Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: nodeal on January 15, 2009, 09:24:46 PM

Title: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: nodeal on January 15, 2009, 09:24:46 PM
a government conspiracy to further the agendas of world bank leaders and elitists alike??? :-X
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: The Coach on January 15, 2009, 09:25:56 PM
a government conspiracy to further the agendas of world bank leaders and elitists alike??? :-X

Only libs would think so.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: windsor88 on January 15, 2009, 09:26:48 PM
Only libs would think so.

 ::)
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: 240 is Back on January 15, 2009, 09:27:39 PM
Only libs would think so.

it must really annoy you that there are thousands of hardcore republicans who believe 911 was an inside job, huh?
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: chaos on January 15, 2009, 09:27:55 PM
Global warming brought that plane down.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: chaos on January 15, 2009, 09:28:39 PM
it must really annoy you that there are thousands of hardcore republicans who believe 911 was an inside job, huh?
Why do you keep bringing that up? I thought you were over it? ::)
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Fury on January 15, 2009, 09:28:53 PM
The Illuminati spent the past 12 years training those geese to fly into that engine. All part of the "plan". Ha ha ha!!!!!!!
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: elite_lifter on January 15, 2009, 09:29:35 PM
I am not so sure birds took out two engines. Maybe lack of maintenance by US AIR. :-X They could go bankrupt real quick if it got out that they don't maintain their planes.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Camel Jockey on January 15, 2009, 09:29:52 PM
The Illuminati spent the past 12 years training those geese to fly into that engine. All part of the "plan". Ha ha ha!!!!!!!

It was the works of the Free Masons, the Duponts and Rothschilds.  ::)
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: 240 is Back on January 15, 2009, 09:31:27 PM
Why do you keep bringing that up? I thought you were over it? ::)

hey, planes in NYC, what else can you think of?

joe blames conspiracy theories on 'libs' when the fact of the matter is, many of the loudest people for another investigation are lifetime republicans.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Fury on January 15, 2009, 09:33:26 PM
I am not so sure birds took out two engines. Maybe lack of maintenance by US AIR. :-X They could go bankrupt real quick if it got out that they don't maintain their planes.

Like at the end of the 90s when they had a shitload of crashes and it came out that their planes weren't maintained very well and that they were consistently violating safety regulations? Pretty sure they made it through that as they're still around today.

It was the works of the Free Masons, the Duponts and Rothschilds.  ::)

The Bilberberg brigade has extended their influence into the USA's fowl population!!!!!! DOOMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: 240 is Back on January 15, 2009, 09:36:06 PM
seriously tho - airlines, like many companies are broke.  theyr'e probably cutting corners with parts, changes, service, and employees. 

Pilot did call in that he hit a bunch of birds tho, right?
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Fury on January 15, 2009, 09:37:36 PM
seriously tho - airlines, like many companies are broke.  theyr'e probably cutting corners with parts, changes, service, and employees. 

Pilot did call in that he hit a bunch of birds tho, right?

There was an article on cnn.com two weeks ago talking about the fact that there hasn't been a fatality on a US plane in two years. They had only gone one year without a fatality four times or so (can't remember exactly) in the last 50+ years. Obviously they're doing something right.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: wolfgang187 on January 15, 2009, 09:40:53 PM
a government conspiracy to further the agendas of world bank leaders and elitists alike??? :-X



NO, THEY SHOT A FROZEN CHICKEN INTO THE ENGINE TO BRING THE PLAN DOWN FOR THE HELL OF IT
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: nodeal on January 15, 2009, 09:43:01 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/plane_in_river



The pilot, identified as Chesley B. "Sully" Sullenberger III of Danville, Calif., "was phenomenal," passenger Joe Hart said. "He landed it — I tell you what, the impact wasn't a whole lot more than a rear-end (collision). It threw you into the seat ahead of you.

"Both engines cut out and he actually floated it into the river," he said.


cut out, as if there was a remote device already planted ahead of time? hmmm

The plane was submerged up to its windows in the river by the time rescuers arrived, including Coast Guard vessels and commuter ferries that happened to be nearby. Some passengers waded in water up to their knees, standing on the wing of the plane and waiting for help.

why did it take rescuers so long to reach the impact point? isnt there constant interaction between ATC and pilots? werent they aware of  the planes dire situation before it had to make an emergency landing in the water? why was the plane submerged in water UP TO THE WINDOWS before rescuers arrived? hmmmmmm

Dave Sanderson, who was flying home to Charlotte after a business trip, said the sound of an explosion was followed by passengers running up the aisle and people being shoved out of the way.
an explosion? sounds like more of a predetermined elaborate scheme then some geese flying into an engine. hmmmmmmmm

The controller told the pilot to divert to an airport in nearby Teterboro, N.J., but it was not clear why the pilot did not land there.
Why did the pilot choose to not take the course to the suggested airport? why did he ignore the instructions of ATC? hmmmmmm

Church said there was no mayday call from the plane's transponder.
hmmmmmmmm

Bank of America and Wells Fargo said they had employees on the plane. Charlotte is a major banking center.
if this doesnt raise flags for you then you must be a real naive dumbass. more elitist manipulation of society. HMMMMMMMMM
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: calfzilla on January 15, 2009, 10:46:30 PM
I don't think it was an inside job.  I def think it was an act of terrorism though.  Perpetrated by...
















Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: nycbull on January 15, 2009, 10:56:14 PM
"Bank of America and Wells Fargo said they had employees on the plane."



who the fuck gives a shit, as if their employees are so much more important than a regular person.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: 240 is Back on January 15, 2009, 10:56:23 PM
chunk of birds was big enouigh to show up on radar, hence why it killed both engines.  and they always hear the explosion of engines when they flare out.  plane was submerged quickly because of the luggages sized holes in bottom let cabin fill with water.  Pilot was a vet who preferred water to making the lap, as his altitude was dropping quickly.  

I'm all for a good conspiracy theory, but I don't see one here.  Pilot made a maverick move and dipped to water, and it paid off.  
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Charfman84 on January 15, 2009, 11:43:08 PM
But how did only one guy get seriously injured with two broken legs?  Did he have his seat back tray down?
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Disgusted on January 15, 2009, 11:45:49 PM
chunk of birds was big enouigh to show up on radar, hence why it killed both engines.  and they always hear the explosion of engines when they flare out.  plane was submerged quickly because of the luggages sized holes in bottom let cabin fill with water.  Pilot was a vet who preferred water to making the lap, as his altitude was dropping quickly.  

I'm all for a good conspiracy theory, but I don't see one here.  Pilot made a maverick move and dipped to water, and it paid off.  

I know someone who watched the plane hit the water and said the pilot did an unreal job in landing that thing on water.

Oh and did you have to use the word "maverick?"  ;D
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Captain Equipoise on January 15, 2009, 11:51:25 PM
The Illuminati spent the past 12 years training those geese to fly into that engine. All part of the "plan". Ha ha ha!!!!!!!

ROFL...post of the day!!!
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: nodeal on January 16, 2009, 12:38:35 AM
chunk of birds was big enouigh to show up on radar, hence why it killed both engines.  and they always hear the explosion of engines when they flare out.  plane was submerged quickly because of the luggages sized holes in bottom let cabin fill with water.  Pilot was a vet who preferred water to making the lap, as his altitude was dropping quickly.  

I'm all for a good conspiracy theory, but I don't see one here.  Pilot made a maverick move and dipped to water, and it paid off.  

hmmmmmmmm
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Samourai Pizzacat on January 16, 2009, 01:56:54 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/plane_in_river



The pilot, identified as Chesley B. "Sully" Sullenberger III of Danville, Calif., "was phenomenal," passenger Joe Hart said. "He landed it — I tell you what, the impact wasn't a whole lot more than a rear-end (collision). It threw you into the seat ahead of you.

"Both engines cut out and he actually floated it into the river," he said.


cut out, as if there was a remote device already planted ahead of time? hmmm   

The plane was submerged up to its windows in the river by the time rescuers arrived, including Coast Guard vessels and commuter ferries that happened to be nearby. Some passengers waded in water up to their knees, standing on the wing of the plane and waiting for help.

why did it take rescuers so long to reach the impact point? isnt there constant interaction between ATC and pilots? werent they aware of  the planes dire situation before it had to make an emergency landing in the water? why was the plane submerged in water UP TO THE WINDOWS before rescuers arrived? hmmmmmm

Dave Sanderson, who was flying home to Charlotte after a business trip, said the sound of an explosion was followed by passengers running up the aisle and people being shoved out of the way.
an explosion? sounds like more of a predetermined elaborate scheme then some geese flying into an engine. hmmmmmmmm

The controller told the pilot to divert to an airport in nearby Teterboro, N.J., but it was not clear why the pilot did not land there.
Why did the pilot choose to not take the course to the suggested airport? why did he ignore the instructions of ATC? hmmmmmm

Church said there was no mayday call from the plane's transponder.
hmmmmmmmm

Bank of America and Wells Fargo said they had employees on the plane. Charlotte is a major banking center.
if this doesnt raise flags for you then you must be a real naive dumbass. more elitist manipulation of society. HMMMMMMMMM

OMFG! you must be onto something....or, maybe not...
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: The Ugly on January 16, 2009, 06:12:54 AM
it must really annoy you that there are thousands of hardcore republicans who believe 911 was an inside job, huh?

Thousands?
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Army of One on January 16, 2009, 06:15:58 AM
Is there any video of this plane going down yet?
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: jesusbod on January 16, 2009, 06:37:19 AM
a government conspiracy to further the agendas of world bank leaders and elitists alike??? :-X


Only you...
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: SAMSON123 on January 16, 2009, 07:22:08 AM
This whole series of events is bizarre at best. A plane supposedly crashing into birds right after taking off. A plane nearly crashing into New York again...especially right before an inauguration, A plane crashing right after the DEAD Osama Bin Laden sends still another tape to Washington, A plane that crashes supposedly becasue of birds yet there is NO OTHER CASE OF THIS EVER HAPPENING IN NEW YORK....HMMMMMMMMMMMMM.. .I smell a RAT. Add to this all of this PRAISE AND WORSHIP of this pilot as though he levitated the plane out of the water. Pilot sends e-mail while supposedly crash landing the plane????WTF?, pilot carrying on a conversation and being told to land in Teterboro New Jersey but he decides on landing in the river. How come a passenger ended up either losingboth legs or severly breaking both legs when no one else had more than scratches...  and all of this in a flight that took off only 6 minutes before it crashed....
THE SMELL OF THE RAT IS GETTING WORST.....
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Yamalia on January 16, 2009, 07:23:59 AM
where is the hudson river, NYC?
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Mr. Magoo on January 16, 2009, 07:29:18 AM
even if there was a conspiracy, that's a fucking awesome landing, i dont care who you are.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: knny187 on January 16, 2009, 07:35:01 AM
Rumor has it that George Bush was behind the conspiracy. 
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: The Coach on January 16, 2009, 08:18:38 AM
Yes, i heard the samething.......from 240
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: tommywishbone on January 16, 2009, 08:20:31 AM
"The water was really really cold." &guy

It is January and you are in New York.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: mass 04 on January 16, 2009, 08:21:22 AM
"The water was really really cold." &guy

It is January and you are in New York.
;D
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Mars on January 16, 2009, 08:22:51 AM
as long as we know 911 did was an inside job.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: The Ugly on January 16, 2009, 08:24:17 AM
CIA-trained geese.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: heretostay13 on January 16, 2009, 08:24:47 AM
Things can't be as simple or as coincidental as they seem to be for Americans, or perhaps people in general. Perhaps it's as simple as the facts may seem to be, what's with all this abstract thought attached to anything that seems a little off? Can't it just be the how it is? Can't it be that terrorists simply flew planes into the Twin Towers? Can't it be that man landed on the moon? Can't it be that a plane went down into the Hudson Rivers? No...these things are too simple. We must involve complex government conspiracies, aliens, and that damn sasquatch in order to explain simple concepts.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: The Ugly on January 16, 2009, 08:27:33 AM
Things can't be as simple or as coincidental as they seem to be for Americans

Yes, they can.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: tommywishbone on January 16, 2009, 08:29:18 AM
CIA-trained geese.

Are you implying "fowl play"? 
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Mars on January 16, 2009, 08:29:43 AM
im not a conspiracy kind of guy but i refuse to believe these twin towers came down just because of a few airplanes and building 7 just because of fire.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Thin Lizzy on January 16, 2009, 08:30:46 AM
Things can't be as simple or as coincidental as they seem to be for Americans, or perhaps people in general.

There's a whole conspiracy theory cottage industry that thrives on this stuff and gives purpose to people who otherwise don't have much else goin' on.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: cheftim on January 16, 2009, 08:31:54 AM
I am not so sure birds took out two engines. Maybe lack of maintenance by US AIR. :-X They could go bankrupt real quick if it got out that they don't maintain their planes.
There's loads of these big Canandian geese flying around NYC.
(http://www.1atexasgoosehunting.com/canada-geese-flying.jpg)
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: The Coach on January 16, 2009, 08:34:32 AM
as long as we know 911 did was an inside job.

Yes, of course it was. And Obama knew nothing of Blagos dealings ::)
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: chainsaw on January 16, 2009, 08:37:37 AM
You guys who think this was a conspiracy are really psychotic.
Bird strikes are common
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: heretostay13 on January 16, 2009, 08:39:22 AM
Yes, they can.

I was saying that for most people it can't be simple. For me, it can be....but most think things are far more complicated and complex in nature than what they really are.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: jaejonna on January 16, 2009, 08:41:03 AM
It was a relatively small plane (aka 'airbus') it happened near my crib actually, but the time i go home they moved it down the river near battery park.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: The_Punisher on January 16, 2009, 08:44:21 AM
with all Jokes aside, Kudos to this Veteran Pilot. when facing critical situation like this,  there are no margins for error. that plane was losing LIFT rapidly and he made that U-turn and miss the bridge by 900ft. everything happen in the nick of time. US Airways owe this pilot a Big gift.
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: nodeal on January 16, 2009, 09:15:17 AM
This whole series of events is bizarre at best. A plane supposedly crashing into birds right after taking off. A plane nearly crashing into New York again...especially right before an inauguration, A plane crashing right after the DEAD Osama Bin Laden sends still another tape to Washington, A plane that crashes supposedly becasue of birds yet there is NO OTHER CASE OF THIS EVER HAPPENING IN NEW YORK....HMMMMMMMMMMMMM.. .I smell a RAT. Add to this all of this PRAISE AND WORSHIP of this pilot as though he levitated the plane out of the water. Pilot sends e-mail while supposedly crash landing the plane????WTF?, pilot carrying on a conversation and being told to land in Teterboro New Jersey but he decides on landing in the river. How come a passenger ended up either losingboth legs or severly breaking both legs when no one else had more than scratches...  and all of this in a flight that took off only 6 minutes before it crashed....
THE SMELL OF THE RAT IS GETTING WORST.....

i think we are on to something.
Things can't be as simple or as coincidental as they seem to be for Americans, or perhaps people in general. Perhaps it's as simple as the facts may seem to be, what's with all this abstract thought attached to anything that seems a little off? Can't it just be the how it is? Can't it be that terrorists simply flew planes into the Twin Towers? Can't it be that man landed on the moon? Can't it be that a plane went down into the Hudson Rivers? No...these things are too simple. We must involve complex government conspiracies, aliens, and that damn sasquatch in order to explain simple concepts.

hmmm aliens, i never thought of that as a possibility. but they may very well be involved with this. i mean its already a proven fact that the elitists and government fat cats have developed regular contact and relationships with these foreign beings, so it wouldnt surprise me if they coincided with each other to pull off this elaborate scheme just as they did for 9/11, the moon landing, and the titanic. the truth is at our disposal! we cannot deny our reality, we must make this known and put an end to this global manipulation!
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Dos Equis on January 16, 2009, 10:08:17 AM
You guys are cracking me up today.   :D
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: IFBBwannaB on January 16, 2009, 11:26:04 AM
You guys are cracking me up today.   :D

I thought your BF was in your crack today....don't let these guys separate you two  :D
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: Dos Equis on January 16, 2009, 11:29:18 AM
I thought your BF was in your crack today....don't let these guys separate you two  :D

lol.  You must be confusing me with someone else.   :)
Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: The Ugly on January 16, 2009, 02:54:21 PM
I was saying that for most people it can't be simple. For me, it can be....but most think things are far more complicated and complex in nature than what they really are.

That's how I took it.

Some of us are ok with simple/reasonable is all.

Title: Re: So who here thinks the plane crashing in the Hudson river was really....
Post by: The Ugly on January 16, 2009, 03:03:03 PM
im not a conspiracy kind of guy but i refuse to believe these twin towers came down just because of a few airplanes and building 7 just because of fire.

POPULAR MECHANICS's researchers, reporters, and editors consulted more than 70 professionals in fields that form the core content of this magazine, including aviation, engineering and the military. They're cool with it:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=5#wtc7