Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: headhuntersix on January 05, 2009, 08:34:01 AM
-
Dateline: January 3rd 1944
Fury continues to mount worldwide about the senseless loss of civilian life in Germany caused by England's callous bombing of German cities including Berlin, Hamburg and Dresden.
As of today many innocent German women and children have died in these utterly brutal bombing missions. And now there are ground offensives starting on mainland Europe.
The English have claimed that they are merely retaliating against the V-1 flying bombs being launched indiscriminately by Nazis at their civilian population in London, Manchester, Liverpool, Birmingham, Coventry and other cities. The English point out that their enemy is sworn to its utter destruction and has used the missiles and flying bombs against its civilians without any regard to English loss of life. Moreover it makes the case that their own bombing missions are specifically directed to military targets that the German army has intentionally planted in the heart of civilian populations to try and deter English counter-attacks.
These points may of course be true - but they are utterly besides the point.
Of course England has a right to exist. Of course England has a right to defend itself. But it should ensure that its responses are PROPORTIONATE.
-
interestingly, china wasn't feeding rockets to the germans back then.
today, different story :(
-
Dateline: January 3rd 1944
Fury continues to mount worldwide about the senseless loss of civilian life in Germany caused by England's callous bombing of German cities including Berlin, Hamburg and Dresden.
As of today many innocent German women and children have died in these utterly brutal bombing missions. And now there are ground offensives starting on mainland Europe.
The English have claimed that they are merely retaliating against the V-1 flying bombs being launched indiscriminately by Nazis at their civilian population in London, Manchester, Liverpool, Birmingham, Coventry and other cities. The English point out that their enemy is sworn to its utter destruction and has used the missiles and flying bombs against its civilians without any regard to English loss of life. Moreover it makes the case that their own bombing missions are specifically directed to military targets that the German army has intentionally planted in the heart of civilian populations to try and deter English counter-attacks.
These points may of course be true - but they are utterly besides the point.
Of course England has a right to exist. Of course England has a right to defend itself. But it should ensure that its responses are PROPORTIONATE.
Good one. War is war. These liberal dope addicts think war was invented last week when wars have been faught man has been on the planet. It will always be with us, no different than our need to take a dump every day. The key is to be good at it and to convince your enemies that they have more to lose by fighting you than to gain by beating you. Thisa was what Sun Tzu said and he was 10000000000000% correct.
The late great General George S. Patton Jr., whom was considered a "Genius for War" said it best when he said that less people will die in the long wrong if you take out a lot of people very fast than if you clown around and try to avoid casualties in the beginning.
These liberal panzies need to read the Art of War by Sun Tzu and learn a thing or two.
The faster, sooner, and more agressive Israel acts now, the less people will die in the long run.
-
How many native civilians have been raped, tortured and murdered in Darfur by the Muslim janjaweed? THOUSANDS. Not once have I seen these liberal apologists even address that situation. Why? Because it involves blacks and muslims, two groups of people that no one cares very much for.
What everyone ignores is the fact that Israel hasn't set out to kill civilians. They're after Hamas. Hamas specifically targets civilians. There's a huge difference.
-
"Hamas specifically targets civilians. There's a huge difference."
Yep. I have no idea how some of the far left liberals can justify tolerance for these arab terrorists. They must completely blind themselves to their barbarism.