Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Hulkster on February 20, 2009, 10:44:02 PM

Title: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Hulkster on February 20, 2009, 10:44:02 PM
saw this over at bodybuilding dungeon LOL

they were talking about how nasser lacks quality muscle compared to the 1965 Mr. O. hahahahaha

so true :P
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Hulkster on February 20, 2009, 10:45:01 PM
this of course begs the question:

had nasser competed in 1965/66 could he have been Mr. Olympia?

naaaaaaaaaahhhhh probably not.

lol
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Hulkster on February 20, 2009, 10:48:05 PM
this is interesting:

larry's arm vs nasser's synthol-scarred arm: :-X
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: saucetradomous on February 20, 2009, 10:51:19 PM
Here come the pumpkinheads.  Scottie is destroying Nasser here.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Dorian01 on February 20, 2009, 10:57:27 PM
Nasser got runner up during bodybuilding's most competitive era. You look more and more like a retard every day, Hulkster.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: WillGrant on February 20, 2009, 11:57:51 PM
Nasser got runner up during bodybuilding's most competitive era. You look more and more like a retard every day, Hulkster.
Scot looks better though  ???
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on February 21, 2009, 12:58:49 AM
Haha Larry Scott used his fair share of drugs.  But damn he looked far and away better than Nasser.  You can tell Nasser was all drugs. Plus Scott was a handsome guy.  Nasser looked like a beast from the underworld.  And we wonder why nobody takes bodybuilding seriously.  Atleast the guys back in the day had some style, class, and good looks.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Boost on February 21, 2009, 01:10:55 AM
Scot looks better though  ???
Scott looks 10x better than nasser
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: D_1000 on February 21, 2009, 02:13:29 AM
Nasser looked like a beast from the underworld. 

 :)
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: no one on February 21, 2009, 02:35:21 AM
:)

ahahahahaha

look at that lazy-eyed retard.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Figo on February 21, 2009, 10:08:14 AM
Haha Larry Scott used his fair share of drugs.  But damn he looked far and away better than Nasser.  You can tell Nasser was all drugs. Plus Scott was a handsome guy.  Nasser looked like a beast from the underworld.  And we wonder why nobody takes bodybuilding seriously.  Atleast the guys back in the day had some style, class, and good looks.


Good post.

The difference is in Scott's day, they were people that happenned to do bbing. Nowadays its an extreme where they're bbers 1st, and not normal social creatures.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Hulkster on February 21, 2009, 10:19:09 AM
Scot looks better though  ???

exactly.

not much of retard now, am I? hahahha

the nasser fans can suck it. their here was crap and they know it.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: BroadStreetBruiser on February 21, 2009, 10:28:04 AM
Larry Scott at a minimum covered his ass.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: The ChemistV2 on February 21, 2009, 10:29:00 AM
Larry has sworn up and down that he never used more than 25mg a day of dianabol.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Figo on February 21, 2009, 10:44:46 AM
Larry has sworn up and down that he never used more than 25mg a day of dianabol.

Both him and Pearl. And only once pre-contest for a couple days/weeks, cant remember.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: The ChemistV2 on February 21, 2009, 10:49:50 AM
Both him and Pearl. And only once pre-contest for a couple days/weeks, cant remember.
I read an article years ago where Pearl said he used the oral steroid Nilevar, but only took it once for a couple of months. He claims he was natural when he won the 71 Mr. universe. If that's true, at a height of just under 6 feet weighing 241 pound, he would have been one the biggest naturals of all time. He seems to have a lot of integrity but I find these statements hard to believe.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Sharma on February 21, 2009, 12:01:39 PM
The biggest LOL here is that Hulkster is having a fit because Bigbobs and others don't share his blinded admiration of Ronnie (and Ronnie has never uttered a word to Hulkster despite hulkster devoting his whole life to him) when he often praised Nasser when it suits him to when he argue with nastydiet about Yates not deserving the 1997 Mr O.

so Nasser is great when it make ND look bad but suddenly terrible because it was pointed out that Ronnie has faults ;D
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: bigbobs on February 21, 2009, 04:48:18 PM
The biggest LOL here is that Hulkster is having a fit because Bigbobs and others don't share his blinded admiration of Ronnie (and Ronnie has never uttered a word to Hulkster despite hulkster devoting his whole life to him) when he often praised Nasser when it suits him to when he argue with nastydiet about Yates not deserving the 1997 Mr O.

so Nasser is great when it make ND look bad but suddenly terrible because it was pointed out that Ronnie has faults ;D

Great post, QFT

Even with politics against him, Nasser was a top Olympia contender for many years, if Larry Scott were really better than him he would have gotten several Mr. Olympia wins in the 90's  ::)

Hulkster definitely reached a lowest level of desperation here.  :-\ He even used an offseason guestposing photo of Nasser  ::)
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: honest on February 21, 2009, 04:59:56 PM
The only thing you could judge two bodybuilders from two different eras and drug regimes on is visable genetics. Larry Scott is far superior to Nasser.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Camel Jockey on February 21, 2009, 05:06:31 PM
The only thing you could judge two bodybuilders from two different eras and drug regimes on is visable genetics. Larry Scott is far superior to Nasser.


How do you know? Are you aN expert on genes?
Larry Scott was a great bber for sure, but to compare him to a 90's era bber is stupid.

I
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Hulkster on February 21, 2009, 05:09:15 PM
of course it is.

but its so easy to get a rise out of the nasser fans, just like it is out of the dorian fans.

I play them all like a panio..
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: HugeAl on February 21, 2009, 08:20:40 PM
of course it is.

but its so easy to get a rise out of the nasser fans, just like it is out of the dorian fans.

I play them all like a panio..

Does playing them like a 'panio' beat having any form of real life, or even objectivity?
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: honest on February 21, 2009, 08:47:36 PM

How do you know? Are you aN expert on genes?
Larry Scott was a great bber for sure, but to compare him to a 90's era bber is stupid.

I

Whats stupid is having 16000 posts and challenging something that is so obvious to anyone with any REAL bodybuilding knowledge, Structurally they are light years apart, Scott has no real weaknesses, Nasser has no genetics for back, even with a great mind for modern day bodybuilding and the drugs of the modern era, he couldnt overcome this huge weakness, as he had in other weaknesses such as his delts arms and calves, even you must realise that if they werent weak points he wouldnt have needed to shoot the shit out of them so that he actually had more scar tissue than muscle in the end.
Nasser was a great modern day bodybuilder, and in the modern age he overcame a shortfall on his genetic structure, by being more massive, in an age where mass was overly rewarded in my opinion. He got close to the top of the sport and would have won an olympia if he had a better back, every front and side pose of the man is top 6 at the olympia, but when he turned around he wasnt even top 10 and this is what hurt his placings not politics. 
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: bigbobs on February 21, 2009, 10:14:27 PM
Whats stupid is having 16000 posts and challenging something that is so obvious to anyone with any REAL bodybuilding knowledge, Structurally they are light years apart, Scott has no real weaknesses, Nasser has no genetics for back, even with a great mind for modern day bodybuilding and the drugs of the modern era, he couldnt overcome this huge weakness, as he had in other weaknesses such as his delts arms and calves, even you must realise that if they werent weak points he wouldnt have needed to shoot the shit out of them so that he actually had more scar tissue than muscle in the end.
Nasser was a great modern day bodybuilder, and in the modern age he overcame a shortfall on his genetic structure, by being more massive, in an age where mass was overly rewarded in my opinion. He got close to the top of the sport and would have won an olympia if he had a better back, every front and side pose of the man is top 6 at the olympia, but when he turned around he wasnt even top 10 and this is what hurt his placings not politics. 

Brutal 500 word essay meltdown.  I'm not even reading that, and the intelligent Camel Jockey likely won't either ;)  If you give a Coles notes version I might.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: WillGrant on February 21, 2009, 11:15:11 PM
Brutal 500 word essay meltdown.  I'm not even reading that, and the intelligent Camel Jockey likely won't either ;)  If you give a Coles notes version I might.
You should , you might learn somthing..Great post honest  :)
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: LatsMcGee on February 22, 2009, 12:17:47 AM
Larry Scott's hair is a better bodybuilder than Nasser.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: honest on February 22, 2009, 02:36:08 AM
Brutal 500 word essay meltdown.  I'm not even reading that, and the intelligent Camel Jockey likely won't either ;)  If you give a Coles notes version I might.

   ;D sure you didnt and your relationship with nasser is strictly hetro as well ::), you own yourself everytime you post.  :-*
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Sharma on February 22, 2009, 05:39:33 AM
ridiculous. you cant compare a guy on probably minimal gear with absolutely no legs at all with one of the greatest mass monster of all time. definitely the most aesthetic mass monster.
if you think he look better than nasser then you prefer that look, fine. he would be them standards look a lot better than ronnie coleman with his terrible gyno and disgusting waist.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on February 22, 2009, 06:17:55 AM
ridiculous. you cant compare a guy on probably minimal gear with absolutely no legs at all with one of the greatest mass monster of all time. definitely the most aesthetic mass monster.
if you think he look better than nasser then you prefer that look, fine. he would be them standards look a lot better than ronnie coleman with his terrible gyno and disgusting waist.

Aha, so now you say this beauty pageant people call bodybuilding is all about preference. Interesting.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: honest on February 22, 2009, 01:42:33 PM
on a few dbol a day Larry had a better back delts and arms than nasser did on grams of test HGH and insulin. I think its safe to say he could have brought his legs up with a little more, also modern gym equipment and nutrition other than just a milk and egg powder might have helped his cause too.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Hulkster on February 22, 2009, 03:01:46 PM
Quote
you cant compare a guy on probably minimal gear with absolutely no legs at all with one of the greatest mass monster of all time

you can if you want to get a rise out of predictable nuthuggers like yourself!

works every time.. :P
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: 3Dkiller on February 22, 2009, 10:08:48 PM
larry scot is the no legs man
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Sharma on February 23, 2009, 07:06:50 AM
larry scot is the no legs man

Larry Scott probably not have the genetics to pack on the mass of Nasser. If he did, there is no way it would be as stunning as Nasser's combination of proportion, symmetry , x-frame, tight waist. This is really why Nasser is totally unique and amazing: nobody ever came close to being a genuine mass monster but still with great aesthetics and things like a tight waist, v-taper and x- frame with the elite calves (Nasser's calves the top 3 of all time). Not even Ronnie could make his mass as aesthetic as Nasser.

Of course, Nasser is great according to Hulkster when it make ND and Dorian look bad but when he compared with his gyno boy Ronnie, then he suddenly terrible 
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: local hero on February 23, 2009, 07:21:51 AM
if any of you realy beleive that they only took 25mg per day back then u must be excited about the easter bunny comming next month...
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: SOMEPARTS on February 23, 2009, 09:03:54 AM
tight waist and v taper....

 ;D
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Sharma on February 23, 2009, 09:13:51 AM
tight waist and v taper....

 ;D

In competition condition Nasser had one of the tightest waists and best shoulder to waist ration of MASS MONSTER.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on February 23, 2009, 10:53:33 AM
In competition condition Nasser had one of the tightest waists and best shoulder to waist ration of MASS MONSTER.


FYI your fellow comrade Bigbobs claims these are from a competition  ;)
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: bigbobs on February 23, 2009, 06:29:19 PM
FYI your fellow comrade Bigbobs claims these are from a competition  ;)

hahaha what desperation, taking screenshots as soon as Huge Nasser has taken in a huge breath of air, and ignoring those where he is flexing and showing that he had the SMALLEST WAIST of ALL Mass Monsters as the legendary Sharma previously confirmed.

Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on February 23, 2009, 06:51:29 PM
hahaha what desperation, taking screenshots as soon as Huge Nasser has taken in a huge breath of air, and ignoring those where he is flexing and showing that he had the SMALLEST WAIST of ALL Mass Monsters as the legendary Sharma previously confirmed.



Why didn't Larry Scott have that kind of midsection when he took in a huge breath of air?
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on February 23, 2009, 06:54:08 PM
hahaha what desperation, taking screenshots as soon as Huge Nasser has taken in a huge breath of air, and ignoring those where he is flexing and showing that he had the SMALLEST WAIST of ALL Mass Monsters as the legendary Sharma previously confirmed.



Smallest waist he says lol
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: HugeAl on February 23, 2009, 06:57:22 PM
Oh dear, ND getting destroyed yet again. If it's not by Hulk then bobs and Sharma are humiliating him ;D
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on February 23, 2009, 07:15:02 PM
Oh dear, ND getting destroyed yet again. If it's not by Hulk then bobs and Sharma are humiliating him ;D

Isn't it sad you're now reduced to following me around?  ;) who's destroying whom?  ;D
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: bigbobs on February 23, 2009, 07:16:15 PM
Isn't it sad you're now reduced to following me around?  ;) who's destroying whom?  ;D

Isn't it sad that you have reduced to posting either

a) screenshots while Nasser took in a breath of air while ignoring where he's actually flexed and posing. 

b) screenshots from the offseason

 ::)

Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on February 23, 2009, 07:17:40 PM
Isn't it sad that you have reduced to posting either

a) screenshots while Nasser took in a breath of air while ignoring where he's actually flexed and posing. 

b) screenshots from the offseason

 ::)



People who live in glasses house Bob  ;)
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: superthick on February 24, 2009, 01:58:21 AM
larry scot kills nasser in everyway, he was the first mr O, nasser was the first one who abused synthol in every bodypart
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Get Rowdy on February 24, 2009, 02:06:22 AM
At the end of the day Larry has two Olympia titles and Nasser still has none.
Title: Re: Nasser vs Larry Scott LOL
Post by: Hulkster on February 24, 2009, 01:55:24 PM
At the end of the day Larry has two Olympia titles and Nasser still has none.

hahaha so true.

but its doubtul Nasser could have won the O. in 1965 with all the competition and such 8)