Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: MuscleMcMannus on February 24, 2009, 07:44:14 AM
-
Why couldn't we have gotten this guy as our first black President instead of Obongo? One more fucking reason Obongo is a NWO plant allowed to be President by the powers that be who pull the strings behind closed doors.
-
He's like the black Ron Paul no? LOL.
-
Why couldn't we have gotten this guy as our first black President instead of Obongo? One more fucking reason Obongo is a NWO plant allowed to be President by the powers that be who pull the strings behind closed doors.
That is Alan Keyes.
He owns Obama on every level.
The masses who are asses buy into "Hope & Change" while people like Jindal and Keyes speak the damn truth.
-
That is Alan Keyes.
He owns Obama on every level.
The masses who are asses buy into "Hope & Change" while people like Jindal and Keyes speak the damn truth.
I've honestly never really paid much attention to him. This is what I love about my country. No matter how bad things get or how hopeless things seem to be there are and always will be those lone voices of truth. It's comforting really. Hell Keyes may not be correct in everything he says but when people like him speak, the truth resonates. Did many blacks support him? If not it says a lot about black culture in this country.
-
I've honestly never really paid much attention to him. This is what I love about my country. No matter how bad things get or how hopeless things seem to be there are and always will be those lone voices of truth. It's comforting really. Hell Keyes may not be correct in everything he says but when people like him speak, the truth resonates. Did many blacks support him? If not it says a lot about black culture in this country.
No, he ran against ZERO for the Senate. Blacks disowned him like he was KKK or something.
Alan Keyes is a brilliant man and speaks the truth.
Everyone hate the messenger of course.
-
I've honestly never really paid much attention to him. This is what I love about my country. No matter how bad things get or how hopeless things seem to be there are and always will be those lone voices of truth. It's comforting really. Hell Keyes may not be correct in everything he says but when people like him speak, the truth resonates. Did many blacks support him? If not it says a lot about black culture in this country.
Alan Keyes has been on the scene for a long time. I remember my dad metioning him either 4 or 8 years ago. Either way the dude has been speaking the truth for a while.
-
No, he ran against ZERO for the Senate. Blacks disowned him like he was KKK or something.
Alan Keyes is a brilliant man and speaks the truth.
Everyone hate the messenger of course.
Typical.
-
Typical.
Alan Keyes got the Bill Cosby treatment by the usual gang of welfare brats, racist rabble rousers, race hustlers, grievance industry specialists, and persistent malcontents.
Bill Cosby told the truth and got shut up by the usual gang of povery pimps.
-
Keyes is a total wing nut just like Palin
What is wrong with the people on the far right.
Why are they so friggin stupid
-
Alan Keyes on Gun control!
Paul/Keyes/Celente 2012!
-
Keyes is a total wing nut just like Palin
What is wrong with the people on the far right.
Why are they so friggin stupid
Tell me FACTUALLY what he said that was wrong.
1. We are broke
2. Obama supported partial birth abortion
3. Obama refuses to show his BC
4. Obama supports amnesty for illegal
5. Obama has radical marxist friends and associations.
What was wrong FACTUALLY with that?
-
I'm as objective as anyone when it comes to politicians. However, comparing Palin to Keyes is just downright moronic. I don't think I heard one intelligent thing spewed from Palin's lips. This is the first clip I've ever heard from Keyes and he's already at the top of my list like Paul, Schiff, Celente, Jones, etc.
-
Tell me FACTUALLY what he said that was wrong.
1. We are broke
2. Obama supported partial birth abortion
3. Obama refuses to show his BC
4. Obama supports amnesty for illegal
5. Obama has radical marxist friends and associations.
What was wrong FACTUALLY with that?
2 thru 5 are wrong
No time to waste this morning explaining it to you as I'm sure it would make any difference anyway
-
I'm as objective as anyone when it comes to politicians. However, comparing Palin to Keyes is just downright moronic. I don't think I heard one intelligent thing spewed from Palin's lips. This is the first clip I've ever heard from Keyes and he's already at the top of my list like Paul, Schiff, Celente, Jones, etc.
Funny I was going to agree that I shouldn't compare Palin to Keyes.
Keyes is ten times nuttier than Palin could ever hope to be.
Palin is just a rube
Keyes is fucking out there
-
2 thru 5 are wrong
No time to waste this morning explaining it to you as I'm sure it would make any difference anyway
Are you serious?
Where is his birth certificate?
Did you not even listen to his interview about PBA?
Did you not read the article yesterday about immigration????
-
Funny I was going to agree that I shouldn't compare Palin to Keyes.
Keyes is ten times nuttier than Palin could ever hope to be.
Palin is just a rube
Keyes is fucking out there
About what specifically?
To me, a marxist who wants to spend 1 trillion dollars on garbage spending and give money away to deadbeats is "Out There"
-
Are you serious?
Where is his birth certificate?
Did you not even listen to his interview about PBA?
Did you not read the article yesterday about immigration????
Remember dude, there is a huge difference in ignorance and choosing not to take a look at the facts. Straw man is choosing not to look at the facts, which in my opinion is much worse than just being ignorant.
-
Remember dude, there is a huge difference in ignorance and choosing not to take a look at the facts. Straw man is choosing not to look at the facts, which in my opinion is much worse than just being ignorant.
No it's the definition of stupidity.
-
No it's the definition of stupidity.
lol
-
Remember dude, there is a huge difference in ignorance and choosing not to take a look at the facts. Straw man is choosing not to look at the facts, which in my opinion is much worse than just being ignorant.
You guys are hilarious.
This has been proven over and over and yet you guys are still hung up on it.
It's rich that you suggest I'm the one who won't look at the facts
I'll go with the US Supreme Court.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp
http://www.fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate
-
lol
Many people voted for Obama bought into this myth and story line about Obama sold to them by the MSM. The slogans "Change & Hope" were used to brainwash these fools.
Those of us who warned of this prior to the election were called all sorts of names, etc etc.
Now that not even a month into this we are being proven 10000% right on what we said, they are in melt down seeing their messiah pursue a NWO agenda intended to bankrupt and destroy us.
-
You guys are hilarious.
This has been proven over and over and yet you guys are still hung up on it.
It's rich that you suggest I'm the one who won't look at the facts
I'll go with the US Supreme Court.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp
http://www.fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate
SNOPES? My god man do some real research will ya? I could care one way or the other whether or not Obongo's BC is real. That's a moot point. However, anyone that quotes "snopes" is an intellectual lackey.
-
SNOPES? My god man do some real research will ya? I could care one way or the other whether or not Obongo's BC is real. That's a moot point. However, anyone that quotes "snopes" is an intellectual lackey.
problem with the messenger so you ignore the content?
How about the US Supreme Court?
This site has turned into a right wing echo chamber
-
problem with the messenger so you ignore the content?
How about the US Supreme Court?
This site has turned into a right wing echo chamber
In this day and age you can find just about any website that will prove your point. But snopes is along the lines of that stupid website "quackwatch". The guy who ran quackwatch turned out to be a paid, government schill of a fraud.
However, I agree about the Supreme Court. Absolutely.
-
problem with the messenger so you ignore the content?
How about the US Supreme Court?
This site has turned into a right wing echo chamber
The SC has never ruled on the merits, only standing of the plaintiff.
-
800 billion in stimulus
700 billion in TARP bailouts
30-40 billion in auto bailouts with more being proposed by Obama
410 billion in bloated gov operating budget proposed by the democratic congress
Obama will start the talk about funding nationalized healthcare tonight.
Obama will talk about raising taxes on everyone (or worse yet households) making more than 200K in a time of recession
Obama will soon raise capital gains taxes in a time of recession.
This administration is redistributing wealth, wasting money, and granting more gov control in many areas.
No thanks! You can have Bush II, Obama, and the democratic congressional leaders.
-
About what specifically?
To me, a marxist who wants to spend 1 trillion dollars on garbage spending and give money away to deadbeats is "Out There"
Why do you constantly post that Obama is a Marxist when he is not? ???
-
Why do you constantly post that Obama is a Marxist when he is not? ???
Would you call him a socialist instead?
-
Would you call him a socialist instead?
No.
I think he, like most US mainstream politicians, have their base in liberalism.
Bush did too, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Nixon, Kennedy, Truman, et al.
Some are leaning towards social-conservative, some towards social-liberalism.
Traditionally, the Republican party has been pro free-trade, so that makes them more true to liberalism in that sense.
At the same time, Democrats have supported abortion rights, been more liberal on recreational drugs, not as social-conservative. And that is also being liberal.
So both parties have areas where they are liberal - and some areas where they're not.
But short answer is that all mainstream politicians today are liberals to some degree.
Because liberalism is what our democracy is funded on.
-
We have a Federal Republic, not a Democracy.
Go look it up.
-
We have a Federal Republic, not a Democracy.
Go look it up.
Touche.
I meant to say - what our democracies are founded on.
As in all the modern democracies.
Edit: It's besides the point whether the nation is constituted as a republic or has a parliamentary democracy.
The point I'm trying to make, is whether the nation is democratic obviously.
-
I've honestly never really paid much attention to him. This is what I love about my country. No matter how bad things get or how hopeless things seem to be there are and always will be those lone voices of truth. It's comforting really. Hell Keyes may not be correct in everything he says but when people like him speak, the truth resonates. Did many blacks support him? If not it says a lot about black culture in this country.
Funny how you seem to notice Allen Keyes NOW!!!! He ran for president before and spoke the same then as he does now...how come you didn't notice him then?
For the record...I KNOW how the american system of government works. Putting trust in anyone is putting trust in the most deviant of persons as NO AMERICAN PRESIDENT OR CANDIDATE IS OF A HONEST CLOTH. They are all beholden to those who PUT them into power and therefore are beholden to these large companies and corrupt individuals and secret societies which NEVER think in terms of the masses but what they and they alone can obtain monetarily, politically, geographically.
Whites supported Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Nixon, Ford, etc etc etc....all of whom brought america to the pathetic state it presently is in.....THAT SAYS A LOT ABOUT THE WHITE BRAIN...
-
Funny how you seem to notice Allen Keyes NOW!!!! He ran for president before and spoke the same then as he does now...how come you didn't notice him then?
For the record...I KNOW how the american system of government works. Putting trust in anyone is putting trust in the most deviant of persons as NO AMERICAN PRESIDENT OR CANDIDATE IS OF A HONEST CLOTH. They are all beholden to those who PUT them into power and therefore are beholden to these large companies and corrupt individuals and secret societies which NEVER think in terms of the masses but what they and they alone can obtain monetarily, politically, geographically.
Whites supported Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Nixon, Ford, etc etc etc....all of whom brought america to the pathetic state it presently is in.....THAT SAYS A LOT ABOUT THE WHITE BRAIN...
Like I said I knew of him but I never really knew what he stood for or listened to him. Glad I ran into this video. I think the guy speaks the truth.
-
Funny how you seem to notice Allen Keyes NOW!!!! He ran for president before and spoke the same then as he does now...how come you didn't notice him then?
For the record...I KNOW how the american system of government works. Putting trust in anyone is putting trust in the most deviant of persons as NO AMERICAN PRESIDENT OR CANDIDATE IS OF A HONEST CLOTH. They are all beholden to those who PUT them into power and therefore are beholden to these large companies and corrupt individuals and secret societies which NEVER think in terms of the masses but what they and they alone can obtain monetarily, politically, geographically.
Whites supported Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Nixon, Ford, etc etc etc....all of whom brought america to the pathetic state it presently is in.....THAT SAYS A LOT ABOUT THE WHITE BRAIN...
Nigeria/Zimbabwe/N. Korea/Venezuela/Mexico are all great right?
-
Funny how you seem to notice Allen Keyes NOW!!!! He ran for president before and spoke the same then as he does now...how come you didn't notice him then?
For the record...I KNOW how the american system of government works. Putting trust in anyone is putting trust in the most deviant of persons as NO AMERICAN PRESIDENT OR CANDIDATE IS OF A HONEST CLOTH. They are all beholden to those who PUT them into power and therefore are beholden to these large companies and corrupt individuals and secret societies which NEVER think in terms of the masses but what they and they alone can obtain monetarily, politically, geographically.
Whites supported Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Nixon, Ford, etc etc etc....all of whom brought america to the pathetic state it presently is in.....THAT SAYS A LOT ABOUT THE WHITE BRAIN...
::) It has nothing to do with America this or America that. That's not the point. There are just as many corrupt and evil politicians in Latin America, Africa, Asia and Europe as there are in America. And they are all in bed with each other. Think outside the box dude. You must be black because you're turning it into a black and white issue instead of seeing the big picture. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are as big of pieces of shit as any white President.
-
No.
I think he, like most US mainstream politicians, have their base in liberalism.
Bush did too, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Nixon, Kennedy, Truman, et al.
Some are leaning towards social-conservative, some towards social-liberalism.
Traditionally, the Republican party has been pro free-trade, so that makes them more true to liberalism in that sense.
At the same time, Democrats have supported abortion rights, been more liberal on recreational drugs, not as social-conservative. And that is also being liberal.
So both parties have areas where they are liberal - and some areas where they're not.
But short answer is that all mainstream politicians today are liberals to some degree.
Because liberalism is what our democracy is funded on.
Most of what you just said is political jargon aka ideological mumbojumbo. Just a way to further complicate the issues. I think it's safer to say that most of the Presidents in years past have been unAmerican :)
Within liberalism, there are various streams of thought which compete over the use of the term "liberal" and may propose very different policies, but they are generally united by their support for constitutional liberalism, which encompasses support for: freedom of thought and speech, limitations on the power of governments, the rule of law, an individual's right to private property,[2] and a transparent system of government.[3][4][5] All liberals, as well as some adherents of other political ideologies, support some variant of the form of government known as liberal democracy, with open and fair elections, where all citizens have equal rights by law.[6]
Liberalism appears in two broad forms: Classical liberalism, which emphasizes the importance of individual liberty, and social liberalism which emphasizes some kind of redistribution of wealth.[7] Those who identify themselves as classical liberals, to distinguish themselves from social liberals, oppose all government regulation of business and the economy, with the exception of laws against force and fraud, and support free market laissez-faire capitalism. In Europe, the term "liberalism" is closer to the economic outlook of American economic conservatives.[8] In the United States, "liberalism" is most often used in the sense of social liberalism, which supports some regulation of business and other economic interventionism which they believe to be in the public interest.