Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Balloon on March 05, 2009, 04:56:23 PM

Title: Better than Arnold?
Post by: Balloon on March 05, 2009, 04:56:23 PM
Certainly better conditioning
(http://www.wpse.com/Galleries/1/375/Robby%20Robinson_68245.jpg)
(http://www.scurvoriginalz.com/image/19064920.jpg)
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: Mr. Magoo on March 05, 2009, 05:07:32 PM
He should have won a Mr. O

Awesome build. Looked great when heavy and when light.
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: YoungBlood on March 05, 2009, 05:13:01 PM
He should have won a Mr. O

He won the over 200 class, I think in 78-79. But lost to Zane in the overall, so he wasn't officially Mr. Olympia.
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: Mr. Magoo on March 05, 2009, 05:14:14 PM
He won the over 200 class, I think in 78-79. But lost to Zane in the overall, so he wasn't officially Mr. Olympia.

yea but he looked a lot better than the 170 lb skeleton.
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 05:15:01 PM
Certainly better conditioning
(http://www.wpse.com/Galleries/1/375/Robby%20Robinson_68245.jpg)
(http://www.scurvoriginalz.com/image/19064920.jpg)

Robby was awesome
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: Jeffro on March 05, 2009, 05:15:18 PM
Great, but not better than Arnold.
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: bigbobs on March 05, 2009, 05:16:34 PM
This man had a physique better than Arnold.
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: Mr. Magoo on March 05, 2009, 05:17:31 PM
This man had a physique better than Arnold.

stop
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: dr.chimps on March 05, 2009, 05:17:38 PM
Certainly better conditioning
Was my favourite when I first started lifting. Legs were sub-par, but the rest was amazing. Seemed to be supremely confident and calm. 'Course, when you live through the shit, maybe Venice Beach is a cakewalk.

/like the Black Power 'fro
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 05:19:34 PM
Was my favourite when I first started lifting. Legs were sub-par, but the rest was amazing. Seemed to be supremely confident and calm. 'Course, when you live through the shit, maybe Venice Beach is a cakewalk.

/like the Black Power 'fro

yeah no kidding , Robby is unique in the sport the hero of many bodybuilders
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2009, 05:20:36 PM
Not better than Arnold but pretty damn close-he had dryness and density like only a few others like Columbu and Yates have had, along with impressive size, aesthetics and tapers. In person the physique stood out even amongst other greats-the muscles looked like they were knotted. The best physique of the late 70s along with Padilla and Fox IMO. Clearly should have won an Olympia somewhere along the way except for politics, as can be seen in this '78 video-he and Callendar were as or more cut than Zane, with alot more size, so the decision was BS. He was too heavy and smooth in '77 though.

http://www.dailymotion.com/search/mr.%252Bolympia/video/x2s3jd_mr-olympia-1978_extreme


His legs were actually pretty good, considering that many guys didn't have great legs then-hams were outrageous, far superior to virtually anyone else and not as obvious in pics as when seen in person. Quads had good size, shape and sweep, cuts when he was in shape were decent. Calves were not bad-not tiny and had good shape. Overall, powerful looking football legs.
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 05:24:45 PM
Not better than Arnold but pretty damn close-he had dryness and density like only a few have had over the decades, along with impressive size and tapers. The best physique of the late 70s along with Padilla and Fox IMO. Clearly should have won an Olympia somewhere along the way except for politics, as can be seen in this '78 video-he and Callendar were as or more cut than Zane, with alot more size, so the decision was BS. He was too heavy and smooth in '77 though.

http://www.dailymotion.com/search/mr.%252Bolympia/video/x2s3jd_mr-olympia-1978_extreme

Ha ha ha more cut than Zane my ass , you're so full of shit ..Zane was the epitome of conditioning in the 70s and Robby like Samir was always trying to work his out , enough with the politics cry whenever a white guy wins seriously it's tired already
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2009, 05:26:40 PM
Ha ha ha more cut than Zane my ass , you're so full of shit ..Zane was the epitome of conditioning in the 70s and Robby like Samir was always trying to work his out , enough with the politics cry whenever a white guy wins seriously it's tired already

Meltdown. The video proof utterly refutes your stock overturns your stock fantasty excuses for the IFBB and Zane 8 LOL Robby was as cut as Zane and alot bigger.

http://www.dailymotion.com/search/mr.%252Bolympia/video/x2s3jd_mr-olympia-1978_extreme
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: YoungBlood on March 05, 2009, 05:30:08 PM
yea but he looked a lot better than the 170 lb skeleton.

I agree. But for three years, the judges leaned towards that skeleton. I'd like to see if Robby could do a vacuum like Zane did....

(http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z112/Jug_07/Fitness%20Life/Frank_Zane_1.jpg?t=1236302968)
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2009, 05:31:33 PM
I agree. But for three years, the judges leaned towards that skeleton. I'd like to see if Robby could do a vacuum like Zane did....


Everyone has certain poses they're better at; doesn't mean much overall to point out one shot.
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 05:31:46 PM
Meltdown. It's all in the video dumbass, completely overturning your stock fantasty excuses for the IFBB and Zane that Robby wasn't in shape in '78 LOL he was as cut as Zane and alot bigger.

http://www.dailymotion.com/search/mr.%252Bolympia/video/x2s3jd_mr-olympia-1978_extreme

Again default excuses with you , Robbies problem was conditioning and it was Zane's strong point . a common pattern with you is excuses whenever a white guy beats a black get over it already
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 05:33:07 PM
I agree. But for three years, the judges leaned towards that skeleton. I'd like to see if Robby could do a vacuum like Zane did....

(http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z112/Jug_07/Fitness%20Life/Frank_Zane_1.jpg?t=1236302968)

Robby himself said Zane was very unassuming backstage didn't look like much UNTIL he posed and his physique exploded ....Zane was deceptive this way no politics needed
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: YoungBlood on March 05, 2009, 05:35:20 PM
Everyone has certain poses they're better at; doesn't mean much overall to point out one shot.

Read into what I posted, why don't you.
I speculated. I did not, did not, say anywhere that I think Robbie should have won over Zane if he could do that one pose or anything of the sort.
All I meant/said was that I would like to see Robby do that pose, because even Zane looks wicked in it. I think if Robby could pull it off, he'd look phenomenal.
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 05:35:52 PM
Everyone has certain poses they're better at; doesn't mean much overall to point out one shot.

This coming from YOU of all people lol irony alert
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: calfzilla on March 05, 2009, 05:36:57 PM
Where?  All I see is an inferior black man. 
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 05:36:59 PM
Read into what I posted, why don't you.
I speculated. I did not, did not, say anywhere that I think Robbie should have won over Zane if he could do that one pose or anything of the sort.
All I meant/said was that I would like to see Robby do that pose, because even Zane looks wicked in it. I think if Robby could pull it off, he'd look phenomenal.

ouch lol he gets defensive whenever you question his ebony heros
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2009, 05:40:25 PM
ouch lol he gets defensive whenever you question his ebony heros

Straight from one of getbig's most outstanding white BB schmoes. :-*

Calendar was in better shape than either of them. Zane was the least cut of the three.
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2009, 05:41:45 PM

All I meant/said was that I would like to see Robby do that pose, because even Zane looks wicked in it. I think if Robby could pull it off, he'd look phenomenal.

Actually you implied something like it or not, by leaving out the part you just added about Robinson. ;)
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 05:42:38 PM
Straight from one of getbig's favorite white BB schmoes. :-*

More projection , I don't base race on contest placings YOU do , I never claimed Dorian should have beat Haney in 91 or Arnold should have beat Sergio in 69 , you're the one who cries politics every single occasion a white guys beat a black one that's your hang up , I was rooting for Flex Wheeler in 1993 ...opppssssss so much for that one  ;)

Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 05:43:55 PM
Where?  All I see is an inferior black man. 

Shhhhhh don't say that pumpster gets upset
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2009, 05:46:59 PM
More projection , I don't base race on contest placings YOU do


All you ever do is regurgitate and support what the contest placing were, something a trained monkey could do. Absolutely mindless and lacking in imagination with every thought clearly inside the box. Try again.
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2009, 05:48:37 PM
Shhhhhh don't say that pumpster gets upset

Epic pumpster infatuation lol


Quote
I don't base race on contest placings YOU do

You've repeatedly claimed that Zane won fair and square every year by being in better shape...NOT, as proved on tape LOL
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: YoungBlood on March 05, 2009, 05:48:49 PM
Actually you implied something like it or not, by leaving out the part you just added about Robinson. ;)

I think I would know whether I implied something or not, correct? Again
you read into it.
Read into all you want. You're still wrong about what I typed.
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2009, 05:50:01 PM
I think I would know whether I implied something or not, correct? Again
you read into it.
Read into all you want. You're still wrong about what I typed.

No, you left out half your reasoning then backpeddled in filling it in later, thereby clarifying your ambiquity lol
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 05:51:29 PM
All you ever do is regurgitate and support what the contest placing were, something a trained monkey could do. Absolutely mindless and lacking in imagination with every thought clearly inside the box. Try again.

All you ever do is CRY politics whenever your fan favorite doesn't win i.e. black
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2009, 05:53:33 PM
All you ever do is CRY politics whenever your fan favorite doesn't win i.e. black

And the support is there, nice n clear on video, you haven't been able to refute it, which negates your IFBB cronie claims that politics don't exist..NEXT...LOL
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 05:53:38 PM
Epic pumpster infatuation lol


You've repeatedly claimed that Zane won fair and square every year by being in better shape...NOT, as proved on tape LOL

infatuation?  ::) don't flatter yourself ..when I'm wishing you dead than maybe , hey wait a moment wasn't it YOU who wished me dead ? lol owned

Zane won fair & square all three years , his conditioning in those years were second to NONE better than Robby and Roy and Mentzer and everyone else , the tape proves my point , you see what you want as usual
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 05:55:12 PM
And the support is there, nice n clear on video, you haven't been able to refute it, which negates your IFBB cronie claims that politics don't exist..NEXT...LOL

 ;)

Robby disagrees , thanks for playing though
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2009, 05:55:23 PM
infatuation?  ::) don't flatter yourself ..when I'm wishing you dead than maybe , hey wait a moment wasn't it YOU who wished me dead ? lol owned

Zane won fair & square all three years , his conditioning in those years were second to NONE better than Robby and Roy and Mentzer and everyone else , the tape proves my point , you see what you want as usual

THE VIDEO DOESN'T SUPPORT YOUR IFBB SHILL CLAIMS FOR WHY ZANE WON, THAT ZANE WAS IN BETTER SHAPE IN '78. ROBINSON WAS AS CUT AND MUCH BETTER OVERALL, CALLENDAR WAS MUCH MORE CUT THAN ZANE. CORNEY ALSO LOOKED GREAT.

A TRAINED MONKEY COULD DO A GOOD ND IMPERSONATION BY REGURGITATING THE CONTEST RANKINGS LOL
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2009, 05:56:31 PM
;)

Robby disagrees , thanks for playing though


Try again, Arnold was just as thrilled when Sergio won even though it was very close.
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 05:57:37 PM
THE VIDEO DOESN'T SUPPORT YOUR IFBB SHILL CLAIMS FOR WHY ZANE WON, THAT ZANE WAS IN BETTER SHAPE IN '78. ROBINSON WAS AS CUT AND MUCH BETTER OVERALL, CALLENDAR WAS MUCH MORE CUT THAN ZANE. CORNEY ALSO LOOKED GREAT.

caps lock meltdown  ;)

and I loved how you throw in the token white guy , Zane's conditioning raised the bar the years he won and Robbies was always hit or miss , the videos shows this as usual you're in denial and crack out your default politics excuse
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2009, 05:59:26 PM


and I loved how you throw in the token white guy , Zane's conditioning raised the bar the years he won and Robbies was always hit or miss

Token white guy sounds like a lil racism from our trained monkey lol Robby's and Callendar's condition was clearly as good or better-the tape doesn't lie, unlike our little shill here-change your coke bottle glasses for some that work haha
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 06:00:33 PM

Try again, Arnold was just as thrilled when Sergio won even though it was very close.

Arnold knew he got beaten fair & square that's why he was happy , so did Robby PROOF is in the pics  ;)
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2009, 06:01:43 PM
Arnold knew he got beaten fair & square that's why he was happy , so did Robby PROOF is in the pics  ;)

Fair and square yet you cannot explain in any way Columbu over Padilla in '81...NEXT
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 06:03:11 PM
Token white guy sounds like a lil racism from our trained monkey lol Robby's and Callendar's condition was clearly as good or better-the tape doesn't lie, unlike our little shill here-change your coke bottle glasses for some that work haha

That's you trying not to sound biased when you add Corney in , please he was in NO danger of touching Zane or anyone else that's a pathetic attempt by you Robby and Roy's conditioning may be ' good ' it was NOT on par with Zane , he set the standard in the lates 70s for conditioning and lets entertain it was just as good it doesn't mean they deserved to beat Zane anyway , it's the total package that is judged not just parts of it

Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: Relentless on March 05, 2009, 06:04:34 PM
This man had a physique better than Arnold.

Thats true!  But he did not have the gumption or the good looks possessed by Arnold.  Arnold is the bigger winner in the game of LIFE.
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 06:05:01 PM
Fair and square yet you cannot explain in any way Columbu over Padilla in '81...NEXT

This coming from the same guy who claimed Ronnie dominated in 2001 lol next  ;)

white guy wins a controversial win racism , black guys wins one he ' dominated ' more examples of your bias
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2009, 06:06:52 PM
That's you trying not to sound biased when you add Corney in , please he was in NO danger of touching Zane or anyone else that's a pathetic attempt by you Robby and Roy's conditioning may be ' good ' it was NOT on par with Zane

You're a laughing stock on here precisely because you have poor, very selective vision. You've claimed over and over that Zane won because of superior conditioning that is not evident vis-a-vis either Robinson or Callendar. THE TAPE DOESN'T LIE.

"Fair and square" contests my ass-you can't prove that about '81, which opens the door to many other shows LOL

I OWN U  ;D
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 06:07:22 PM
This man had a physique better than Arnold.

from the front lol
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 06:11:08 PM
You're a laughing stock on here precisely because you have poor, very selective vision. You've claimed over and over that Zane won because of superior conditioning that is not evident vis-a-vis either Robinson or Callendar. THE TAPE DOESN'T LIE.

"Fair and square" contests my ass-you can't prove that about '81, which opens the door to many other shows LOL

I OWN U  ;D

The tape doesn't lie  ::) the pics of Robby enthusiastically congratulating Zane don't lie either , you see what you want and it's guided by rose colored glasses and bias

again how does one dominate in 2001 by losing the whole prejudging ? explain this one , explain this contest ...you can't opppssss

you own nothing that's why you run like a coward whenever I confront you on your nonsense and why you wished me dead  ;)
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: YoungBlood on March 05, 2009, 06:32:42 PM
No, you left out half your reasoning then backpeddled in filling it in later, thereby clarifying your ambiquity lol

Typical shithouse psychologist attempting to "read someone."
I said I'd like to see Robbie do the pose. I said I agree (with Mr Magoo) with him that I liked Robby better. The judges did not see it that way. Because one says he'd like to see Robby do one pose as Zane does it, does not mean that I think Robby should have won based on that one pose. You were the one that put that reasoning in there.
I'm not back peddling, and why would I care to, especially in some discourse with an asshat as yourself?
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 05, 2009, 06:37:26 PM
Typical shithouse psychologist attempting to "read someone."
I said I'd like to see Robbie do the pose. I said I agree (with Mr Magoo) with him that I liked Robby better. The judges did not see it that way. Because one says he'd like to see Robby do one pose as Zane does it, does not mean that I think Robby should have won based on that one pose. You were the ones that put that reasoning in there.
I'm not back peddling, and why would I care to, especially in some discourse with an asshate as yourself?

Great post ! you wont have much luck with calling him on his bullshit when confronted he runs it's his m.o. he thinks he has it all figured out until you ask him for explanations then he gets real uncomfortable
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: Pollux on March 05, 2009, 07:06:57 PM
Shhhhhh don't say that pumpster gets upset

He takes his frustration out on his BowFlex.  :D
Title: Re: Better than Arnold?
Post by: Pollux on March 05, 2009, 07:07:58 PM
Better than Arnold? Robbie's not better, but he's definitely up there.