Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: ribonucleic on December 30, 2008, 06:14:54 PM

Title: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: ribonucleic on December 30, 2008, 06:14:54 PM
 ???
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: wnybodybuildingfan on December 30, 2008, 06:16:46 PM
I think her beautiful physique was natural. 
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: saucetradomous on December 30, 2008, 06:19:11 PM
useless without pics
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: Bast000 on December 30, 2008, 06:20:39 PM
are her tits?
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: The ChemistV2 on December 30, 2008, 06:20:48 PM
Yes, I doubt you'd be able to pull her undies down and see one of those hideous Vienna sausages between her legs. Never had a maculinized face or voice, no Platz jaw. Those days of women's bodybuilding are long gone.
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: wnybodybuildingfan on December 30, 2008, 06:21:26 PM
Here is one
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: ribonucleic on December 30, 2008, 06:22:11 PM
useless without pics

my bad...

(http://www.ifbb.com/halloffame/1999/RachelMcLish2.jpg)
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: luvvsuNOT on December 30, 2008, 06:22:56 PM
Rachel was as far as a women should go, with maybe Cory Everson. But after Cory it became a freak show.
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: wnybodybuildingfan on December 30, 2008, 06:23:03 PM
Here is a good one.
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: wnybodybuildingfan on December 30, 2008, 06:24:30 PM
Third one.
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: wnybodybuildingfan on December 30, 2008, 06:26:10 PM
Last one!
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: luvvsuNOT on December 30, 2008, 06:26:44 PM
Read gh15 Bible. No natural nothing. Only diff is the degree of "unnaturalness."
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: saucetradomous on December 30, 2008, 06:27:39 PM
yeah them tits are definetly fake
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: luvvsuNOT on December 30, 2008, 06:32:41 PM
yeah them tits are definetly fake

Don't forget the clen, t3 and var.
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: ripitupbaby on December 30, 2008, 06:34:12 PM
Maybe... maybe not.

Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: ribonucleic on December 30, 2008, 06:37:55 PM
Rachel was as far as a women should go, with maybe Cory Everson. But after Cory it became a freak show.

You just can't handle this much woman...

(http://www.bbcenter.sk/images/gallery/zeny/kim/kim12.jpg)
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: luvvsuNOT on December 30, 2008, 06:45:27 PM
You just can't handle this much woman...

(http://www.bbcenter.sk/images/gallery/zeny/kim/kim12.jpg)

Shoots, I'm at work so the pic isn't coming up but I suspect you might be right. Rachel was about as good as it gets for me. Also, there was another one from back in that day, Gladys Portuguez, or something like that. She use to be married to Van Damme. In fact, I think I read somewhere that they recently got back together.
That was one fine piece of A if you don't mind my saying.
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: johnnynoname on December 30, 2008, 06:46:43 PM
In fact, I think I read somewhere that they recently got back together.


yes- they remarried
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: YoungBlood on December 30, 2008, 06:47:27 PM
, Gladys Portuguez,


Yeah she was hot!!!
But Sharon Bruneau was just as hot if not better ;)
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: ribonucleic on December 30, 2008, 06:53:34 PM
Shoots, I'm at work so the pic isn't coming up

It's a studio portrait of Kim Chizevsky in a front lat spread, somewhat resembling the actor Oded Fehr.

Trust me... it's a lot of woman.
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: luvvsuNOT on December 30, 2008, 06:57:12 PM
It's a studio portrait of Kim Chizevsky in a front lat spread, somewhat resembling the actor Oded Fehr.

Trust me... it's a lot of woman.

Kim Chizesky? Nuff said. Maybe if I went on a Lee Priest cycle (his real cycle) I might begin to approach that beast. And I see that you use the term "woman" rather loosely.
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: jwb on December 30, 2008, 07:09:30 PM
i'm pretty sure almost all female bber's from the start (late 70's) used at least low androgen orals...
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: jesusbod on December 30, 2008, 07:34:39 PM
I think BAY would stick it to Rachel... hahahahaha!
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: wnybodybuildingfan on December 31, 2008, 05:40:15 AM
Rachel was as far as a women should go, with maybe Cory Everson. But after Cory it became a freak show.
Totally agree!  Rachel and Cory had beautiful bodies but also sounded like a woman.  It's no wonder that there are less IFBB women's bodybuilding shows this year. 
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: Mars on December 31, 2008, 05:43:55 AM
yes most of them are molested in their youth.
Title: Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
Post by: CalvinH on December 31, 2008, 08:10:44 AM
Rachel=yummy