gained 40lbs of water in 4 weeks without ending up in a hospital you know nothing about human physiology.  You might have gained a lot of water which is normal post contest but it wasn't 40lbs genius. 

MMM, where did Stavios proclaim that he gained a solid 40lbs of nothing but earth shattering, panty dropping sheaths of muscle???? You've been a bit of a dick lately... maybe you need to lay off the sauce.  :-\
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 19, 2008, 01:14:51 PM
If you think you gained 40lbs of water in 4 weeks without ending up in a hospital you know nothing about human physiology.  You might have gained a lot of water which is normal post contest but it wasn't 40lbs genius. 

fat plus water plus 1-2 pounds of muscle, yes those were the gains I made "genius".
if you don't believe me I don't give a shit
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 19, 2008, 01:38:05 PM
check this out guys !
Stavios's face at 240 lbs  ;D

 :-X

my face was so swollen that my eyes were disapearing under my cheeks
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Luv2Hurt on December 19, 2008, 02:38:29 PM
check this out guys !
Stavios's face at 240 lbs  ;D

 :-X

my face was so swollen that my eyes were disapearing under my cheeks

Thats a good offseason look, its the holidays, I say after the first start thinking about what you eat.  With that said I may even have a drink or 2 tonight.  ;D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 19, 2008, 03:01:15 PM
Thats a good offseason look, its the holidays, I say after the first start thinking about what you eat.  With that said I may even have a drink or 2 tonight.  ;D

yeah that's the plan !
I am doing a mini diet for 1 month before going back "On" in january to bulk for a few weeks.

after that, around mid-april I'll start dieting again as I will be:

10 weeks out from the beach !!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stacker21 on December 19, 2008, 03:43:47 PM
I would just open the bottle and swallow all of it, then put water in and shake it up to make sure you get it all.  I may go as far as snorting the test ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: jtsunami on December 19, 2008, 04:55:16 PM
Stavios you are looking good, I would love to slid up in between the sheets with you.  But did the person who waxed your eyebrows only do one side?

jt
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 19, 2008, 05:51:17 PM
Stavios you are looking good, I would love to slid up in between the sheets with you.  But did the person who waxed your eyebrows only do one side?

jt

lmao !
no I did it alone, I fucked it up  ;D

lesson learned, leave the chick jobs to the chicks  ;D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: dustin on December 19, 2008, 06:06:46 PM
I know that damn near no one here will admit it, but I'd say at least half of all fellas out there have fucked up plucking, shaving or waxing their eyebrows lmao ;D

I've admittedly fucked mine up pretty good. I just shave my uni a little bit so it's not too brutally cavemen-esque. I just make sure they remain manly yet clean.

lmao !
no I did it alone, I fucked it up  ;D

lesson learned, leave the chick jobs to the chicks  ;D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Emmortal on December 19, 2008, 06:10:45 PM
I know that damn near no one here will admit it, but I'd say at least half of all fellas out there have fucked up plucking, shaving or waxing their eyebrows lmao ;D

I've admittedly fucked mine up pretty good. I just shave my uni a little bit so it's not too brutally cavemen-esque. I just make sure they remain manly yet clean.


I just have my stylist trim them for me =)
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: tbombz on December 19, 2008, 06:24:25 PM
i used to trim my brows with a bic razor right down the middle..looked like stavy's... however i had a few women tell me it was obvious i was using a razor like i was ..so now ill use tweezers and pluck..  8)
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: WillGrant on December 19, 2008, 07:18:04 PM
Stavios you are looking good, I would love to slid up in between the sheets with you.  But did the person who waxed your eyebrows only do one side?

jt
:-X
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: jtsunami on December 19, 2008, 07:30:27 PM
lmao !
no I did it alone, I fucked it up  ;D

lesson learned, leave the chick jobs to the chicks  ;D

understood.

jt
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: dustin on December 19, 2008, 10:57:05 PM
i used to trim my brows with a bic razor right down the middle..looked like stavy's... however i had a few women tell me it was obvious i was using a razor like i was ..so now ill use tweezers and pluck..  8)

I have steady hands. I can use a razor for my uni and get away with it pretty well. Any time I take a tweezer to that shit I don't want to stop. Makes my eye brows get really irritated too. Unless it's caveman style, best not to touch em!! :-X
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 20, 2008, 09:17:41 AM
i used to trim my brows with a bic razor right down the middle..looked like stavy's... however i had a few women tell me it was obvious i was using a razor like i was ..so now ill use tweezers and pluck..  8)
I know it's apparent on the picture but no one noticed  ;D
good for me
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: tbombz on December 20, 2008, 09:36:05 AM
I know it's apparent on the picture but no one noticed  ;D
good for me
lol.

delts and chest looking SWOLE in that picture
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 20, 2008, 09:38:23 AM
lol.

delts and chest looking SWOLE in that picture

thanks man !
they were  :'(

In Feb comes the juice train again !!!!!!!
chouuuuuuuu chooooooou  8)
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: tbombz on December 20, 2008, 09:42:27 AM
thanks man !
they were  :'(

In Feb comes the juice train again !!!!!!!
chouuuuuuuu chooooooou  8)
hahahhahah  ;D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: StillTippin on December 20, 2008, 10:34:03 AM
thanks man !
they were  :'(

In Feb comes the juice train again !!!!!!!
chouuuuuuuu chooooooou  8)

I thought you said in another thread a few weeks ago that you were going back on in December?

Don't be a pussy Stav, do it.   :D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 20, 2008, 10:42:52 AM
I thought you said in another thread a few weeks ago that you were going back on in December?

Don't be a pussy Stav, do it.   :D

Yeah but my grandfather was having serious money problems so I lended (or lowned ? I don't know what the right word is) him 6k  :-\
my muscles can wait a month or 2  :)
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: StillTippin on December 20, 2008, 10:51:12 AM
Yeah but my grandfather was having serious money problems so I lended him 6k  :-\

my muscles can wait a month or 2  :)

Wow.  Don't think you could have a better excuse than that.

Although as a bodybuilder you should really be mooching off of him and anyone else.  You've got it all backward my friend.   ;D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 20, 2008, 10:54:47 AM
haha I know !
It sucked but that was the right thing to do. Or else my mom would have gaved him some $ and she isn't very rich herself so I prefer if she keeps her hard earned money for herself.

so 6k PLUS all the fucking Christmas gifts (I don't want to count how much I spent with that  :-\), it didn't leave me much for the cycle  ;D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: tbombz on December 20, 2008, 11:13:51 AM
Yeah but my grandfather was having serious money problems so I lended (or lowned ? I don't know what the right word is) him 6k  :-\
my muscles can wait a month or 2  :)
wow stav thats a great thing to do
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Cleanest Natural on December 23, 2008, 10:58:25 AM
cheapest best cycle would be dbol only at 500 mg /week plus
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 23, 2008, 11:00:09 AM
cheapest best cycle would be dbol only at 500 mg /week plus

but you said yourself that it mostely gave you bloat when you used 100 mg a day ?

did you have a clean diet ?
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Cleanest Natural on December 31, 2008, 01:25:38 AM
but you said yourself that it mostely gave you bloat when you used 100 mg a day ?

did you have a clean diet ?
not necesarily

never said such thing

dbol = muscle + some bloat...

dbol is the best thing ever for gaining muscle...
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: JasonH on December 31, 2008, 05:22:55 AM
not necesarily

never said such thing

dbol = muscle + some bloat...

dbol is the best thing ever for gaining muscle...

Test is better IMO - that's probably going to be my next cycle - 900mg test a week for 15 weeks. I wouldn't go back to Dbol - you lose eveything you've gained.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on December 31, 2008, 06:38:15 AM
Test is better IMO - that's probably going to be my next cycle - 900mg test a week for 15 weeks. I wouldn't go back to Dbol - you lose eveything you've gained.

it's gonna be the same with every drug IMO
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Cleanest Natural on December 31, 2008, 06:48:45 AM
it's gonna be the same with every drug IMO
;)
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: jtsunami on December 31, 2008, 07:02:59 AM
yeah proof, just ask the twink above  ;)

Test is better IMO - that's probably going to be my next cycle - 900mg test a week for 15 weeks. I wouldn't go back to Dbol - you lose eveything you've gained.

why exaclty 900mg, what is your test dosed at? 

jt
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: JasonH on January 01, 2009, 02:27:04 AM
yeah proof, just ask the twink above  ;)

why exaclty 900mg, what is your test dosed at? 

jt

I'll be running test enanthate from pro.chem labs - I've used it before - their stuff comes in 300mg/ml in a 10ml vial. It's much easier to work out 600 or 900mg a week than 500 or 1000mg.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Cleanest Natural on January 01, 2009, 02:28:00 AM
yeah proof, just ask the twink above  ;)

why exaclty 900mg, what is your test dosed at? 

jt
The gayest getbig fruitcake is giving gear advise ?  :D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: theworm on January 01, 2009, 07:03:05 AM
yeah, i think a 600 test x 15 weeks os going to be good for me... of course its HG!  so thats prob equivilent to 1200 of UG crap.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Luv2Hurt on January 01, 2009, 07:08:38 AM
yeah, i think a 600 test x 15 weeks os going to be good for me... of course its HG!  so thats prob equivilent to 1200 of UG crap.

Well if it's bunk UG then yes.  Have had good luck with many UG companies as far as active ingredient.  But have found UG to cause more pain and swelling at injection sites.  More BA and less sterile conditions most likely, this is the best thing about HG and is what makes it better....its better quality and consistency.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: krazee on January 02, 2009, 01:35:12 PM
I did a test propionate only cycle for 6 week this summer

went from 190 to 243 in 4 weeks  ;D
major bloat but then, it was post contest

amazing strenght increase tho

Bro are you for real...53 lbs on just Prop...seems a little fishy there cuz..
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on January 02, 2009, 08:08:47 PM
Bro are you for real...53 lbs on just Prop...seems a little fishy there cuz..
what's so hard about READING THE WHOLE FUCKING THREAD

it was after a contest, so there was a huge water rebound.

now, I am done on that subject and all the people who argue that it's not possible don't know jack shit about  bodybuilding.

there is nothing uncommon with a big water (and fat) gain after a contest  ::)
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: WillGrant on January 02, 2009, 08:13:19 PM
what's so hard about READING THE WHOLE FUCKING THREAD

it was after a contest, so there was a huge water rebound.

now, I am done on that subject and all the people who argue that it's not possible don't know jack shit about  bodybuilding.

there is nothing uncommon with a big water (and fat) gain after a contest  ::)
Meltdownnnnnnnnnn  ;D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on January 05, 2009, 03:33:21 PM
what's so hard about READING THE WHOLE FUCKING THREAD

it was after a contest, so there was a huge water rebound.

now, I am done on that subject and all the people who argue that it's not possible don't know jack shit about  bodybuilding.

there is nothing uncommon with a big water (and fat) gain after a contest  ::)

LOL water rebound of 40lbs? Haha!   ::) 
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Emmortal on January 05, 2009, 04:09:48 PM
LOL water rebound of 40lbs? Haha!   ::) 

I don't' see what's so difficult to comprehend here, this is NOT uncommon after a contest.  The body is extremely depleted for a contest to get into shape and it's quite common for this rebound to happen.  Most guys who've been competing for a while don't let it happen that drastically because it can wreck havoc on the body, health and skin wise.  If you consider the fact that most competitors are 40-50lbs higher in the offseason than they are in contest shape what do you think happens when you start mass feeding the body after a severe depletion like that?  Huge rebound.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Luv2Hurt on January 05, 2009, 04:24:56 PM
Yeah look at the pros, I saw a guy who won a pro show the weekend before and he guest posed at a local show and I ws amazed at how out of shape he was.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on January 06, 2009, 02:26:13 AM
I don't' see what's so difficult to comprehend here, this is NOT uncommon after a contest.  The body is extremely depleted for a contest to get into shape and it's quite common for this rebound to happen.  Most guys who've been competing for a while don't let it happen that drastically because it can wreck havoc on the body, health and skin wise.  If you consider the fact that most competitors are 40-50lbs higher in the offseason than they are in contest shape what do you think happens when you start mass feeding the body after a severe depletion like that?  Huge rebound.

40lbs of water in 4 weeks????????  You're an idiot as well!  15-20lbs MAYBE!  No fucking way 40lbs of water.  Go back to science class genius. 
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Luv2Hurt on January 06, 2009, 04:55:19 AM
I do have to say it would take me a couple months to put on 40lbs after a show.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: StillTippin on January 06, 2009, 08:54:07 AM
I do have to say it would take me a couple months to put on 40lbs after a show.

But you're not the Stavios.   ;)
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on January 09, 2009, 02:48:52 PM
But you're not the Stavios.   ;)

 ::)

I said I gained Bloat, not anything else.  ::)

I now declare everyone who does not believe a 40-50 lbs gain in 1 month after a contest a complete idiot !

now to all the haters who never even dieted down, please fuck off

Your friend, Stavios  8)

Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: StillTippin on January 09, 2009, 04:06:08 PM
::)

I said I gained Bloat, not anything else.  ::)

I now declare everyone who does not believe a 40-50 lbs gain in 1 month after a contest a complete idiot !

now to all the haters who never even dieted down, please fuck off

Your friend, Stavios  8)



That wasn't a shot at you man.  I believe you, what would be the point in lying about it.

I'm dieting for my second show right now and without even trying I'm sure I will be up 20-25 pounds a month after.  Double that on your frame size isn't unreasonable when going a little crazy.

I'm gonna be avoiding that though since I don't want those lower back pumps.  I hate those almost as much as foot cramps!
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Van_Bilderass on January 09, 2009, 04:10:34 PM
40lbs of water in 4 weeks????????  You're an idiot as well!  15-20lbs MAYBE!  No fucking way 40lbs of water.  Go back to science class genius. 

I have seen almost that in a couple of days. No shit. Think about this example: you have been on zero carbs for a several weeks. Day before show you shoot Lasix and take 15lbs off overnight. What do you think happens when you stuff your face after the show?
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: StillTippin on January 09, 2009, 04:16:36 PM
I have seen almost that in a couple of days. No shit. Think about this example: you have been on zero carbs for a several weeks. Day before show you shoot Lasix and take 15lbs off overnight. What do you think happens when you stuff your face after the show?

Just out of curiosity, have you competed before Van?  I'm assuming you have with the gear knowledge and all.  Sorry if you've discussed it before, I've never seen you mention it.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Van_Bilderass on January 09, 2009, 04:26:09 PM
Just out of curiosity, have you competed before Van?  I'm assuming you have with the gear knowledge and all.  Sorry if you've discussed it before, I've never seen you mention it.

Only once a long time ago. Injuries put an end to that unfortunately. I have a lot of friends who compete which is why I've seen these rebounds.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: StillTippin on January 09, 2009, 04:38:40 PM
Only once a long time ago. Injuries put an end to that unfortunately. I have a lot of friends who compete which is why I've seen these rebounds.

Sorry to hear that.  Training injuries or something else?
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: jtsunami on January 09, 2009, 04:45:15 PM
Sorry to hear that.  Training injuries or something else?

very sad indeed, although he is still a strong poster here.

jt
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Van_Bilderass on January 09, 2009, 07:32:53 PM
Sorry to hear that.  Training injuries or something else?

Yeah, mainly a pec that's torn as bad as it can be torn.

very sad indeed, although he is still a strong poster here.

jt

lmao  :D
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on January 10, 2009, 10:23:16 AM
I have seen almost that in a couple of days. No shit. Think about this example: you have been on zero carbs for a several weeks. Day before show you shoot Lasix and take 15lbs off overnight. What do you think happens when you stuff your face after the show?

Exactly !!!!

a dude from my gym gained 35 lbs in less than 48 hours.
he had to be hospitalized tho
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: StillTippin on January 10, 2009, 11:25:51 AM
Exactly !!!!

a dude from my gym gained 35 lbs in less than 48 hours.
he had to be hospitalized tho

Fuck that sounds painfull.  Did they give him diuretics at the hospital or anything?
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on January 10, 2009, 01:10:30 PM
Fuck that sounds painfull.  Did they give him diuretics at the hospital or anything?

yop he was super super bloated. his ankles were painful to look at  :-X
I don't know exactly what they did at the hospital but I think they gave him diuretics if I remember well.

don't know what he did to get so bloated, he fucked up pretty bad with diuretics before the show too.
he looked horrible at the show because of his diuretic abuse
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: StillTippin on January 10, 2009, 01:15:21 PM
yop he was super super bloated. his ankles were painful to look at  :-X
I don't know exactly what they did at the hospital but I think they gave him diuretics if I remember well.

don't know what he did to get so bloated, he fucked up pretty bad with diuretics before the show too.
he looked horrible at the show because of his diuretic abuse

I hope he wasn't a junior.
Title: Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
Post by: Stavios on January 10, 2009, 01:31:14 PM
I hope he wasn't a junior.

no he was well in his 30's.