Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: Tre on January 05, 2009, 07:50:20 AM
-
What's up with all the non-hot gold diggers running loose these days?
-
everyone's a starlet thanks to myspace
-
everyone's a starlet thanks to myspace
No thanks to MTV
-
i expected at least some examples in the form of pictures.
-
Gold diggin girls........drivin me crazy.........I can't take it no more!
-
What's up with all the non-hot gold diggers running loose these days?
Example?
-
i expected at least some examples in the form of pictures.
See above video clip
-
What's up with all the non-hot gold diggers running loose these days?
Is this in your 'circle' Tre? Or are we talking about non-gym junkies?
-
Is this in your 'circle' Tre? Or are we talking about non-gym junkies?
Mainly non-gym, but I'm noticing this shit more and more in the gyms, too...buttaface girls who are still chunky, but go to the gym so that they can claim "I work out" in order to improve their standing in gold digger culture a bit.
As an example, I know this one girl - doesn't work out at all and eats like shit - who describes herself as having an 'athletic' body. She's 40-50 pounds overweight.
Shit like this is the reason I prefer sugar babies - they understand it's a short-term arrangement and they always take good care of themselves, because they know if they let themselves go, the ride is over.
-
Mainly non-gym, but I'm noticing this shit more and more in the gyms, too...buttaface girls who are still chunky, but go to the gym so that they can claim "I work out" in order to improve their standing in gold digger culture a bit.
As an example, I know this one girl - doesn't work out at all and eats like shit - who describes herself as having an 'athletic' body. She's 40-50 pounds overweight.
Shit like this is the reason I prefer sugar babies - they understand it's a short-term arrangement and they always take good care of themselves, because they know if they let themselves go, the ride is over.
Yes, they are everywhere. Sporty fat girls. I think it's their way of saying they want a fit guy, but there aren't too many fit blind men around.
Some might be overcompensating, but I agree most are delusional. Major factors are an even fatter family and chunkier friends, so that she's always the 'petite one.' Also, men will fuck just about anything, and often think they'll have better luck with an uglier woman, so it's not necessarily a compliment when one of us hits on her but she mistakes it for one.
-
Well, if they think they can dig gold without an advantageous appearance, they got something else coming for them.
-
Thank the losers that put these skanks on a pedestal.
-
DID YOU SEE ONE IN K-MART
-
So many woman have hugely inflated egos...it is ridiculous.
It is because men hit on anything...buy them drinks...compliment them.
idiots.
Never buy a girl a drink or compliment her...these fugly girls come home from the bar feeling like they are the hottest thing ever because they got a bunch of guys to fawn all over them. DONT DO IT
it is the only way to fix this situation.
-
You guys remember that crazy owning about a year back!?! it was on all the forums, some gold digging girl from NY posted a question as to why she can't find a richer guy and some stock broker/investor replied and layeth down the smackdown verbally, owning her into oblivion...
-
You guys remember that crazy owning about a year back!?! it was on all the forums, some gold digging #### from NY posted a question as to why she can't find a richer guy and some stock broker/investor replied and layeth down the smackdown verbally, owning her into oblivion...
I remember that...it was epic
All woman should be required to read that
-
what was that sugar baby site again, Tre nugz?
-
You guys remember that crazy owning about a year back!?! it was on all the forums, some gold digging #### from NY posted a question as to why she can't find a richer guy and some stock broker/investor replied and layeth down the smackdown verbally, owning her into oblivion...
Haha. "You are a depreciating asset."
-
She responded to him. By "she" I mean someone smarter than her.
http://www.craigslist.org/about/best/nyc/445962092.html
Dear Sir,
I must confess that I was somewhat taken aback upon reading your email. Indeed, it has taken some time for me to sufficiently recuperate from my surprise. Lest your confidence quickly inflate for little reason (as we know is the predisposition for Wall St. types), allow me to hasten to reassure you that the source of my surprise was neither your candor nor the accuracy of your perception. Indeed, it is your "claimed" success in light of your poor grasp of economics which has me baffled. If the standards required to meet with financial success on Wall St. have sunk so low, perhaps I should indeed "make my own money", except for the fact that the effort/reward ratio is far too high for my liking - especially when so many of your ilk have displayed a far more cogent grasp of market realities than you have.
By now you are likely scratching your ever-vanishing hairline in confusion, so allow me to elaborate, dear man. To build some credibility I will tell you a bit more about yourself. Though you did not mention the details of your occupation, it is clear that you are an investment banker and not a trader, as any good trader would understand that human courtships are based upon a semi-efficient open market, and not an investment banking cartel. However, your inability to grasp the realities of the dating market is not surprising, given that you have successfully employed the tools of collusion and market manipulation rather that true acumen in your supposed wealth generation.
If your grasp of finance were not a minority partner with your ego, you would realize that the "outflows" associated with my depreciating "assets" are quite certain, and therefore subject to a low discount rate when determining their present value. In addition, though your concept of economics evidentially failed to move past the 1950s, advancement in plastic surgery is not subject to the same limitation. Thus, with some additional capital expenditure, the overall lifetime of "outflows" generated by these assets is greatly increased. Sad that Ashton Kutcher has demonstrated understanding of the female asset class which you, in all of your financial "wisdom", have not.
You, on the other hand, are, given the uncertainty of the Wall St. job market, more of an inflation-indexed junk bond with an underwater nested call option. Though you may argue that you are more of an equity investment, my monetary minimums required from you do not change, and if you are unable to pay them, I will liquidate you without the benefit of a chapter 11, just as you would me.
Because your outflows are so much more uncertain with respect to mine, I require additional compensation in the form of a underwater nested call option on your future assets. I say underwater because, even taking into account the value of your junk bond coupon payment to me, the value of my "outflow" is in excess of the market price of your equity (which is quite low due to its riskiness associated with your poor grasp of finance and my existing claim upon your junk bond coupon).
I must thank you though for raising the question, despite the reputation cost of subjecting your weak logic to such widespread scrutiny. This took either considerable courage or ignorance on your part- and we'll give you the benefit of doubt, just this once. My current boyfriend (a trader who lives in Central Park West, of course) and I thoroughly enjoyed discussing your response and we wish you the best of luck in your unhappy pursuit of that elusive market inefficiency.
-
what was that sugar baby site again, Tre nugz?
http://www.sugardaddyforme.com
Terrific resource. :)
-
She responded to him. By "she" I mean someone smarter than her.
http://www.craigslist.org/about/best/nyc/445962092.html
Dear Sir,
I must confess that I was somewhat taken aback upon reading your email. Indeed, it has taken some time for me to sufficiently recuperate from my surprise. Lest your confidence quickly inflate for little reason (as we know is the predisposition for Wall St. types), allow me to hasten to reassure you that the source of my surprise was neither your candor nor the accuracy of your perception. Indeed, it is your "claimed" success in light of your poor grasp of economics which has me baffled. If the standards required to meet with financial success on Wall St. have sunk so low, perhaps I should indeed "make my own money", except for the fact that the effort/reward ratio is far too high for my liking - especially when so many of your ilk have displayed a far more cogent grasp of market realities than you have.
By now you are likely scratching your ever-vanishing hairline in confusion, so allow me to elaborate, dear man. To build some credibility I will tell you a bit more about yourself. Though you did not mention the details of your occupation, it is clear that you are an investment banker and not a trader, as any good trader would understand that human courtships are based upon a semi-efficient open market, and not an investment banking cartel. However, your inability to grasp the realities of the dating market is not surprising, given that you have successfully employed the tools of collusion and market manipulation rather that true acumen in your supposed wealth generation.
If your grasp of finance were not a minority partner with your ego, you would realize that the "outflows" associated with my depreciating "assets" are quite certain, and therefore subject to a low discount rate when determining their present value. In addition, though your concept of economics evidentially failed to move past the 1950s, advancement in plastic surgery is not subject to the same limitation. Thus, with some additional capital expenditure, the overall lifetime of "outflows" generated by these assets is greatly increased. Sad that Ashton Kutcher has demonstrated understanding of the female asset class which you, in all of your financial "wisdom", have not.
You, on the other hand, are, given the uncertainty of the Wall St. job market, more of an inflation-indexed junk bond with an underwater nested call option. Though you may argue that you are more of an equity investment, my monetary minimums required from you do not change, and if you are unable to pay them, I will liquidate you without the benefit of a chapter 11, just as you would me.
Because your outflows are so much more uncertain with respect to mine, I require additional compensation in the form of a underwater nested call option on your future assets. I say underwater because, even taking into account the value of your junk bond coupon payment to me, the value of my "outflow" is in excess of the market price of your equity (which is quite low due to its riskiness associated with your poor grasp of finance and my existing claim upon your junk bond coupon).
I must thank you though for raising the question, despite the reputation cost of subjecting your weak logic to such widespread scrutiny. This took either considerable courage or ignorance on your part- and we'll give you the benefit of doubt, just this once. My current boyfriend (a trader who lives in Central Park West, of course) and I thoroughly enjoyed discussing your response and we wish you the best of luck in your unhappy pursuit of that elusive market inefficiency.
brutal failure right here.... shittiest comeback of all time.
-
brutal failure right here.... shittiest comeback of all time.
yep. that guy should post on getbig. he'd be an owning machine.
-
are women still golddiggers, even now a days with all the opportunities they have?
-
brutal failure right here.... shittiest comeback of all time.
Yep, a major try-hard reply.
-
are women still golddiggers, even now a days with all the opportunities they have?
I see it all the time at the gym and in my home city. Most girls I knew in college these days were after money and only attended college to get money and married.
Yep, a major try-hard reply.
Guarantee she did not write it. Brutal attempt by her new sucker boyfriend to get a hand job that night.
-
are women still golddiggers, even now a days with all the opportunities they have?
Women want financial security; as men do. However, their main concern is not financial/business success; it is pro-creation orientated. The man's main concern is to be successful in business, find a woman, and help her pro-create. The woman stays home with the kids for the most part - which is her top priority - while the man continues to work - which is his top priority. That's the general basis of men and women in terms of how they value money and what constitutes success.
The woman doesn't dig just for money. They did for security of themselves and their pro-creation.
-
Shit like this is the reason I prefer sugar babies - they understand it's a short-term arrangement and they always take good care of themselves, because they know if they let themselves go, the ride is over.
ew
-
Guarantee she did not write it. Brutal attempt by her new sucker boyfriend to get a hand job that night.
Ya, definitely someone other than the OP.
The original post was an internet classic, although not genuine imo (but we'll never be sure). One of the greatest trollings ever. Thousands of furious, raging respondants.
-
Women want financial security; as men do. However, their main concern is not financial/business success; it is pro-creation orientated. The man's main concern is to be successful in business, find a woman, and help her pro-create. The woman stays home with the kids for the most part - which is her top priority - while the man continues to work - which is his top priority. That's the general basis of men and women in terms of how they value money and what constitutes success.
The woman doesn't dig just for money. They did for security of themselves and their pro-creation.
yea but it should have changed a lot more these days, since women can work, and in some cases make more money than the men...I can see back before women's lib there were women just looking for money cause they had no choice. There should be less gold diggers overall.
-
yea but it should have changed a lot more these days, since women can work, and in some cases make more money than the men...I can see back before women's lib there were women just looking for money cause they had no choice. There should be less gold diggers overall.
I see a lot of women in there 30's and older (divorced, etc) that are trying to find the man with money. Most college women I knew were trying to find a guy who was going into the pros or in a major that was going to pay the big bucks. I took a class and the female teacher flat out asked how many women were in college to get their "MRS"; needless to say MANY women raised there hands. Most people choose the greatest rewards for the least work and that is still the MO of many women.
I was asked in class if I would never work if I had a wealthy wife, and I said no. The women seemed puzzled by my response.
-
yea but it should have changed a lot more these days, since women can work, and in some cases make more money than the men...I can see back before women's lib there were women just looking for money cause they had no choice. There should be less gold diggers overall.
Women are more insecure than men. They value success as getting a man; either as a husband, boyfriend or one-night-stand. Whatever they require at that particular time. It ranks them higher over their friends. Men also rate women as success and are insecure, but they do it more out of a traditional habit. Get a job > get a woman > get married > live in a house with a picket fence.
More women are working now more than ever, but their desire for a man is still as strong for the reasons above. Money is a big part of it, but not the only part.
-
I see a lot of women in there 30's and older (divorced, etc) that are trying to find the man with money. Most college women I knew were trying to find a guy who was going into the pros or in a major that was going to pay the big bucks. I took a class and the female teacher flat out asked how many women were in college to get their "MRS"; needless to say MANY women raised there hands. Most people choose the greatest rewards for the least work and that is still the MO of many women.
look at it from their point of view
any chick with half a brain knows that she looks her best while she's in college, if she doesn't find the chump willing to marry her in college her chances of finding the "perfect guy" gets worse because her looks will decline after college
E
-
look at it from their point of view
any chick with half a brain knows that she looks her best while she's in college, if she doesn't find the chump willing to marry her in college her chances of finding the "perfect guy" gets worse because her looks will decline after college
E
True, but she is a depreciating asset. ;D
I want my wife to work so she has her own money, can pay most if not all of her bills, and if we get divorced she can't rape me as bad...assuming, my prenup does not hold up well.
-
I see it all the time at the gym and in my home city. Most girls I knew in college these days were after money and only attended college to get money and married.
Guarantee she did not write it. Brutal attempt by her new sucker boyfriend to get a hand job that night.
Epic truth, given her original email/post there is no fucking way she wrote that retort. She probably had it thoroughly inspected by 2 attorney's before she even hit the reply button.
-
Women want financial security; as men do. However, their main concern is not financial/business success; it is pro-creation orientated. The man's main concern is to be successful in business, find a woman, and help her pro-create. The woman stays home with the kids for the most part - which is her top priority - while the man continues to work - which is his top priority. That's the general basis of men and women in terms of how they value money and what constitutes success.
The woman doesn't dig just for money. They did for security of themselves and their pro-creation.
EXACTLY WOMEN WILL KILL YOUR DREAMS TO REACH THERES IT'S A HORRIBLE CYCLE
-
EXACTLY WOMEN WILL KILL YOUR DREAMS TO REACH THERES IT'S A HORRIBLE CYCLE
so that's why you are a penis puffer
E
-
so that's why you are a penis puffer
E
MELTDOWN
-
i don tplan on getting married for sometime (10-15 years)
im 25
-
ew
Hi, Beast.
You can't hate on me for not liking fat chicks. >:(