Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: benchthis on May 25, 2009, 11:45:48 AM

Title: question for those into politics
Post by: benchthis on May 25, 2009, 11:45:48 AM
why didnt the good USA take over and liberate N. Korea as opposed to iraq?

seems to me N. korea is more of a threat and a problem than what iraq was....

and dont say oil...
Title: Re: question for those into politics
Post by: Mars on May 25, 2009, 12:04:44 PM
Governments are not after "liberating" people, its only about money, but the biggest difference between Saddams Iraq and North Korea is that the koreans are 200 % behind their leader, they dont know about a world behind Koreas borders, they think kim yung ill is the boss of the world. they are brainwashed robots. In Iraq only the sunni elite was behind Saddam.
Title: Re: question for those into politics
Post by: Deicide on May 25, 2009, 12:05:46 PM
Governments are not after "liberating" people, its only about money, but the biggest difference between Saddams Iraq and North Korea is that the koreans are 200 % behind their leader, they dont know about a world behind Koreas borders, they think kim yung ill is the boss of the world. they are brainwashed robots. In Iraq only the sunni elite was behind Saddam.

Mars=muscle god+ political god 8)
Title: Re: question for those into politics
Post by: benchthis on May 25, 2009, 12:10:28 PM
Governments are not after "liberating" people, its only about money, but the biggest difference between Saddams Iraq and North Korea is that the koreans are 200 % behind their leader, they dont know about a world behind Koreas borders, they think kim yung ill is the boss of the world. they are brainwashed robots. In Iraq only the sunni elite was behind Saddam.

wow mars great post... direct and to the point... thanks