Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: jtsunami on April 28, 2009, 08:11:00 AM
-
Later on in his career dude was seriously jacked, 6'3 243 pounds at weigh in and prolly heavier night of fight. Ripped to the bone, probably could have won a local BB show with his body.
Any guesses on what he was on?
(http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2008/0105/box_g_mccall_bruno_sq_300.jpg)
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38365000/jpg/_38365677_frank150.jpg)
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/39096000/jpg/_39096615_frank_bruno_pa300.jpg)
(http://www.autotrader.co.uk/EDITORIAL/editorial_images/non_imported/tyson_vs_bruno_small.jpg)
Boxers in the 80's and 90's had legs too, not like now days they have sticks for legs.
jt
-
Some sort of test!
duh
-
Later on in his career dude was seriously jacked, 6'3 243 pounds at weigh in and prolly heavier night of fight. Ripped to the bone, probably could have won a local BB show with his body.
Any guesses on what he was on?
(http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2008/0105/box_g_mccall_bruno_sq_300.jpg)
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38365000/jpg/_38365677_frank150.jpg)
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/39096000/jpg/_39096615_frank_bruno_pa300.jpg)
(http://www.autotrader.co.uk/EDITORIAL/editorial_images/non_imported/tyson_vs_bruno_small.jpg)
Boxers in the 80's and 90's had legs too, not like now days they have sticks for legs.
jt
I bet he was on....nothing.
Look at his pics as a young amateur...always had that kind of build/structure/leanness.
Furthermore, why do you think he would weigh 'more on fight night' ...he WAS a HEAVYWEIGHT, so there is no upper limit, therefore no need to cut any weight, like other divisions.
-
madd halotestin
-
I bet he was on....nothing.
Look at his pics as a young amateur...always had that kind of build/structure/leanness.
Yea because there's no way he could have been on the juice early on... ::)
-
BGG
naturally athletic and talanted
plus 243lbs at 6'3 is BIG but for a pro athlete hardly groundbreaking.
Primo Carnera was heavier and bigger in the 30's
-
I bet he was on....nothing.
Look at his pics as a young amateur...always had that kind of build/structure/leanness.
Furthermore, why do you think he would weigh 'more on fight night' ...he WAS a HEAVYWEIGHT, so there is no upper limit, therefore no need to cut any weight, like other divisions.
your kidding right? Did you see his body in the 2nd fight, has paper thin skin, hardly any body fat and 243, I mean seriously do you think that is naturally obtainable??? I surely do not. The first fight he looked much smaller compared to his 2nd fight form.
I bet he was on....nothing.
Look at his pics as a young amateur...always had that kind of build/structure/leanness.
Furthermore, why do you think he would weigh 'more on fight night' ...he WAS a HEAVYWEIGHT, so there is no upper limit, therefore no need to cut any weight, like other divisions.
You make a great point lol, I was thinking he was cutting weight ahhh.
jt
-
Later on in his career dude was seriously jacked, 6'3 243 pounds at weigh in and prolly heavier night of fight. Ripped to the bone, probably could have won a local BB show with his body.
Any guesses on what he was on?
(http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2008/0105/box_g_mccall_bruno_sq_300.jpg)
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38365000/jpg/_38365677_frank150.jpg)
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/39096000/jpg/_39096615_frank_bruno_pa300.jpg)
(http://www.autotrader.co.uk/EDITORIAL/editorial_images/non_imported/tyson_vs_bruno_small.jpg)
Boxers in the 80's and 90's had legs too, not like now days they have sticks for legs.
jt
How is Eastern University treating you bro?
-
Test and Winstrol
-
fast forward to 2:40, his skin just has that juicer look, check out the nipples, erect as hell, to me it looks like he is.
jt
-
fast forward to 2:40, his skin just has that juicer look, check out the nipples, erect as hell, to me it looks like he is.
jt
What a great quote
Welcome to getbig.com
-
He was definitely on this stuff, you know what I mean, Harry...
-
Dude was natural. ANOTHER case of lazy guys on here not realising you can build a lot of muscle without drugs
-
Bruno was a decent boxer and very underrated.
-
Later on in his career dude was seriously jacked, 6'3 243 pounds at weigh in and prolly heavier night of fight. Ripped to the bone, probably could have won a local BB show with his body.
Any guesses on what he was on?
(http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2008/0105/box_g_mccall_bruno_sq_300.jpg)
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38365000/jpg/_38365677_frank150.jpg)
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/39096000/jpg/_39096615_frank_bruno_pa300.jpg)
(http://www.autotrader.co.uk/EDITORIAL/editorial_images/non_imported/tyson_vs_bruno_small.jpg)
Boxers in the 80's and 90's had legs too, not like now days they have sticks for legs.
jt
"Plasmosis" ???
-
Dude was natural. ANOTHER case of lazy guys on here not realising you can build a lot of muscle without drugs
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
-
Actually, I take my earlier statement back. I think he was natural for that fight. I do think though that later in his career Tyson took test and winstrol.
-
BGG
naturally athletic and talanted
plus 243lbs at 6'3 is BIG but for a pro athlete hardly groundbreaking.
Primo Carnera was heavier and bigger in the 30's
100% agreed Goudy
-
What a great quote
Welcome to getbig.com
His nipples were erect, lol. Great reasoning ast to why he MUST be on juice.
You've definitely proved me wrong.
Erect nipples ;D