Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Team Diver on April 03, 2009, 01:33:47 PM

Title: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: Team Diver on April 03, 2009, 01:33:47 PM
Might be a multiple repost, but a cool pic!
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on April 03, 2009, 01:36:54 PM
today's bodybuilders are not as good as this man
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on April 03, 2009, 02:07:39 PM
simply legendary
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: D_1000 on April 03, 2009, 02:09:31 PM
today's bodybuilders are not as good as this man

Indeed.
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: Bobby on April 03, 2009, 02:26:57 PM
never seen that one before, cool!
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: DeketheCreep on April 03, 2009, 02:32:57 PM
Indeed.
bigger package than kai
srry wiggs
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: Meso_z on April 03, 2009, 03:07:42 PM
today's bodybuilders are not as good as this man

 ::)

actually this man had only biceps and chest.

Todays pros are more complete.
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: Pollux on April 03, 2009, 03:16:21 PM
never seen that one before, cool!

The penis pic?  :D
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on April 03, 2009, 03:17:10 PM
::)

actually this man had only biceps and chest.

Todays pros are more complete.

Sure, but they're no Arnold
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: Bobby on April 03, 2009, 03:32:13 PM
The penis pic?  :D

no i've seen that one about 100 times before on here ;D
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: Bobby on April 03, 2009, 03:33:35 PM
::)

actually this man had only biceps and chest.

Todays pros are more complete.

then why don't they look as good, or better ?
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: pumpster on April 03, 2009, 03:37:10 PM
::)

actually this man had only biceps and chest.

Todays pros are more complete.

Can't agree with that. He lacked only on thigh mass and made up with that nicely with aesthetics, cuts and posing. Today's guys don't have the aesthetics and size-most aren't over 6 feet and don't flow.
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: Meso_z on April 03, 2009, 03:42:13 PM
then why don't they look as good, or better ?

They ARE better.

Arnold knew how to keep his stomach in and with his unique posing he displayed very well his strong points, only chest and bis and knew how to hide his weaknesses.

Notice that we rarely saw him doing a side tri or an abs and thighs pose etc....he was only hitting those twisting shots, classic.
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: clued-up on April 03, 2009, 04:30:21 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=273519.0;attach=312846;image)

he looked good  8)
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: mesmorph78 on April 03, 2009, 04:32:53 PM
arnold was the man
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: nycbull on April 03, 2009, 08:00:36 PM
everytime i see that pic, someone photoshops his dick a little bit bigger....hahahha
Title: Re: The Oak had muscles...
Post by: benz on April 03, 2009, 08:03:45 PM
everytime i see that pic, someone photoshops his dick a little bit bigger....hahahha

and im sure you just love it since you got that disease called homosexualism